Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Derex et al. reply

Abstract

Replying to C. Andersson & D. Read Nature 511, 10.1038/nature13411 (2014)

In the accompanying Comment1, Andersson & Read challenge our results2 that group size influences cultural complexity. Using a dual-task computer game, our experiment demonstrated that an increasing group size prevents the loss of cultural traits (simple and complex), promotes their improvements and prevents cultural richness to disappear2. Among these various effects, Andersson & Read1 are questioning the finding that larger groups favour the persistence of the complex trait.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Frequency of individuals exploiting the complex task according to group size.

References

  1. 1

    Andersson, C. & Read, D. Group size and cultural complexity. Nature 511, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13411 (2014)

  2. 2

    Derex, M., Beugin, M.-P., Godelle, B. & Raymond, M. Experimental evidence for the influence of group size on cultural complexity. Nature 503, 389–391 (2013)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Fisher, R. A. Statistical Methods for Research Workers (Oliver and Boyd, 1925)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Mesoudi, A. Variable cultural acquisition costs constrain cumulative cultural evolution. PLoS ONE 6, e18239 (2011)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Henrich, J. Demography and cultural evolution: how adaptive cultural processes can produce maladaptive losses—the Tasmanian case. Am. Antiq. 69, 197–214 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Shennan, S. Demography and cultural innovation: a model and its implications for the emergence of modern human culture. Camb. Archaeol. J. 11, 5–16 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Muthukrishna, M., Shulman, B. W., Vasilescu, V. & Henrich, J. Sociality influences cultural complexity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 281, 20132511 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Kempe, M. & Mesoudi, A. An experimental demonstration of the effect of group size on cultural accumulation. Evol. Hum. Behav. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.02.009 (in the press)

  9. 9

    Richerson, P. J. & Boyd, R. Not by Genes Alone (Univ. Chicago Press, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Mesoudi, A. Cultural Evolution: How Darwinian Theory Can Explain Human Culture and Synthesize the Social Sciences (Univ. Chicago Press, 2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maxime Derex.

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Derex, M., Beugin, MP., Godelle, B. et al. Derex et al. reply. Nature 511, E2 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13412

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links