Article | Published:

Intestinal label-retaining cells are secretory precursors expressing Lgr5

Nature volume 495, pages 6569 (07 March 2013) | Download Citation

Abstract

The rapid cell turnover of the intestinal epithelium is achieved from small numbers of stem cells located in the base of glandular crypts. These stem cells have been variously described as rapidly cycling or quiescent. A functional arrangement of stem cells that reconciles both of these behaviours has so far been difficult to obtain. Alternative explanations for quiescent cells have been that they act as a parallel or reserve population that replace rapidly cycling stem cells periodically or after injury; their exact nature remains unknown. Here we show mouse intestinal quiescent cells to be precursors that are committed to mature into differentiated secretory cells of the Paneth and enteroendocrine lineage. However, crucially we find that after intestinal injury they are capable of extensive proliferation and can give rise to clones comprising the main epithelial cell types. Thus, quiescent cells can be recalled to the stem-cell state. These findings establish quiescent cells as an effective clonogenic reserve and provide a motivation for investigating their role in pathologies such as colorectal cancers and intestinal inflammation.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Accessions

Primary accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

Data deposits

Data were deposited to the GEO database under accession number GSE43772.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature 449, 1003–1007 (2007)

  2. 2.

    et al. Paneth cells in intestinal homeostasis and tissue injury. PLoS ONE 7, e38965 (2012)

  3. 3.

    et al. The Pan-ErbB negative regulator Lrig1 is an intestinal stem cell marker that functions as a tumor suppressor. Cell 149, 146–158 (2012)

  4. 4.

    & Bmi1 is expressed in vivo in intestinal stem cells. Nature Genet. 40, 915–920 (2008)

  5. 5.

    et al. Mouse telomerase reverse transcriptase (mTert) expression marks slowly cycling intestinal stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 179–184 (2011)

  6. 6.

    et al. Interconversion between intestinal stem cell populations in distinct niches. Science 334, 1420–1424 (2011)

  7. 7.

    et al. Lrig1 controls intestinal stem-cell homeostasis by negative regulation of ErbB signalling. Nature Cell Biol. 14, 401–408 (2012)

  8. 8.

    , , & Intestinal stem cell replacement follows a pattern of neutral drift. Science 330, 822–825 (2010)

  9. 9.

    et al. Intestinal crypt homeostasis results from neutral competition between symmetrically dividing Lgr5 stem cells. Cell 143, 134–144 (2010)

  10. 10.

    & Coexistence of quiescent and active adult stem cells in mammals. Science 327, 542–545 (2010)

  11. 11.

    et al. A reserve stem cell population in small intestine renders Lgr5-positive cells dispensable. Nature 478, 255–259 (2011)

  12. 12.

    , , & The segregation of DNA in epithelial stem cells. Cell 15, 899–906 (1978)

  13. 13.

    , & Intestinal stem cells protect their genome by selective segregation of template DNA strands. J. Cell Sci. 115, 2381–2388 (2002)

  14. 14.

    et al. Wip1 phosphatase regulates p53-dependent apoptosis of stem cells and tumorigenesis in the mouse intestine. Cell Stem Cell 1, 180–190 (2007)

  15. 15.

    et al. BMP signaling inhibits intestinal stem cell self-renewal through suppression of Wnt-β-catenin signaling. Nature Genet. 36, 1117–1121 (2004)

  16. 16.

    et al. PTEN-deficient intestinal stem cells initiate intestinal polyposis. Nature Genet. 39, 189–198 (2007)

  17. 17.

    et al. The Lgr5 intestinal stem cell signature: robust expression of proposed quiescent '+4' cell markers. EMBO J. 31, 3079–3091 (2012)

  18. 18.

    , , & Cellular inheritance of a Cre-activated reporter gene to determine Paneth cell longevity in the murine small intestine. Dev. Dyn. 233, 1332–1336 (2005)

  19. 19.

    et al. Analysis of histone 2B-GFP retention reveals slowly cycling hematopoietic stem cells. Nature Biotechnol. 27, 84–90 (2009)

  20. 20.

    et al. Paneth cells constitute the niche for Lgr5 stem cells in intestinal crypts. Nature 469, 415–418 (2011)

  21. 21.

    & Origin, differentiation and renewal of the four main epithelial cell types in the mouse small intestine. V. Unitarian Theory of the origin of the four epithelial cell types. Am. J. Anat. 141, 537–561 (1974)

  22. 22.

    et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature 459, 262–265 (2009)

  23. 23.

    , , & Regulation of Cre recombinase by ligand-induced complementation of inactive fragments. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, e131 (2003)

  24. 24.

    et al. Dll1+ secretory progenitor cells revert to stem cells upon crypt damage. Nature Cell Biol. 14, 1099–1104 (2012)

  25. 25.

    et al. Severe polyposis in Apc(1322T) mice is associated with submaximal Wnt signalling and increased expression of the stem cell marker Lgr5. Gut 59, 1680–1686 (2010)

  26. 26.

    et al. Regulation of the CYP1A1 promoter in transgenic mice: an exquisitely sensitive on-off system for cell specific gene regulation. J. Cell Sci. 109, 2619–2625 (1996)

  27. 27.

    , & A highly efficient ligand-regulated Cre recombinase mouse line shows that LoxP recombination is position dependent. EMBO Rep. 2, 292–297 (2001)

  28. 28.

    et al. Characterization of a heat resistant β-glucosidase as a new reporter in cells and mice. BMC Biol. 8, 89 (2010)

  29. 29.

    , & Sox9 expression marks a subset of CD24-expressing small intestine epithelial stem cells that form organoids in vitro. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 298, G590–G600 (2010)

  30. 30.

    & Stem cells: attributes, cycles, spirals, pitfalls and uncertainties. Lessons for and from the crypt. Development 110, 1001–1020 (1990)

  31. 31.

    & Methods for the isolation of intact epithelium from the mouse intestine. Anat. Rec. 199, 565–574 (1981)

  32. 32.

    et al. Summaries of Affymetrix GeneChip probe level data. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, e15 (2003)

  33. 33.

    , , & NCBI Reference Sequences: current status, policy and new initiatives. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D32–D36 (2009)

  34. 34.

    Exon array data analysis using Affymetrix power tools and R statistical software. Brief. Bioinform. 12, 634–644 (2011)

  35. 35.

    R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (2009)

  36. 36.

    et al. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. 5, R80 (2004)

  37. 37.

    in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions using R and Bioconductor Solutions using R and Bioconductor (eds Carey, V., Gentleman, R., Dudoit, S., Huber, W. & Izzarry, R.) 397–420 (Springer, 2005)

  38. 38.

    & Single-cell expression profiling of human epidermal stem and transit-amplifying cells: Lrig1 is a regulator of stem cell quiescence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 11958–11963 (2006)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Cancer Research UK (S.J.A.B., H.I.Z., A.M.N., R.R., R.K. and D.J.W.). L.V. was supported by a KWF fellowship. We thank D. Tan for providing the single-cell RNA amplification protocol. We also thank M. de la Roche, R. von Furstenberg and S. Henning for advice with the in vitro culture work. We acknowledge the following core facilities at CRUK/CRI: The Transgenic Laboratory, Biological Resource Unit, Flow Cytometry, Histopathology, Microscopy, Genomics and Bioinformatics and the CRUK Paterson Institute Microarray Facility. We thank R. J. Davies, A. Klein and A. Ibrahim for manuscript discussions.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Cancer Research UK Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK

    • Simon J. A. Buczacki
    • , Heather Ireland Zecchini
    • , Anna M. Nicholson
    • , Roslin Russell
    • , Louis Vermeulen
    • , Richard Kemp
    •  & Douglas J. Winton

Authors

  1. Search for Simon J. A. Buczacki in:

  2. Search for Heather Ireland Zecchini in:

  3. Search for Anna M. Nicholson in:

  4. Search for Roslin Russell in:

  5. Search for Louis Vermeulen in:

  6. Search for Richard Kemp in:

  7. Search for Douglas J. Winton in:

Contributions

S.J.A.B. designed and performed experiments and wrote the paper. H.I.Z. designed and developed the H2B–YFP model and performed experiments. R.R. performed the bioinformatic analysis. A.M.N. and L.V. performed experiments. R.K. designed experiments and performed bioinformatic analysis. D.J.W. designed experiments, developed the diCreAB model and wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas J. Winton.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-6.

Videos

  1. 1.

    H2B-YFP Paneth cells are non-responsive to βNF induction

    Confocal reconstruction video of an isolated crypt immediately following βNF treatment, showing all cells other than Paneth cells express YFP. Yellow=YFP. Red=UEA.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11965

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.