Letter | Published:

Porous materials with optimal adsorption thermodynamics and kinetics for CO2 separation

Nature volume 495, pages 8084 (07 March 2013) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

The energy costs associated with the separation and purification of industrial commodities, such as gases, fine chemicals and fresh water, currently represent around 15 per cent of global energy production, and the demand for such commodities is projected to triple by 2050 (ref. 1). The challenge of developing effective separation and purification technologies that have much smaller energy footprints is greater for carbon dioxide (CO2) than for other gases; in addition to its involvement in climate change, CO2 is an impurity in natural gas, biogas (natural gas produced from biomass), syngas (CO/H2, the main source of hydrogen in refineries) and many other gas streams. In the context of porous crystalline materials that can exploit both equilibrium and kinetic selectivity, size selectivity and targeted molecular recognition are attractive characteristics for CO2 separation and capture, as exemplified by zeolites 5A and 13X (ref. 2), as well as metal–organic materials (MOMs)3,4,5,6,7,8,9. Here we report that a crystal engineering7 or reticular chemistry5,9 strategy that controls pore functionality and size in a series of MOMs with coordinately saturated metal centres and periodically arrayed hexafluorosilicate (SiF62−) anions enables a ‘sweet spot’ of kinetics and thermodynamics that offers high volumetric uptake at low CO2 partial pressure (less than 0.15 bar). Most importantly, such MOMs offer an unprecedented CO2 sorption selectivity over N2, H2 and CH4, even in the presence of moisture. These MOMs are therefore relevant to CO2 separation in the context of post-combustion (flue gas, CO2/N2), pre-combustion (shifted synthesis gas stream, CO2/H2) and natural gas upgrading (natural gas clean-up, CO2/CH4).

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Taylor, P. Energy Technology Perspectives 2010 — Scenarios and Strategies to 2050 74 (International Energy Agency, Paris, 2010)

  2. 2.

    , & Experimental investigation on CO2 post-combustion capture by indirect thermal swing adsorption using 13X and 5A zeolites. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47, 209–215 (2008)

  3. 3.

    Metal-Organic Frameworks: Design and Application (Wiley & Sons, 2010)

  4. 4.

    , , & Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal-organic framework. Nature 402, 276–279 (1999)

  5. 5.

    et al. Systematic design of pore size and functionality in isoreticular MOFs and their application in methane storage. Science 295, 469–472 (2002)

  6. 6.

    et al. Metal–organic framework materials with ultrahigh surface areas: is the sky the limit? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 15016–15021 (2012)

  7. 7.

    & From molecules to crystal engineering: supramolecular isomerism and polymorphism in network solids. Chem. Rev. 101, 1629–1658 (2001)

  8. 8.

    , & Functional porous coordination polymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn 43, 2334–2375 (2004)

  9. 9.

    et al. Reticular synthesis and the design of new materials. Nature 423, 705–714 (2003)

  10. 10.

    , & Dramatic tuning of carbon dioxide uptake via metal substitution in a coordination polymer with cylindrical pores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 10870–10871 (2008)

  11. 11.

    et al. Carbon dioxide capture in metal–organic frameworks. Chem. Rev. 112, 724–781 (2012)

  12. 12.

    , & Effect of humidity on the performance of microporous coordination polymers as adsorbents for CO2 capture. Langmuir 27, 6368–6373 (2011)

  13. 13.

    & Porous solids by design — [Zn(4,4'-bpy)2(SiF6)n]-xDMF, a single framework octahedral coordination polymer with large square channels. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn 34, 2127–2129 (1995)

  14. 14.

    , , & A new methane adsorbent, porous coordination polymer [CuSiF6(4,4′-bipyridine)2]n. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn 39, 2081–2084 (2000)

  15. 15.

    et al. Highly selective carbon dioxide uptake by [Cu(bpy-n)2(SiF6)] (bpy-1 = 4,4′-bipyridine; bpy-2 = 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethene). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 3663–3666 (2012)

  16. 16.

    et al. Syntheses, spectroscopic and molecular quadratic nonlinear optical properties of dipolar ruthenium(II) complexes of the ligand 1,2-phenylenebis(dimethylarsine). Dalton Trans. (18), 2935–2942 (2004)

  17. 17.

    , , , & Syntheses, crystal structures and adsorption properties of ultramicroporous coordination polymers constructed from hexafluorosilicate ions and pyrazine. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. (16), 2329–2337 (2009)

  18. 18.

    & Comparison of DFT characterization methods based on N2, Ar, CO2, and H2 adsorption applied to carbons with various pore size distributions. Carbon 42, 1227–1232 (2004)

  19. 19.

    et al. Framework-catenation isomerism in metal−organic frameworks and its impact on hydrogen uptake. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 1858–1859 (2007)

  20. 20.

    et al. High uptakes of CO2 and CH4 in mesoporous metal-organic frameworks MIL-100 and MIL-101. Langmuir 24, 7245–7250 (2008)

  21. 21.

    et al. A microporous copper metal–organic framework with high H2 and CO2 adsorption capacity at ambient pressure. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn 123, 10528–10532 (2011)

  22. 22.

    et al. Enhanced CO2 adsorption in metal-organic frameworks via occupation of open-metal sites by coordinated water molecules. Chem. Mater. 21, 1425–1430 (2009)

  23. 23.

    & Thermodynamics of mixed-gas adsorption. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 11, 121–127 (1965)

  24. 24.

    , & Reducing the cost of CO2 capture from flue gases using pressure swing adsorption. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47, 4883–4890 (2008)

  25. 25.

    et al. Microporous metal-organic framework with potential for carbon dioxide capture at ambient conditions. Nature Commun. 3, 954 (2012)

  26. 26.

    , & Adsorption equilibrium of methane, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen on zeolite 13X at high pressures. J. Chem. Eng. Data 49, 1095–1101 (2004)

  27. 27.

    et al. Direct observation and quantification of CO2 binding within an amine-functionalized nanoporous solid. Science 330, 650–653 (2010)

  28. 28.

    , & Adsorption of CO2-containing gas mixtures over amine-bearing pore-expanded MCM-41 silica: application for gas purification. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49, 359–365 (2010)

  29. 29.

    , , , & Metal-organic frameworks as adsorbents for hydrogen purification and precombustion carbon dioxide capture. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 5664–5667 (2011)

  30. 30.

    et al. High-throughput screening of metal–organic frameworks for CO2 separation. ACS Combinat. Sci. 14, 263–267 (2012)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This publication is based on work supported by KAUST award number FIC/2010/06 (M.E. and M.J.Z.) and KAUST start up funds (M.E.). B.S. acknowledges computational resources made available by an XSEDE grant (number TG-DMR090028). Single-crystal diffraction experiments on SIFSIX-2-Cu-i were conducted at the Advanced Photon Source on beamline 15ID-B of ChemMatCARS Sector 15, which is principally supported by the National Science Foundation/Department of Energy under grant number NSF/CHE-0822838. Use of the Advanced Photon Source was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under contract number DE-AC02-06CH11357.

Author information

Author notes

    • Patrick Nugent
    •  & Youssef Belmabkhout

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa, Florida 33620, USA

    • Patrick Nugent
    • , Stephen D. Burd
    • , Katherine Forrest
    • , Tony Pham
    • , Shengqian Ma
    • , Brian Space
    • , Lukasz Wojtas
    • , Mohamed Eddaoudi
    •  & Michael J. Zaworotko
  2. Advanced Membranes and Porous Materials Center, Division of Physical Sciences and Engineering, 4700 King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia

    • Youssef Belmabkhout
    • , Amy J. Cairns
    • , Ryan Luebke
    •  & Mohamed Eddaoudi

Authors

  1. Search for Patrick Nugent in:

  2. Search for Youssef Belmabkhout in:

  3. Search for Stephen D. Burd in:

  4. Search for Amy J. Cairns in:

  5. Search for Ryan Luebke in:

  6. Search for Katherine Forrest in:

  7. Search for Tony Pham in:

  8. Search for Shengqian Ma in:

  9. Search for Brian Space in:

  10. Search for Lukasz Wojtas in:

  11. Search for Mohamed Eddaoudi in:

  12. Search for Michael J. Zaworotko in:

Contributions

P.N., S.D.B. and M.J.Z. contributed to the conceptual approach to designing the materials synthetic experiments; P.N. and S.D.B. carried out the materials synthesis ; L.W. and R.L. conducted and interpreted the crystallographic experiments; P.N., S.D.B., Y.B., S.M., M.E. and A.J.C. conducted and interpreted low-pressure sorption experiments; Y.B. and M.E. contributed to the initial ideas, conceptualizing, designing, conducting (Y.B.) and interpreting sorption experiments for gas separation of various industrially relevant gas mixtures (high-pressure single and mixed gas sorption experiments, sorption kinetics and breakthrough experiments) and IAST calculations; K.F., T.P. and B.S. conducted electrostatic models of gas sorption; and M.E. and M.J.Z. wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mohamed Eddaoudi or Michael J. Zaworotko.

Supplementary crystallographicdata for this manuscript has been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre under deposition numbers CCDC 914600 and 914601. These data can be obtained free of charge from http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Text and Data, Supplementary Schemes 1-3, Supplementary Tables 1-4, Supplementary Figures 1-28 and Supplementary References.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11893

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.