RNA is arguably the most functionally diverse biological macromolecule. In some cases a single discrete RNA sequence performs multiple roles, and this can be conferred by a complex three-dimensional structure. Such multifunctionality can also be driven or enhanced by the ability of a given RNA to assume different conformational (and therefore functional) states1. Despite its biological importance, a detailed structural understanding of the paradigm of RNA structure-driven multifunctionality is lacking. To address this gap it is useful to study examples from single-stranded positive-sense RNA viruses, a prototype being the tRNA-like structure (TLS) found at the 3′ end of the turnip yellow mosaic virus (TYMV). This TLS not only acts like a tRNA to drive aminoacylation of the viral genomic (g)RNA2,3,4, but also interacts with other structures in the 3′ untranslated region of the gRNA5, contains the promoter for negative-strand synthesis, and influences several infection-critical processes6. TLS RNA can provide a glimpse into the structural basis of RNA multifunctionality and plasticity, but for decades its high-resolution structure has remained elusive. Here we present the crystal structure of the complete TYMV TLS to 2.0 Å resolution. Globally, the RNA adopts a shape that mimics tRNA, but it uses a very different set of intramolecular interactions to achieve this shape. These interactions also allow the TLS to readily switch conformations. In addition, the TLS structure is ‘two faced’: one face closely mimics tRNA and drives aminoacylation, the other face diverges from tRNA and enables additional functionality. The TLS is thus structured to perform several functions and interact with diverse binding partners, and we demonstrate its ability to specifically bind to ribosomes.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Dethoff, E. A., Chugh, J., Mustoe, A. M. & Al-Hashimi, H. M. Functional complexity and regulation through RNA dynamics. Nature 482, 322–330 (2012)
Yot, P., Pinck, M., Haenni, A. L., Duranton, H. M. & Chapeville, F. Valine-specific tRNA-like structure in turnip yellow mosaic virus RNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 67, 1345–1352 (1970)
Pinck, M., Yot, P., Chapeville, F. & Duranton, H. M. Enzymatic binding of valine to the 3′ end of TYMV-RNA. Nature 226, 954–956 (1970)
Litvak, S., Carr, D. S. & Chapeville, F. TYMV RNA as a substrate of the tRNA nucleotidyltransferase. FEBS Lett. 11, 316–319 (1970)
Hammond, J. A., Rambo, R. P. & Kieft, J. S. Multi-domain packing in the aminoacylatable 3′ end of a plant viral RNA. J. Mol. Biol. 399, 450–463 (2010)
Dreher, T. W. Role of tRNA-like structures in controlling plant virus replication. Virus Res. 139, 217–229 (2009)
Giegé, R., Frugier, M. & Rudinger, J. tRNA mimics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8, 286–293 (1998)
Cliffe, A. R., Nash, A. A. & Dutia, B. M. Selective uptake of small RNA molecules in the virion of murine gammaherpesvirus 68. J. Virol. 83, 2321–2326 (2009)
Dreher, T. W. Viral tRNAs and tRNA-like structures. Wiley. Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 1, 402–414 (2010)
Wilusz, J. E., Freier, S. M. & Spector, D. L. 3′ End processing of a long nuclear-retained noncoding RNA yields a tRNA-like cytoplasmic RNA. Cell 135, 919–932 (2008)
Hammond, J. A., Rambo, R. P., Filbin, M. E. & Kieft, J. S. Comparison and functional implications of the 3D architectures of viral tRNA-like structures. RNA 15, 294–307 (2009)
Rietveld, K., Linschooten, K., Pleij, C. W. & Bosch, L. The three-dimensional folding of the tRNA-like structure of tobacco mosaic virus RNA. A new building principle applied twice. EMBO J. 3, 2613–2619 (1984)
Rietveld, K., Pleij, C. W. & Bosch, L. Three-dimensional models of the tRNA-like 3′ termini of some plant viral RNAs. EMBO J. 2, 1079–1085 (1983)
Rietveld, K., Van Poelgeest, R., Pleij, C. W., Van Boom, J. H. & Bosch, L. The tRNA-like structure at the 3′ terminus of turnip yellow mosaic virus RNA. Differences and similarities with canonical tRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 10, 1929–1946 (1982)
Florentz, C. et al. The tRNA-like structure of turnip yellow mosaic virus RNA: structural organization of the last 159 nucleotides from the 3′ OH terminus. EMBO J. 1, 269–276 (1982)
Giegé, R., Florentz, C. & Dreher, T. W. The TYMV tRNA-like structure. Biochimie 75, 569–582 (1993)
Matsuda, D. & Dreher, T. W. The tRNA-like structure of turnip yellow mosaic virus RNA is a 3′-translational enhancer. Virology 321, 36–46 (2004)
Singh, R. N. & Dreher, T. W. Turnip yellow mosaic virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase: initiation of minus strand synthesis in vitro . Virology 233, 430–439 (1997)
Skuzeski, J. M., Bozarth, C. S. & Dreher, T. W. The turnip yellow mosaic virus tRNA-like structure cannot be replaced by generic tRNA-like elements or by heterologous 3′ untranslated regions known to enhance mRNA expression and stability. J. Virol. 70, 2107–2115 (1996)
Matsuda, D., Yoshinari, S. & Dreher, T. W. eEF1A binding to aminoacylated viral RNA represses minus strand synthesis by TYMV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Virology 321, 47–56 (2004)
Shi, H. & Moore, P. B. The crystal structure of yeast phenylalanine tRNA at 1.93 Å resolution: a classic structure revisited. RNA 6, 1091–1105 (2000)
Dumas, P. et al. 3-D graphics modelling of the tRNA-like 3′-end of turnip yellow mosaic virus RNA: structural and functional implications. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 4, 707–728 (1987)
Singh, R. N. & Dreher, T. W. Specific site selection in RNA resulting from a combination of nonspecific secondary structure and –CCR– boxes: initiation of minus strand synthesis by turnip yellow mosaic virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. RNA 4, 1083–1095 (1998)
Deiman, B. A., Koenen, A. K., Verlaan, P. W. & Pleij, C. W. Minimal template requirements for initiation of minus-strand synthesis in vitro by the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of turnip yellow mosaic virus. J. Virol. 72, 3965–3972 (1998)
Fukai, S. et al. Structural basis for double-sieve discrimination of L-valine from L-isoleucine and L-threonine by the complex of tRNAVal and valyl-tRNA synthetase. Cell 103, 793–803 (2000)
Dreher, T. W., Tsai, C. H., Florentz, C. & Giege, R. Specific valylation of turnip yellow mosaic virus RNA by wheat germ valyl-tRNA synthetase determined by three anticodon loop nucleotides. Biochemistry 31, 9183–9189 (1992)
Dreher, T. W. & Goodwin, J. B. Transfer RNA mimicry among tymoviral genomic RNAs ranges from highly efficient to vestigial. Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 4356–4364 (1998)
Barends, S., Bink, H. H., van den Worm, S. H., Pleij, C. W. & Kraal, B. Entrapping ribosomes for viral translation: tRNA mimicry as a molecular Trojan horse. Cell 112, 123–129 (2003)
Berthelot, F., Bogdanovsky, D., Schapira, G. & Gros, F. Interchangeability of factors and tRNA’s in bacterial and eukaryotic translation initiation systems. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 1, 63–72 (1973)
Leontis, N. B. & Westhof, E. Geometric nomenclature and classification of RNA base pairs. RNA 7, 499–512 (2001)
Keel, A. Y., Rambo, R. P., Batey, R. T. & Kieft, J. S. A general strategy to solve the phase problem in RNA crystallography. Structure 15, 761–772 (2007)
Wientges, J., Putz, J., Giege, R., Florentz, C. & Schwienhorst, A. Selection of viral RNA-derived tRNA-like structures with improved valylation activities. Biochemistry 39, 6207–6218 (2000)
Kabsch, W. Xds. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 125–132 (2010)
Kabsch, W. Integration, scaling, space-group assignment and post-refinement. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 133–144 (2010)
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213–221 (2010)
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126–2132 (2004)
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010)
Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 12–21 (2010)
Davis, I. W., Murray, L. W., Richardson, J. S. & Richardson, D. C. MolProbity: structure validation and all-atom contact analysis for nucleic acids and their complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, W615–W619 (2004)
Zhu, J. et al. Crystal structures of complexes containing domains from two viral internal ribosome entry site (IRES) RNAs bound to the 70S ribosome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 1839–1844 (2011)
Costantino, D. & Kieft, J. S. A preformed compact ribosome-binding domain in the cricket paralysis-like virus IRES RNAs. RNA 11, 332–343 (2005)
Kieft, J. S., Zhou, K., Jubin, R. & Doudna, J. A. Mechanism of ribosome recruitment by hepatitis C IRES RNA. RNA 7, 194–206 (2001)
Kolk, M. H. et al. NMR structure of a classical pseudoknot: interplay of single- and double-stranded RNA. Science 280, 434–438 (1998)
Nissen, P. et al. Crystal structure of the ternary complex of Phe-tRNAPhe, EF-Tu, and a GTP analog. Science 270, 1464–1472 (1995)
Karplus, P. A. & Diederichs, K. Linking crystallographic model and data quality. Science 336, 1030–1033 (2012)
We thank H. Noller for the gift of 70S ribosomes. We thank I. Tinoco Jr, C. Musselman and T. Dreher for critical reading of this manuscript. The University of Colorado (UC) Denver X-ray Facility is supported by UC Cancer Center Support Grant P30CA046934. The Advanced Light Source is supported by the Director, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the US Department of Energy under contract #DE-AC02-05CH11231. J.S.K. is supported by grants GM081346 and GM097333 from the National Institutes of Health and is an Early Career Scientist of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Extended data figures and tables
Top left, sequence and secondary structure of the complete TYMV TLS and the UPD (green dashed box). The UPD is just upstream of the UUAG sequence that is important for stabilizing the L-shaped structure and the UPD is known to be able to pack against the TLS5,11. Interestingly, the stop codon for the Coat protein is within the UPD (magenta). Right and bottom, sequences and secondary structures of all additional RNAs used in ribosome binding assays or discussed in the text. Yellow highlights indicate the location of mutation.
a, Unbiased, density-modified electron density from SAD phasing using data to 2.5 Å (grey mesh, 2σ), superimposed on the final model. The T loop and part of the D loop is shown. For simplicity, the density and structure of water and ions is not shown. b, Final 2Fo − Fc electron density map after model building and refinement to 1.99 Å (2σ). c, Structure with the location of 12 iridium (III) hexammine ions. Although many of these hexammine binding sites may also be Mg2+ binding sites important for stabilizing the fold, the trivalent hexammine was present at 8 mM and thus many weaker Mg2+ binding sites could have been occupied. For this reason, and because there is not a one-to-one correlation of Mg2+ binding sites and trivalent hexammine sites, we do not make conclusions about Mg2+ binding on the basis of this structure.
a, Top, the topology of a canonical tRNA is shown in rainbow colours with the 5′ end in blue and the 3′ end in red. The attached amino acid is shown (labelled ‘aa’ or Val) and structural features are labelled: AC, anticodon loop; D, D loop, T, T loop; V, variable loop. The 5′ and 3′ ends of the RNA are shown. Bottom, ribbon representation of the backbone of tRNAPhe coloured roughly to match the cartoon diagram. b, Same as a, but for the TYMV TLS. The location of the UPD (grey dashed box) and gRNA (grey dashed line connected to the 5′ end) are shown on the top diagram.
a, Nucleotide G4, which forms the long-range base pair with C76 in the pseudoknot, is in a syn conformation. Top, placement of the base into an anti conformation results in positive and negative density (green and red, respectively) in the Fo − Fc map (left, contoured at 3σ), and the 2Fo − Fc map (right) shows the base is incorrectly placed (blue density, contoured at 1.5σ). In contrast, placement of the base into the syn conformation (bottom) results in a flat Fo − Fc map (left, contoured at 3σ) and a good fit to the 2Fo − Fc map (right, blue density contoured at 1.5σ). Base A11 is also in a syn conformation; the same analysis was performed to verify this (data not shown). b, 2Fo − Fc map surrounding bases A3–C5. The C4′–C5′ bond of G4 is best modelled in the trans conformation.
a, Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) analysis of TYMV TLS RNAs, adapted with permission from ref. 5. Left, ab initio SAXS reconstruction of the shape of the TLS when the 5′ sequence that interacts with the pseudoknot (Fig. 2) is present. The RNA forms an L shape overall, illustrated by the black bars (stabilizing long-range interaction in grey). When these 5′ nucleotides are removed (right), the L shape is lost and the RNA becomes more extended. b, Hydroxyl radical probing of several TYMV TLS RNAs that indicate the effect of disrupting the long-range interaction, adapted with permission from refs 5, 11. Green and red indicate protection from cleavage by radicals and enhanced cleavage by radicals, respectively. Overall, the presence of green and red indicate tightly folded RNA. When the 5′ nucleotides that form the long-range interaction are present, the RNA stably folds (TYMV UUAG, left). Removal of the 5′ nucleotides destabilizes the fold (TYMV 0G, right). The presence of just G4 on the 5′ end partially stabilizes the RNA fold (TYMV 1G, middle), confirming its importance in folding and also indicating that the nucleotides adjacent to G4 further stabilize the fold.
Extended Data Figure 6 T loop and acceptor stems of the tRNA and TLS, and elongation factor binding.
a, Superimposed structures of the TLS T loop (red) and part of the D loop (cyan) with the analogous structures in tRNA (grey). TLS bases A11 and A12 are shown; these bases match the interactions formed by analogous bases in tRNA. In the TLS, A11 is in a syn conformation, but the matching base in tRNA is not. This may be due to local differences in the backbone conformation. b, Superimposed structures of the TLS T loop (red) and pseudoknot (blue) with the T loop and acceptor stem elements in a tRNA (grey). View is from the ‘top’ of the molecule, down the axis of the D and AC stems. c, Top, the structure of the T loop (red) and acceptor stem pseudoknot (blue) in the TLS crystal structure. Bottom, structure of these elements isolated from the rest of the TLS and solved by NMR (Protein Data Bank accession 1A60)43. d, Superposition of the TLS structure (red) onto the tRNA (cyan) of a tRNAPhe bound to EF-Tu (yellow), the bacterial homologue of eEF1A (Protein Data Bank accession 1TTT)44. Binding is probably facilitated by the fact that the RNA backbone conformation of the TLS pseudoknot and T stem/loop matches that of a tRNA.
Several views of the TLS (red) superimposed on tRNAPhe (cyan)21 are shown, rotated 90° relative to each other. The dashed line bisects the structure into its two faces. The backbones are very similar on the tRNA-like face, but differ on the divergent face. Locations where the two structures diverge most markedly are shaded grey. The 5′ end of the TLS, where the UPD connects, is indicated.
a, Structure of the AC loop of tRNAPhe, solved to 1.93 Å (ref. 21). The loop is coloured to reflect relative B factors, with red as the highest and blue as the lowest. b, Structure of the AC loop of the TYMV TLS, coloured identically to a. The asterisk marks the C30 base that was mutated to G to enhance crystallization. This was the only mutation made to the TLS for crystallization and does not inhibit aminoacylation32. Overall, the loop structures are similar and both have high crystallographic B factors compared with other parts of the structures, a common feature of tRNAs. There is no evidence that the TYMV TLS AC loop is post-transcriptionally modified, yet it has structural features and conformal flexibility similar to the AC loop of a tRNA (which is often modified; Fig. 2a). c, Crystal packing involving the AC loop of the TYMV TLS. Two interacting copies of the RNA are shown in red and magenta, with the C30G mutation in yellow. This mutation, although not appearing to alter the overall AC-loop structure compared to a tRNA, induces intermolecular base pairing in the crystal (pattern shown to the right), suggesting why this mutation aided crystallization. d, Crystal packing of the 3′ CCA of the TLS (red, labelled) against an adjacent molecule (magenta) probably causes the CCA to adopt a folded-back conformation.
a, Model of the TLS (red, backbone ribbon shown) on the valine of AARS (green; Protein Data Bank accession 1GAX), similar to Fig. 3b, but viewed from the top and with the tRNAVal not shown. The location of the UPD directly 5′ of and against the TLS is shown as a grey oval. The viral genomic RNA is 5′ of the UPD. Note that the strategy used by the TYMV TLS to interact with this protein is probably very different from that used by the TLSs that are histidylated or tyrosylated, which are very different in terms of their secondary structure and fold6,9. b, Same as a, but with the TLS modelled onto the bacterial homologue of eEF1A (EF-Tu) as in Extended Data Fig. 6. tRNAPhe is not shown. In both complexes, the location of the 5′ end, the UPD, and viral genome would not interfere with protein binding. This would not be true if the TLS had a tRNA-like topology with the 5′ end paired to the 3′ end.
About this article
Cite this article
Colussi, T., Costantino, D., Hammond, J. et al. The structural basis of transfer RNA mimicry and conformational plasticity by a viral RNA. Nature 511, 366–369 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13378
Nature Communications (2021)
Nature Reviews Microbiology (2019)
Nature Communications (2018)
Genome Biology (2014)