Letter | Published:

Pathway from subducting slab to surface for melt and fluids beneath Mount Rainier

Nature volume 511, pages 338340 (17 July 2014) | Download Citation

Abstract

Convergent margin volcanism originates with partial melting, primarily of the upper mantle, into which the subducting slab descends1,2. Melting of this material can occur in one of two ways. The flow induced in the mantle by the slab can result in upwelling and melting through adiabatic decompression1,3. Alternatively, fluids released from the descending slab through dehydration reactions can migrate into the hot mantle wedge, inducing melting by lowering the solidus temperature2,4. The two mechanisms are not mutually exclusive1. In either case, the buoyant melts make their way towards the surface to reside in the crust or to be extruded as lava. Here we use magnetotelluric data collected across the central state of Washington, USA, to image the complete pathway for the fluid–melt phase. By incorporating constraints from a collocated seismic study5 into the magnetotelluric inversion process, we obtain superior constraints on the fluids and melt in a subduction setting. Specifically, we are able to identify and connect fluid release at or near the top of the slab, migration of fluids into the overlying mantle wedge, melting in the wedge, and transport of the melt/fluid phase to a reservoir in the crust beneath Mt Rainier.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Subduction zones. Rev. Geophys. 40, 1012, (2002)

  2. 2.

    & Physical model of source region of subduction zone volcanics. J. Geophys. Res. 97 (B2). 2037–2070 (1992)

  3. 3.

    & Diapiric flow at subduction zones: a recipe for rapid transport. Science 292, 2472–2475 (2001)

  4. 4.

    , , & The influence of H2O on mantle wedge melting. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 249, 74–89 (2006)

  5. 5.

    The CAFE experiment: a joint seismic and MT investigation of the Cascadia subduction system. PhD thesis, MIT/WHOI Joint Program. (2013)

  6. 6.

    , , , & Complex patterns of fluid and melt transport in the central Andean subduction zone revealed by attenuation tomography. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 215, 105–119 (2003)

  7. 7.

    & Arc magmas sourced from mélange diapirs in subduction zones. Nature Geosci. 5, 862–867 (2012)

  8. 8.

    & Tectonic implications of the composition of volcanic arc magmas. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 23, 251–285 (1995)

  9. 9.

    & Geochemical consequences of melt percolation: the upper mantle as a chromatographic column. J. Geol. 95, 285–307 (1987)

  10. 10.

    & The transition from porous to channelized flow due to melt/rock reaction during melt migration. Geophys. Res. Lett. 21, 145–148 (1994)

  11. 11.

    & Melting above the anhydrous solidus controls the location of volcanic arcs. Nature 467, 700–703 (2010)

  12. 12.

    , , , & Connectivity of aqueous fluid in eclogite and its implications for fluid migration in the Earth’s interior. J. Geophys. Res. 108 (B6). 2295 (2003)

  13. 13.

    , , , & Kinematic variables and water transport control the formation and location of arc volcanoes. Nature 459, 694–697 (2009); erratum. 460, 1044 (2009)

  14. 14.

    et al. Imaging the source region of Cascadia tremor and intermediate-depth earthquakes. Geology 37, 1119–1122 (2009)

  15. 15.

    & Multisite, multifrequency tensor decompositions of magnetotelluric data. Geophysics 66, 158–173 (2001)

  16. 16.

    & Decomposition of magnetotelluric impedance tensors in the presence of local three-dimensional galvanic distortion. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 1913–1925 (1989)

  17. 17.

    & Nonlinear conjugate gradients algorithm for 2-D magnetotelluric inversion. Geophysics 66, 174–187 (2001)

  18. 18.

    et al. Resistivity cross section through the Juan de Fuca subduction system and its tectonic implications. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 14127–14144 (1989)

  19. 19.

    & Deep electrical structure of the northern Cascadia (British Columbia, Canada) subduction zone: implications for the distribution of fluids. Geology 34, 53–56 (2006)

  20. 20.

    , , & Electrical structure of the Central Cascadia subduction zone: the EMSLAB Lincoln line revisited. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett (in the press)

  21. 21.

    , , , & Deep electrical resistivity structure of the northwestern U.S. derived from 3-D inversion of USArray magnetotelluric data. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. (in the press)

  22. 22.

    & Partial eclogitization of gabbroic rocks in a late Precambrian subduction zone (Zambia): prograde metamorphism triggered by fluid infiltration. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 146, 174–191 (2003)

  23. 23.

    , , & Juan de Fuca slab geometry and its relation to Wadati-Benioff zone seismicity. J. Geophys. Res. 117, B09306 (2012)

  24. 24.

    , & Electrical conductivity of hydrous basaltic melts: implications for partial melting in the upper mantle. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 162, 637–650 (2011)

  25. 25.

    , , & Subduction factory: 4. Depth-dependent flux of H2O from subducting slabs worldwide. J. Geophys. Res. 116, B01401 (2011)

  26. 26.

    , , , & Microtomography of partially molten rocks: three-dimensional melt distribution in mantle peridotite. Science 332, 88–91 (2011)

  27. 27.

    & Derivation of some modern arc magmas by melting of young subducted lithosphere. Nature 347, 662–665 (1990)

  28. 28.

    , & Origin and emplacement of the andesite of Burroughs Mountain, a zoned, large-volume lava flow at Mount Rainier, Washington, USA. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 119, 275–296 (2003)

  29. 29.

    & Imaging crustal structure in southwestern Washington with small magnetometer arrays. J. Geophys. Res. 98 (B9). 15967–15985 (1993)

  30. 30.

    , , , & Magnetotelluric image of the fluid cycle in the Costa Rican subduction zone. Nature Geosci. 4, 108–111 (2011)

  31. 31.

    & Bounded influence magnetotelluric response function estimation. Geophys. J. Int. 157, 988–1006 (2004)

  32. 32.

    Robust multiple station magnetotelluric data processing. Geophys. J. Int. 130, 475–496 (1997)

  33. 33.

    , & The magnetotelluric phase tensor. Geophys. J. Int. 158, 457–469 (2004)

  34. 34.

    & Practical Magnetotellurics 93–98 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005)

  35. 35.

    & Regional conductivity structure of Cascadia: preliminary results from 3D inversion of USArray transportable array magnetotelluric data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L20311 (2008)

  36. 36.

    et al. Upper mantle electrical resistivity structure beneath the central Mariana subduction system. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 11, Q09003 (2010)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank V. Maris, M. Brown, A. Kelbert, and Quantec Geoscience, Inc. for their part in data acquisition. We also thank A. Pommier, D. Lizarralde, A. Malcolm, A. Shaw, H. Marschall and J. P. Canales for critical discussions and input on early versions of the manuscript. Finally, we thank P. van Keken for use of his thermal overlay in the magnetotelluric figure. This work was supported by US National Science Foundation grant EAR08-44041 (Principal Investigator R.L.E.) and US National Science Foundation grant EAR08-43725 (Principal Investigator P.E.W.), both through the Earthscope programme. R.S.M. was supported by a National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) fellowship.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Geology and Geophysics, MS#22, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 360 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA

    • R. Shane McGary
    • , Rob L. Evans
    •  & Jimmy Elsenbeck
  2. Energy and Geoscience Institute, University of Utah, 423 Wakara Way, Suite 300, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, USA

    • Philip E. Wannamaker
  3. Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Allegaten 41, 5007 Bergen, Norway

    • Stéphane Rondenay

Authors

  1. Search for R. Shane McGary in:

  2. Search for Rob L. Evans in:

  3. Search for Philip E. Wannamaker in:

  4. Search for Jimmy Elsenbeck in:

  5. Search for Stéphane Rondenay in:

Contributions

R.L.E. and P.E.W. conceived the experiment. R.S.M. participated in data collection and was primarily responsible for the processing and inversion work and analysis. R.L.E. was involved in all aspects of the development of the magnetotelluric models. P.E.W. coordinated and led the data collection, and also performed some of the processing and analysis of the broadband data. J.E. assisted with data reduction and processing. S.R. was involved in the production of the seismic image. All authors contributed to the understanding of the results and editing of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Shane McGary.

Extended data

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13493

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.