Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communications Arising
  • Published:

Zheng et al. reply

Subjects

Abstract

REPLYING TO G. Mayr & A. Manegold Nature 499, 10.1038/nature12367 (2013)

Our explanation that structures preserved in three Early Cretaceous Jehol birds1 are ovarian follicles is challenged by Mayr & Manegold2. We believe that their conclusions are speculative and do not take into account our original arguments. Contrary to Mayr & Manegold2, unambiguous evidence for the preservation of less resistant tissue, such as muscles or internal organs, are not scarce among Jehol fossils (for example, fish, lampreys)3 and eggs are sometimes preserved in specimens of the sturgeon Peipiaosteus (J.-Y. Zhang, personal communication). Although we cannot explain the vagaries of taphonomy that lead to the preservation of ovarian follicles in these specimens, what is clear is that exceptional preservation of soft tissue is dictated by the unique chemical microenvironment created by the individual decaying tissues, and thus varied degrees of preservation within a single specimen is expected4. Exceptional Jehol fossils are a reminder that simply because something is unlikely to preserve does not mean that it will not.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zheng, X. et al. Preservation of ovarian follicles reveals early evolution of avian reproductive behaviour. Nature 495, 507–511 (2013)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mayr, G. & Manegold, A. Can ovarian follicles fossilize? Nature 499, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12367 (2013)

  3. Zhou, Z. & Wang, Y. Vertebrate diversity of the Jehol Biota as compared with other lagerstätten. Sci. China Earth Sci. 53, 1894–1907 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Briggs, D. E. G., Wilby, P. R., Pérez-Moreno, B., Sanz, J. L. & Frenegal-Martinez, M. The mineralization of dinosaur soft tissue in the Lower Cretaceous of Las Hoyas, Spain. J. Geol. Soc. 154, 587–588 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Griffiths, P. J. in 1r Congrés Internacional sobre Ous i Cries de Dinosaures, Extended Abstracts (eds Bravo, A. M. & Reyes, T. ) 77–83 (Isona i Conca Dellà, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, P.-J., Dong, Z. & Zhen, S. An exceptionally well-preserved theropod dinosaur from the Yixian Formation of China. Nature 391, 147–152 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Weiner, S., Lowenstam, H. A. & Hood, L. Characterization of 80-million-year-old mollusk shell proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 73, 2541–2545 (1976)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Minnaar, P. & Minnaar, M. The Emu Farmer’s Handbook (Iduna Company, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gill, F. B. Ornithology 3rd edn (W.H. Freeman and Company, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zheng, X. et al. Fossil evidence of avian crops from the Early Cretaceous of China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 15904–15907 (2011)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Thorbjarnarson, J. B. Reproductive characteristics of the order Crocodylia. Herpetologica 52, 8–24 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chinsamy, A., Chiappe, L. M. & Dodson, P. Mesozoic avian bone microstructure: physiological implications. Paleobiology 21, 561–574 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dyke, G. D. & Kaiser, G. In Proceedings of the VII International Meeting of the Society of Avian Paleontology and Evolution Vol. 62 (eds Boles, W. E. & Worthy, T. H. ) 207–216 (Records of the Australian Museum, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.O., Z.Z. and X.Z. designed the research. J.O. and Z.Z. wrote the reply.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingmai O’Connor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Connor, J., Zheng, X. & Zhou, Z. Zheng et al. reply. Nature 499, E1–E2 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12368

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12368

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing