Abstract
Replying to E. Hawkins et al. Nature 511, 10.1038/nature13523 (2014)
In the accompanying Comment, Hawkins et al.1 suggest that our index2 of the projected timing of climate departure from recent variability is biased to occur too early and is given with overestimated confidence. We contest their assertions and maintain that our findings are conservative and remain unaltered in light of their analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
$199.00
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
from$8.99
All prices are NET prices.
References
- 1
Hawkins, E. et al. Uncertainties in the timing of unprecedented climates. Nature 511, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13523 (2014)
- 2
Mora, C. et al. The projected timing of climate departure from recent variability. Nature 502, 183–187 (2013)
- 3
Deser, C., Knutti, R., Solomon, S. & Phillips, A. S. Communication of the role of natural variability in future North American climate. Nature Clim. Change 2, 775–779 (2012)
- 4
Tebaldi, C. & Knutti, R. The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 365, 2053–2075 (2007)
- 5
Altman, D. G. & Bland, J. M. Standard deviations and standard errors. Br. Med. J. 331, 903 (2005)
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mora, C., Frazier, A., Longman, R. et al. Mora et al. reply. Nature 511, E5–E6 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13524
Published:
Issue Date:
Further reading
-
Expulsion from history
Nature (2014)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.