Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Defect pair separation as the controlling step in homogeneous ice melting



On being heated, ice melts into liquid water. Although in practice this process tends to be heterogeneous, it can occur homogeneously inside bulk ice1. The thermally induced homogeneous melting of solids is fairly well understood, and involves the formation and growth of melting nuclei1,2,3,4,5. But in the case of water, resilient hydrogen bonds render ice melting more complex. We know that the first defects appearing during homogeneous ice melting are pairs of five- and seven-membered rings, which appear and disappear repeatedly and randomly in space and time in the crystalline ice structure6,7,8. However, the accumulation of these defects to form an aggregate is nearly additive in energy, and results in a steep free energy increase that suppresses further growth. Here we report molecular dynamics simulations of homogeneous ice melting that identify as a crucial first step not the formation but rather the spatial separation of a defect pair. We find that once it is separated, the defect pair—either an interstitial (I) and a vacancy (V) defect pair (a Frenkel pair), or an L and a D defect pair (a Bjerrum pair)9—is entropically stabilized, or ‘entangled’. In this state, defects with threefold hydrogen-bond coordination persist and grow, and thereby prepare the system for subsequent rapid melting.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Potential energy per molecule and number of off-lattice molecules in a melting trajectory.
Figure 2: Snapshots of hydrogen-bond structures and the time evolution of excess edit distance, dTex.
Figure 3: Free energies.
Figure 4: Potential energy surfaces during defect growth.

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Iglev, H., Schmeisser, M., Simeonidis, K., Thaller, A. & Laubereau, A. Ultrafast superheating and melting of bulk ice. Nature 439, 183–186 (2006)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fecht, H. J. Defect-induced melting and solid-state amorphization. Nature 356, 133–135 (1992)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cahn, R. W. Materials science: Melting from within. Nature 413, 582–583 (2001)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Forsblom, M. & Grimvall, G. How superheated crystals melt. Nature Mater. 4, 388–390 (2005)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jin, Z. H., Gumbsch, P., Lu, K. & Ma, E. Melting mechanisms at the limit of superheating. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 055703 (2001)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanaka, H. & Mohanty, J. On the Debye-Waller factor of hexagonal ice: a computer simulation study. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 8085–8089 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Grishina, N. & Buch, V. Structure and dynamics of orientational defects in ice I. J. Chem. Phys. 120, 5217–5225 (2004)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Donadio, D., Raiteri, P. & Parrinello, M. Topological defects and bulk melting of hexagonal ice. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 5421–5424 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bjerrum, N. Structure and properties of ice. Science 115, 385–390 (1952)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. McBride, C., Vega, C., Sanz, E., MacDowell, L. G. & Abascal, J. L. F. The range of meta stability of ice-water melting for two simple models of water. Mol. Phys. 103, 1–5 (2005)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bernal, J. D. & Fowler, R. H. A theory of water and ionic solution, with particular reference to hydrogen and hydroxyl ions. J. Chem. Phys. 1, 515–548 (1933)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Petrenko, V. F. & Whitworth, R. W. Physics of Ice (Oxford Univ. Press, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Abraham, F. F. Homogeneous Nucleation Theory: The Pretransition Theory of Vapor Condensation (Academic, 1974)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wales, D. Energy Landscapes: Applications to Clusters, Biomolecules and Glasses (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Henkelman, G., Uberuaga, B. P. & Jonsson, H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9901–9904 (2000)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsumoto, M., Baba, A. & Ohmine, I. Topological building blocks of hydrogen bond network in water. J. Chem. Phys. 127, 134504 (2007)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsumoto, M., Saito, S. & Ohmine, I. Molecular dynamics simulation of the ice nucleation and growth process leading to water freezing. Nature 416, 409–413 (2002)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jacobson, L. C., Hujo, W. & Molinero, V. Amorphous precursors in the nucleation of clathrate hydrates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 11806–11811 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Walsh, M. R., Koh, C. A., Sloan, E. D., Sum, A. K. & Wu, D. T. Microsecond simulations of spontaneous methane hydrate nucleation and growth. Science 326, 1095–1098 (2009)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Moore, E. B. & Molinero, V. Structural transformation in supercooled water controls the crystallization rate of ice. Nature 479, 506–508 (2011)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W. & Klein, M. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926–935 (1983)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jorgensen, W. L. & Madura, J. D. Temperature and size dependence for Monte-Carlo simulations of TIP4P water. Mol. Phys. 56, 1381–1392 (1985)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vega, C., Sanz, E. & Abascal, J. L. F. The melting temperature of the most common models of water. J. Chem. Phys. 122, 114507 (2005)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jacobson, L. C., Hujo, W. & Molinero, V. Thermodynamic stability and growth of guest-free clathrate hydrates: a low-density crystal phase of water. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 10298–10307 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nose, S. Constant-temperature molecular dynamics. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2, SA115–SA119 (1990)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Frenkel, D. & Smit, B. Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications (Academic, 2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank D. J. Wales, N. Kosugi, H. Tanaka and S. Saito for their support and advice, and T. Yagasaki for performing the free-energy calculation to determine the melting temperature. Some of the calculations were carried out at the Research Center for Computational Science of NINS, Okazaki, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



K.M. performed the simulations and carried out data analysis. M.M. developed the methods and carried out data analysis. All authors designed the study, discussed the results and contributed to writing the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenji Mochizuki.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-9, Supplementary Methods, a Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary Table 1 and additional references. (PDF 4200 kb)

Local density of ice melting

This video shows the successive transformation of Voronoi polyhedron along the trajectory of Figure 1.Voronoi tessellation is applied to show the volume occupied by each water molecule. The Voronoi polyhedra that have more than 5% larger (5% smaller) volume than the average volume are gradated in blue (red). Polyhedra with thickest colors have more than 10% higher or lower local volume than the average. At around 2150ps when many off-lattice molecules are accumulated in a locus (form a cluster), inside of which the density fluctuation is observed. Then, at 2210 ps, this cluster is separated into the high-density region (I-defect region, red) and the low-density region (V-defect region, blue). (MP4 25798 kb)

Local structure of ice melting

This video shows the local HB structure change along the trajectory of Figure 1. Fragments are used to show the local HB structures; eight typical interfacial fragments of (a)~(h) in Supplementary Figure 5 are colored with from red to green, respectively. The other types of fragments in the interfacial region are colored in gray. White thin lines are for HBs belonging to the ice fragment, and blue lines are for other HBs. One can see that there are 4 stages in this trajectory; 0-2150 ps, 2150-2730 ps, 2730-3050 ps, and 3050 ps-. See the legend of Supplementary Figure 5 for the detail of each stage. (MP4 27772 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mochizuki, K., Matsumoto, M. & Ohmine, I. Defect pair separation as the controlling step in homogeneous ice melting. Nature 498, 350–354 (2013).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing