Abstract
The bacterial type VI secretion system (T6SS) is a large multicomponent, dynamic macromolecular machine that has an important role in the ecology of many Gram-negative bacteria. T6SS is responsible for translocation of a wide range of toxic effector molecules, allowing predatory cells to kill both prokaryotic as well as eukaryotic prey cells1,2,3,4,5. The T6SS organelle is functionally analogous to contractile tails of bacteriophages and is thought to attack cells by initially penetrating them with a trimeric protein complex called the VgrG spike6,7. Neither the exact protein composition of the T6SS organelle nor the mechanisms of effector selection and delivery are known. Here we report that proteins from the PAAR (proline-alanine-alanine-arginine) repeat superfamily form a sharp conical extension on the VgrG spike, which is further involved in attaching effector domains to the spike. The crystal structures of two PAAR-repeat proteins bound to VgrG-like partners show that these proteins sharpen the tip of the T6SS spike complex. We demonstrate that PAAR proteins are essential for T6SS-mediated secretion and target cell killing by Vibrio cholerae and Acinetobacter baylyi. Our results indicate a new model of the T6SS organelle in which the VgrG–PAAR spike complex is decorated with multiple effectors that are delivered simultaneously into target cells in a single contraction-driven translocation event.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Accession codes
Primary accessions
Protein Data Bank
Data deposits
The atomic coordinates and the structure factors of the refined atomic models of gp5(VCA0018)–(VCA0105) and gp5(c1883)–(c1882) complexes were deposited to the Protein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org) under the accession numbers 4JIV and 4JIW, respectively.
References
Pukatzki, S. et al. Identification of a conserved bacterial protein secretion system in Vibrio cholerae using the Dictyostelium host model system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 1528–1533 (2006)
Mougous, J. D. et al. A virulence locus of Pseudomonas aeruginosa encodes a protein secretion apparatus. Science 312, 1526–1530 (2006)
Basler, M., Pilhofer, M., Henderson, G. P., Jensen, G. J. & Mekalanos, J. J. Type VI secretion requires a dynamic contractile phage tail-like structure. Nature 483, 182–186 (2012)
Kapitein, N. & Mogk, A. Deadly syringes: type VI secretion system activities in pathogenicity and interbacterial competition. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 16, 52–58 (2013)
Basler, M., Ho, B. T. & Mekalanos, J. J. Tit-for-tat: type VI secretion system counterattack during bacterial cell-cell interactions. Cell 152, 884–894 (2013)
Pukatzki, S., Ma, A. T., Revel, A. T., Sturtevant, D. & Mekalanos, J. J. Type VI secretion system translocates a phage tail spike-like protein into target cells where it cross-links actin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15508–15513 (2007)
Leiman, P. G. et al. Type VI secretion apparatus and phage tail-associated protein complexes share a common evolutionary origin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 4154–4159 (2009)
Dong, T. G., Ho, B. T., Yoder-Himes, D. R. & Mekalanos, J. J. Identification of T6SS-dependent effector and immunity proteins by Tn-seq in Vibrio cholerae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2623–2628 (2013)
Kostyuchenko, V. A. et al. Three-dimensional structure of bacteriophage T4 baseplate. Nature Struct. Biol. 10, 688–693 (2003)
Kanamaru, S. et al. Structure of the cell-puncturing device of bacteriophage T4. Nature 415, 553–557 (2002)
Rossmann, M. G. & Blow, D. M. The detection of sub-units within the crystallographic asymmetric unit. Acta Crystallogr. 15, 24–31 (1962)
Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J. Mol. Biol. 372, 774–797 (2007)
Kikuchi, Y. & King, J. Genetic control of bacteriophage T4 baseplate morphogenesis. II. Mutants unable to form the central part of the baseplate. J. Mol. Biol. 99, 673–680 (1975)
Marchler-Bauer, A. et al. CDD: conserved domains and protein three-dimensional structure. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D348–D352 (2013)
Hamburger, Z. A., Brown, M. S., Isberg, R. R. & Bjorkman, P. J. Crystal structure of invasin: a bacterial integrin-binding protein. Science 286, 291–295 (1999)
Felisberto-Rodrigues, C. et al. Towards a structural comprehension of bacterial type VI secretion systems: characterization of the TssJ-TssM complex of an Escherichia coli pathovar. PLoS Pathog. 7, e1002386 (2011)
Koskiniemi, S. et al. Rhs proteins from diverse bacteria mediate intercellular competition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7032–7037 (2013)
Hachani, A. et al. Type VI secretion system in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: secretion and multimerization of VgrG proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 12317–12327 (2011)
McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007)
Adams, P. D. et al. The Phenix software for automated determination of macromolecular structures. Methods 55, 94–106 (2011)
Murshudov, G. N. et al. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. D 67, 355–367 (2011)
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010)
Finn, R. D., Clements, J. & Eddy, S. R. HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, W29–W37 (2011)
Söding, J., Biegert, A. & Lupas, A. N. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W244–W248 (2005)
Geer, L. Y., Domrachev, M., Lipman, D. J. & Bryant, S. H. CDART: protein homology by domain architecture. Genome Res. 12, 1619–1623 (2002)
Fürste, J. P. et al. Molecular-cloning of the plasmid RP4 primase region in a multi-host-range TacP expression vector. Gene 48, 119–131 (1986)
Kabsch, W. XDS. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 125–132 (2010)
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126–2132 (2004)
Finn, R. D. et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D211–D222 (2010)
Guzman, L. M., Belin, D., Carson, M. J. & Beckwith, J. Tight regulation, modulation, and high-level expression by vectors containing the arabinose PBAD promoter. J. Bacteriol. 177, 4121–4130 (1995)
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods 9, 676–682 (2012)
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004)
Kyte, J. & Doolittle, R. F. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J. Mol. Biol. 157, 105–132 (1982)
Bearden, J. A. X-ray wavelengths. Reviews of Modern Physics 39, 78–124 (1967)
Crooks, G. E., Hon, G., Chandonia, J. M. & Brenner, S. E. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 14, 1188–1190 (2004)
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410 (1990)
Acknowledgements
We thank the entire staff of the Swiss Light Source PX beamlines and V. Olieric in particular for support related to crystallographic data collection. The project was made possible by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant 31003A_127092) and EPFL funding to P.G.L., and grants AI-026289 and AI-01845 from the NIAID to J.J.M.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.M.S. performed the initial bioinformatic analysis that led to the identification of PAAR proteins; M.M.S. cloned all VgrG and PAAR proteins for biochemical characterization and crystallization; M.M.S. and P.G.L. designed VgrG–PAAR binding experiments; M.M.S. and S.A.B. performed gp5(VgrG)–PAAR binding experiments and purification of gp5(VgrG)–PAAR complexes; S.A.B. crystallized gp5(VgrG)–PAAR complexes and determined their crystal structures; J.J.M., M.B. and B.T.H. designed T6SS secretion and T6SS-mediated killing assay experiments involving PAAR mutants, B.T.H. and M.B. performed these experiments; B.T.H. performed the bioinformatics analysis of PAAR protein domain extensions. All authors participated in writing the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Extended data figures and tables
Extended Data Figure 1 Design of gp5–VgrG chimaeras and analysis of their interaction with selected PAAR proteins.
a, Identification of the blunt ends of selected VgrG β-helices. The last β-strand of the known T4 gp5 structure is shown in blue. Putative β-strands terminating VgrG β-helices are in plum colour. The glycine/serine-rich motif is bold highlighted. The residue number for the first amino acid of the shown fragment and that for the C-terminal amino acid of the protein are given. Abbreviations used EC, E. coli CTF073; VC, V. cholerae O1 biovar El Tor str. N16961. b, Binding of several PAAR proteins to gp5-based VgrG-like β-helices. Two complexes for which the crystal structures are reported in this paper are highlighted with green background. Entries showing gp5 modifications that did not result in PAAR binding have a grey background. c1882* contains three mutations T28K, T64K and T90K that were made to mimic T4 gp5.4. Note that VCA0105 and VCA0284 contain threonines and serines in these positions and they bind wild-type gp5.
Extended Data Figure 2 Surface features of gp5(VgrG)–PAAR complexes and VgrG–PAAR interface.
a, b, Molecular surfaces are coloured according to their hydrophobicity with sky blue, white, and orange corresponding to the most hydrophilic, neutral and hydrophobic patches, respectively. Residue hydrophobicity values are according to the Kyte-Doolittle scale33, which is given as a coloured bar labelled ‘KD hydropathy’. Three orientations of the gp5(VgrG)–PAAR complex and an ‘open book’ view of the VgrG–PAAR interface are shown for both PAAR proteins.
Extended Data Figure 3 Main chain hydrogen-bonding network of VgrG–PAAR interface.
The dashed line rectangle in the left panel indicates the area shown enlarged in the panels on the right. The three right panels show the main chain hydrogen bonds between VgrG and PAAR proteins for three different sides of the gp5(VgrG)–PAAR complex. Residues with side chains pointing inwards and forming the VgrG–PAAR hydrophobic interface are in bold italic. Side chains are not shown for clarity. The carbon atoms of the PAAR protein are colored orange.
Extended Data Figure 4 PAAR proteins contain a Zn atom.
a, X-ray fluorescence spectra of gp5(VC0018)–VCA0105 and gp5(c1883)–c1882 crystals and their cryoprotectant solutions. The excitation wavelength is 1.0 Å (∼12.4 keV). The energies and peak heights for the atomic Zn Kα and Kβ lines are taken from ref. 34. b, c, Anomalous difference Fourier maps (magenta mesh) of both crystal structures contain only one non-noise peak corresponding to the Zn atom. The VCA0105 and c1882 maps are contoured at 15.0 and 6.0 standard deviations above the mean, respectively. The corresponding noise level of the two maps is ∼5.1 and ∼4.5 standard deviations above the mean, respectively.
Extended Data Figure 5 Conserved features of PAAR proteins.
a, WebLogo35 sequence alignment of VCA0105 homologues identified with BLAST36. GenBank accession numbers of protein sequences that were used to prepare this WebLogo diagram in order of their appearance in the BLAST alignment file: 15600876, 227811731, 153212840, 417818856, 262403304, 258622274, 261212686, 260769543, 336125205, 417954065, 153801242, 424808850, 399908303, 15601050, 153817580, 254284956, 444380739, 307545498, 237731059, 197336227, 387815895, 59712519, 149377963, 120556511, 359395272, 338997855, 209695798, 338998698, 126665853, 440287404, 327412950, 145298557, 385332665, 87118978, 433087003, 433201317, 433072538, 432504178, 222155056, 262169027, 26247740, 145300690, 422833042, 432730965, 91210698, 432592619, 222156204, 432758040, 218704924, 26247745, 222156197, 417084314, 50121038, 444375671, 253990116, 423141622, 416895592, 423207453, 417628384, 331657463, 406676759, 251790158, 323491128, 421082032, 437829594, 120555573, 433076042, 145301291, 269102718, 261823483, 343512222, 343512225, 343515540, 343510421, 416895589, 145299403, 117619593, 385873501, 425070534, 343512226, 343510889, 422021929, 229523366, 262402814, 385870158, 411009627, 385869971, 258627229, 295418810, 37525853, 261819862, 307133118, 432995158, 422803770, 253987746, 253688569, 114319223, 268590359 and 261822686. The conserved PAAR motif and residues forming the Zn binding site are labelled. b, c, Pseudotrimeric organization of the three interacting PAAR motifs in VCA0105 and c1882, respectively. The buried hydrogen bonds stabilizing the fold are shown with dashed lines.
Extended Data Figure 6 Superposition of VCA0105 and c1882 PAAR structures.
Residue numbers are given at strategic positions.
Extended Data Figure 8 Complementation analysis of heterologous PAAR proteins.
a, SDS–PAGE assay for Hcp secretion of the V. cholerae 2740-80 2 × P− mutant described in Fig. 2 legend carrying a plasmid expressing endogenous or heterologous PAAR proteins. Plasmids pV105, pA0052, and pA2681 express PAAR genes vca0105 (Vibrio), aciad0052 (Acinetobacter) and aciad2681 (Acinetobacter), respectively, under the control of arabinose-inducible pBAD promoter30. N.P. stands for no plasmid. Cells were grown in the presence of 0.001%, 0.01% and 0.1% arabinose for 4 h. Both panels show a typical representative of three identical experiments. b, E. coli MG1655 killing by the V. cholerae 2740-80 2 × P− mutant that carries a plasmid expressing endogenous and heterologous PAAR proteins. The complementation efficiency is calculated as the log10 ratio of E. coli recovered after competition with the wild type strain of V. cholerae 2740-80 and its 2 × P− mutant supplemented with the indicated plasmid. The data represent the average of three experiments; error bars correspond to one standard deviation.
Extended Data Figure 9 Bioinformatic analysis of PAAR proteins.
a, Domain organization of all known bacterial (non-phage) PAAR proteins. b, Relative abundance of the seven distinct domain organizations. c, Predicted functions of the C-terminal domains. TTR stands for transthyretin domain.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
This file contains Supplementary Notes, which relate to Extended Data Figure 5. (PDF 115 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shneider, M., Buth, S., Ho, B. et al. PAAR-repeat proteins sharpen and diversify the type VI secretion system spike. Nature 500, 350–353 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12453
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12453
This article is cited by
-
High genetic diversity and different type VI secretion systems in Enterobacter species revealed by comparative genomics analysis
BMC Microbiology (2024)
-
Genome wide analysis revealed conserved domains involved in the effector discrimination of bacterial type VI secretion system
Communications Biology (2023)
-
A Fur-regulated type VI secretion system contributes to oxidative stress resistance and virulence in Yersinia pseudotuberculosis
Stress Biology (2023)
-
Bacterial type VI secretion system (T6SS): an evolved molecular weapon with diverse functionality
Biotechnology Letters (2023)
-
The P. aeruginosa effector Tse5 forms membrane pores disrupting the membrane potential of intoxicated bacteria
Communications Biology (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.