Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Rand et al. reply

Nature volume 498, pages E2–E3 (2013)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

replying to G. Tinghög et al. Nature498,http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12194(2013)

Tinghög et al.1 take issue with two of the ten experiments in our paper2 (studies 6 and 7). Here we reanalyse the data from these experiments as suggested by Tinghög et al.1, and demonstrate that our reported positive effect of time pressure on cooperation is not an artefact. Furthermore, an aggregate analysis based on fifteen studies and 6,910 decisions also replicates this effect3.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Tinghög, G. et al. Intuition and cooperation reconsidered. Nature 498, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12194 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D. & Nowak, M. A. Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature 489, 427–430 (2012)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rand, D. G. et al. Intuitive cooperation and the social heuristics hypothesis: evidence from 15 time constraint studies. Preprint at SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=2222683 (2013)

  4. Piovesan, M. & Wengström, E. Fast or fair? A study of response times. Econ. Lett. 105, 193–196 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Rand, D. G. The promise of Mechanical Turk: how online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments. J. Theor. Biol. 299, 172–179 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, Harvard University, Cambridge, 02138, Massachusetts, USA

    David G. Rand & Martin A. Nowak

  2. Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, 02138, Massachusetts, USA

    David G. Rand & Joshua D. Greene

  3. Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, 06520, Connecticut, USA

    David G. Rand

  4. Department of Mathematics, Harvard University, Cambridge, 02138, Massachusetts, USA

    Martin A. Nowak

  5. Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, 02138, Massachusetts, USA

    Martin A. Nowak

Authors
  1. David G. Rand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joshua D. Greene
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martin A. Nowak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.G.R., J.D.G. and M.A.N. performed the analysis and wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David G. Rand.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rand, D., Greene, J. & Nowak, M. Rand et al. reply. Nature 498, E2–E3 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12195

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12195

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing