Letter | Published:

Epidermal Merkel cells are mechanosensory cells that tune mammalian touch receptors

Nature volume 509, pages 617621 (29 May 2014) | Download Citation



Touch submodalities, such as flutter and pressure, are mediated by somatosensory afferents whose terminal specializations extract tactile features and encode them as action potential trains with unique activity patterns1. Whether non-neuronal cells tune touch receptors through active or passive mechanisms is debated. Terminal specializations are thought to function as passive mechanical filters analogous to the cochlea’s basilar membrane, which deconstructs complex sounds into tones that are transduced by mechanosensory hair cells. The model that cutaneous specializations are merely passive has been recently challenged because epidermal cells express sensory ion channels and neurotransmitters2,3; however, direct evidence that epidermal cells excite tactile afferents is lacking. Epidermal Merkel cells display features of sensory receptor cells4,5 and make ‘synapse-like’ contacts5,6 with slowly adapting type I (SAI) afferents7,8,9. These complexes, which encode spatial features such as edges and texture1, localize to skin regions with high tactile acuity, including whisker follicles, fingertips and touch domes. Here we show that Merkel cells actively participate in touch reception in mice. Merkel cells display fast, touch-evoked mechanotransduction currents. Optogenetic approaches in intact skin show that Merkel cells are both necessary and sufficient for sustained action-potential firing in tactile afferents. Recordings from touch-dome afferents lacking Merkel cells demonstrate that Merkel cells confer high-frequency responses to dynamic stimuli and enable sustained firing. These data are the first, to our knowledge, to directly demonstrate a functional, excitatory connection between epidermal cells and sensory neurons. Together, these findings indicate that Merkel cells actively tune mechanosensory responses to facilitate high spatio-temporal acuity. Moreover, our results indicate a division of labour in the Merkel cell–neurite complex: Merkel cells signal static stimuli, such as pressure, whereas sensory afferents transduce dynamic stimuli, such as moving gratings. Thus, the Merkel cell–neurite complex is an unique sensory structure composed of two different receptor cell types specialized for distinct elements of discriminative touch.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    The roles and functions of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 455–461 (2001)

  2. 2.

    & Mechanisms of sensory transduction in the skin. Nature 445, 858–865 (2007)

  3. 3.

    , , , & TRPA1 modulates mechanotransduction in cutaneous sensory neurons. J. Neurosci. 29, 4808–4819 (2009)

  4. 4.

    et al. Molecular profiling reveals synaptic release machinery in Merkel cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 14503–14508 (2004)

  5. 5.

    , & Neurotransmitters and synaptic components in the Merkel cell-neurite complex, a gentle-touch receptor. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1279, 13–21 (2013)

  6. 6.

    & Fine structural analysis of the synaptic junction of Merkel cell-axon-complexes. J. Invest. Dermatol. 75, 159–165 (1980)

  7. 7.

    & The structure and function of a slowly adapting touch corpuscle in hairy skin. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 200, 763–796 (1969)

  8. 8.

    & Central and peripheral anatomy of slowly adapting type I low-threshold mechanoreceptors innervating trunk skin of neonatal mice. J. Comp. Neurol. 505, 547–561 (2007)

  9. 9.

    , , & The regularity of sustained firing reveals two populations of slowly adapting touch receptors in mouse hairy skin. J. Neurophysiol. 103, 3378–3388 (2010)

  10. 10.

    , , & Voltage-activated ion channels and Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release shape Ca2+ signaling in Merkel cells. Pflugers Arch. 457, 197–209 (2008)

  11. 11.

    Neurosensory mechanotransduction. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 44–52 (2009)

  12. 12.

    & Mechanosensitive currents in the neurites of cultured mouse sensory neurones. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 577, 815–828 (2006)

  13. 13.

    et al. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science 330, 55–60 (2010)

  14. 14.

    , & A Drosophila mechanosensory transduction channel. Science 287, 2229–2234 (2000)

  15. 15.

    et al. Piezo2 is required for Merkel cell mechanotransduction. Nature (this issue)

  16. 16.

    et al. Computation identifies structural features that govern neuronal firing properties in slowly adapting touch receptors. eLife 3, e01488 (2014)

  17. 17.

    , , , & Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity. Nature Neurosci. 8, 1263–1268 (2005)

  18. 18.

    et al. A resource of Cre driver lines for genetic targeting of GABAergic neurons in cerebral cortex. Neuron 71, 995–1013 (2011)

  19. 19.

    et al. A toolbox of Cre-dependent optogenetic transgenic mice for light-induced activation and silencing. Nature Neurosci. 15, 793–802 (2012)

  20. 20.

    , & Unsupervised spike detection and sorting with wavelets and superparamagnetic clustering. Neural Comput. 16, 1661–1687 (2004)

  21. 21.

    , , , & Sonic hedgehog regulates growth and morphogenesis of the tooth. Development 127, 4775–4785 (2000)

  22. 22.

    et al. A high-light sensitivity optical neural silencer: development and application to optogenetic control of non-human primate cortex. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 5, 18 (2011)

  23. 23.

    , , & Mammalian Merkel cells are descended from the epidermal lineage. Dev. Biol. 336, 76–83 (2009)

  24. 24.

    et al. Merkel cells are essential for light-touch responses. Science 324, 1580–1582 (2009)

  25. 25.

    et al. Lighting up the senses: FM1–43 loading of sensory cells through nonselective ion channels. J. Neurosci. 23, 4054–4065 (2003)

  26. 26.

    , & Receptive properties of mouse sensory neurons innervating hairy skin. J. Neurophysiol. 78, 1841–1850 (1997)

  27. 27.

    & Neural mechanisms of spatial tactile discrimination: neural patterns evoked by braille-like dot patterns in the monkey. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 310, 117–144 (1981)

  28. 28.

    & Tactile spatial resolution. II. Neural representation of Bars, edges, and gratings in monkey primary afferents. J. Neurophysiol. 46, 1192–1203 (1981)

  29. 29.

    , , & Rodents rely on Merkel cells for texture discrimination tasks. J. Neurosci. 32, 3296–3300 (2012)

  30. 30.

    & Slowly adapting cutaneous mechanoreceptor afferent units associated with Merkel cells in frogs and effects of direct currents. Somatosens. Mot. Res. 8, 87–95 (1991)

  31. 31.

    et al. Math1-driven GFP expression in the developing nervous system of transgenic mice. Gene Expr. Patterns 3, 389–395 (2003)

  32. 32.

    , , , & βIV spectrins are essential for membrane stability and the molecular organization of nodes of Ranvier. J. Neurosci. 24, 7230–7240 (2004)

  33. 33.

    et al. Three-dimensional imaging of solvent-cleared organs using 3DISCO. Nature Protocols 7, 1983–1995 (2012)

  34. 34.

    , & Distinct mechanosensitive properties of capsaicin-sensitive and -insensitive sensory neurons. J. Neurosci. 22, RC228 (2002)

  35. 35.

    , & Mechanoelectrical transduction and adaptation in hair cells of the mouse utricle, a low-frequency vestibular organ. J. Neurosci. 17, 8739–8748 (1997)

  36. 36.

    A user’s guide to channelrhodopsin variants: features, limitations and future developments. Exp. Physiol. 96, 19–25 (2011)

  37. 37.

    , , , & Swelling-activated Ca2+ channels trigger Ca2+ signals in Merkel cells. PLoS ONE 3, e1750 (2008)

  38. 38.

    , , , & Excitatory glutamate is essential for development and maintenance of the piloneural mechanoreceptor. Development 139, 740–748 (2012)

Download references


Thanks to R. Axel, A. MacDermott and the Lumpkin laboratory for helpful discussions and to D. Florez and R. Piskorowski for advice on whole-cell recordings. Funding was provided by NIH/NIAMS grants R01AR051219 and R21AR062307 (to E.A.L.), R01DE022358 (to A.P.) and fellowships to S.M. (5T32HL087745-05 and NIH/NINDS F32NS080544), M.N. (JSPS Research Fellowships for Young Scientists 24-7585), and A.M.N. (McNair Foundation). Microscopy and flow cytometry was performed with core support from the Columbia SDRC (P30AR044535) and Cancer Center (P30CA013696). Initial studies were performed at Baylor College of Medicine with assistance from Flow Cytometry and Genetically Engineered Mouse Shared Resources (P30CA125123).

Author information

Author notes

    • Srdjan Maksimovic
    • , Masashi Nakatani
    •  & Yoshichika Baba

    These authors contributed equally to this work.


  1. Department of Dermatology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA

    • Srdjan Maksimovic
    • , Masashi Nakatani
    • , Yoshichika Baba
    • , Aislyn M. Nelson
    • , Kara L. Marshall
    •  & Ellen A. Lumpkin
  2. Graduate School of System Design and Management, Keio University, Yokohama 223-8526, Japan

    • Masashi Nakatani
  3. Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77006, USA

    • Aislyn M. Nelson
    • , Scott A. Wellnitz
    •  & Pervez Firozi
  4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla California 92037, USA

    • Seung-Hyun Woo
    • , Sanjeev Ranade
    •  & Ardem Patapoutian
  5. Department of Physiology & Cellular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA

    • Ellen A. Lumpkin
  6. Program in Neurobiology & Behavior, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA

    • Ellen A. Lumpkin


  1. Search for Srdjan Maksimovic in:

  2. Search for Masashi Nakatani in:

  3. Search for Yoshichika Baba in:

  4. Search for Aislyn M. Nelson in:

  5. Search for Kara L. Marshall in:

  6. Search for Scott A. Wellnitz in:

  7. Search for Pervez Firozi in:

  8. Search for Seung-Hyun Woo in:

  9. Search for Sanjeev Ranade in:

  10. Search for Ardem Patapoutian in:

  11. Search for Ellen A. Lumpkin in:


S.M. screened transgenic mouse lines, and performed and analysed all ex vivo optogenetic experiments (Fig. 2 and Extended Data Figs 36). M.N. performed and analysed all whole-cell recordings (Fig. 1, Extended Data Fig. 1a, b and Extended Data Table 1). Y.B. performed and analysed recordings from Atoh1 and Piezo2 strains (Fig. 3, Extended Data Fig. 8 and Extended Data Table 2). A.M.N. performed qRT-PCR (Fig. 1i) and calcium imaging (Extended Data Fig. 1c–i). K.L.M. performed immunohistochemistry in Atoh1 strains (Extended Data Fig. 7) and assisted in preparation of all figures. S.A.W. and E.A.L. conceived optogenetic strategies. P.F. generated initial ChR2 transgenic mouse lines. E.A.L. conceived and supervised the project. During this manuscript’s peer-review process, we entered into a collaboration with S.H.W., S.R. and A.P., to analyse unpublished Piezo2CKO mice. S.R. generated Piezo2flox/flox mice and S.-H.W. generated and validated Krt14Cre;Piezo2flox/flox mice in the laboratory of A.P. The manuscript was written by S.M., M.N., Y.B. and E.A.L. and edited by A.M.N., K.L.M., S.A.W., P.F., S.-H.W. and A.P.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ellen A. Lumpkin.

Extended data

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.