Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Multiple phases of chondrocyte enlargement underlie differences in skeletal proportions

Abstract

The wide diversity of skeletal proportions in mammals is evident upon a survey of any natural history museum's collections and allows us to distinguish between species even when reduced to their calcified components. Similarly, each individual is comprised of a variety of bones of differing lengths. The largest contribution to the lengthening of a skeletal element, and to the differential elongation of elements, comes from a dramatic increase in the volume of hypertrophic chondrocytes in the growth plate as they undergo terminal differentiation1,2,3,4,5,6,7. However, the mechanisms of chondrocyte volume enlargement have remained a mystery8,9,10,11. Here we use quantitative phase microscopy12 to show that mammalian chondrocytes undergo three distinct phases of volume increase, including a phase of massive cell swelling in which the cellular dry mass is significantly diluted. In light of the tight fluid regulatory mechanisms known to control volume in many cell types13, this is a remarkable mechanism for increasing cell size and regulating growth rate. It is, however, the duration of the final phase of volume enlargement by proportional dry mass increase at low density that varies most between rapidly and slowly elongating growth plates. Moreover, we find that this third phase is locally regulated through a mechanism dependent on insulin-like growth factor. This study provides a framework for understanding how skeletal size is regulated and for exploring how cells sense, modify and establish a volume set point.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Hypertrophic chondrocytes increase in volume through three distinct phases including a phase of massive cell swelling.
Figure 2: Differences in cell size associated with different skeletal growth rates are attributed to modulating a common growth trajectory.
Figure 3: Igf1 is required for phase 3 of volume enlargement by dry mass production at low dry mass density.
Figure 4: Mouse proximal tibia and distal metatarsal hypertrophic chondrocytes rapidly increase in average cell height.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilsman, N. J., Farnum, C. E., Leiferman, E. M., Fry, M. & Barreto, C. Differential growth by growth plates as a function of multiple parameters of chondrocytic kinetics. J. Orthop. Res. 14, 927–936 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hunziker, E. B., Schenk, R. K. & Cruz-Orive, L. M. Quantitation of chondrocyte performance in growth-plate cartilage during longitudinal bone growth. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 69, 162–173 (1987)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hunziker, E. B. & Schenk, R. K. Physiological mechanisms adopted by chondrocytes in regulating longitudinal bone growth in rats. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 414, 55–71 (1989)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Breur, G. J., VanEnkevort, B. A., Farnum, C. E. & Wilsman, N. J. Linear relationship between the volume of hypertrophic chondrocytes and the rate of longitudinal bone growth in growth plates. J. Orthop. Res. 9, 348–359 (1991)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuhn, J. L., Delacey, J. H. & Leenellett, E. E. Relationship between bone growth rate and hypertrophic chondrocyte volume in New Zealand white rabbits of varying ages. J. Orthop. Res. 14, 706–711 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilsman, N. J., Bernardini, E. S., Leiferman, E., Noonan, K. & Farnum, C. E. Age and pattern of the onset of differential growth among growth plates in rats. J. Orthop. Res. 26, 1457–1465 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Farnum, C. E., Tinsley, M. & Hermanson, J. W. Forelimb versus hindlimb skeletal development in the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus: functional divergence is reflected in chondrocytic performance in autopodial growth plates. Cells Tissues Organs 187, 35–47 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Buckwalter, J. A., Mower, D., Ungar, R., Schaeffer, J. & Ginsberg, B. Morphometric analysis of chondrocyte hypertrophy. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 68, 243–255 (1986)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Farnum, C. E., Lee, R., O’Hara, K. & Urban, J. P. G. Volume increase in growth plate chondrocytes during hypertrophy: the contribution of organic osmolytes. Bone 30, 574–581 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bush, P. G., Parisinos, C. A. & Hall, A. C. The osmotic sensitivity of rat growth plate chondrocytes in situ; clarifying the mechanisms of hypertrophy. J. Cell. Physiol. 214, 621–629 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bush, P. G., Pritchard, M., Loqman, M. Y., Damron, T. A. & Hall, A. C. A key role for membrane transporter NKCC1 in mediating chondrocyte volume increase in the mammalian growth plate. J. Bone Miner. Res. 25, 1594–1603 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Barer, R. Interference microscopy and mass determination. Nature 169, 366–367 (1952)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hoffmann, E. K., Lambert, I. H. & Pedersen, S. F. Physiology of cell volume regulation in vertebrates. Physiol. Rev. 89, 193–277 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hunziker, E. B. Mechanism of longitudinal bone growth and its regulation by growth plate chondrocytes. Microsc. Res. Tech. 28, 505–519 (1994)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kronenberg, H. M. Developmental regulation of the growth plate. Nature 423, 332–336 (2003)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Popescu, G., Ikeda, T., Dasari, R. R. & Feld, M. S. Diffraction phase microscopy for quantifying cell structure and dynamics. Opt. Lett. 31, 775–777 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Barer, R. Determination of dry mass, thickness, solid and water concentration in Living Cells. Nature 172, 1097–1098 (1953)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cooper, K. L. The lesser Egyptian jerboa, Jaculus jaculus: a unique rodent model for evolution and development. Cold Spring Harb. Protocols 2011, pdb.emo066704 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, J., Zhou, J. & Bondy, C. A. Igf1 promotes longitudinal bone growth by insulin-like actions augmenting chondrocyte hypertrophy. FASEB J. 13, 1985–1990 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Oldham, S. & Hafen, E. Insulin/IGF and target of rapamycin signaling: a TOR de force in growth control. Trends Cell Biol. 13, 79–85 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yakar, S. Normal growth and development in the absence of hepatic insulin-like growth factor I. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 7324–7329 (1999)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lowe, L. A., Yamada, S. & Kuehn, M. R. HoxB6-Cre transgenic mice express Cre recombinase in extra-embryonic mesoderm, in lateral plate and limb mesoderm and at the midbrain/hindbrain junction. Genesis 26, 118–120 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Serrat, M. A., Lovejoy, C. O. & King, D. Age- and site-specific decline in insulin-like growth factor-I receptor expression is correlated with differential growth plate activity in the mouse hindlimb. Anat. Rec. (Hoboken) 290, 375–381 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jordan, B., Vercammen, P. & Cooper, K. L. Husbandry and breeding of the lesser Egyptian jerboa, Jaculus jaculus. Cold Spring Harb Protocols 2011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot066712 (2011)

  25. Maroudas, A. & Evans, H. A study of ionic equilibria in cartilage. Connect. Tissue Res. 1, 69–77 (1972)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Urban, J. P. G., Hall, A. C. & Gehl, K. A. Regulation of matrix synthesis rates by the ionic and osmotic environment of articular chondrocytes. J. Cell. Physiol. 154, 262–270 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Errington, R. J., Fricker, M. D., Wood, J. L., Hall, A. C. & White, N. S. Four-dimensional imaging of living chondrocytes in cartilage using confocal microscopy: a pragmatic approach. Am. J. Physiol. 272, C1040–C1051 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lecine, P., Blank, V. & Shivdasani, R. Characterization of the hematopoietic transcription factor NF-E2 in primary murine megakaryocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 7572–7578 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Shivdasani, R. A. & Schulze, H. Culture, expansion, and differentiation of murine megakaryocytes. Current Protocols Immunol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0471142735.im22f06s67 (2005)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank T. J. Mitchison, C. E. Farnum and members of the Developmental Bone Morphogenesis program project grant (National Institutes of Health (NIH)) for helpful discussions. We also thank the Nikon Imaging Center at Harvard Medical School for technical support, A. Luyten and R. Shivdasani for providing mouse megakaryocytes and P. Ramirez for jerboa care. This work was supported by NIH grants P01DK056246 to C.J.T.; R01GM026875 to M.W.K.; and by NIH grant P41RR02594, National Science Foundation (NSF) grant DBI0754339 and support from the Hamamatsu Corporation to R.R.D.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.L.C. and S.O. conceived the project and carried out most of the experiments. Y.S. and R.R.D. carried out critical tomographic experiments validating the primary approaches taken. C.J.T. and M.W.K. supervised the project. K.L.C., S.O., M.W.K. and C.J.T. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimberly L. Cooper.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-14, Supplementary Methods, and Data , Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary References. (PDF 3883 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cooper, K., Oh, S., Sung, Y. et al. Multiple phases of chondrocyte enlargement underlie differences in skeletal proportions. Nature 495, 375–378 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11940

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11940

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing