Letter | Published:

Mfsd2a is critical for the formation and function of the blood–brain barrier

Nature volume 509, pages 507511 (22 May 2014) | Download Citation

Abstract

The central nervous system (CNS) requires a tightly controlled environment free of toxins and pathogens to provide the proper chemical composition for neural function. This environment is maintained by the ‘blood–brain barrier’ (BBB), which is composed of blood vessels whose endothelial cells display specialized tight junctions and extremely low rates of transcellular vesicular transport (transcytosis)1,2,3. In concert with pericytes and astrocytes, this unique brain endothelial physiological barrier seals the CNS and controls substance influx and efflux4,5,6. Although BBB breakdown has recently been associated with initiation and perpetuation of various neurological disorders, an intact BBB is a major obstacle for drug delivery to the CNS7,8,9,10. A limited understanding of the molecular mechanisms that control BBB formation has hindered our ability to manipulate the BBB in disease and therapy. Here we identify mechanisms governing the establishment of a functional BBB. First, using a novel tracer-injection method for embryos, we demonstrate spatiotemporal developmental profiles of BBB functionality and find that the mouse BBB becomes functional at embryonic day 15.5 (E15.5). We then screen for BBB-specific genes expressed during BBB formation, and find that major facilitator super family domain containing 2a (Mfsd2a) is selectively expressed in BBB-containing blood vessels in the CNS. Genetic ablation of Mfsd2a results in a leaky BBB from embryonic stages through to adulthood, but the normal patterning of vascular networks is maintained. Electron microscopy examination reveals a dramatic increase in CNS-endothelial-cell vesicular transcytosis in Mfsd2a−/− mice, without obvious tight-junction defects. Finally we show that Mfsd2a endothelial expression is regulated by pericytes to facilitate BBB integrity. These findings identify Mfsd2a as a key regulator of BBB function that may act by suppressing transcytosis in CNS endothelial cells. Furthermore, our findings may aid in efforts to develop therapeutic approaches for CNS drug delivery.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Accessions

Primary accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

Referenced accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

Data deposits

Microarray data have been deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and are accessible through GEO series accession number GSE56777.

References

  1. 1.

    , & Barrier mechanisms in the developing brain. Front. Pharmacol. 3, 46 (2012)

  2. 2.

    & Fine structural localization of a blood-brain barrier to exogenous peroxidase. J. Cell Biol. 34, 207–217 (1967)

  3. 3.

    , & ‘Sealing off the CNS': cellular and molecular regulation of blood-brain barriergenesis. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 23, 1057–1064 (2013)

  4. 4.

    , , & Pericytes are required for blood–brain barrier integrity during embryogenesis. Nature 468, 562–566 (2010)

  5. 5.

    et al. Pericytes regulate the blood–brain barrier. Nature 468, 557–561 (2010)

  6. 6.

    et al. Pericytes control key neurovascular functions and neuronal phenotype in the adult brain and during brain aging. Neuron 68, 321–323 (2010)

  7. 7.

    The blood-brain barrier in health and chronic neurodegenerative disorders. Neuron 57, 178–201 (2008)

  8. 8.

    et al. ALS-causing SOD1 mutants generate vascular changes prior to motor neuron degeneration. Nature Neurosci. 11, 420–422 (2008)

  9. 9.

    & Neurovascular mechanisms and blood-brain barrier disorder in Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol. 118, 103–113 (2009)

  10. 10.

    et al. Apolipoprotein E controls cerebrovascular integrity via cyclophilin A. Nature 485, 512–516 (2012)

  11. 11.

    et al. Transporters of the blood–brain and blood–CSF interfaces in development and in the adult. Mol. Aspects Med. 34, 742–752 (2013)

  12. 12.

    et al. Canonical Wnt signaling regulates organ-specific assembly and differentiation of CNS vasculature. Science 322, 1247–1250 (2008)

  13. 13.

    et al. Wnt/β-catenin signaling controls development of the blood–brain barrier. J. Cell Biol. 183, 409–417 (2008)

  14. 14.

    et al. Wnt/β-catenin signaling is required for CNS, but not non-CNS, angiogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 641–646 (2009)

  15. 15.

    et al. Death receptors DR6 and TROY regulate brain vascular development. Dev. Cell 22, 403–417 (2012)

  16. 16.

    et al. GPR124, an orphan G protein-coupled receptor, is required for CNS-specific vascularization and establishment of the blood–brain barrier. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 5759–5764 (2011)

  17. 17.

    et al. Norrin/Frizzled4 signaling in retinal vascular development and blood brain barrier plasticity. Cell 151, 1332–1344 (2012)

  18. 18.

    et al. The Hedgehog pathway promotes blood-brain barrier integrity and CNS immune quiescence. Science 334, 1727–1731 (2011)

  19. 19.

    et al. Retinoic acid induces blood–brain barrier development. J. Neurosci. 33, 1660–1671 (2013)

  20. 20.

    , & Le fonctionnement de la barrière hémato-encéphalique chez les nouveau-nés. C. R. Soc. Biol 100, 231–223 (1929)

  21. 21.

    et al. A mouse knockout library for secreted and transmembrane proteins. Nature Biotechnol. 28, 749–755 (2010)

  22. 22.

    placenta-specific receptor for the fusogenic, endogenous retrovirus-derived, human syncytin-2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17532–17537 (2008)

  23. 23.

    et al. A Haploid genetic screen identifies the major facilitator domain containing2A (MFSD2A) transporter as a key mediator in the response to tunicamycin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11756–11765 (2011)

  24. 24.

    et al. MFSD2a, the Syncytin-2 receptor, is important for trophoblast fusion. Placenta 34, 85–88 (2013)

  25. 25.

    Charron, M.J. Silver, D.L. Major facilitator superfamily domain-containing protein 2a (MFSD2A) has roles in body growth, motor function, and lipid metabolism. PLoS One 7, e50629 (2012)

  26. 26.

    In The Blood–Brain Barrier—Biology and Research Protocols. Part 2 (ed. ). 99–100 (2003)

  27. 27.

    , , & (eds) Mol. Cell Special Review issue. 40, (2010)

  28. 28.

    , , & Functional effectiveness of the blood-brain barrier to small water-soluble molecules in developing and adult opossum (Monodelphisdomestica). J. Comp. Neurol. 496, 13–26 (2006)

  29. 29.

    , & Differentiation-dependent expression of proteins in brain endothelium during development of the blood-brain barrier. Dev. Biol. 117, 537–545 (1986)

  30. 30.

    et al. Ontogenic expression of the erythroid-type glucose transporter (Glut 1) in the telencephalon of the mouse: correlation to the tightening of the blood-brain barrier. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 86, 317–325 (1995)

  31. 31.

    et al. The mouse blood-brain barrier transcriptome: a new resource for understanding the development and function of brain endothelial cells. PLoS One 5, 313741 (2010)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Karnovsky, E. Raviola and T. Reese for advice and discussion; S. R. Datta, C. Weitz, M. Greenberg, Q. Ma, C. Harvey and members of the Gu laboratory for comments on the manuscript; D. Sabatini and J. Reeling for sharing unpublished data; C. Betsholtz and C. Olsson for providing Pdgfbret/ret mouse brain samples; T. Schwarz and A. Oztan for discussion and advice on cell trafficking; W.-J. Oh for help with graphic illustrations; the Flow Cytometry Facility in the department of Systems Biology at Harvard Medical School for cell sorting; the Microarray Core at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute for Affymetrix assay; HSPH Bioinformatics Core, Harvard School of Public Health, for assistance with microarray analysis and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) submission; the Enhanced Neuroimaging Core at Harvard NeuroDiscovery Center for helping with confocal imaging and image analysis; the HMS Electron Microscopy Core Facility, the Neurobiology Imaging Facility for consultation and instrument availability that supported this work (this facility is supported in part by the Neural Imaging Center as part of an NINDS P30 Core Center grant no. NS072030); R. Polakiewicz and J. Xie from CST for generating Mfsd2a antibodies. This work was supported by the Harold Perlman postdoctoral fellowships, the Goldenson postdoctoral fellowship, and the Lefler postdoctoral fellowship (A.B.-Z.); the DFG-German Research Foundation postdoctoral fellowship (E.K.); the Mahoney postdoctoral fellowship (B.L.); NIH training grant 5T32MH20017-15 (B.J.A.); and the Sloan research fellowship, Armenise junior faculty award, the Genise Goldenson fund, the Freudenberger award, and NIH grant R01NS064583 (C.G.).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, 220 Longwood Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA

    • Ayal Ben-Zvi
    • , Baptiste Lacoste
    • , Esther Kur
    • , Benjamin J. Andreone
    • , Han Yan
    •  & Chenghua Gu
  2. Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, 220 Longwood Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA

    • Yoav Mayshar

Authors

  1. Search for Ayal Ben-Zvi in:

  2. Search for Baptiste Lacoste in:

  3. Search for Esther Kur in:

  4. Search for Benjamin J. Andreone in:

  5. Search for Yoav Mayshar in:

  6. Search for Han Yan in:

  7. Search for Chenghua Gu in:

Contributions

C.G. and A.B.-Z. conceived and designed the project. A.B.-Z, B.L., E.K, B.J.A. and H.Y. performed experiments. A.B.-Z. and B.L. analysed data and preformed image analysis and quantification. Y.M. analysed microarray data. C.G. and A.B.-Z. wrote the manuscript with significant input from B.L. and B.J.A.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chenghua Gu.

Extended data

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Data, a Supplementary Discussion and additional references.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13324

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.