Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Ecosystem resilience despite large-scale altered hydroclimatic conditions

This article has been updated


Climate change is predicted to increase both drought frequency and duration, and when coupled with substantial warming, will establish a new hydroclimatological model for many regions1. Large-scale, warm droughts have recently occurred in North America, Africa, Europe, Amazonia and Australia, resulting in major effects on terrestrial ecosystems, carbon balance and food security2,3. Here we compare the functional response of above-ground net primary production to contrasting hydroclimatic periods in the late twentieth century (1975–1998), and drier, warmer conditions in the early twenty-first century (2000–2009) in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. We find a common ecosystem water-use efficiency (WUEe: above-ground net primary production/evapotranspiration) across biomes ranging from grassland to forest that indicates an intrinsic system sensitivity to water availability across rainfall regimes, regardless of hydroclimatic conditions. We found higher WUEe in drier years that increased significantly with drought to a maximum WUEe across all biomes; and a minimum native state in wetter years that was common across hydroclimatic periods. This indicates biome-scale resilience to the interannual variability associated with the early twenty-first century drought—that is, the capacity to tolerate low, annual precipitation and to respond to subsequent periods of favourable water balance. These findings provide a conceptual model of ecosystem properties at the decadal scale applicable to the widespread altered hydroclimatic conditions that are predicted for later this century. Understanding the hydroclimatic threshold that will break down ecosystem resilience and alter maximum WUEe may allow us to predict land-surface consequences as large regions become more arid, starting with water-limited, low-productivity grasslands.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Relationship between ANPP and iEVI.
Figure 2: Cross-biome sensitivity to precipitation during altered hydroclimatic conditions.
Figure 3: Ecosystem resilience across biomes and hydroclimatic conditions.
Figure 4: A conceptual model of ecosystem resilience during altered hydroclimatic condition.

Change history

  • 22 May 2013

    The required hyphen has been added to the surname of author Guillermo Ponce-Campos in the HTML.


  1. Dai, A. Drought under global warming: a review. WIRES Clim. Change 2, 45–65 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Breshears, D. D. et al. Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15144–15148 (2005)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Saleska, S. R., Didan, K., Huete, A. R. & da Rocha, H. R. Amazon forests green-up during 2005 drought. Science 318, 612 (2007)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Scott, R. L., Hamerlynck, E. P., Jenerette, G. D., Moran, M. S. & Barron-Gafford, G. A. Carbon dioxide exchange in a semidesert grassland through drought-induced vegetation change. J. Geophys. Res. 115, G03026 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Allen, C. D. et al. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 259, 660–684 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Milly, P. C. D. et al. Stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science 319, 573–574 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Weltzin, J. F. et al. Assessing the response of terrestrial ecosystems to potential changes in precipitation. Bioscience 53, 941–952 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Roxburgh, S. H., Berry, S. L., Buckley, T. N., Barnes, B. & Roderick, M. L. What is NPP? Inconsistent accounting of respiratory fluxes in the definition of net primary production. Funct. Ecol. 19, 378–382 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Le Houérou, H. N. Rain use efficiency: a unifying concept in arid-land ecology. J. Arid Environ. 7, 213 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huxman, T. E. et al. Convergence across biomes to a common rain-use efficiency. Nature 429, 651–654 (2004)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Monson, R. K. et al. Tree species effects on ecosystem water-use efficiency in a high-elevation, subalpine forest. Oecologia 162, 491–504 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, L., Dawes, W. R. & Walker, G. R. Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resour. Res. 37, 701–708 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R. & Kinzig, A. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 9, 5 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. MacDonald, G. M. Water, climate change, and sustainability in the southwest. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 21256–21262 (2010)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. US climate division data plots ( (2012)

  16. Jung, M. et al. Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply. Nature 467, 951–954 (2010)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. National Drought Mitigation Center. U.S. drought monitor ( (2012)

  18. Australian. Government Bureau of Meteorology. Australia’s climate change datasets ( (2011)

  19. Huete, A. et al. Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sens. Environ. 83, 195–213 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Running, S. W. et al. A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. Bioscience 54, 547 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Knapp, A. K. & Smith, M. D. Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production. Science 291, 481–484 (2001)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Morgan, J. A. et al. C4 grasses prosper as carbon dioxide eliminates desiccation in warmed semi-arid grassland. Nature 476, 202–205 (2011)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jönsson, P. & Eklundh, L. TIMESAT–a program for analyzing time-series of satellite s ensor data. Comput. Geosci. 30, 833–845 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Savitzky, A. & Golay, M. J. E. Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least s quares procedures. Anal. Chem. 36, 1627–1639 (1964)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Palmer, W. C. Meteorological Drought Weather Bureau Res. Paper no.45. (1965)

  26. Thornthwaite, C. W. An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr. Rev. 38, 55 (1948)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wells, N., Goddard, S. & Hayes, M. J. A self-calibrating Palmer Drought Severity Index. J. Clim. 17, 2335–2351 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The work was supported in part by the NASA SMAP Science Definition Team under agreement 08-SMAPSDT08-0042, the Australian Research Council (ARC) Discover Project (DP1115479) and the Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN) EIF: AusCover. We thank the Australian Bureau of Meteorology for providing the precipitation data. We also thank J. Overpeck, T. McVicar, R. Donohue and M. Walbridge for their input.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



G.E.P.C., M.S.M. and A.H. conceived the study, assembled the data and produced the preliminary results. The remaining authors collected and analysed data, and contributed to the interpretation of results. All authors contributed to writing the paper. Statistical analyses were performed by G.E.P.C.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guillermo E. Ponce-Campos or M. Susan Moran.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-4, Supplementary Tables 1-3 and additional references. (PDF 976 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ponce-Campos, G., Moran, M., Huete, A. et al. Ecosystem resilience despite large-scale altered hydroclimatic conditions. Nature 494, 349–352 (2013).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing