Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

An early and enduring advanced technology originating 71,000 years ago in South Africa



There is consensus that the modern human lineage appeared in Africa before 100,000 years ago1,2. But there is debate as to when cultural and cognitive characteristics typical of modern humans first appeared, and the role that these had in the expansion of modern humans out of Africa3. Scientists rely on symbolically specific proxies, such as artistic expression, to document the origins of complex cognition. Advanced technologies with elaborate chains of production are also proxies, as these often demand high-fidelity transmission and thus language. Some argue that advanced technologies in Africa appear and disappear and thus do not indicate complex cognition exclusive to early modern humans in Africa3,4. The origins of composite tools and advanced projectile weapons figure prominently in modern human evolution research, and the latter have been argued to have been in the exclusive possession of modern humans5,6. Here we describe a previously unrecognized advanced stone tool technology from Pinnacle Point Site 5–6 on the south coast of South Africa, originating approximately 71,000 years ago. This technology is dominated by the production of small bladelets (microliths) primarily from heat-treated stone. There is agreement that microlithic technology was used to create composite tool components as part of advanced projectile weapons7,8. Microliths were common worldwide by the mid-Holocene epoch, but have a patchy pattern of first appearance that is rarely earlier than 40,000 years ago9,10, and were thought to appear briefly between 65,000 and 60,000 years ago in South Africa and then disappear. Our research extends this record to 71,000 years, shows that microlithic technology originated early in South Africa, evolved over a vast time span (11,000 years), and was typically coupled to complex heat treatment that persisted for nearly 100,000 years. Advanced technologies in Africa were early and enduring; a small sample of excavated sites in Africa is the best explanation for any perceived ‘flickering’ pattern.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Segment dimensions from PP5–6 and selected late Pleistocene and Holocene sites.
Figure 2: PP5–6 stratigraphic aggregates.
Figure 3: PP5–6 microlithic tools.


  1. Blum, M. G. B. & Jakobsson, M. Deep divergences of human gene trees and models of human origins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 889–898 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Endicott, P., Hob, S. Y. W. & Stringer, C. Using genetic evidence to evaluate four palaeoanthropological hypotheses for the timing of Neanderthal and modern human origins. J. Hum. Evol. 59, 87–95 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. d’Errico, F. & Stringer, C. Evolution, revolution or saltation scenario for the emergence of modern cultures? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 1060–1069 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Powell, A., Shennan, S. & Thomas, M. Late Pleistocene demography and the appearance of modern human behavior. Science 324, 1298–1301 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sisk, M. L. & Shea, J. J. The African origin of complex projectile technology: an analysis using tip cross-sectional area and perimeter. Int. J. Evol. Biol. 2011, 968012 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brooks, A. S., Nevell, L., Yellen, J. E. & Hartman, G. in Transitions Before the Transition (eds Hovers, E. & Kuhn, S. L. ) 233–255 (Springer, 2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Clark, J. D. in Recent Advances in Indo-Pacific Prehistory (eds Misra, V. N. & Bellwood, P. ) 95–101 (E. J. Brill, 1985)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ambrose, S. Small things remembered: origins of early microlithic industries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Archaeol. Papers Am. Anthropol. Assoc. 12, 9–29 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuhn, S. & Elston, R. Introduction: thinking small globally. Archaeol. Papers Am. Anthropol. Assoc. 12, 1–7 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kuhn, S. Pioneers of microlithization: the “proto-Aurignacian” of Southern Europe. Archaeol. Papers Am. Anthropol. Assoc. 12, 83–94 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Manega, P. C. Geochronology, Geochemistry and Isotopic Study of the Plio-Pleistocene Hominid Sites and the Ngorongoro Volcanic Highland in Northern Tanzania. PhD thesis, Univ. Colorado (1993)

  12. Skinner, A. R., Hay, R. L., Masao, F. & Blackwell, B. A. B. Dating the Naisiusiu Beds, Olduvai Gorge, by electron spin resonance. Quat. Sci. Rev. 22, 1361–1366 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gliganic, L. A., Jacobs, Z., Roberts, R. G., Domínguez-Rodrigo, M. & Mabulla, A. Z. P. New ages for Middle and Later Stone Age deposits at Mumba rockshelter, Tanzania: optically stimulated luminescence dating of quartz and feldspar grains. J. Hum. Evol. 62, 533–547 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Barham, L. Backed tools in Middle Pleistocene central Africa and their evolutionary significance. J. Hum. Evol. 43, 585–603 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Herries, A. I. R. A chronological perspective on the Acheulian and its transition to the Middle Stone Age in Southern Africa: the question of the Fauresmith. Int. J. Evol. Biol. 2011, 1–25 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Barham, L. Clarifying some fundamental errors in Herries’ “a chronological perspective on the Acheulian and its transition to the Middle Stone Age in southern Africa: the question of the Fauresmith. Int. J. Evol. Biol. 2012, 1–5 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jacobs, Z. et al. Ages for the Middle Stone Age of Southern Africa: implications for human behavior and dispersal. Science 322, 733–735 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown, K. S. et al. Fire as an engineering tool of early modern humans in coastal South Africa. Science 325, 859–862 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Singer, R. & Wymer, J. The Middle Stone Age at Klasies River Mouth in South Africa (Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wurz, S. The Howiesons Poort backed artefacts from Klasies River: an argument for symbolic behavior. S. Afr. Archaeol. Bul. 54, 38–50 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Adams, D. C. et al. Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’. Ital. J. Zool. (Modena) 71, 5–16 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rohlf, F. J. tpsDig Version 2.10. (2006)

  23. Mellars, P. Major issues in the emergence of modern humans. Curr. Anthropol. 30, 349–385 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bar-Yosef, O. & Kuhn, S. The big deal about blades: laminar technologies and human evolution. Am. Anthropol. 101, 322–338 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Clark, J. D., Phillips, J. & Staley, P. S. Interpretations of prehistoric technology from ancient Egyptian and other sources. Part I: ancient Egyptian bows and arrows and their relevance for African prehistory. Paleorient 2, 323–388 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Clark, J. D. Interpretations of prehistoric technology from ancient Egyptian and other sources. Part II: prehistoric arrow forms in Africa as shown by surviving examples of traditional arrows of the San Bushmen. Paleorient 3, 127–150 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pétillon, J.-M. et al. Hard core and cutting edge: experimental manufacture and use of Magdalenian composite projectile tips. J. Archaeol. Sci. 38, 1266–1283 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shea, J. The origins of lithic projectile point technology: evidence from Africa, the Levant, and Europe. J. Archaeol. Sci. 33, 823–846 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bingham, P. M. Human evolution and human history: A complete theory. Evol. Anthropol. 9, 248–257 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Churchill, S. E., Franciscus, R., McKean-Peraza, H., Daniel, J. & Warren, B. Shanidar 3 Neandertal rib puncture wound and paleolithic weaponry. J. Hum. Evol. 57, 163–178 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Marean, C. W. et al. Paleoanthropological investigations of Middle Stone Age sites at Pinnacle Point, Mossel Bay (South Africa): Archaeology and hominid remains from the 2000 Field Season. PaleoAnthropol. 83, 14–83 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dibble, H. L. et al. The use of barcodes in excavation projects. SAA Archaeol. Rec. 7, 33–38 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Marean, C. W. et al. The stratigraphy of the Middle Stone Age sediments at Pinnacle Point Cave 13B (Mossel Bay, Western Cape Province, South Africa). J. Hum. Evol. 59, 234–255 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bernatchez, J. & Marean, C. W. Total station archaeology and the use of digital photography. SAA Archaeol. Rec. 11, 16–21 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Huntley, D. J., Godfrey-Smith, D. I. & Thewalt, M. L. W. Optical dating of sediments. Nature 313, 105–107 (1985)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Aitken, M. J. An Introduction to Optical Dating (Oxford Univ. Press, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Duller, G. A. T. Luminescence dating of Quaternary sediment: recent developments. J. Quat. Sci. 19, 183–192 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lian, O. B. & Roberts, R. G. Dating the Quaternary: progress in luminescence dating of sediments. Quat. Sci. Rev. 25, 2449–2468 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Jacobs, Z. & Roberts, R. G. Advances in optically stimulated luminescence dating of individual grains of quartz from archeological deposits. Evol. Anthropol. 16, 210–223 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wintle, A. G. Fifty years of luminescence dating. Archaeometry 50, 276–312 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Bookstein, F. L. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Med. Image Anal. 1, 225–243 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank the MAPCRM staff for their assistance, the Dias Museum for field facilities, and SAHRA and HWC for permits. This research was funded by the National Science Foundation (grants BCS-9912465, BCS-0130713, BCS-0524087 and BCS-1138073 to C.W.M.), the Hyde Family Foundation, the Institute of Human Origins (IHO), and the Australian Research Council (DP1092843 to Z.J.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



K.S.B. led the lithic analysis and with C.W.M. took the lead in writing the paper; J.B. contributed to the site analysis; E.C.F. conducted the GIS analysis and photomosaic construction; C.W.M. is the project director and an excavation permit co-holder; S.O. contributed to the lithic analysis; B.J.S. contributed to the lithic analysis and conducted the morphometric analysis; Z.J. conducted the OSL dating; P.K. studied the sedimentology and geology of the site; T.M. is an excavation permit co-holder and contributes to palaeoenvironmental studies; and J.B., K.S.B., E.C.F., C.W.M., S.O. and B.J.S. all contributed substantially to the excavations. All authors contributed to the writing of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Curtis W. Marean.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

The data reported in this paper are tabulated in the Supplementary Information and archived at Arizona State University.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Discussions, Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Figures 1-10, Supplementary Tables 1-7 and additional references. (PDF 1935 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, K., Marean, C., Jacobs, Z. et al. An early and enduring advanced technology originating 71,000 years ago in South Africa. Nature 491, 590–593 (2012).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing