Measurement of a solid-state triple point at the metal–insulator transition in VO2

Abstract

First-order phase transitions in solids are notoriously challenging to study. The combination of change in unit cell shape, long range of elastic distortion and flow of latent heat leads to large energy barriers resulting in domain structure, hysteresis and cracking. The situation is worse near a triple point, where more than two phases are involved. The well-known metal–insulator transition in vanadium dioxide1, a popular candidate for ultrafast optical and electrical switching applications, is a case in point. Even though VO2 is one of the simplest strongly correlated materials, experimental difficulties posed by the first-order nature of the metal–insulator transition as well as the involvement of at least two competing insulating phases have led to persistent controversy about its nature1,2,3,4. Here we show that studying single-crystal VO2 nanobeams5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16 in a purpose-built nanomechanical strain apparatus allows investigation of this prototypical phase transition with unprecedented control and precision. Our results include the striking finding that the triple point of the metallic phase and two insulating phases is at the transition temperature, Ttr = Tc, which we determine to be 65.0 ± 0.1 °C. The findings have profound implications for the mechanism of the metal–insulator transition in VO2, but they also demonstrate the importance of this approach for mastering phase transitions in many other strongly correlated materials, such as manganites17 and iron-based superconductors18.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Control of the metal–insulator transition in VO2 using uniaxial stress.
Figure 2: Temperature and length dependence in coexistence.
Figure 3: Resistance–length measurements.
Figure 4: Phase diagram of VO2.

References

  1. 1

    Zylbersztejn, A. & Mott, N. F. Metal–insulator transition in vanadium dioxide. Phys. Rev. B 11, 4383–4395 (1975)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Rice, T. M., Launois, H. & Pouget, J. P. Comment on ‘VO2: Peierls or Mott–Hubbard? A view from band theory’. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3042 (1994)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Biermann, S., Poteryaev, A., Lichtenstein, A. I. & Georges, A. Dynamical singlets and correlation-assisted Peierls transition in VO2 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 026404 (2005)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Eyert, V. VO2: a novel view from band theory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 016401 (2011)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Wu, J. Q. et al. Strain-induced self organization of metal–insulator domains in single-crystalline VO2 nanobeams. Nano Lett. 6, 2313–2317 (2006)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Guo, H. et al. Mechanics and dynamics of the strain-induced M1–M2 structural phase transition in individual VO2 nanowires. Nano Lett. 11, 3207–3213 (2011)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Atkin, J. M. et al. Strain and temperature dependence of the insulating phases of VO2 near the metal–insulator transition. Phys. Rev. B 85, 020101(R) (2012)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Sohn, J. I. et al. Surface-stress-induced Mott transition and nature of associated spatial phase transition in single crystalline VO2 nanowires. Nano Lett. 9, 3392–3397 (2009)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Zhang, S. X., Chou, J. Y. & Lauhon, L. J. Direct correlation of structural domain formation with the metal insulator transition in a VO2 nanobeam. Nano Lett. 9, 4527–4532 (2009)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Tselev, A. et al. Symmetry relationship and strain-induced transitions between insulating M1 and M2 and metallic R phases of vanadium dioxide. Nano Lett. 10, 4409–4416 (2010)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Tselev, A. et al. Interplay between ferroelastic and metal–insulator phase transitions in strained quasi-two-dimensional VO2 nanoplatelets. Nano Lett. 10, 2003–2011 (2010)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Cao, J. et al. Constant threshold resistivity in the metal–insulator transition of VO2 . Phys. Rev. B 82, 241101(R) (2010)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Wei, J., Wang, Z. H., Chen, W. & Cobden, D. H. New aspects of the metal–insulator transition in single-domain vanadium dioxide nanobeams. Nature Nanotechnol. 4, 420–424 (2009)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Kasirga, T. S. et al. Photoresponse of a strongly correlated material determined by scanning photocurrent microscopy. Nature Nanotechnol. 7, 723–727 (2012)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Cao, J. et al. Strain engineering and one-dimensional organization of metal–insulator domains in single-crystal vanadium dioxide beams. Nature Nanotechnol. 4, 732–737 (2009)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Cao, J. et al. Extended mapping and exploration of the vanadium dioxide stress–temperature phase diagram. Nano Lett. 10, 2667–2673 (2010)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Podzorov, V., Kim, B. G., Kiryukhin, V., Gershenson, M. E. & Cheong, S. W. Martensitic accommodation strain and the metal–insulator transition in manganites. Phys. Rev. B 64, 140406(R) (2001)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Chu, J.-H., Kuo, H.-H., Analytis, J. G. & Fisher, I. R. Divergent nematic susceptibility in an iron arsenide superconductor. Science 337, 710–712 (2012)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Becker, M. F., Buckman, A. B. & Walser, R. M. Femtosecond laser excitation of the semiconductor–metal phase transition in VO2 . Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 1507–1509 (1994)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Hilton, D. J. et al. Enhanced photosusceptibility near Tc for the light-induced insulator-to-metal phase transition in vanadium dioxide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 226401 (2007)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Kubler, C. et al. Coherent structural dynamics and electronic correlations during an ultrafast insulator-to-metal phase transition in VO2 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 116401 (2007)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Qazilbash, M. M. et al. Mott transition in VO2 revealed by infrared spectroscopy and nano-imaging. Science 318, 1750–1753 (2007)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Jones, A. C., Berweger, S., Wei, J., Cobden, D. & Raschke, M. B. Nano-optical investigations of the metal–insulator phase behavior of individual VO2 microcrystals. Nano Lett. 10, 1574–1581 (2010)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Nakano, M. et al. Collective bulk carrier delocalization driven by electrostatic surface charge accumulation. Nature 487, 459–462 (2012)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Jeong, J. et al. Suppression of metal–insulator transition in VO2 by electric field–induced oxygen vacancy formation. Science 339, 1402–1405 (2013)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Wei, J., Ji, H., Guo, W. H., Nevidomskyy, A. H. & Natelson, D. Hydrogen stabilization of metallic vanadium dioxide in single-crystal nanobeams. Nature Nanotechnol. 7, 357–362 (2012)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Pouget, J. P., Launois, H., Dhaenens, J. P., Merenda, P. & Rice, T. M. Electron localization induced by uniaxial stress in pure VO2 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 873–875 (1975)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Marezio, M., McWhan, B., Dernier, P. D. & Remeika, J. P. Structural aspects of metal–insulator transitions in Cr-doped VO2 . Phys. Rev. B 5, 2541–2551 (1972)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Kucharczyk, D. & Niklewski, T. Accurate X-ray determination of the lattice parameters and the thermal expansion coefficients of VO2 near the transition temperature. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 12, 370–373 (1979)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Berglund, C. N. & Guggenheim, H. J. Electronic properties of VO2 near the semiconductor–metal transition. Phys. Rev. 185, 1022–1033 (1969)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank B. Spivak, A. Levanyuk and J. Wei for discussions. The silicon chips were patterned at the University of Washington Microfabrication Facility and the Nanofabrication Facility at the University of California, Santa Barbara. This work was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering, award DE-SC0002197.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors performed measurements and device fabrication. J.H.P. and J.M.C. designed and constructed the apparatus. D.H.C. conceived and directed the experiments. D.H.C. and J.H.P. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David H. Cobden.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Text and Data 1-5, Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Figure 1 and additional references. (PDF 345 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, J., Coy, J., Kasirga, T. et al. Measurement of a solid-state triple point at the metal–insulator transition in VO2. Nature 500, 431–434 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12425

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.