Letter | Published:

Diversity loss with persistent human disturbance increases vulnerability to ecosystem collapse

Nature volume 494, pages 8689 (07 February 2013) | Download Citation



Long-term and persistent human disturbances have simultaneously altered the stability and diversity of ecological systems, with disturbances directly reducing functional attributes such as invasion resistance, while eliminating the buffering effects of high species diversity1,2,3,4. Theory predicts that this combination of environmental change and diversity loss increases the risk of abrupt and potentially irreversible ecosystem collapse1,2,3,5,6,7, but long-term empirical evidence from natural systems is lacking. Here we demonstrate this relationship in a degraded but species-rich pyrogenic grassland in which the combined effects of fire suppression, invasion and trophic collapse have created a species-poor grassland that is highly productive, resilient to yearly climatic fluctuations, and resistant to invasion, but vulnerable to rapid collapse after the re-introduction of fire. We initially show how human disturbance has created a negative relationship between diversity and function, contrary to theoretical predictions3,4. Fire prevention since the mid-nineteenth century is associated with the loss of plant species but it has stabilized high-yield annual production and invasion resistance, comparable to a managed high-yield low-diversity agricultural system. In managing for fire suppression, however, a hidden vulnerability to sudden environmental change emerges that is explained by the elimination of the buffering effects of high species diversity. With the re-introduction of fire, grasslands only persist in areas with remnant concentrations of native species, in which a range of rare and mostly functionally redundant plants proliferate after burning and prevent extensive invasion including a rapid conversion towards woodland. This research shows how biodiversity can be crucial for ecosystem stability despite appearing functionally insignificant beforehand, a relationship probably applicable to many ecosystems given the globally prevalent combination of intensive long-term land management and species loss.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    & Stability and diversity of ecosystems. Science 317, 58–62 (2007)

  2. 2.

    et al. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature 486, 105–108 (2012)

  3. 3.

    From Populations to Ecosystems: Theoretical Foundations for a New Ecological Synthesis (Princeton, 2010)

  4. 4.

    The diversity–stability debate. Nature 405, 228–233 (2000)

  5. 5.

    et al. Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere. Nature 486, 52–58 (2012)

  6. 6.

    et al. Spatial vegetation patterns and imminent desertification in Mediterranean arid ecosystems. Nature 449, 213–217 (2007)

  7. 7.

    , , & Self-organized patchiness and catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Science 305, 1926–1929 (2004)

  8. 8.

    Diversity favors productivity. Nature 472, 45–46 (2011)

  9. 9.

    et al. Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293, 629–637 (2001)

  10. 10.

    Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems (Princeton Univ. Press, 1973)

  11. 11.

    Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants (Chapman & Hall, 1958)

  12. 12.

    The stability of real ecosystems. Nature 289, 674–676 (1981)

  13. 13.

    et al. Eutrophication causes speciation reversal in whitefish adaptive radiations. Nature 482, 357–362 (2012)

  14. 14.

    et al. Initial community evenness favours functionality under selective stress. Nature 458, 623–626 (2009)

  15. 15.

    , & Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade long grassland experiment. Nature 441, 629–632 (2006)

  16. 16.

    , & The global extent and determinants of savanna and forest as alternative biome states. Science 334, 230–232 (2011)

  17. 17.

    , , & Global resilience of tropical forest and savanna to critical transitions. Science 334, 232–235 (2011)

  18. 18.

    et al. Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature 461, 53–59 (2009)

  19. 19.

    & Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature 390, 507–509 (1997)

  20. 20.

    , & Functional redundancy supports biodiversity and ecosystem function in a closed and constant environment. Ecology 85, 1534–1540 (2004)

  21. 21.

    et al. Fire in the earth system. Science 324, 481–484 (2009)

  22. 22.

    , & Defining conservation strategies with historical perspectives: a case study from a degraded oak grassland ecosystem. Conserv. Biol. 18, 455–465 (2004)

  23. 23.

    & Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1463–1468 (1999)

  24. 24.

    Response of diversity and invasibility to burning in a northern oak savanna. Ecology 86, 3354–3363 (2005)

  25. 25.

    & Contingencies and compounded rare perturbations dictate sudden distributional shifts during periods of gradual climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 11172–11176 (2009)

  26. 26.

    & Are invasive species the drivers or passengers of change in degraded ecosystems? Ecology 86, 42–55 (2005)

Download references


We thank I. Banman, T. Ennis and C. Elder; the Garry Oak Ecosystem Recovery Team; the British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Lands, and Natural Resource Operations; the Municipality of North Cowichan, British Columbia; the Maple Bay Fire Department; and the many field technicians over ten years who assisted with this project. All burning was conducted with the assistance and approval of the Municipality of North Cowichan and the BC Ministry of Forests, Lands, and Natural Resource Operations. Thanks also to B. Gilbert, Y. Hautier, E. Harvey, L. Keshet, P. Arcese, M. Fuchs, D. Fraser, R. Hebda, H. Roemer, B. Costanzo, B. Beckwith, G. Douglas, A. Ceska and M. Fairbarns. Funding was provided by NSERC, World Wildlife Fund Endangered Species Recovery Fund, Mountain Equipment Co-Op Environmental Research Fund, and the University of Guelph, with significant in-kind contributions from the Nature Conservancy of Canada.

Author information


  1. Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada

    • A. S. MacDougall
    • , K. S. McCann
    •  & G. Gellner
  2. Department of Botany, and Biodiversity Research Center, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada

    • R. Turkington


  1. Search for A. S. MacDougall in:

  2. Search for K. S. McCann in:

  3. Search for G. Gellner in:

  4. Search for R. Turkington in:


Experimental design was by A.S.M. and R.T., fieldwork was by A.S.M., statistical analyses were by A.S.M. and G.G., supplementary methods and analysis were by G.G. and K.S.M., and writing was by A.S.M. with input from R.T., K.S.M. and G.G.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. S. MacDougall.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-4, Supplementary Tables 1-3 and a Supplementary Appendix.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.