Letter | Published:

Tropical forcing of the recent rapid Arctic warming in northeastern Canada and Greenland

Nature volume 509, pages 209212 (08 May 2014) | Download Citation


Rapid Arctic warming and sea-ice reduction in the Arctic Ocean are widely attributed to anthropogenic climate change1,2,3. The Arctic warming exceeds the global average warming because of feedbacks that include sea-ice reduction4,5 and other dynamical and radiative feedbacks6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. We find that the most prominent annual mean surface and tropospheric warming in the Arctic since 1979 has occurred in northeastern Canada and Greenland. In this region, much of the year-to-year temperature variability is associated with the leading mode of large-scale circulation variability in the North Atlantic, namely, the North Atlantic Oscillation14,15. Here we show that the recent warming in this region is strongly associated with a negative trend in the North Atlantic Oscillation, which is a response to anomalous Rossby wave-train activity originating in the tropical Pacific. Atmospheric model experiments forced by prescribed tropical sea surface temperatures simulate the observed circulation changes and associated tropospheric and surface warming over northeastern Canada and Greenland. Experiments from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (ref. 16) models with prescribed anthropogenic forcing show no similar circulation changes related to the North Atlantic Oscillation or associated tropospheric warming. This suggests that a substantial portion of recent warming in the northeastern Canada and Greenland sector of the Arctic arises from unforced natural variability.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds et al.) 953–1028 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013)

  2. 2.

    & Processes and impacts of Arctic amplification: a research synthesis. Global Planet. Change 77, 85–96 (2011)

  3. 3.

    , & Recent changes of Arctic multiyear sea ice coverage and the likely causes. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 145–151 (2012)

  4. 4.

    , , , & The emergence of surface-based Arctic amplification. Cryosphere 3, 11–19 (2009)

  5. 5.

    & The central role of diminishing sea ice in recent Arctic temperature amplification. Nature 464, 1334–1337 (2010)

  6. 6.

    , , , & Arctic air temperature change amplification and the Atlantic multidecadal oscillation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L14801 (2009)

  7. 7.

    , , , & Vertical structure of recent Arctic warming. Nature 451, 53–56 (2008)

  8. 8.

    Testing of the tropically excited Arctic warming (TEAM) mechanism with traditional El Nino and La Nina. J. Clim. 25, 4015–4022 (2012)

  9. 9.

    & New insight into the disappearing Arctic sea ice. Eos 87, 509–511 (2006)

  10. 10.

    , & Can a convective cloud feedback help eliminate winter sea ice at high CO2 concentration? J. Clim. 22, 5719–5731 (2009)

  11. 11.

    & Soot climate forcing via snow and ice albedo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 423–428 (2004)

  12. 12.

    & Climate response to regional radiative forcing during the twentieth century. Nature Geosci. 2, 294–300 (2009)

  13. 13.

    , & Impact of the Madden-Julian Oscillation trend on the polar amplification of surface air temperature during 1979–2008 boreal winter. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L24804 (2011)

  14. 14.

    & Classification, seasonality and persistence of low-frequency atmospheric circulation patterns. Mon. Weath. Rev. 115, 1083–1126 (1987)

  15. 15.

    Decadal trends in the North Atlantic Oscillation: regional temperatures and precipitation. Science 269, 676–679 (1995)

  16. 16.

    , & An overview of the CMIP5 and the experimental design. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 485–498 (2012)

  17. 17.

    , & Local and remote controls on observed Arctic warming. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L10709 (2012)

  18. 18.

    , , & A tropospheric assessment of the ERA-40, NCEP, and JRA-25 global reanalyses in the polar regions. J. Geophys. Res. 112, D10111 (2007)

  19. 19.

    et al. The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 137, 553–597 (2011)

  20. 20.

    et al. MERRA: NASA’s modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications. J. Clim. 24, 3624–3648 (2011)

  21. 21.

    & Smart interpolation of annually averaged air temperature in the United States. J. Appl. Meteorol. 34, 2577–2586 (1995)

  22. 22.

    , , & Global surface temperature change. Rev. Geophys. 48, RG4004 (2010)

  23. 23.

    & North Atlantic climate variability: the role of the North Atlantic Oscillation. J. Mar. Syst. 78, 28–41 (2009)

  24. 24.

    , & Tropical origins for recent North Atlantic climate change. Science 292, 90–92 (2001)

  25. 25.

    & Central Pacific El Niño, the “subtropical bridge,” and Eurasian climate. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D01102 (2012)

  26. 26.

    , & Singular value decomposition of wintertime sea surface temperature and 500-mb height anomalies. J. Clim. 5, 561–576 (1992)

  27. 27.

    et al. The Atmospheric General Circulation Model ECHAM-4: Model Description and Simulation of Present-Day Climate (Max Planck Institut für Meteorologie Report 218, 1996)

  28. 28.

    et al. New strategies for evaluating ENSO processes in climate models. Bull. Amer. Meteorol Soc. 93, 235–238 (2012)

  29. 29.

    , , & Improvements to NOAA’s historical merged land-ocean surface temperature analysis (1880–2006). J. Clim. 21, 2283–2296 (2008)

  30. 30.

    et al. (2003) Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J. Geophys. Res.. 108(D14), 4407, (2003)

  31. 31.

    , , & Improving the global precipitation record: GPCP version 2.1. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L17808 (2009)

  32. 32.

    On the three-dimensional propagation of stationary waves. J. Atmos. Sci. 42, 217–229 (1985)

Download references


We thank the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology model developer for making ECHAM4.6 available and C. Bitz, Q. Fu, D. L. Hartmann, D. Frierson and W.-J. Li for discussion. This work was supported by the US National Science Foundation (OPP 1043092 and ATM 1122989). Q.D. acknowledges support from the University of Washington’s Quaternary Research Center and the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program-2013CB430203). H.-J.K. acknowledges support from the APEC Climate Center.

Author information


  1. Department of Earth and Space Sciences and Quaternary Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA

    • Qinghua Ding
    •  & Eric J. Steig
  2. Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA

    • John M. Wallace
    • , David S. Battisti
    •  & Lei Geng
  3. School of Geography and Environmental Science, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia

    • Ailie J. E. Gallant
  4. Climate Research Department, APEC Climate Center, 12 Centum 7-ro, Haeundae-gu, Busan 612-020, South Korea

    • Hyung-Jin Kim


  1. Search for Qinghua Ding in:

  2. Search for John M. Wallace in:

  3. Search for David S. Battisti in:

  4. Search for Eric J. Steig in:

  5. Search for Ailie J. E. Gallant in:

  6. Search for Hyung-Jin Kim in:

  7. Search for Lei Geng in:


Q.D. made the calculations, implemented the general circulation model experiments, created the figures, and led the writing of the paper. All authors contributed to the experimental design, and to writing the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qinghua Ding.

Extended data

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.