Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Transcriptional landscape of the prenatal human brain


The anatomical and functional architecture of the human brain is mainly determined by prenatal transcriptional processes. We describe an anatomically comprehensive atlas of the mid-gestational human brain, including de novo reference atlases, in situ hybridization, ultra-high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and microarray analysis on highly discrete laser-microdissected brain regions. In developing cerebral cortex, transcriptional differences are found between different proliferative and post-mitotic layers, wherein laminar signatures reflect cellular composition and developmental processes. Cytoarchitectural differences between human and mouse have molecular correlates, including species differences in gene expression in subplate, although surprisingly we find minimal differences between the inner and outer subventricular zones even though the outer zone is expanded in humans. Both germinal and post-mitotic cortical layers exhibit fronto-temporal gradients, with particular enrichment in the frontal lobe. Finally, many neurodevelopmental disorder and human-evolution-related genes show patterned expression, potentially underlying unique features of human cortical formation. These data provide a rich, freely-accessible resource for understanding human brain development.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Prenatal human brain atlas components.
Figure 2: Laminar gene expression mirrors developmental processes in prenatal neocortex.
Figure 3: Co-expression analyses of prenatal cortex.
Figure 4: Common and distinct subplate markers in human and mouse.
Figure 5: Areal patterning in the developing neocortex.

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Colantuoni, C. et al. Temporal dynamics and genetic control of transcription in the human prefrontal cortex. Nature 478, 519–523 (2011)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Fietz, S. A. et al. Transcriptomes of germinal zones of human and mouse fetal neocortex suggest a role of extracellular matrix in progenitor self-renewal. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 11836–11841 (2012)

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson, M. B. et al. Functional and evolutionary insights into human brain development through global transcriptome analysis. Neuron 62, 494–509 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kang, H. J. et al. Spatio-temporal transcriptome of the human brain. Nature 478, 483–489 (2011)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lambert, N. et al. Genes expressed in specific areas of the human fetal cerebral cortex display distinct patterns of evolution. PLoS ONE 6, e17753 (2011)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kriegstein, A., Noctor, S. & Martínez-Cerdeño, V. Patterns of neural stem and progenitor cell division may underlie evolutionary cortical expansion. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 7, 883–890 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hansen, D. V., Lui, J., Parker, P. & Kriegstein, A. Neurogenic radial glia in the outer subventricular zone of human neocortex. Nature 464, 554–561 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Smart, I., Dehay, C., Giroud, P., Berland, M. & Kennedy, H. Unique morphological features of the proliferative zones and postmitotic compartments of the neural epithelium giving rise to striate and extrastriate cortex in the monkey. Cereb.Cortex 12, 37–53 (2002)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brun, A. The subpial granular layer of the foetal cerebral cortex in man. Its ontogeny and significance in congenital cortical malformations. Acta Pathologica et Microbiologica Scandinavica 179 (suppl.). 3–98 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson, S. A., Eisenstat, D. D., Shi, L. & Rubenstein, J. L. Interneuron migration from basal forebrain to neocortex: dependence on Dlx genes. Science 278, 474–476 (1997)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ma, T. et al. Subcortical origins of human and monkey neocortical interneurons. Nature Neurosci. 16, 1588–1597 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu, X. & Zecevic, N. Dorsal radial glial cells have the potential to generate cortical interneurons in human but not in mouse brain. J. Neurosci. 31, 2413–2420 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Letinic, K., Zoncu, R. & Rakic, P. Origin of GABAergic neurons in the human neocortex. Nature 417, 645–649 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hansen, D. V. et al. Non-epithelial stem cells and cortical interneuron production in the human ganglionic eminences. Nature Neurosci. 16, 1576–1587 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Prabhakar, S., Noonan, J., Pääbo, S. & Rubin, E. Accelerated evolution of conserved noncoding sequences in humans. Science 314, 786 (2006)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ayoub, A. E. et al. Transcriptional programs in transient embryonic zones of the cerebral cortex defined by high-resolution mRNA sequencing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 14950–14955 (2011)

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Montiel, J. et al. Hypothesis on the dual origin of the mammalian subplate. Front. Neuroanat. 5, 25 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, W. Z. et al. Comparative aspects of subplate zone studied with gene expression in sauropsids and mammals. Cereb. Cortex 21, 2187–2203 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Insel, T. R. Rethinking schizophrenia. Nature 468, 187–193 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Paxinos, G. & Franklin, K. Paxinos and Franklin’s the Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates 4th edn (Academic Press, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Saleem, K. & Logothetis, N. A Combined MRI and Histology Atlas of the Rhesus Monkey Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates 2nd edition (Academic Press, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dong, H. W. Allen Reference Atlas: a Digital Color Brain Atlas of the C57BL/6J Male Mouse (Wiley, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hawrylycz, M. J. et al. An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome. Nature 489, 391–399 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lein, E. S. et al. Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature 445, 168–176 (2007)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bernard, A. et al. Transcriptional architecture of the primate neocortex. Neuron 73, 1083–1099 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Steinfeld, R. et al. Folate receptor alpha defect causes cerebral folate transport deficiency: a treatable neurodegenerative disorder associated with disturbed myelin metabolism. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 85, 354–363 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Dubourg, C. et al. Molecular screening of SHH, ZIC2, SIX3, and TGIF genes in patients with features of holoprosencephaly spectrum: mutation review and genotype–phenotype correlations. Hum. Mutat. 24, 43–51 (2004)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang, H. et al. Anatomical characterization of human fetal brain development with diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci. 29, 4263–4273 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Bystron, I., Blakemore, C. & Rakic, P. Development of the human cerebral cortex: Boulder Committee revisited. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 9, 110–122 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Vogt Weisenhorn, D. M., Prieto, E. W. & Celio, M. R. Localization of calretinin in cells of layer I (Cajal-Retzius cells) of the developing cortex of the rat. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 82, 293–297 (1994)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Englund, C. et al. Pax6, Tbr2, and Tbr1 are expressed sequentially by radial glia, intermediate progenitor cells, and postmitotic neurons in developing neocortex. J. Neurosci. 25, 247–251 (2005)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Levitt, P. & Rakic, P. Immunoperoxidase localization of glial fibrillary acidic protein in radial glial cells and astrocytes of the developing rhesus monkey brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 193, 815–840 (1980)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Grinberg, I. et al. Heterozygous deletion of the linked genes ZIC1 and ZIC4 is involved in Dandy-Walker malformation. Nature Genet. 36, 1053–1055 (2004)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Inoue, T., Ogawa, M., Mikoshiba, K. & Aruga, J. Zic deficiency in the cortical marginal zone and meninges results in cortical lamination defects resembling those in type II lissencephaly. J. Neurosci. 28, 4712–4725 (2008)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Kostović, I. & Judas, M. The development of the subplate and thalamocortical connections in the human foetal brain. Acta Paediatr. 99, 1119–1127 (2010)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang, B. & Horvath, S. A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 4, 17 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Oldham, M. C. et al. Functional organization of the transcriptome in human brain. Nature Neurosci. 11, 1271–1282 (2008)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Voineagu, I. et al. Transcriptomic analysis of autistic brain reveals convergent molecular pathology. Nature 474, 380–384 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Parikshak, N. N. et al. Integrative functional genomic analyses implicate specific molecular pathways and circuits in autism. Cell 155, 1008–1021 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Willsey, A. J. et al. Coexpression networks implicate human midfetal deep cortical projection neurons in the pathogenesis of autism. Cell 155, 997–1007 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Gaspard, N. & Vanderhaeghen, P. Laminar fate specification in the cerebral cortex. F1000 Biol. Rep. 3, 6 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Betizeau, M. et al. Precursor diversity and complexity of lineage relationships in the outer subventricular zone of the primate. Neuron 80, 442–457 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kawaguchi, A. et al. Single-cell gene profiling defines differential progenitor subclasses in mammalian neurogenesis. Development 135, 3113–3124 (2008)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Butler, D. M., Ono, J. K., Chang, T., McCaman, R. E. & Barish, M. E. Mouse brain potassium channel β1 subunit mRNA: cloning and distribution during development. J. Neurobiol. 34, 135–150 (1998)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gerashchenko, D. et al. Hypocretin-2-saporin lesions of the lateral hypothalamus produce narcoleptic-like sleep behavior in the rat. J. Neurosci. 21, 7273–7283 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Mallamaci, A. & Stoykova, A. Gene networks controlling early cerebral cortex arealization. Eur. J. Neurosci. 23, 847–856 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. O’Leary, D. D. Do cortical areas emerge from a protocortex? Trends Neurosci. 12, 400–406 (1989)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Rakic, P. Specification of cerebral cortical areas. Science 241, 170–176 (1988)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sansom, S. N. & Livesey, F. Gradients in the brain: the control of the development of form and function in the cerebral cortex. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 1, a002519 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Hevner, R. F. The cerebral cortex malformation in thanatophoric dysplasia: neuropathology and pathogenesis. Acta Neuropathol. 110, 208–221 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Pinto, L. et al. AP2γ regulates basal progenitor fate in a region- and layer-specific manner in the developing cortex. Nature Neurosci. 12, 1229–1237 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Rakic, P. Neurogenesis in adult primates. Prog. Brain Res. 138, 3–14 (2002)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Allendoerfer, K. L. & Shatz, C. J. The subplate, a transient neocortical structure: its role in the development of connections between thalamus and cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 185–218 (1994)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Enard, W. et al. Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language. Nature 418, 869–872 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Qiu, S. et al. Single-neuron RNA-seq: technical feasibility and reproducibility. Front. Genet. 3, 124 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Sorensen, S. A. et al. Correlated gene expression and target specificity demonstrate excitatory projection neuron diversity. Cereb. Cortex (2013)

  57. Johnson, W. E., Li, C. & Rabinovic, A. Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. Biostatistics 8, 118–127 (2007)

    Article  MATH  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Langfelder, P. & Horvath, S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 559 (2008)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Langfelder, P. & Horvath, S. Eigengene networks for studying the relationships between co-expression modules. BMC Syst. Biol. 1, 54 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. & Lempicki, R. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nature Protocols 4, 44–57 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Cahoy, J. et al. A transcriptome database for astrocytes, neurons, and oligodendrocytes: a new resource for understanding brain development and function. J. Neurosci. 28, 264–278 (2008)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Sugino, K. et al. Molecular taxonomy of major neuronal classes in the adult mouse forebrain. Nature Neurosci. 9, 99–107 (2006)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Miller, J. A. et al. Strategies for aggregating gene expression data: the collapseRows R function. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 322 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Hu, Z., Mellor, J., Wu, J. & DeLisi, C. VisANT: an online visualization and analysis tool for biological interaction data. BMC Bioinformatics 5, 17 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We wish to thank the Allen Institute founders, P. G. Allen and J. Allen, for their vision, encouragement and support. We express our gratitude to past and present Allen Institute staff members R. Adams, A. Alpisa, A. Boe, E. Byrnes, M. Chapin, J. Chen, C. Copeland, N. Dotson, K. Fotheringham, E. Fulfs, M. Gasparrini, T. Gilbert, Z. Haradon, N. Hejazinia, N. Ivanov, J. Kinnunen, A. Kriedberg, J. Laoenkue, S. Levine, V. Menon, E. Mott, N. Motz, J. Pendergraft, L. Potekhina, J. Redmayne-Titley, D. Rosen, C. Simpson, S. Shi, L. Velasquez, U. Wagley, N. Wong and B. Youngstrom for their technical assistance. We would also like to thank J. Augustinack, T. Benner, A. Mayaram, M. Roy, A. van der Kouwe and L. Wald from the Fischl laboratory. Also, we wish to acknowledge Covance Genomics Laboratory (Seattle, Washington) for microarray probe generation, hybridization and scanning. In addition, we express our gratitude to Advanced Bioscience Resources, for providing tissue used for expression profiling and reference atlas generation as well as to the Laboratory of Developmental Biology, University of Washington, for providing tissue used for expression profiling and reference atlas generation. The Laboratory of Developmental Biology work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Award Number 5R24HD0008836 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development. The BrainSpan project was supported by Award Number RC2MH089921 (PIs: E. Lein and M. Hawrylycz, Allen Institute for Brain Science) from the National Institute of Mental Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the respective authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Mental Health or the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



E.S.L, S.-L.D., K.A.S. and S.M.S. contributed significantly to the overall project design. S.M.S, K.A.S., A.E., A.B., and P.W. managed the tissue and sample processing in the laboratory. K.A., J.M.A., C.B., D.B., K.B., S.B., S.C., A.C., C.C., R.A.D., G.Ge., J.G., L.G., B.W.G., R.E.H., T.A.L., Na.M., N.F.M., N.-K.N., A.O., E.O., J.Pa., P.D.P., S.E.P., M.P., Me.R., J.J.R., K.R., D.S., Me.S., S.S., N.V.S. and Mi.S. contributed to tissue and sample processing. E.H.S., Z.L.R., T.N.-C., and I.A.G. contributed to establishing the tissue acquisition pipeline. N.D., J.N. and A.B. contributed to protocol development. A.S.P., L.Z., B.F., and H.H. contributed to MR and DWI imaging and analysis. J.M.J., C.R.S., and D.W. provided engineering support. S.-L.D., R.A.D., P.D.P., D.S. and J.G.H. contributed to the neuroanatomical design and implementation. S.-L.D., B.A.C.F., Ph.L., B.M., J.J.R., R.F.H., N.Se. and J.G.H. contributed to the reference atlas design, quality control and implementation. L.N., A.S. and C.D. managed the creation of the data pipeline, visualization and mining tools. L.N., A.S., T.A.D., D.F., T.P.F., G.Gu, C.L.K., C.La., F.L., N.Sj. and A.J.S. contributed to the creation of the data pipeline, visualization and mining tools. J.A.M., S.-L.D., R.F.H., C.-K.L., M.J.H., S.M.S. and E.S.L. contributed to data analysis and interpretation. M.B.G., D.H.G., J.A.K., Pa.L., J.W.P., N.Se. and A.R.J. contributed to overall project design and consortium management. E.S.L. and M.J.H. conceived the project, and the manuscript was written by J.A.M. and E.S.L. with input from all other authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ed S. Lein.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

These data are freely accessible as part of the BrainSpan Atlas of the Developing Human Brain (, also available via the Allen Brain Atlas data portal (

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Representative Nissl sections for laser microdissection (LMD) of 16 pcw and 21 pcw brains.

a, b, Nissl-stained sections were annotated and used to determine LMD region boundaries for 16 pcw (a) and 21 pcw (b) brains. Regions from adjacent sections on PEN membrane slides were captured using these annotations as guidelines. Labels show full name and abbreviation for representative planes of section through presumptive neocortical regions. Panel b is a higher resolution modified version of the bottom row in Fig. 1d of the main manuscript.

Extended Data Figure 2 Overview of magnetic resonance imaging data acquired from the post-mortem, formalin-fixed human fetal brain samples.

Diffusion-weighted MRI were acquired for each sample using a steady state free precession sequence (b = 730 s per mm2; 44 directions), yielding maps of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (first row) and of fractional anisotropy (FA) (second row). Whole-brain deterministic tractography results (third row) represent visualization of tractography output data filtered by a coronal slice filter. Structural data were acquired for each sample using a multi-echo flash sequence with images acquired at alpha = 40 providing optimal contrast to identify cortical and subcortical structures of interest (fourth row).

Extended Data Figure 3 White matter fibre tracts in fetal human brain.

ad, Orientation-encoded diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) colormaps in the left panel (a) and the three-dimensionally reconstructed fetal white matter fibres in the right panels (bd) for fetal brains at 15 pcw (upper row), 16 pcw (middle row) and 19 pcw (lower row). The orientation-encoded DTI colormaps are in axial planes at the anterior commissure level. The red, pink, green and purple fibres in the right panels are cc in (b), cp and icp in (c) and pvf in (d), respectively. The transparent whole brain and yellow thalamus are also shown as anatomical guidance in (bd). The scale bars are shown in the left panel (a). The fibre name abbreviations are: cc, corpus callosum; cp, cerebral peduncle; icp, inferior cerebellar peduncle; pvf, periventricular fibres (transient fibres coursing around the germinal matrix and only existing in the prenatal brain).

Extended Data Figure 4 Module eigengene expression of remaining modules in the cortical network.

Module eigengene expression of remaining 38 modules averaged across brain and layer. Each box corresponds to average module eigengene expression of all samples in that layer (rows) and brain (columns). Red corresponds to higher expression.

Extended Data Figure 5 Temporal patterning of whole cortex WGCNA modules across early to mid-gestational periods in BrainSpan RNA-seq cortical data.

RNA-seq RPKM values for 8–22 pcw specimens in the BrainSpan database for genes assigned to WGCNA modules (Fig. 3 in main manuscript) were correlated with age. For each module (Fig. 3a–c; x axis), the average correlation (± standard error of the mean) between expression of genes in that module and age (y axis) is plotted. Many of the modules show increases (positive correlation) or decreases (negative correlation) with age. In particular, modules C38 (decreasing with age) and C22 (increasing with age) presented in the main manuscript (see Fig. 3b, left column) show consistent trends with age in both data sets.

Extended Data Figure 6 Gene sets corresponding to GABAergic interneurons and proliferating layers also are highly expressed in the ganglionic eminences.

To examine the relationship between genes enriched in the cortical ventricular zone, including gene modules associated with GABAergic interneurons and mitotically active proliferative cells, WGCNA was performed on the combined cortical and GE samples (referred to as the ‘GE network’). a, Genes from module C31 in the whole cortex WGCNA (GABAergic interneurons) are assigned primarily to three modules in the GE network. GE31a has a similar pattern in cortex as C31, is highly expressed in GE and is enriched in genes associated with GABAergic interneurons. Other genes from C31 were assigned to modules with other cortical patterns and functional ontological associations (GE31b, GE31c). b, Genes from module C38 in the whole cortex WGCNA also divide primarily into three GE modules that are enriched in both the cortical germinal layers and the GE. These modules are enriched for genes expressed in astrocytes, potentially reflecting expression in radial glia, and are associated with cell cycle. For all plots, module eigengene (ME) expression is averaged across brain and layer (as in Fig. 3b), also including LGE, MGE and CGE (referred to here collectively as GE). Numbers in parentheses below each plot show the number of genes from module C31 in a, or C38 in b, out of the total number of module genes in the newly generated network. One representative enrichment category for each module is shown with enrichment P value.

Extended Data Figure 7 FISH of hub genes in ventricular-zone-enriched modules shows expected laminar enrichment and largely non-overlapping subcellular distributions.

a, Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in proliferative layers of 15 pcw human cortex for three genes in modules G7 and G8 in the germinal layers network shown in Fig. 3 of the manuscript (see Fig. 3d–f)—SPATA13, NR2E1 and DTL. All three genes show enrichment in the ventricular zone compared to the subventricular zone as expected based on microarray data. Nuclei are labelled with DAPI (blue). b. High-magnification images in the ventricular zone show double labelling for each pair of genes (with fluor reversal, lower row) and show complex subcellular distributions. SPATA13, NR2E1 and (to a lesser extent) DTL appear to be expressed in most cells in the ventricular zone, but these genes are typically expressed in non-overlapping punctate cytoplasmic locations (excluded from DAPI-stained nuclei in blue). b is at ×50 magnification relative to a.

Extended Data Figure 8 Laminar gene expression of putative SP markers for human and mouse in prenatal human cortex.

a, Novel human subplate-enriched genes showing at least eightfold enrichment in subplate in all four prenatal human brains. CDH18, a known subplate marker in mouse, is presented as a positive control. b, Genes with differences in subplate expression between mouse and human. These genes have been reported as subplate-enriched in mouse studies but do not show human subplate enrichment. Labelling as in Fig. 4a of the main manuscript. Microarray data are plotted as the average ±s.e.m. for each layer in each of the four brains analysed (colours).

Extended Data Figure 9 Areal gradients are consistent with patterns in BrainSpan RNA-seq cortical data, particularly for post-mitotic layers.

RNA-seq RPKM values for 8–22 pcw specimens in the BrainSpan database were used to assess rostral caudal patterning for all genes in prenatal development. Specifically, gene expression was correlated with a template of frontal cortex samples (1) versus samples from other cortical areas (0), such that positive correlations correspond to rostral enrichment. The same density plot of the resulting correlations is plotted for each layer in black. For each layer (except the subpial granular zone), density plots for the subset of rostral (red) and caudal (green) genes identified in this study (Fig. 5h) are shown. Note the significant offset of density curves for rostral and caudal genes in MZ, CPo, CPi, and IZ (and other layers to a lesser extent), indicating good agreement in areal gradient genes between studies.

Extended Data Figure 10 Areal and laminar expression patterning of FOXP2.

a, Summarized expression levels of FOXP2 across each lobe, layer and brain. b, FOXP2 shows enrichment in parietal and temporal regions overlapping Wernicke’s area in subplate at all three time points. c, FOXP2 shows enrichment in frontal cortex in germinal zones. Red corresponds to higher expression.

Related audio

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Table 1, which gives additional biological insights into the prenatal human brain. (PDF 274 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

Complete ontology for the BrainSpan project, showing the subset of structures and layers assayed in this study. Further details in the "Key" tab of the spreadsheet. (XLS 531 kb)

Supplementary Table 3 and 4

Layer of maximal expression (with statistics) for each gene in each brain (Supplementary Table 3). These data were used for Figure 2d. Enrichment analysis for laminar genes at 21pcw (Supplementary Table 4). Significantly enriched gene ontology and brain-related categories are listed. Further details in the "Key" tab of the spreadsheet. (XLS 6409 kb)

Supplementary Table 5

Module assignments and module membership for each gene in the cortical network. Genes listed in Figure 3b were chosen from this table. Further details in the "Key" tab of the spreadsheet. (XLS 27162 kb)

Supplementary Table 6

Enrichment analysis for genes in each cortical network module. Significantly enriched DAVID categories and relevant brain-related categories, including cell type enrichment are listed. Details are described in the worksheet labeled "Key". (XLS 1368 kb)

Supplementary Table 7

Enrichment analysis for genes in each germinal network module. Significantly enriched DAVID categories and relevant brain-related categories, including cell type enrichment are listed. Details are described in the worksheet labeled "Key". (XLS 450 kb)

Supplementary Table 8

150 marker genes for human and/or mouse subplate, along with evidence for defining these genes as SP markers. Genes listed in Figure 4 were selected from this table. Further details in the "Key" tab of the spreadsheet. (XLS 81 kb)

Supplementary Table 9

All genes identified as showing frontal to temporal gradient patterning in the developing human neocortex are included. Subsets of these genes, which are associated with human accelerated conserved noncoding sequences (haCNSs) or that are consistent with mouse, are also highlighted. Further details in the "Key" tab of the spreadsheet. (XLS 217 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, J., Ding, SL., Sunkin, S. et al. Transcriptional landscape of the prenatal human brain. Nature 508, 199–206 (2014).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing