Letter | Published:

Elevated CO2 further lengthens growing season under warming conditions

Nature volume 510, pages 259262 (12 June 2014) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Observations of a longer growing season through earlier plant growth in temperate to polar regions have been thought to be a response to climate warming1,2,3,4,5. However, data from experimental warming studies indicate that many species that initiate leaf growth and flowering earlier also reach seed maturation and senesce earlier, shortening their active and reproductive periods6,7,8,9,10. A conceptual model to explain this apparent contradiction11, and an analysis of the effect of elevated CO2—which can delay annual life cycle events12,13,14—on changing season length, have not been tested. Here we show that experimental warming in a temperate grassland led to a longer growing season through earlier leaf emergence by the first species to leaf, often a grass, and constant or delayed senescence by other species that were the last to senesce, supporting the conceptual model. Elevated CO2 further extended growing, but not reproductive, season length in the warmed grassland by conserving water, which enabled most species to remain active longer. Our results suggest that a longer growing season, especially in years or biomes where water is a limiting factor, is not due to warming alone, but also to higher atmospheric CO2 concentrations that extend the active period of plant annual life cycles.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , & Satellite detection of increasing Northern Hemisphere non-frozen seasons from 1979 to 2008: implications for regional vegetation growth. Remote Sens. Environ. 121, 472–487 (2012)

  2. 2.

    et al. European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 1969–1976 (2006)

  3. 3.

    , , , & Increased plant growth in the northern latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature 386, 698–702 (1997)

  4. 4.

    & A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421, 37–42 (2003)

  5. 5.

    , & Onset of spring starting earlier across the Northern Hemisphere. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 343–351 (2006)

  6. 6.

    et al. Phenological changes in six Australian subalpine plants in response to experimental warming and year-to-year variation. J. Ecol. 98, 927–937 (2010)

  7. 7.

    , & Plant response to temperature in northern Alaska: implications for predicting vegetation change. Ecology 86, 1562–1570 (2005)

  8. 8.

    , , & Phenological sequences reveal aggregate life history response to climatic warming. Ecology 89, 363–370 (2008)

  9. 9.

    et al. Divergence of reproductive phenology under climate warming. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 198–202 (2007)

  10. 10.

    et al. Plants reverse warming effect on ecosystem water balance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9892–9893 (2003)

  11. 11.

    & Seasons and life cycles. Science 324, 886–887 (2009)

  12. 12.

    , , , & Diverse responses of phenology to global changes in a grassland ecosystem. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 13740–13744 (2006)

  13. 13.

    Plant CO2 responses: an issue of definition, time and resource supply. New Phytol. 172, 393–411 (2006)

  14. 14.

    & Flowering time and elevated atmospheric CO2. New Phytol. 176, 243–255 (2007)

  15. 15.

    & Rapid changes in flowering time in British plants. Science 296, 1689–1691 (2002)

  16. 16.

    , , , & Emergence of a mid-season period of low floral resources in a montane meadow ecosystem associated with climate change. J. Ecol. 99, 905–913 (2011)

  17. 17.

    , , , & Shorter flowering seasons and declining abundance of flower visitors in a warmer Arctic. Nature Climate Change 3, 759–763 (2013)

  18. 18.

    et al. Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system. Agric. For. Meteorol. 169, 156–173 (2013)

  19. 19.

    et al. C4 grasses prosper as carbon dioxide eliminates desiccation in warmed semi-arid grassland. Nature 476, 202–205 (2011)

  20. 20.

    , , , & Flowering phenology in a species-rich temperate grassland is sensitive to warming but not elevated CO2. New Phytol. 178, 815–822 (2008)

  21. 21.

    et al. Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15144–15148 (2005)

  22. 22.

    et al. Widespread increase of tree mortality rates in the western United States. Science 323, 521–524 (2009)

  23. 23.

    et al. Soil-mediated effects of subambient to increased carbon dioxide on grassland productivity. Nature Climate Change 2, 742–746 (2012)

  24. 24.

    & The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 30, 258–270 (2007)

  25. 25.

    , & in Progress in Photosynthesis Research (ed. ) 221–224 (Martinus-Nijhoff, 1987)

  26. 26.

    et al. Infrared heater arrays for warming ecosystem field plots. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 309–320 (2008)

  27. 27.

    et al. Free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) of a poplar plantation: the POPFACE fumigation system. New Phytol. 150, 465–476 (2001)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The following individuals contributed to the installation and maintenance of the Prairie Heating and CO2 Enrichment (PHACE) project: D. Smith, D. Blumenthal, E. Pendall, E. Hardy, L. Griffith, A. Hansen, K. Corp, V. Banuelos, G. Tinnin, M. West, C. Brooks, M. Busick, D. Milchunas, G. Dunn and L. Ahuja. Funding for this work was supported by the US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Center (USDA-ARS) Climate Change, Soils & Emissions Program, by the US Department of Energy’s Office of Science through the Terrestrial Ecosystem Science Program, by the National Science Foundation (DEB no. 1021559) and by Colorado State University. D. Inouye provided comments that improved the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

    • Melissa Reyes-Fox
    •  & Heidi Steltzer

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. USDA-ARS, Soil Plant Nutrient Research Unit and Northern Plains Area, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526, USA

    • Melissa Reyes-Fox
  2. Department of Biology, Fort Lewis College, Durango, Colorado 81301, USA

    • Heidi Steltzer
  3. Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA

    • M. J. Trlica
  4. USDA-ARS, Agricultural Systems Research Unit and Northern Plains Area, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526, USA

    • Gregory S. McMaster
  5. Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA

    • Allan A. Andales
  6. USDA-ARS, Rangeland Resources Research Unit, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526, USA

    • Dan R. LeCain
    •  & Jack A. Morgan

Authors

  1. Search for Melissa Reyes-Fox in:

  2. Search for Heidi Steltzer in:

  3. Search for M. J. Trlica in:

  4. Search for Gregory S. McMaster in:

  5. Search for Allan A. Andales in:

  6. Search for Dan R. LeCain in:

  7. Search for Jack A. Morgan in:

Contributions

M.R.-F., M.J.T., A.A.A., G.S.M. and J.A.M. designed the research. M.R.-F. and D.R.L. conducted the observations. J.A.M. oversaw the PHACE experiment. H.S. and M.R-F. analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to revision of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Melissa Reyes-Fox or Heidi Steltzer.

Extended data

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Table 1.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13207

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.