Letter | Published:

Processing properties of ON and OFF pathways for Drosophila motion detection

Nature volume 512, pages 427430 (28 August 2014) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

The algorithms and neural circuits that process spatio-temporal changes in luminance to extract visual motion cues have been the focus of intense research. An influential model, the Hassenstein–Reichardt correlator1, relies on differential temporal filtering of two spatially separated input channels, delaying one input signal with respect to the other. Motion in a particular direction causes these delayed and non-delayed luminance signals to arrive simultaneously at a subsequent processing step in the brain; these signals are then nonlinearly amplified to produce a direction-selective response. Recent work in Drosophila has identified two parallel pathways that selectively respond to either moving light or dark edges2,3. Each of these pathways requires two critical processing steps to be applied to incoming signals: differential delay between the spatial input channels, and distinct processing of brightness increment and decrement signals. Here we demonstrate, using in vivo patch-clamp recordings, that four medulla neurons implement these two processing steps. The neurons Mi1 and Tm3 respond selectively to brightness increments, with the response of Mi1 delayed relative to Tm3. Conversely, Tm1 and Tm2 respond selectively to brightness decrements, with the response of Tm1 delayed compared with Tm2. Remarkably, constraining Hassenstein–Reichardt correlator models using these measurements produces outputs consistent with previously measured properties of motion detectors, including temporal frequency tuning and specificity for light versus dark edges. We propose that Mi1 and Tm3 perform critical processing of the delayed and non-delayed input channels of the correlator responsible for the detection of light edges, while Tm1 and Tm2 play analogous roles in the detection of moving dark edges. Our data show that specific medulla neurons possess response properties that allow them to implement the algorithmic steps that precede the correlative operation in the Hassenstein–Reichardt correlator, revealing elements of the long-sought neural substrates of motion detection in the fly.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & System theoretical analysis of time, sequence and sign analysis of the motion perception of the snout-beetle Chlorophanus. Z. Naturforsch. B 11, 513–524 (1956)

  2. 2.

    , , , & ON and OFF pathways in Drosophila motion vision. Nature 468, 300–304 (2010)

  3. 3.

    , , , & Defining the computational structure of the motion detector in Drosophila. Neuron 70, 1165–1177 (2011)

  4. 4.

    & Principles of visual motion detection. Trends Neurosci. 12, 297–306 (1989)

  5. 5.

    Elementary movement detectors in an insect visual system. Biol. Cybern. 24, 85–101 (1976)

  6. 6.

    & Synaptic organization of columnar elements in the lamina of the wild type in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Comp. Neurol. 305, 232–263 (1991)

  7. 7.

    et al. Dissection of the peripheral motion channel in the visual system of Drosophila melanogaster. Neuron 56, 155–170 (2007)

  8. 8.

    & Motion processing streams in Drosophila are behaviorally specialized. Neuron 59, 322–335 (2008)

  9. 9.

    , , , & Contributions of the 12 neuron classes in the fly lamina to motion vision. Neuron 79, 128–140 (2013)

  10. 10.

    et al. Modular use of peripheral input channels tunes motion-detecting circuitry. Neuron 79, 111–127 (2013)

  11. 11.

    , & The optic lobe of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Tissue Res. 267, 17–28 (1992)

  12. 12.

    et al. A directional tuning map of Drosophila elementary motion detectors. Nature 500, 212–216 (2013)

  13. 13.

    , , & Columnar cells necessary for motion responses of wide-field visual interneurons in Drosophila. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 198, 389–395 (2012)

  14. 14.

    , & Fly motion vision. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 33, 49–70 (2010)

  15. 15.

    & Activity labeling patterns in the medulla of Drosophila melanogaster caused by motion stimuli. Cell Tissue Res. 270, 25–35 (1992)

  16. 16.

    et al. A visual motion detection circuit suggested by Drosophila connectomics. Nature 500, 175–181 (2013)

  17. 17.

    et al. Candidate neural substrates for off-edge motion detection in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 24, 1–9 (2014)

  18. 18.

    et al. Neural circuit components of the Drosophila OFF motion vision pathway. Current Biol. (2014)

  19. 19.

    , , , & Internal structure of the fly elementary motion detector. Neuron 70, 1155–1164 (2011)

  20. 20.

    , , & Response properties of motion-sensitive visual interneurons in the lobula plate of Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 18, 368–374 (2008)

  21. 21.

    A simple white noise analysis of neuronal light responses. Network 12, 199–213 (2001)

  22. 22.

    & Fast and slow contrast adaptation in retinal circuitry. Neuron 36, 909–919 (2002)

  23. 23.

    , & Contrast gain reduction in fly motion adaptation. Neuron 28, 595–606 (2000)

  24. 24.

    & Development and application of white-noise modeling techniques for studies of insect visual nervous system. Kybernetik 12, 74–89 (1973)

  25. 25.

    , & in Facets of Vision (eds & ) Ch. 17, 360–390 (Springer, 1989)

  26. 26.

    & What kind of movement detector is triggering the landing response of the housefly? Biol. Cybern. 55, 59–69 (1986)

  27. 27.

    Parallel processing in the mammalian retina. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 5, 747–757 (2004)

  28. 28.

    & The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbit’s retina. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 178, 477–504 (1965)

  29. 29.

    , & Transformation of olfactory representations in the Drosophila antennal lobe. Science 303, 366–370 (2004)

  30. 30.

    & The optic lobe of Drosophila melanogaster. I. A Golgi analysis of wild-type structure. Cell Tissue Res. 258, 441–475 (1989)

  31. 31.

    et al. Concentric zones, cell migration and neuronal circuits in the Drosophila visual center. Development 138, 983–993 (2011)

  32. 32.

    et al. A GAL4-driver line resource for Drosophila neurobiology. Cell Rep. 2, 991–1001 (2012)

  33. 33.

    & The color-vision circuit in the medulla of Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 18, 553–565 (2008)

  34. 34.

    & Role of GABAergic inhibition in shaping odor-evoked spatiotemporal patterns in the Drosophila antennal lobe. J. Neurosci. 25, 9069–9079 (2005)

  35. 35.

    , , , & GABAergic lateral interactions tune the early stages of visual processing in Drosophila. Neuron 78, 1075–1089 (2013)

  36. 36.

    The psychophysics toolbox. Spat. Vis. 10, 433–436 (1997)

  37. 37.

    Angular and spectral sensitivity of fly photoreceptors. II. Dependence on facet lens F-number and rhabdomere type in Drosophila. J. Comp. Physiol. A 189, 189–202 (2003)

  38. 38.

    & Dissection and staining of Drosophila optic lobes at different stages of development. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2011, 652–656 (2011)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank G. Turner for his initial help on whole-cell recordings; X. Li for providing the confocal image of the 686-Gal4 flip-out clone, and N. Vogt, J. Rister and members of the Clandinin laboratory, as well as H. S. Seung and S. A. Baccus, for reading of the manuscript. We also thank D. B. Chklovskii for suggesting recording from Tm3 and T. Erclick for identifying the Tm3 Gal4 line. This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (R01EY017916) and a grant from New York University Abu Dhabi Institute (G1205C) to C.D.; R.B. was supported by fellowships from EMBO and the Human Frontier Science Program. This work was also supported by grants from the NIH to T.R.C. (R01EY022638 and DP1 OD003530). D.A.C. was partly supported by an NIH T32 Vision Training Grant and a Jane Coffin Childs postdoctoral fellowship. A.G.C. was supported by a Scholar Award from The McKnight Foundation.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Center for Developmental Genetics, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York 10003-6688, USA

    • Rudy Behnia
    •  & Claude Desplan
  2. Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA

    • Damon A. Clark
  3. Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA

    • Damon A. Clark
    •  & Thomas R. Clandinin
  4. Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003, USA

    • Adam G. Carter
  5. Center for Genomics & Systems Biology, New York University Abu Dhabi Institute, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

    • Claude Desplan

Authors

  1. Search for Rudy Behnia in:

  2. Search for Damon A. Clark in:

  3. Search for Adam G. Carter in:

  4. Search for Thomas R. Clandinin in:

  5. Search for Claude Desplan in:

Contributions

R.B. designed experiments, performed electrophysiological recordings and analysed the data. D.A.C. designed visual stimuli and experiments, analysed the data and performed modelling. A.G.C. provided electrophysiological training and advice to R.B. T.R.C. and C.D. contributed to the design of experiments. R.B., D.A.C., T.R.C. and C.D. wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rudy Behnia or Damon A. Clark.

Extended data

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13427

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.