Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Amazon River carbon dioxide outgassing fuelled by wetlands

Subjects

Abstract

River systems connect the terrestrial biosphere, the atmosphere and the ocean in the global carbon cycle1. A recent estimate suggests that up to 3 petagrams of carbon per year could be emitted as carbon dioxide (CO2) from global inland waters, offsetting the carbon uptake by terrestrial ecosystems2. It is generally assumed that inland waters emit carbon that has been previously fixed upstream by land plant photosynthesis, then transferred to soils, and subsequently transported downstream in run-off. But at the scale of entire drainage basins, the lateral carbon fluxes carried by small rivers upstream do not account for all of the CO2 emitted from inundated areas downstream3,4. Three-quarters of the world’s flooded land consists of temporary wetlands5, but the contribution of these productive ecosystems6 to the inland water carbon budget has been largely overlooked. Here we show that wetlands pump large amounts of atmospheric CO2 into river waters in the floodplains of the central Amazon. Flooded forests and floating vegetation export large amounts of carbon to river waters and the dissolved CO2 can be transported dozens to hundreds of kilometres downstream before being emitted. We estimate that Amazonian wetlands export half of their gross primary production to river waters as dissolved CO2 and organic carbon, compared with only a few per cent of gross primary production exported in upland (not flooded) ecosystems1,7. Moreover, we suggest that wetland carbon export is potentially large enough to account for at least the 0.21 petagrams of carbon emitted per year as CO2 from the central Amazon River and its floodplains8. Global carbon budgets should explicitly address temporary or vegetated flooded areas, because these ecosystems combine high aerial primary production with large, fast carbon export, potentially supporting a substantial fraction of CO2 evasion from inland waters.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Study area.
Figure 2: CO2 advection from flooded forest to open waters.
Figure 3: Vegetation-mediated control of CO2 outgassing in floodplain lakes.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cole, J. J. et al. Plumbing the global carbon cycle: integrating inland waters into the terrestrial carbon budget. Ecosystems 10, 172–185 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aufdenkampe, A. K. et al. Rivers key to coupling biogeochemical cycles between land, oceans and atmosphere. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 53–60 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davidson, E. A., Figueiredo, R. O., Markewitz, D. & Aufdenkampe, A. K. Dissolved CO2 in small catchment streams of eastern Amazonia: a minor pathway of terrestrial carbon loss. J. Geophys. Res. 115, G04005 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Butman, D. & Raymond, P. A. Significant efflux of carbon dioxide from streams and rivers in the United States. Nature Geosci. 4, 839–842 (2011)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Downing, J. A. Global limnology: up-scaling aquatic services and processes to planet Earth. Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol. 30, 1149–1166 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Whittaker, R. H. & Likens, G. E. in Primary Productivity of the Biosphere (eds Lieth, H. & Whittaker, R. H. ) 305–328 (Springer, 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schulze, E. D. et al. The European carbon balance. Part 4: integration of carbon and other trace-gas fluxes. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 1451–1469 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Richey, J. E., Melack, J. M., Aufdenkampe, A. K., Ballester, V. M. & Hess, L. L. Outgassing from Amazonian rivers and wetlands as a large tropical source of atmospheric CO2 . Nature 416, 617–620 (2002)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Battin, T. J. et al. Biophysical controls on organic carbon fluxes in fluvial networks. Nature Geosci. 1, 95–100 (2008)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Duarte, C. M. & Prairie, Y. T. Prevalence of heterotrophy and atmospheric CO2 emissions from aquatic ecosystems. Ecosystems 8, 862–870 (2005)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kayranli, B., Scholz, M., Mustafa, A. & Hedmark, A. Carbon storage and fluxes within freshwater wetlands: a critical review. Wetlands 30, 111–124 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hess, L. L., Melack, J. M., Novo, E. M., Barbosa, C. C. F. & Gastil, M. Dual-season mapping of wetland inundation and vegetation for the central Amazon basin. Remote Sens. Environ. 87, 404–428 (2003)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Maurice-Bourgoin, L. et al. Temporal dynamics of water and sediment exchanges between the Curuaí floodplain and the Amazon River, Brazil. J. Hydrol. 335, 140–156 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schöngart, J., Wittmann, F. & Worbes, M. in Amazonian Floodplain Forests: Ecophysiology, Biodiversity and Sustainable Management (eds Junk, W. J. et al.) 347–388 (Springer, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Engle, D. L., Melack, J. M., Doyle, R. D. & Fisher, T. R. High rates of net primary production and turnover of floating grasses on the Amazon floodplain: implications for aquatic respiration and regional CO2 flux. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 369–381 (2008)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamilton, S. K., Sippel, S. J. & Melack, J. M. Oxygen depletion and carbon dioxide and methane production in waters of the Pantanal wetland of Brazil. Biogeochemistry 30, 115–141 (1995)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Polsenaere, P. et al. Thermal enhancement of gas transfer velocity of CO2 in an Amazon floodplain lake revealed by eddy covariance. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 1734–1740 (2013)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Junk, W. J., Bayley, P. B. & Sparks, R. E. The flood pulse concept in river–floodplain systems. in Proc. Int. Large River Symp. (ed. Dodge, D. P. ) Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. Spec. Publ. 106, 110–127 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Devol, A. H. et al. Seasonal variation in chemical distributions in the Amazon (Solimões) River: a multiyear time series. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 9, 307–328 (1995)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ellis, E. E. et al. Factors controlling water-column respiration in rivers of the central and southwestern Amazon Basin. Limnol. Oceanogr. 57, 527–540 (2012)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mortillaro, J. M. et al. Particulate organic matter distribution along the Lower Amazon River: addressing aquatic ecology concepts using fatty acids. PLoS ONE 7, e46141 (2012)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Moreira-Turcq, P. et al. Seasonal variability in concentration, composition, age and fluxes of particulate organic carbon exchanged between the floodplain and Amazon River. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 27, 119–130 (2013)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Quay, P. D. et al. Carbon cycling in the Amazon River: implications from the 13C compositions of particles and solutes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 37, 857–871 (1992)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ward, N. D. et al. Degradation of terrestrially derived macromolecules in the Amazon River. Nature Geosci. 6, 530–533 (2013)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mayorga, E. et al. Young organic matter as a source of carbon dioxide outgassing from Amazonian rivers. Nature 436, 538–541 (2005)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Worbes, M. in The Central Amazon Floodplain: Ecology of a Pulsing System (ed. Junk, W. J. ) 223–265 (Springer, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lloyd, J. et al. An airborne regional carbon balance of Central Amazonia. Biogeosciences 4, 759–768 (2007)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Aselmann, I. & Crutzen, P. J. Global distribution of natural freshwater wetlands and rice paddies, their net primary productivity, seasonality and possible methane emissions. J. Atmos. Chem. 8, 307–358 (1989)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Abril, G., Richard, S. & Guérin, F. In situ measurements of dissolved gases (CO2 and CH4) in a wide range of concentrations in a tropical reservoir using an equilibrator. Sci. Total Environ. 354, 246–251 (2006)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sioli, H. Hydrochemistry and geology in the Brazilian Amazon region. Amazoniana 3, 267–277 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mertes, L. A. K., Dunne, T. & Martinelli, L. A. Channel–floodplain geomorphology along the Solimões-Amazon River, Brazil. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 108, 1089–1107 (1996)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Trigg, M. A., Bates, P. D., Wilson, M. D., Schumann, G. & Baugh, C. Floodplain channel morphology and networks of the middle Amazon River. Wat. Resour. Res. 48, W10504 (2012)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Alsdorf, D., Han, S.-C., Bates, P. & Melack, J. Seasonal water storage on the Amazon floodplain measured from satellites. Remote Sens. Environ. 114, 2448–2456 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bonnet, M. P. et al. Floodplain hydrology in an Amazon floodplain lake (Lago Grande de Curuai). J. Hydrol. 349, 18–30 (2008)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rosenqvist, A., Forsberg, B. R., Pimentel, T., Rauste, Y. A. & Richey, J. E. The use of spaceborne radar to model inundation patterns and trace gas emissions in the central Amazon floodplain. Int. J. Remote Sens. 23, 1303–1328 (2002)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Martinez, J. M. & Le Toan, T. Mapping of flood dynamics and spatial distribution of vegetation in the Amazon floodplain using multitemporal SAR data. Remote Sens. Environ. 108, 209–223 (2007)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. Quegan, S., Le Toan, T., Yu, J. J., Ribbes, F. & Floury, N. Multitemporal ERS SAR analysis applied to forest monitoring. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens. 38, 741–753 (2000)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee, J. S. A simple speckle smoothing algorithm for synthetic aperture radar images. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 13, 85–89 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Frankignoulle, M., Borges, A. & Biondo, R. A new design of equilibrator to monitor carbon dioxide in highly dynamic and turbid environments. Water Res. 35, 1344–1347 (2001)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Santos, I. R., Maher, D. T. & Eyre, B. D. Coupling automated radon and carbon dioxide measurements in coastal waters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 7685–7691 (2012)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Beutler, M. et al. A fluorometric method for the differentiation of algal populations in vivo and in situ. Photosynth. Res. 72, 39–53 (2002)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. MacIntyre, H. L., Lawrenz, E. & Richardson, T. L. in Chlorophyll a Fluorescence in Aquatic Sciences: Methods and Applications (eds Suggett, D. J. et al.) 129–169 (Developments in Applied Phycology 4, Springer, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lorenzen, C. J. Determination of chlorophyll and pheopigments: spectrophotometric equations. Limnol. Oceanogr. 12, 343–346 (1967)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Weiss, R. F. Carbon dioxide in water and seawater: the solubility of a non-ideal gas. Mar. Chem. 2, 203–215 (1974)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Jähne, B. et al. On parameters influencing air-water exchange. J. Geophys. Res. 92, 1937–1949 (1987)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. Wanninkhof, R. Relationship between gas exchange and wind speed over the ocean. J. Geophys. Res. 97, 7373–7382 (1992)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Guérin, F. et al. Gas transfer velocities of CO2 and CH4 in a tropical reservoir and its river downstream. J. Mar. Syst. 66, 161–172 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Cole, J. J. & Caraco, N. F. Atmospheric exchange of carbon dioxide in a low-wind oligotrophic lake measured by the addition of SF6 . Limnol. Oceanogr. 43, 647–656 (1998)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Zappa, C. J. et al. Environmental turbulent mixing controls on air-water gas exchange in marine and aquatic systems. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028790 (2007)

  50. Abril, G., Commarieu, M. V., Sottolichio, A., Bretel, P. & Guérin, F. Turbidity limits gas exchange in a large macrotidal estuary. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 83, 342–348 (2009)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. MacIntyre, S. et al. Buoyancy flux, turbulence, and the gas transfer coefficient in a stratified lake. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L24604 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. Rudorff, C. M., Melack, J. M., MacIntyre, S., Barbosa, C. C. F. & Novo, E. M. L. M. Seasonal and spatial variability of CO2 emission from a large floodplain lake in the lower Amazon. J. Geophys. Res. 116, G04007 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Salter, M. E. et al. Impact of an artificial surfactant release on air-sea gas fluxes during deep ocean gas exchange experiment II. J. Geophys. Res. 116, C11016 (2011)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. Parolin, P. et al. Central Amazon floodplain forests: tree survival in a pulsing system. Bot. Rev. 70, 357–380 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Richey, J. E., Krusche, A. V., Johnson, M. S., da Cunha, H. B. & Ballester, M. V. in Amazonia and Global Change (eds Keller, M. et al.) 489–504 (Geophys. Monogr. Ser. 186, AGU, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Devol, A. H., Quay, P. D., Richey, J. E. & Martinelli, L. A. The role of gas exchange in the inorganic carbon, oxygen and 222Rn budgets of the Amazon River. Limnol. Oceanogr. 32, 235–248 (1987)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Alin, S. R. et al. Physical controls on carbon dioxide transfer velocity and flux in low-gradient river systems and implications for regional carbon budgets. J. Geophys. Res. 116, G01009 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Junk, W. J. & Piedade, M. T. F. Biomass and primary production of herbaceous plant communities in the Amazon floodplain. Hydrobiology 263, 155–162 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Malhi, Y. & Grace, J. Tropical forests and atmospheric carbon dioxide. Trees 15, 332–337 (2000)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Horna, V., Zimmermann, R., Müller, E. & Parolin, P. in Amazonian Floodplain Forests: Ecophysiology, Biodiversity and Sustainable Management (eds Junk, W. J. et al.) 223–241 (Springer, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Worbes, M. in The Central Amazon Floodplain: Ecology of a Pulsing System (ed Junk, W. J. ) 223–265 (Springer, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Saatchi, S. S., Houghton, R. A., Dos Santos Avala, R. C., Soares, J. V. & Yu, Y. Distribution of aboveground live biomass in the Amazon basin. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 816–837 (2007)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  63. Meyer, U., Junk, W. J. & Linck, C. in Amazonian Floodplain Forests: Ecophysiology, Biodiversity and Sustainable Management (eds Junk, W. J. et al.) 163–178 (Springer, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Parolin, P., Wittmann, F. & Schöngart, J. in Amazonian Floodplain Forests: Ecophysiology, Biodiversity and Sustainable Management (eds Junk, W. J. et al.) 105–126 (Springer, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Piedade, M. T. F., Ferreira, C. S., de Oliveira Wittmann, A., Buckeridge, M. & Parolin, P. in Amazonian Floodplain Forests: Ecophysiology, Biodiversity and Sustainable Management (eds Junk, W. J. et al.) 127–139 (Springer, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Junk, W. J., Piedade, M. T. F., Parolin, P., Wittmann, F. & Schöngart, J. in Amazonian Floodplain Forests: Ecophysiology, Biodiversity and Sustainable Management (eds Junk, W. J. et al.) 511–540 (Springer, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Morison, J. I. L. et al. Very high productivity of the C4 aquatic grass Echinocloa polystachya in the Amazon floodplain confirmed by net ecosystem CO2 flux measurements. Oecologia 125, 400–411 (2000)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Costa, M. Estimate of net primary productivity of aquatic vegetation of the Amazon floodplain using Radarsat and JERS-1. Int. J. Remote Sens. 26, 4527–4536 (2005)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  69. Melack, J. M. et al. in Amazonia and Global Change (eds Keller, M. et al.) 525–542 (Geophys. Monogr. Ser. 186, AGU, 2009)

  70. Moreira-Turcq, P. et al. Carbon sedimentation at Lago Grande de Curuai, a floodplain lake in the low Amazon region: insights into sedimentation rates. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclim. Palaeoecol. 214, 27–40 (2004)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is a contribution to the CARBAMA project, funded by the French National Agency for Research (grant number 08-BLAN-0221), the French INSU national programme EC2CO, and the National Council of Research and Development (CNPq), Brazil (Universal Program number 477655/2010-6). It was conducted under the auspices of the Environmental Research Observatory Hydrology and Geochemistry of the Amazon Basin (HYBAM), supported by the INSU and the IRD (Institute for Research and Development, France). F.R. was supported by CNPq and a Brazilian ‘Excellent Researcher’ fellowship. We thank all the participants of the CARBAMA cruises.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G.A., J.-M.M., P.M.-T., L.F.A., T.M. and M.F.B. conceived and designed the study. G.A. coordinated project and fieldwork. G.A., J.D., M.F.L.d.S. and N.S. performed the p co 2 measurements. J.-M.M. and E.L.S. analysed the remote sensing data. L.F.A. measured Chl a and fluorescence. L.V. and F.R. measured respiration. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the data. G.A. wrote the manuscript, J.-M.M., L.F.A. and F.R. contributed to manuscript writing and P.M.-T., L.V., T.M., J.-H.K., M.C.B., N.S. and M.F.B. commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gwenaël Abril.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Instrumental set-up for continuous measurement of p co 2 and ancillary parameters while underway in the Amazon River and floodplain lakes.

Side-view diagrams of both boats are illustrated with photos of the equipment. See detailed description in the Methods.

Extended Data Figure 2 Continuous record of water p co 2 in the Amazon River, tributaries, and floodplain lakes during the high water (June 2009).

a, Track of the ship in the main stem (brown), floodplain lakes (green), and major tributaries (blue). Land occupation derived from SAR data is shown as flooded forest (light grey), temporary open waters (dark grey) and permanent open waters (black). b, Conductivity values show that water in the floodplain lakes primarily originates from the flooding of the Solimões and Amazon rivers with modest contribution from local drainage. c, The distribution of water at maximum flooding shows the predominance of supersaturation with a net decrease downstream, in parallel with the extent of vegetation in the floodplains (percentage of total floodplain area is given in parentheses for each lake).

Extended Data Figure 3 Continuous record of water p co 2 in the Amazon River, its tributaries and floodplain lakes during the low water of October 2009.

a, Track of the ship in the main stem (brown), floodplain lakes (green), and major tributaries (blue). Land occupation derived from SAR data is shown as flooded forest (light grey), temporary open waters (dark grey) and permanent open waters (black). b, Conductivity values show that water in the floodplain lakes primarily originates from the flooding of the Solimões and Amazon rivers with modest contribution from local drainage. c, The distribution of water shows large contrasts between channel and floodplains, with a significant decrease downstream (as during the high water), in parallel with the extent of vegetation in the floodplains (percentage of total floodplain area is given in parentheses for each lake). Undersaturation in occurs at low water in dense phytoplankton blooms in almost isolated lakes.

Extended Data Figure 4 Conceptual diagram for carbon dioxide outgassing fuelled by Amazonian wetlands.

In flooded forests, aerial gross primary production absorbs CO2 from the atmosphere and sequesters part of this carbon in wood. Most of the sequestration in wood occurs during the terrestrial phase and is supposed to be balanced by natural tree mortality associated with channel migration. Leaves and wood also respire CO2 back to the atmosphere. Litter falls from flooded trees primarily during flooding and constitutes a significant organic carbon input to the water. Floating plants in the Amazon grow above the water level, where they perform aerial photosynthesis, and as the water level progressively rises, their biomass is recycled and decomposes underwater. Because no significant burial of macrophyte material is observed in sediment, it is assumed that all their annual net primary production (NPP) is transferred to water as organic carbon (litter fall). Below water, the respiration of roots of flooded trees and floating macrophytes releases CO2 to the water. With the establishment of anoxic conditions in forest soils, tree metabolism deviates to an anaerobic pathway that generates fermentation products, which are exuded from the roots into the surrounding water. Carbon flux between the Amazonian wetlands and rivers thus occurs through two distinct pathways. CO2 export from the wetlands is derived from root and sediment respiration within the wetlands, whereas organic carbon export from the wetlands is derived from litter fall and from fermentative products released by roots. Quantitative information is missing for the latter exudation flux. In rivers and floodplains, water movement is fast enough relative to gas exchange to generate a lateral CO2 flux with the water mass, and this flux should be taken into account in the interpretation of the spatial and temporal patterns of CO2 outgassing. In water and sediments of the entire aquatic system, microbial heterotrophic respiration continuously converts organic carbon to CO2. In open lakes, phytoplankton uses CO2 dissolved in water (that is, primarily derived from the surrounding wetland vegetation) and infrequently uses atmospheric CO2 because the lakes were rarely net CO2 sinks on a daily basis. The phytoplankton biomass produced in open lakes constitutes an additional source of biodegradable organic carbon. Both C3 and C4 plants are well represented in the wetland. Isotopic and molecular tracers may distinguish woody from non-woody material. However, it is difficult to differentiate woody material from the flooded forest and woody material from the non-inundated forest, particularly as many species are common to both. More detailed discussion and references can be found in the Supplementary Information.

Extended Data Figure 5 Modelling how far dissolved CO2 is transported before being outgassed.

a, We assessed the potential for lateral CO2 transport in rivers and floodplains using a simple one-dimensional model that simultaneously calculates the CO2 lost by outgassing and the CO2 that remains dissolved in water and is transported downstream by the currents. The model starts from a point source in the wetland (set here at 12,000 p.p.m.v., which is a typical value observed in the vicinity of a flooded forest; Fig. 2b). The iteration time was 1 min. In the model, F(CO2) is calculated from , using representative values of k600. The quantity of CO2 lost to the atmosphere during one iteration is subtracted from the initial CO2 quantity present in a column of water of a determined depth H. Note that this procedure is adequate only for acidic, non-buffered waters, such as those in the Amazon. b, c, When integrated (Supplementary Information), the equation gives a one-phase exponential decay function of versus the distance x, the water current velocity w, the normalized gas transfer velocity k600, and the water depth H. The curves give the potential extent of saturation that can be maintained without the necessity of aquatic respiration (Fig. 2b). D½ is the half-evasion distance, which is the theoretical distance the water mass travels before outgassing half of its initial excess CO2. T½ is the associated half-evasion time. d, Typical half-evasion distances of wetland CO2 in river–floodplain systems vary from less than 1 km in a shallow, stagnant, wind- and heat-protected lake to more than 300 km in a deep and fast-flowing river. This illustrates, on the one hand, how far wetland CO2 can be exported downstream, and on the other hand, the large heterogeneity of the transport and outgassing processes in the river–floodplain complex.

Extended Data Table 1 Surface area of flooded land and aquatic biomes in the Central Amazon and study sites
Extended Data Table 2 Water p co 2 , conductivity and Chl a in the river and floodplain lakes of quadrant c
Extended Data Table 3 Tentative revised carbon budget for the central Amazon River and wetlands

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Text 1-4 and additional references. (PDF 409 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abril, G., Martinez, JM., Artigas, L. et al. Amazon River carbon dioxide outgassing fuelled by wetlands. Nature 505, 395–398 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12797

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12797

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology