Abstract
A new data set of middle- and upper-stratospheric temperatures based on reprocessing of satellite radiances provides a view of stratospheric climate change during the period 1979–2005 that is strikingly different from that provided by earlier data sets. The new data call into question our understanding of observed stratospheric temperature trends and our ability to test simulations of the stratospheric response to emissions of greenhouse gases and ozone-depleting substances. Here we highlight the important issues raised by the new data and suggest how the climate science community can resolve them.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Role of Stratospheric Processes in Climate Change: Advances and Challenges
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences Open Access 05 April 2023
-
Resolving the 21st century temperature trends of the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere with satellite observations
Scientific Reports Open Access 24 January 2023
-
Southern-Hemisphere high-latitude stratospheric warming revisit
Climate Dynamics Open Access 18 December 2019
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout



References
Ramaswamy, V. et al. Stratospheric temperature trends: observations and model simulations. Rev. Geophys. 39, 71–122 (2001)
Shine, K. P. et al. A comparison of model-simulated trends in stratospheric temperatures. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 129, 1565–1588 (2003)
Randel, W. J. et al. An update of observed stratospheric temperature trends. J. Geophys. Res. 114, D02107 (2009)
Seidel, D. J., Gillett, N. P., Lanzante, J. R., Shine, K. P. & Thorne, P. W. Stratospheric temperature trends: our evolving understanding. Wiley Interdisc. Rev. Clim. Change 2, 592–616 (2011)
Forster, P. M. et al. in Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2010, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project Report No. 52, Ch. 4 (World Meteorological Organization, 2011)
Hansen, J. et al. Forcings and chaos in interannual to decadal climate change. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 25679–25720 (1997)
Trenberth, K. E. et al. in Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) Ch. 3 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007)
Lanzante, J., Klein, S. & Seidel, D. J. Temporal homogenization of monthly radiosonde temperature data. Part II: Trends, sensitivities and MSU comparisons. J. Clim. 16, 241–262 (2003)
Keckhut, P. et al. Review of ozone and temperature lidar validations performed within the framework of the Network for the Detection of Stratospheric Change. J. Environ. Monit. 6, 721–733 (2004)
Mears, C. A. & Wentz, F. J. Construction of the Remote Sensing Systems V3.2 atmospheric temperature records from the MSU and AMSU microwave sounders. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 26, 1040–1056 (2009)
Christy, J. R., Spencer, R. W., Norris, W. B., Braswell, W. D. & Parke, D. E. Error estimates of version 5.0 of MSU-AMSU bulk atmospheric temperatures. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 20, 613–629 (2003)
Zou, C.-Z. et al. Recalibration of microwave sounding unit for climate studies using simultaneous nadir overpasses. J. Geophys. Res. 111, D19114 (2006)
Nash, J. & Forrester, G. F. Long-term monitoring of stratospheric temperature trends using radiance measurements obtained by the TIROS-N series of NOAA spacecraft. Adv. Space Res. 6, 37–44 (1986). These authors pioneered the use of infrared radiances from the SSU instrument for climate studies and produced the first SSU data set.
Nash, J. Extension of explicit radiance observations by the Stratospheric Sounding Unit into the lower stratosphere and lower mesosphere. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 114, 1153–1171 (1988)
Shine, K. P., Barnett, J. J. & Randel, W. J. Temperature trends derived from Stratospheric Sounding Unit radiances: the effect of increasing CO2 on the weighting function. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L02710 (2008). These authors were the first to quantify the effect of increasing carbon dioxide on the SSU weighting function, and their work highlighted the need to revisit and reprocess the SSU data set of ref. 13.
Wang, L., Zou, C.-Z. & Qian, H. Construction of stratospheric temperature data records from stratospheric sounding units. J. Clim. 25, 2931–2946 (2012). These authors provided the first full reprocessing of the original SSU radiances, and their findings have raised serious questions regarding our understanding of stratospheric temperature trends.
SPARC Report on the Evaluation of Chemistry-Climate Models (eds Eyring, V., Shepherd, T. G. & Waugh, D. W. ) SPARC Report No. 5, WCRP-132, WMO/TD-No. 1526 http://www.sparc-climate.org (SPARC, 2010).
Forster, P. M. et al. Evaluation of radiation scheme performance within chemistry climate models. J. Geophys. Res. 116, D10302 (2011)
Butchart, N. et al. Simulations of anthropogenic change in the strength of the Brewer-Dobson circulation. Clim. Dyn. 27, 727–741 (2006)
Garcia, R. R. & Randel, W. J. Acceleration of the Brewer-Dobson circulation due to increases in greenhouse gases. J. Atmos. Sci. 65, 2731–2739 (2008)
Butchart, N. et al. Chemistry-climate model simulations of 21st century stratospheric climate and circulation changes. J. Clim. 23, (2010)
McLandress, C. & Shepherd, T. G. Simulated anthropogenic changes in the Brewer-Dobson circulation, including its extension to high latitudes. J. Clim. 22, 1516–1540 (2009)
Shepherd, T. G. & McLandress, C. A robust mechanism for strengthening of the Brewer-Dobson circulation in response to climate change: critical-layer control of subtropical wave breaking. J. Atmos. Sci. 68, 784–797 (2011)
Garny, H., Dameris, M., Randel, W. J., Bodeker, G. E. & Deckert, R. Dynamically forced increase of tropical upwelling in the lower stratosphere. J. Atmos. Sci. 68, 1214–1233 (2011)
Randel, W. J. & Thompson, A. M. Interannual variability and trends in tropical ozone derived from SAGE II satellite data and SHADOZ ozonesondes. J. Geophys. Res. 116, D07303 (2011)
Douglas, A. et al. in Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2010, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project Report No. 52, Ch. 2 (World Meteorological Organization, 2011)
Free, M. et al. Radiosonde Atmospheric Temperature Products for Assessing Climate (RATPAC): a new data set of large-area anomaly time series. J. Geophys. Res. 110, D22101 (2005)
Thompson, D. W. J. & Solomon, S. Recent stratospheric climate trends as evidenced in radiosonde data: global structure and tropospheric linkages. J. Clim. 18, 4785–4795 (2005)
Young, P. J. et al. Changes in stratospheric temperatures and their implications for changes in the Brewer Dobson Circulation, 1979–2005. J. Clim. 25, 1759–1772 (2012)
Wang, L. & Waugh, D. W. Chemistry-climate model simulations of recent trends in lower stratospheric temperature and stratospheric residual circulation. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D09109 (2012)
Deshler, T. A review of global stratospheric aerosol: measurements, importance, life cycle, and local stratospheric aerosol. Atmos. Res. 90, 223–232 (2008)
Solomon, S., Young, P. J. & Hassler, B. Uncertainties in the evolution of statospheric ozone and implications for recent temperature changes in the tropical lower stratosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L17706 (2012)
Seidel, D. J. et al. Reference upper-air observations for climate: rationale, progress, and plans. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 90, 361–369 (2009)
Acknowledgements
We thank K. Shine, M. Dameris, M. Free and R. Saunders for suggestions and comments on the manuscript. D.W.J.T. is supported by the National Science Foundation Climate Dynamics Program under budget number AGS-0936255. We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s (WCRP) Working Group on Coupled Modelling and the WCRP CCM Validation project (CCMVal), which are responsible for archiving the CMIP5 and CCMVal2 output, respectively. We also thank the climate modelling groups for producing and making available their model output as listed in Table 1. For CMIP the US Department of Energy’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support and led development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.W.J.T. led the analyses and the writing of the text. D.J.S., W.J.R. and C.-Z.Z. contributed to the text and analysis design and provided guidance on all aspects of the study. A.H.B. provided the CMIP5 output, assisted with the analyses of the model output, and provided advice on the text. C.M. provided expertise on the data sets used in the study and advice on the text. A.O. assisted with the analyses and data processing and provided advice on the text. C.L. and R.L. provided advice on the text.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thompson, D., Seidel, D., Randel, W. et al. The mystery of recent stratospheric temperature trends. Nature 491, 692–697 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11579
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11579
This article is cited by
-
Resolving the 21st century temperature trends of the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere with satellite observations
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Role of Stratospheric Processes in Climate Change: Advances and Challenges
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences (2023)
-
Southern-Hemisphere high-latitude stratospheric warming revisit
Climate Dynamics (2020)
-
Inter-reanalysis differences of the temperature trends in the MERRA-2.0 and ERA-Interim: comparison of the middle and lower atmosphere
Theoretical and Applied Climatology (2019)
-
Toward an Improved Representation of Middle Atmospheric Dynamics Thanks to the ARISE Project
Surveys in Geophysics (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.