Letter | Published:

Demonstration of electron acceleration in a laser-driven dielectric microstructure

Nature volume 503, pages 9194 (07 November 2013) | Download Citation

This article has been updated

Abstract

The enormous size and cost of current state-of-the-art accelerators based on conventional radio-frequency technology has spawned great interest in the development of new acceleration concepts that are more compact and economical. Micro-fabricated dielectric laser accelerators (DLAs) are an attractive approach, because such dielectric microstructures can support accelerating fields one to two orders of magnitude higher than can radio-frequency cavity-based accelerators. DLAs use commercial lasers as a power source, which are smaller and less expensive than the radio-frequency klystrons that power today’s accelerators. In addition, DLAs are fabricated via low-cost, lithographic techniques that can be used for mass production. However, despite several DLA structures having been proposed recently1,2,3,4, no successful demonstration of acceleration in these structures has so far been shown. Here we report high-gradient (beyond 250 MeV m−1) acceleration of electrons in a DLA. Relativistic (60-MeV) electrons are energy-modulated over 563 ± 104 optical periods of a fused silica grating structure, powered by a 800-nm-wavelength mode-locked Ti:sapphire laser. The observed results are in agreement with analytical models and electrodynamic simulations. By comparison, conventional modern linear accelerators operate at gradients of 10–30 MeV m−1, and the first linear radio-frequency cavity accelerator was ten radio-frequency periods (one metre) long with a gradient of approximately 1.6 MeV m−1 (ref. 5). Our results set the stage for the development of future multi-staged DLA devices composed of integrated on-chip systems. This would enable compact table-top accelerators on the MeV–GeV (106–109 eV) scale for security scanners and medical therapy, university-scale X-ray light sources for biological and materials research, and portable medical imaging devices, and would substantially reduce the size and cost of a future collider on the multi-TeV (1012 eV) scale.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Change history

  • 06 November 2013

    Minor changes were made to the Acknowledgements section.

References

  1. 1.

    Photonic band gap fiber accelerator. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Accel. Beams 4, 051301 (2001)

  2. 2.

    & Optical Bragg accelerators. Phys. Rev. E 70, 016505 (2004)

  3. 3.

    Three-dimensional dielectric photonic crystal structures for laser-driven acceleration. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Accel. Beams 11, 011301 (2008)

  4. 4.

    , & Proposed few-optical cycle laser-driven particle accelerator structure. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Accel. Beams 9, 111301 (2006)

  5. 5.

    , & A linear electron accelerator. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 19, 89–108 (1948)

  6. 6.

    et al. Visible-laser acceleration of relativistic electrons in a semi-infinite vacuum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 134801 (2005)

  7. 7.

    Proposal for an electron accelerator using an optical maser. Appl. Opt. 1, 33–35 (1962)

  8. 8.

    , , & Momentum modulation of a free electron beam with a laser. J. Appl. Phys. 46, 132–137 (1975)

  9. 9.

    Interaction of relativistic particles and free electromagnetic waves in the presence of a static helical magnet. J. Appl. Phys. 43, 3014–3023 (1972)

  10. 10.

    , , & Observation of energy gain at the BNL inverse free-electron-laser accelerator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2690–2693 (1996)

  11. 11.

    Free-Electron Lasers 24–26 (McMillan, 1985)

  12. 12.

    & Laser linac with grating. Nucl. Instrum. Methods 62, 306–310 (1968)

  13. 13.

    , , & Experimental evidence of the inverse Smith-Purcell effect. Nature 328, 45–47 (1987)

  14. 14.

    & Laser-based acceleration of non-relativistic electrons at a dielectric structure. Phys. Rev. Lett. (in the press)

  15. 15.

    et al. Design, fabrication, and testing of a fused-silica dual-grating structure for direct laser acceleration of electrons. AIP Conf. Proc. 1507, 169–177 (2012)

  16. 16.

    , & Electromagnetic forces in the vacuum region of laser-driven layered grating structures. J. Mod. Opt. 58, 1518–1528 (2011)

  17. 17.

    et al. Breakdown limits on gigavolt-per-meter electron-beam-driven wakefields in dielectric structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 214801 (2008)

  18. 18.

    et al. Production and characterization of attosecond electron bunch trains. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Accel. Beams 11, 061301 (2008)

  19. 19.

    et al. Laser-photofield emission from needle cathodes for low-emittance electron beams. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 064801 (2008)

  20. 20.

    , & Inverse free electron laser accelerator for advanced light sources. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Accel. Beams 15, 061301 (2012)

  21. 21.

    , & A laser-driven linear collider: sample machine parameters and configuration. Proc. 24th Particle Accelerator Conf. C110328 262–264. (2011)

  22. 22.

    et al. Tm-doped fiber lasers: fundamentals and power scaling. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. 15, 85–92 (2009)

  23. 23.

    Energy efficiency of laser driven, structure based accelerators. Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Accel. Beams 7, 061303 (2004)

  24. 24.

    & Microstructure-based laser-driven free-electron laser. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 593, 63–66 (2008)

  25. 25.

    & Energy loss and straggling of electrons. Phys. Rev. 93, 406–407 (1954)

  26. 26.

    & G4beamline simulation program for matter-dominated beamlines. Proc. 22nd Particle Accelerator Conf. C070625 3468–3470 (2007)

  27. 27.

    , , , & Laser damage threshold measurements of optical materials for direct laser accelerators. AIP Conf. Proc. 1507, 511–515 (2012)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank R. Noble, J. Spencer, O. Solgaard and J. Harris for discussions, J. Nelson, D. McCormick and K. Jobe for technical assistance at SLAC, and M. Tang, M. Mansourpour, N. Latta, M. Stevens, J. Conway and U. Thumser for technical assistance at the Stanford Nanofabrication Facility (SNF). This work was supported by the US DoE (grant no. DE-FG03-92ER40693) and DARPA (grant no. N66001-11-1-4199). Device fabrication took place at SNF, which is supported by the NSF under grant ECS-9731293. Work by G.T., J.M. and E.B.S. supported by US Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) grant HDTRA1-09-1-0043.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA

    • E. A. Peralta
    • , K. Soong
    • , C. McGuinness
    •  & R. L. Byer
  2. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA

    • R. J. England
    • , E. R. Colby
    • , Z. Wu
    •  & D. Walz
  3. Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA

    • B. Montazeri
    •  & K. J. Leedle
  4. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90024, USA

    • J. McNeur
    • , E. B. Sozer
    •  & G. Travish
  5. Tech-X Corporation, 5621 Arapahoe Avenue, Boulder, Colorado 80303, USA

    • B. Cowan
    •  & B. Schwartz

Authors

  1. Search for E. A. Peralta in:

  2. Search for K. Soong in:

  3. Search for R. J. England in:

  4. Search for E. R. Colby in:

  5. Search for Z. Wu in:

  6. Search for B. Montazeri in:

  7. Search for C. McGuinness in:

  8. Search for J. McNeur in:

  9. Search for K. J. Leedle in:

  10. Search for D. Walz in:

  11. Search for E. B. Sozer in:

  12. Search for B. Cowan in:

  13. Search for B. Schwartz in:

  14. Search for G. Travish in:

  15. Search for R. L. Byer in:

Contributions

E.A.P., K.S., R.J.E., E.R.C. and R.L.B. designed the experiment. E.A.P., K.S., R.J.E., E.R.C., Z.W. and B.M. built the experiment, and with the help of C.McG. and J.McN., carried out the experiment. E.A.P. designed and fabricated the structure. E.A.P. and K.S. wrote the data analysis software and analysed the results, and E.B.S. contributed to that software. K.S. developed the analytical model. K.S., B.M., J.McN, B.C. and B.S. performed supporting simulations. G.T, J.McN, E.B.S. and K.J.L. provided feedback to improve the experiment. K.S. and K.J.L. designed and constructed the vacuum damage threshold measurement set-up, and K.S. carried out such measurements. D.W. performed hardware upgrades and installation. E.A.P. wrote the manuscript with contributions from K.S. and R.J.E. and revisions by all.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. L. Byer.

Extended data

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Text and Data and additional references.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12664

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.