Piezo2 is required for Merkel-cell mechanotransduction



How we sense touch remains fundamentally unknown1,2. The Merkel cell–neurite complex is a gentle touch receptor in the skin that mediates slowly adapting responses of Aβ sensory fibres to encode fine details of objects3,4,5,6. This mechanoreceptor complex was recognized to have an essential role in sensing gentle touch nearly 50 years ago3,4. However, whether Merkel cells or afferent fibres themselves sense mechanical force is still debated, and the molecular mechanism of mechanotransduction is unknown1,2,7,8,9,10,11,12. Synapse-like junctions are observed between Merkel cells and associated afferents6,13,14,15, and yet it is unclear whether Merkel cells are inherently mechanosensitive or whether they can rapidly transmit such information to the neighbouring nerve1,2,16,17. Here we show that Merkel cells produce touch-sensitive currents in vitro. Piezo2, a mechanically activated cation channel, is expressed in Merkel cells. We engineered mice deficient in Piezo2 in the skin, but not in sensory neurons, and show that Merkel-cell mechanosensitivity completely depends on Piezo2. In these mice, slowly adapting responses in vivo mediated by the Merkel cell–neurite complex show reduced static firing rates, and moreover, the mice display moderately decreased behavioural responses to gentle touch. Our results indicate that Piezo2 is the Merkel-cell mechanotransduction channel and provide the first line of evidence that Piezo channels have a physiological role in mechanosensation in mammals. Furthermore, our data present evidence for a two-receptor-site model, in which both Merkel cells and innervating afferents act together as mechanosensors. The two-receptor system could provide this mechanoreceptor complex with a tuning mechanism to achieve highly sophisticated responses to a given mechanical stimulus15,18,19.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Piezo2 expression in hairy and glabrous skin.
Figure 2: Generation and characterization of skin-specific Piezo2 conditional knockout mice.
Figure 3: Mechanically activated currents in Merkel cells depend on Piezo2.
Figure 4: Ex vivo skin-saphenous nerve recordings in wild-type and Piezo2 conditional knockout mice.
Figure 5: Gentle touch assay in wild-type and Piezo2 conditional knockout mice.


  1. 1

    Abraira, V. E. & Ginty, D. D. The sensory neurons of touch. Neuron 79, 618–639 (2013)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Maksimovic, S., Baba, Y. & Lumpkin, E. A. Neurotransmitters and synaptic components in the Merkel cell-neurite complex, a gentle-touch receptor. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1279, 13–21 (2013)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Chambers, M. R. & Iggo, A. Slowly-adapting cutaneous mechanoreceptors. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 192, (suppl.). 26P–27P (1967)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Iggo, A. & Muir, A. R. The structure and function of a slowly adapting touch corpuscle in hairy skin. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 200, 763–796 (1969)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Johnson, K. O. The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 455–461 (2001)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Halata, Z., Grim, M. & Bauman, K. I. Friedrich Sigmund Merkel and his “Merkel cell”, morphology, development, and physiology: review and new results. Anat. Rec. A Discov. Mol. Cell. Evol. Biol. 271A, 225–239 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Ikeda, I., Yamashita, Y., Ono, T. & Ogawa, H. Selective phototoxic destruction of rat Merkel cells abolishes responses of slowly adapting type I mechanoreceptor units. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 479, 247–256 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Mills, L. R. & Diamond, J. Merkel cells are not the mechanosensory transducers in the touch dome of the rat. J. Neurocytol. 24, 117–134 (1995)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Senok, S. S., Baumann, K. I. & Halata, Z. Selective phototoxic destruction of quinacrine-loaded Merkel cells is neither selective nor complete. Exp. Brain Research 110, 325–334 (1996)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Kinkelin, I., Stucky, C. L. & Koltzenburg, M. Postnatal loss of Merkel cells, but not of slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in mice lacking the neurotrophin receptor p75. Eur. J. Neurosci. 11, 3963–3969 (1999)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Maricich, S. M. et al. Merkel cells are essential for light-touch responses. Science 324, 1580–1582 (2009)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Maricich, S. M., Morrison, K. M., Mathes, E. L. & Brewer, B. M. Rodents rely on Merkel cells for texture discrimination tasks. J. Neuroscience 32, 3296–3300 (2012)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Hartschuh, W. & Weihe, E. Fine structural analysis of the synaptic junction of Merkel cell-axon-complexes. J. Invest. Dermatol. 75, 159–165 (1980)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Gu, J., Polak, J. M., Tapia, F. J., Marangos, P. J. & Pearse, A. G. Neuron-specific enolase in the Merkel cells of mammalian skin. The use of specific antibody as a simple and reliable histologic marker. Am. J. Pathol. 104, 63–68 (1981)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Fagan, B. M. & Cahusac, P. M. Evidence for glutamate receptor mediated transmission at mechanoreceptors in the skin. Neuroreport 12, 341–347 (2001)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Diamond, J., Holmes, M. & Nurse, C. A. Are Merkel cell-neurite reciprocal synapses involved in the initiation of tactile responses in salamander skin? J. Physiol. (Lond.) 376, 101–120 (1986)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Yamashita, Y., Akaike, N., Wakamori, M., Ikeda, I. & Ogawa, H. Voltage-dependent currents in isolated single Merkel cells of rats. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 450, 143–162 (1992)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Cahusac, P. M. & Mavulati, S. C. Non-competitive metabotropic glutamate 1 receptor antagonists block activity of slowly adapting type I mechanoreceptor units in the rat sinus hair follicle. Neuroscience 163, 933–941 (2009)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Press, D., Mutlu, S. & Guclu, B. Evidence of fast serotonin transmission in frog slowly adapting type 1 responses. Somatosens. Mot. Res. 27, 174–185 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Coste, B. et al. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science 330, 55–60 (2010)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Coste, B. et al. Piezo proteins are pore-forming subunits of mechanically activated channels. Nature 483, 176–181 (2012)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Kim, S. E., Coste, B., Chadha, A., Cook, B. & Patapoutian, A. The role of Drosophila Piezo in mechanical nociception. Nature 483, 209–212 (2012)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Faucherre, A., Nargeot, J., Mangoni, M. E. & Jopling, C. piezo2b regulates vertebrate light touch response. J. Neurosci. 33, 17089–17094 (2013)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Rose, M. F. et al. Math1 is essential for the development of hindbrain neurons critical for perinatal breathing. Neuron 64, 341–354 (2009)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Dassule, H. R., Lewis, P., Bei, M., Maas, R. & McMahon, A. P. Sonic hedgehog regulates growth and morphogenesis of the tooth. Development 127, 4775–4785 (2000)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Lesniak, D. R. et al. Computation identifies structural features that govern neuronal firing properties in slowly adapting touch receptors. eLife 3, e01488 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Wellnitz, S. A., Lesniak, D. R., Gerling, G. J. & Lumpkin, E. A. The regularity of sustained firing reveals two populations of slowly adapting touch receptors in mouse hairy skin. J. Neurophysiol. 103, 3378–3388 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Maksimovic, S. et al. Epidermal Merkel cells are mechanosensory cells that tune mammalian touch receptors. Nature http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13250 (this issue)

  29. 29

    Yamashita, Y. & Ogawa, H. Slowly adapting cutaneous mechanoreceptor afferent units associated with Merkel cells in frogs and effects of direct currents. Somatosens. Mot. Res. 8, 87–95 (1991)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Milenkovic, N., Wetzel, C., Moshourab, R. & Lewin, G. R. Speed and temperature dependences of mechanotransduction in afferent fibers recorded from the mouse saphenous nerve. J. Neurophysiol. 100, 2771–2783 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Woo, S. H., Stumpfova, M., Jensen, U. B., Lumpkin, E. A. & Owens, D. M. Identification of epidermal progenitors for the Merkel cell lineage. Development 137, 3965–3971 (2010)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Piskorowski, R., Haeberle, H., Panditrao, M. V. & Lumpkin, E. A. Voltage-activated ion channels and Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release shape Ca2+ signaling in Merkel cells. Pflugers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 457, 197–209 (2008)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Dubin, A. E. et al. Inflammatory signals enhance Piezo2-mediated mechanosensitive currents. Cell Rep. 2, 511–517 (2012)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Koltzenburg, M., Stucky, C. L. & Lewin, G. R. Receptive properties of mouse sensory neurons innervating hairy skin. J. Neurophysiol. 78, 1841–1850 (1997)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Stucky, C. L. et al. Overexpression of nerve growth factor in skin selectively affects the survival and functional properties of nociceptors. J. Neurosci. 19, 8509–8516 (1999)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Petrus, M. et al. A role of TRPA1 in mechanical hyperalgesia is revealed by pharmacological inhibition. Mol. Pain 3, 40 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank S. Murthy and B. Coste for suggestions. Research was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (to A.P.) and NIH grants R01DE022358 (to A.P.) and R01AR051219 (to E.A.L.).

Author information




S.-H.W. conducted experiments for Figs 13 and Extended Data Figs 15. A.E.D. conducted and analysed in vitro electrophysiology experiments in Fig. 3 and Extended Data Fig. 5. A.D.W. performed and analysed general skin–nerve recordings in Fig. 4a, b and Extended Data Figs 6 and 7. M.P. and K.R. performed behavioural experiments in Fig. 5. S.R. generated Piezo2fl/fl mice. Z.Q. and T.M. generated Piezo2GFP mice. During this manuscript’s peer-review process, we entered into a collaboration with Y.B. and E.A.L. E.A.L. conceived, and Y.B. performed and analysed targeted skin–nerve recordings in Fig. 4c–f. E.A.L. and C.L.S. contributed to the editing of the manuscript. S.-H.W. and A.P. designed experiments and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ardem Patapoutian.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Validation of anti-Piezo2 antibody.

a, Piezo2 detection by western blotting using anti-Piezo2 antibody (see full methods for antibody generation) in HEK293T cells overexpressing pIres2-EGFP (left lane), mPiezo1-pcDNA3.1(-)-Ires-EGFP (middle lane), and mPiezo2-sport6-Ires-EGFP (right lane). b, Piezo2 immunofluorescence in mPiezo2-sport6-Ires-EGFP-transfected HEK293T cells. The left panel shows EGFP epifluorescence in transfected cells, and the middle panel shows Piezo2 immunofluorescence in these same cells. c, d, Immunofluorescence of GFP and Piezo2 in adult Piezo2GFP reporter (c) and wild-type littermate (d) DRG. Piezo2 expression is observed in 45.6% of DRG neurons (587 neurons/1,287 total neurons). Of the Piezo2-expressing neurons, high Piezo2 expression was seen in 159/587 neurons. Scale bars (c, d), 100 μm.

Extended Data Figure 2 GFP immunofluorescence in wild-type control and Piezo2GFP reporter mice.

a, GFP, Krt8, and Nefh co-staining in wild-type littermate whisker follicle. b, c, GFP and Krt8 co-staining in wild-type littermate touch dome (b) and glabrous skin (c). Arrows mark the position of Krt8+ Merkel cells. dh, GFP and Nefh co-staining in Piezo2GFP whisker follicle. eh shows magnified views of the bracketed area in d. Arrows mark GFP expression only. Closed arrowheads mark the co-localization of GFP and Nefh. Scale bars (ah), 20 μm. epi, epidermis; der, dermis.

Extended Data Figure 3 Generation of Piezo2 null allele (Piezo2) and characterization of Piezo2 constitutive knockout mice.

a, A schematic diagram of Piezo2 allele generation. b, qRT–PCR (n = 2) showing Piezo2 levels in Piezo2wt/wt, Piezo2wt/−, and Piezo2−/− E19.5 lungs. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m. **P < 0.01; NS, not significantly different, unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction. c, d, Piezo2 immunofluorescence in wild-type littermate (c) and Piezo2−/− newborn DRG (d). Scale bars (c, d), 100 μm.

Extended Data Figure 4 Characterization of Piezo2fl/fl (wild type) and Krt14Cre;Piezo2fl/fl (conditional knockout) adult skin.

a, b, Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of wild-type (WT) and Piezo2 conditional knockout (cKO) dorsal skin. c, d, Immunofluorescence of Krt14 and a-SMA (alpha smooth muscle actin) in wild-type and conditional knockout dorsal skin. eg, jl, Epidermal touch domes co-stained with Krt8, Nefh and VGLUT2 (vesicular glutamate transporter 2, a marker for Merkel cells) in wild-type and conditional knockout dorsal skin. h, m, n, Lanceolate endings and circumferential fibres co-stained with S100 (S100 calcium binding protein, a marker for Schwann cells) and Nefh in wild-type and conditional knockout dorsal skin. Closed arrowheads mark circumferential fibres, and arrows mark lanceolate endings. i, o, Meissner’s corpuscles co-stained with S100 and Nefh in wild-type and conditional knockout footpads. Closed arrows mark Meissner’s corpuscle. Scale bars, 100 μm (a, b), 20 μm (other panels). epi, epidermis; der, dermis.

Extended Data Figure 5 Current injections simulating Piezo2-mediated currents produce prolonged depolarizations in Merkel cells in vitro.

a, Representative traces of mechanically activated inward currents evoked by a gentle poking stimulus in a wild-type Merkel cell. A ramp (1 μm ms−1)-and-hold displacement stimulus (0.25 μm increments) was applied to the cell in whole-cell voltage clamp configuration. The steady state current at the end of a 125 ms displacement was −6 ± 2 pA (Vhold = −80 mV, n = 15), 4% of the maximal current observed (−146 ± 29 pA). b, Representative current clamp recordings from a wild-type Merkel cell, displaying a change in membrane potential in response to gentle mechanical stimuli. c, Piezo2-dependent currents were simulated by injecting short current pulses followed by different levels of long-lasting but small current injections. In wild-type Merkel cells (n = 4), membrane potential changes are elicited by applying a short (2.5 ms) 150 pA current injection followed by additional current injections of 0 pA (black), +0.5 pA (blue), +1 pA (orange) and +2 pA (red) from the bias holding current (−10 pA). In the absence of any continuous current, the membrane potential slowly decays after cessation of the initial 150 pA injection, consistent with a contribution of passive membrane properties (black trace). Importantly, long-lasting depolarizations are observed when these short pulses are followed by very small current injections (0.5–1 pA, which are 10–15% of the average observed Piezo2 current remaining at the end of the 125 ms mechanical stimulation (Fig. 3b, see above)). d, In wild-type cells (n = 4), membrane potential changes are elicited by a short 100 pA current injection followed by +3 pA (half the average Piezo2-dependent mechanically activated sustained current) from the bias holding current (−10 pA). Orange line, 2.5 ms initial pulse; Blue line, 5 ms initial pulse. These data indicate that long-lasting Piezo2 channel activity at levels below that observed during mechanical stimulation (panel a and Fig. 3b) is crucial for sustained membrane depolarizations in Merkel cells. The high Rm of these cells can enable small current fluctuations to produce large voltage fluctuations.

Extended Data Figure 6 Conduction velocity and von Frey thresholds of all slowly adapting Aβ afferents in wild-type and Piezo2 conditional knockout mice.

Conduction velocity (*P < 0.05, Student’s t-test) and von Frey thresholds (P = 0.0516, Mann–Whitney U-test) of all slowly adapting Aβ fibres from wild-type and Piezo2 conditional knockout mice. Error bars represent mean ± s.e.m.

Extended Data Figure 7 Characterization of rapidly adapting Aβ afferents in wild-type and Piezo2 conditional knockout mice.

a, Firing rates of rapidly adapting Aβ fibres in response to an increasing series of mechanical forces in wild-type and Piezo2 conditional knockout mice. b, c, Conduction velocity (b) and von Frey thresholds (c) of rapidly adapting Aβ fibres from wild-type and Piezo2 conditional knockout mice.

Extended Data Table 1 Membrane properties of wild-type and Piezo2 conditional knockout Merkel cells
Extended Data Table 2 Afferent properties of Aβ, Aδ, and C fibres from wild-type and Piezo2 conditional knockout animals
Extended Data Table 3 Summary of touch dome responses for wild-type and Piezo2 conditional knockout animals

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Woo, SH., Ranade, S., Weyer, A. et al. Piezo2 is required for Merkel-cell mechanotransduction. Nature 509, 622–626 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13251

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing