Article | Published:

An Earth-mass planet orbiting α Centauri B

Nature volume 491, pages 207211 (08 November 2012) | Download Citation



Exoplanets down to the size of Earth have been found, but not in the habitable zone—that is, at a distance from the parent star at which water, if present, would be liquid. There are planets in the habitable zone of stars cooler than our Sun, but for reasons such as tidal locking and strong stellar activity, they are unlikely to harbour water–carbon life as we know it. The detection of a habitable Earth-mass planet orbiting a star similar to our Sun is extremely difficult, because such a signal is overwhelmed by stellar perturbations. Here we report the detection of an Earth-mass planet orbiting our neighbour star α Centauri B, a member of the closest stellar system to the Sun. The planet has an orbital period of 3.236 days and is about 0.04 astronomical units from the star (one astronomical unit is the Earth–Sun distance).


Since the discovery of the first exoplanet orbiting a solar-type star in 19951, the number of known planets has not stopped growing: at present, there are more than 750 confirmed planets2 with minimum mass estimates, and over 2,300 transiting planet candidates detected with the Kepler satellite that are awaiting confirmation. Two main detection techniques have led to this impressive number of discoveries: the radial-velocity technique, which measures the change in the velocity of the central star due to the gravitational pull of an orbiting planet; and the transit method, which measures the small reduction in flux when a planet passes in front of its host star. These two techniques are complementary; the former gives the minimum mass of a planet (minimum because the orbital inclination of the planet is unknown), whereas the latter gives a planet’s radius.

One of the major challenges in the search for exoplanets is the detection of an Earth twin, that is, an Earth-mass planet orbiting in the star’s habitable zone. In this regard, α Centauri B is one of the most interesting targets. At a distance of 1.3 parsecs, it is a member of the closest stellar system to the Sun, composed of itself, α Centauri A and Proxima Centauri. It also exhibits low stellar activity, similar to the solar activity level, usually associated with a small perturbing contribution of intrinsic stellar activity to the measured radial velocities. α Centauri B is cooler than the Sun (effective temperature3,4,5,6 5,214 ± 33 K, spectral type K1V), and has a smaller mass that our parent star7 (0.934 ± 0.006 solar masses). These two conditions ease the detection of a potentially habitable planet using radial velocities; the relative coolness implies a habitable zone closer to the star, and the smaller mass leads to a stronger radial-velocity variation for a similar-mass planet. In addition, theoretical studies show that the formation of an Earth twin is possible around α Centauri B8,9. Finally, the brightness of the star (visual magnitude 1.33) would allow for an efficient characterization of the atmosphere of potentially orbiting planets.

An Earth twin induces a typical radial-velocity variation of a few tenths of a metre per second on a star like α Centauri B. Such detections, technically possible with the most stable high-resolution spectrographs, are however challenging due to the presence of intrinsic stellar signals inducing a radial-velocity ‘jitter’ at the level of a few metres per second, even for quiet stars.

We report here the discovery of a planetary companion around α Centauri B, unveiled by a radial-velocity signal with a semi-amplitude K of 0.51 m s−1, a period P of 3.236 d, and a semi-major axis a of 0.04 astronomical units (au). This planet, with a minimum mass similar to that of Earth, is both the lightest orbiting a solar-type star and the closest to the Solar System found to date. Being much closer to its parent star than Earth is to the Sun, it is not an Earth twin. However, the small amplitude of the signal shows that the radial-velocity technique is capable of reaching the precision needed to detect habitable super-Earth planets around stars similar to our Sun, or even habitable Earths around cooler stars (that is, M-dwarfs). In addition, statistical studies of exoplanets suggest that low-mass planets are preferentially formed in multi-planetary systems10,11,12. There is therefore a high probability that other planets orbit α Centauri B, perhaps in its habitable zone.

High-precision radial velocities

High-precision measurements were obtained for α Centauri B between February 2008 and July 2011 using the HARPS spectrograph (Supplementary Information section 1, and Supplementary Data). HARPS is a high-resolution (R = 110,000) cross-dispersed echelle spectrograph installed on the 3.6-m telescope at La Silla Observatory (ESO, Chile). This instrument has demonstrated a long-term precision of 0.8 m s−1, thereby becoming the most powerful machine with which to hunt for exoplanets using the radial-velocity technique12,13,14. α Centauri B was observed with HARPS following an intensive observational strategy, optimized to sample high- and medium-frequency intrinsic stellar signals15, which makes it possible to model and consequently remove their perturbing contributions. The star was observed every possible night three times, with exposure times of ten minutes, and with measurements optimally separated by two hours14.

The raw radial velocities of α Centauri B (Fig. 1a) exhibit several contributing signals that we could identify. Their origin is associated with instrumental noise, stellar oscillation modes, granulation at the surface of the star, rotational activity, long-term activity induced by a magnetic cycle, the orbital motion of the binary composed of α Centauri A and B, light contamination from α Centauri A, and imprecise stellar coordinates.

Figure 1: Radial velocities of α Centauri B and fitting the long-timescale stellar signals.
Figure 1

a, Raw radial velocities (RV) and the fit of the binary’s signature (α Centauri B orbiting α Centauri A). In the residuals (c), signals at long period are visible. These signals, highlighted by grey arrows (‘long-term activity’) in periodogram b, correspond to the effect of the magnetic cycle. The grey curve in c shows the variation of the low-frequency part of the activity index scaled to the radial-velocity variation. When these low-frequency perturbations are removed, signals induced by rotational activity, pointed out by grey arrows in periodogram d, can be seen at the rotation period of the star and its harmonics. JD, Julian date. Error bars in c, 1σ.

In the following, we will consider each of these contributions separately, modelling and removing them one by one, from the largest to the smallest amplitude. The model parameters estimated for each contribution will then be used as initial conditions for a global fit that will remove all the identified radial-velocity signals. In the residuals, we will be able to search for small-amplitude planetary signals.

Perturbing signals for planet searches

α Centauri B is a quiet star among the targets monitored in searches for low-mass planets. However, the very high precision of HARPS allows us to discern in the measurements different perturbing signals at the metre-per-second level. Compared to the radial-velocity signal induced by terrestrial planets, a few to a few tens of centimetres per second, these perturbing signals are non-negligible and must be modelled and mitigated before searching for small-mass planets.

Instrumental noise

Guiding noise and other possible instrumental noise are not considered in the data error bars. Their global effect is estimated to be 0.7 m s−1, given the typical dispersion obtained for the most stable stars of the HARPS high-precision programme14.

Stellar oscillation modes

α Centauri B exhibits high-frequency oscillation modes16,17, with typical periods of less than five minutes. An exposure time of ten minutes thus averages out efficiently, to a level of a few centimetres per second, the signal due to oscillation modes.


α Centauri B is a solar-type star and has therefore an outer convection zone responsible for a granulation pattern on its surface. Depending on temperature, granulation cells have positive or negative radial velocities, resulting in a non-zero global radial-velocity signal when their individual contributions are integrated over the disk of the star, weighted by the luminosity of the cells. The granulation effect introduces radial-velocity variations on timescales ranging from 15 min to several hours18,19. For α Centauri B, models of granulation20 suggest an r.m.s. radial velocity of 0.6 m s−1.

Rotational activity signal

Owing to stellar rotation and the Doppler effect, one side of the star has a positive radial velocity compared to the average, while the other side has a negative one. However, if a spot (darker or brighter than the mean stellar surface) is present on one side of the star, the velocity balance will be broken and a residual radial velocity will be measured. With stellar rotation, a spot will move from one side of the stellar disk to the other, introducing periodic signals at the stellar rotational period and the corresponding harmonics21. The lifetime of spots on the stellar surface is typically a few rotational periods22, so after several rotations, the configuration of spots will be different, thus changing the phase and amplitude of the signal.

The radial velocities of α Centauri B show a clear signal at 38.7 d (Figs 1d and 2b), which corresponds to the rotational period of the star23. An efficient way to model rotational activity effects is to select radial-velocity measurements over time intervals of a few rotational periods, and fit sine waves at the rotational period and the corresponding harmonics21 (Supplementary Information section 2). The best fit for the rotational activity signal for each observational season can be seen in Fig. 3.

Figure 2: Magnetic cycle of α Centauri B.
Figure 2

a, The grey curve represents a low pass filter applied to the activity index measurements (data points). b, The observations done in 2010 are zoomed in to show the variation induced by rotational activity, which highlights the HARPS precision in determining activity indexes. Error bars (1σ) are smaller than the data points (that is, smaller than 0.015 dex).

Figure 3: Fit of the rotational activity.
Figure 3

ad, Radial velocities (RV) of α Centauri B after correction of the binary’s signature (of α Centauri B orbiting α Centauri A), magnetic-cycle and coordinates effects, for the years 2008 (a), 2009 (b), 2010 (c) and 2011 (d), are shown as black dots with 1σ error bars. The grey curve represents for each plot the fit of the rotational activity signal, adjusting sinusoids at the stellar rotational period and the corresponding harmonics. The rotational period estimated from the stellar activity model decreases from the second season of observation to the last, with estimated periods (in days) of 39.76 (b), 37.80 (c) and 36.71 (d) (Supplementary Information section 6). This can be explained if the star exhibits differential rotation. Indeed, it has been shown for the Sun that spots appear at a latitude of +30° or −30° at the start of a magnetic cycle (like in 2008) and then migrate towards the equator during the cycle. Owing to differential rotation, observed for the Sun, the rotational period estimated by activity modelling should decrease from the start to the end of a magnetic cycle. A similar effect is seen here for α Centauri B. We therefore believe that differential rotational has been detected here for this slow rotator41 (X.D. et al., manuscript in preparation).

Long-term activity signal

During a solar-like magnetic cycle, the number of spots on the stellar surface (dark spots, plage faculae) varies from zero to several hundreds. Inside these spots, a strong magnetic field is present, which freezes the convection24,25,26,27,28. For the Sun, as for other stars similar to α Centauri B in spectral type29, convection induces a blueshift of the stellar spectra30,31,32. Therefore, no convection means no convective blueshift inside these regions, and so the spectrum of the integrated stellar surface will appear redshifted. Because a redshift means a measured positive radial velocity, a positive correlation between the magnetic cycle variation and the long-term radial-velocity variation is then expected.

α Centauri B shows signs of weak but detectable chromospheric activity, evidenced by the re-emission in the centre of the Ca ii H and K lines (the log(RHK) activity index). α Centauri B exhibits a magnetic cycle with a minimum amplitude of AR′HK ≈ 0.11 dex (Fig. 2a). To correct the radial-velocity effect due to the magnetic cycle (see Fig. 1b and c), we assume a linear correlation between the log(RHK) activity index and the activity-related radial-velocity variation33 (that is, both variations have the same shape; Supplementary Information section 3).

Orbital motion

The orbital period of the binary composed of α Centauri A and B is PAB = 79.91 yr (ref. 7). The HARPS observations of α Centauri B cover an interval of only four years. The orbit of the system over such an interval can then adequately be approximated by a second order polynomial (see Fig. 1a).

Light contamination

Owing to the close separation on the sky between α Centauri A and B, the spectra of B can be contaminated by light coming from A when the observing conditions are poor. The resulting effect on the radial-velocity measurements was estimated and problematic observations discarded (Supplementary Information section 4).

Imprecise stellar coordinates

When estimating stellar radial velocities with regard to the barycentre of the Solar System, we need to remove the component of the velocity of the Earth in the direction of the star. Imprecise coordinates will then result in an imprecise correction and therefore in a residual signal in the radial velocities. This effect was first pointed out when searching for planets around pulsars, when the times of arrival were varying periodically in time owing to imprecise pulsar coordinates34. Owing to the circular orbit of the Earth around the Sun, this signal will be a sinusoid with a one-year period. α Centauri A and B are gravitationally bound, resulting in a binary orbital motion, which has to be corrected to obtain precise coordinates for α Centauri B (Supplementary Information section 5).

Removing the various signals

The approaches used to remove or mitigate the effects of the various signals potentially masking the existence of a low-mass planet have been described in the preceding paragraphs. For contamination coming from α Centauri A, we removed observations with a too-high level of contamination. For instrumental noise and granulation that cannot be easily modelled, the estimated radial-velocity contribution from each source is quadratically added as white noise to the raw error bars. For the other effects, parametric models have been proposed. A global fit to the data, including the binary signal, the long-term activity signal and the rotational activity effect, involves 23 free parameters (Supplementary Information section 6).

A planet with a minimum mass that of the Earth

The generalized Lomb-Scargle periodogram35 of the radial-velocity residuals shows two peaks at 3.236 and 0.762 d, with a false alarm probability (FAP) lower than a conservative 1% limit (Fig. 4a). These two periods are aliases of one another. A careful analysis of the structure in frequency of the periodogram suggests that the peak at 3.236 d is the true signal (Supplementary Information section 7).

Figure 4: Periodograms of the radial-velocity residuals after removing the non-planetary signals.
Figure 4

a, The periodogram of the velocities after correction for stellar, imprecise coordinates and binary effects, with continuous, dashed and dotted lines indicating the 0.1%, 1% and 10% FAP, respectively. The highest peak, at 3.236 d inside the shaded region, has an FAP of 0.02%. b, A small part of the periodogram around the planet signal is represented. The periodogram for all seasons is shown in black, and the yearly periodograms for each observational period (2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011) are shown in different colours. The amplitudes of the yearly periodograms are normalized so that the 10% FAP of each matches the 10% FAP of the periodogram for all seasons. The phase of the most important peaks is shown (arrows); the direction of the arrow gives the phase between 0° and 360°. For each year of observation, the peak at 3.236 d conserves the same phase, which is expected for a planetary signal. On the contrary, the peak at 2.8 d and its alias at 3.35 d do not keep the same phase and are therefore associated with noise (these peaks appear only in 2009 and their FAPs are higher than 10%).

The global model makes use of parameters associated with different timescales. One could thus worry whether the signal at 3.236 d could have been introduced during the process of eliminating the stellar signals. We performed Monte Carlo simulations to determine if this could be the case, and concluded that the signal is real and not an artefact of the fitting process (Supplementary Information section 8).

The peak at 3.236 d in the radial-velocity residuals is significant with a FAP of 0.02%. Using a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm coupled to a genetic algorithm to characterize the Keplerian solution, we obtained a signal with a well-constrained period and amplitude. The eccentricity is poorly constrained but is compatible with zero within a 1.4σ uncertainty (Supplementary Information section 9). To fit this planetary signal simultaneously with the other contributions to the radial velocities, we added a sinusoidal signal representing the circular planet orbit to the global fit (Supplementary Information section 6). The observed dispersion of the residuals around the final solution is 1.20 m s−1 and the reduced χ2 value is 1.51 (with 26 parameters for 459 radial-velocity points). The semi-amplitude of the planetary signal is K = 0.51 ± 0.04 m s−1, which corresponds to a planet with a minimum mass of 1.13 ± 0.09 Earth masses considering a stellar mass of 0.934 solar masses and with an orbital period of P = 3.2357 ± 0.0008 d. The orbital and planet parameters are given in Table 1. In the residuals of the global fit, a signal with an FAP of 0.3% is present; however, it could have multiple origins (Supplementary Information section 6).

Table 1: Orbital parameters of the planet orbiting α Centauri B

In Fig. 5, we show the radial-velocity measurements corrected for stellar and binary effects, folded in phase with the 3.236-d period, superimposed on the derived solution for the planetary signal. In Fig. 4b we show that the 3.236-d signal conserves its phase for each observational year, which is expected for a planetary signal.

Figure 5: Phase-folded radial-velocity curve with a period of 3.2357 d.
Figure 5

Green dots, radial velocities after correction of the stellar, binary and coordinates effects. Red dots, the same radial velocities binned in phase, with a bin size of 0.05. The error bar of a given bin is estimated using the weighted r.m.s. of the global fit residuals (including the planetary fit) that make this bin, divided by the square root of the number of measurements included in this bin. This estimation of the bin error bars assumes Gaussian noise, which is justified by the binning in phase, which regroups points that are uncorrelated in time. The r.m.s. around the planetary solution is 1.20 m s−1 for the raw points (green dots) and 0.21 m s−1 for the binned points (red dots). The red curve represents the global fit solution of the planet, with a semi-amplitude of 0.51 m s−1.

An important piece of information about the inner composition of an exoplanet is obtained when the planet is transiting its parent star, allowing its radius to be measured. Combined with the real mass estimate, the radius leads to the average density of the planet. In the present case, given a stellar radius36 of 0.863 times the solar radius and assuming the radius of the planet is that of the Earth, the planet transit probability is estimated at 10%, with a transit depth of 10−4. The detection of a planet transit, only possible from space, would allow us to confirm the expected rocky nature of the detected planet around α Centauri B.

The r.m.s. radial velocity induced by the stellar rotational activity amounts to 1.5 m s−1 on average. The detection of the tiny planetary signal, with a semi-amplitude K = 0.51 m s−1, thus demonstrates that stellar activity is not necessarily a definitive limitation to the detection of small-mass planets. Using an optimized observational strategy and the present knowledge about activity-induced radial-velocity effects, it is possible to model precisely and mitigate activity signals, and therefore improve considerably the planet detection limits.

With a separation from its parent star of only 0.04 au, the planet is orbiting very close to α Centauri B compared to the location of the habitable zone. However, the observed radial-velocity semi-amplitude is equivalent to that induced by a planet of minimum mass four times that of Earth in the habitable zone of the star (P = 200 d; ref. 37). The HARPS spectrograph therefore has the precision required to detect a new category of planets, namely habitable super-Earths. This sensitivity was expected from simulations of intrinsic stellar signals15, and actual observations of planetary systems14.

The optimized observational strategy used to monitor α Centauri B is capable of reaching the precision needed to search for habitable super-Earths around solar-type stars using the radial-velocity technique. However, it requires an important investment in observation time, and thus only few targets can be observed over several years. Recent statistical analyses and theoretical models of planetary formation suggest that low-mass rocky planets and especially Earth twins should be common12,38,39,40. We are therefore confident that we are on the right path to the discovery of Earth analogues.


  1. 1.

    & A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star. Nature 378, 355–359 (1995)

  2. 2.

    , , , & Defining and cataloging exoplanets: the database. Astron. Astrophys. 532, A79 (2011)

  3. 3.

    et al. BESO échelle spectroscopy of solar-type stars at Cerro Armazones. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 411, 2311–2318 (2011)

  4. 4.

    & Spectroscopic properties of cool stars (SPOCS). I. 1040 F, G, and K dwarfs from Keck, Lick, and AAT planet search programs. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 159, 141–166 (2005)

  5. 5.

    et al. Spectroscopic metallicities for planet-host stars: extending the samples. Astron. Astrophys. 437, 1127–1133 (2005)

  6. 6.

    & Spectroscopic analysis of the Alpha Centauri system. Astron. Astrophys. 328, 261–268 (1997)

  7. 7.

    et al. Constraining the difference in convective blueshift between the components of α Centauri with precise radial velocities. Astron. Astrophys. 386, 280–285 (2002)

  8. 8.

    , & Planetesimal accretion in binary systems: could planets form around α Centauri B? Astrophys. J. 708, 1566–1578 (2010)

  9. 9.

    , & Planet formation in the habitable zone of α Centauri B. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 393, L21–L25 (2009)

  10. 10.

    , , , & Architecture and dynamics of Kepler's candidate multiple transiting planet systems. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 197, 8 (2011)

  11. 11.

    , , , & A first comparison of Kepler planet candidates in single and multiple systems. Astrophys. J. 732, L24 (2011)

  12. 12.

    et al. The HARPS search for southern extra-solar planets. XXXIV. Occurrence, mass distribution and orbital properties of super-Earths and Neptune-mass planets. Astron. Astrophys.. (submitted); preprint at (2011)

  13. 13.

    et al. The HARPS search for southern extra-solar planets. XXVIII. Up to seven planets orbiting HD 10180: probing the architecture of low-mass planetary systems. Astron. Astrophys. 528, A112 (2011)

  14. 14.

    et al. The HARPS search for Earth-like planets in the habitable zone. Very low mass planets around HD29794, HD85512 and HD192310. Astron. Astrophys. 534, A58 (2011)

  15. 15.

    , , , & Planetary detection limits taking into account stellar noise. II. Effect of stellar spot groups on radial-velocities. Astron. Astrophys. 527, A82 (2011)

  16. 16.

    et al. Solar-like oscillations in Alpha Centauri B. Astrophys. J. 635, 1281–1290 (2005)

  17. 17.

    & Solar-like oscillations in the K1 dwarf star alpha Cen B. Astron. Astrophys. 406, L23–L26 (2003)

  18. 18.

    Solar granulation properties derived from three different time series. Astron. Astrophys. 428, 1007–1015 (2004)

  19. 19.

    et al. Statistical properties of solar granulation derived from the SOUP instrument on Spacelab 2. Astrophys. J. 336, 475–494 (1989)

  20. 20.

    , , , & Planetary detection limits taking into account stellar noise. I. Observational strategies to reduce stellar oscillation and granulation effects. Astron. Astrophys. 525, A140 (2011)

  21. 21.

    et al. Disentangling between stellar activity and planetary signals. Astron. Astrophys. 528, A4 (2011)

  22. 22.

    & in Encyclopedia of Astronomy and Astrophysics (ed. Murdin, P.) 3173–3177 (Institute of Physics Publishing, 2000)

  23. 23.

    , & X-Ray, FUV, and UV observations of α Centauri B: determination of long-term magnetic activity cycle and rotation period. Astrophys. J. 722, 343–357 (2010)

  24. 24.

    , & Using the Sun to estimate Earth-like planets detection capabilities. II. Impact of plages. Astron. Astrophys. 512, A39 (2010)

  25. 25.

    The Observation and Analysis of Stellar Photospheres (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992)

  26. 26.

    & Solar line asymmetries and the magnetic filling factor. Astron. Astrophys. 231, 221–234 (1990)

  27. 27.

    Magnetic fields, convection and solar luminosity variability. Nature 297, 208–209 (1982)

  28. 28.

    in Stellar Radial Velocities (eds Philip, A. G. D. & Latham, D. W.) 311–320 (IAU Colloquium 88, IAU, 1985)

  29. 29.

    The third signature of stellar granulation. Astrophys. J. 697, 1032–1043 (2009)

  30. 30.

    , & Solar Fe II line asymmetries and wavelength shifts. Astron. Astrophys. 158, 83–88 (1986)

  31. 31.

    & The asymmetry of photospheric absorption lines. I — an analysis of mean solar line profiles. Astron. Astrophys. 116, 332–340 (1982)

  32. 32.

    & Some comments on the limb shift of solar lines. II — The effect of granular motions. Sol. Phys. 58, 243–261 (1978)

  33. 33.

    et al. The HARPS search for southern extra-solar planets. XXXI. Magnetic activity cycles in solar-type stars: statistics and impact on precise radial velocities. Astron. Astrophys.. (submitted); preprint at (2011)

  34. 34.

    & in Exoplanets (ed. Seager, S.) 175–190 (Univ. Arizona Press, 2010)

  35. 35.

    & The generalised Lomb-Scargle periodogram. A new formalism for the floating-mean and Keplerian periodograms. Astron. Astrophys. 496, 577–584 (2009)

  36. 36.

    et al. The diameters of α Centauri A and B. A comparison of the asteroseismic and VINCI / VLTI views. Astron. Astrophys. 404, 1087–1097 (2003)

  37. 37.

    et al. Habitable planets around the star Gliese 581? Astron. Astrophys. 476, 1373–1387 (2007)

  38. 38.

    et al. The HARPS search for southern extra-solar planets. XXXI. The M-dwarf sample. Astron. Astrophys (submitted) preprint at <>

  39. 39.

    , , & Extrasolar planet population synthesis. II. Statistical comparison with observations. Astron. Astrophys. 501, 1161–1184 (2009)

  40. 40.

    et al. One or more bound planets per Milky Way star from microlensing observations. Nature 481, 167–169 (2012)

  41. 41.

    et al. The dependence of differential rotation on temperature and rotation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 357, L1–L5 (2005)

Download references


The data presented here were obtained with the ESO 3.6-m telescope at La Silla Paranal Observatory, Chile. We thank the Swiss National Science Foundation (FNRS) for continuous support. We thank R. Mardeling for English revision. N.S. and X.D. acknowledge support by the European Research Council/European Community under FP7 through Starting Grant agreement number 239953, as well as from Fundacao para a Cîencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) through programme Cîencia 2007 funded by FCT/MCTES (Portugal) and POPH/FSE (EC), and in the form of grants PTDC/CTE-AST/098528/2008 and PTDC/CTE-AST/098604/2008.

Author information


  1. Observatoire de Genève, Université de Genève, 51 chemin des Maillettes, CH-1290 Sauverny, Switzerland

    • Xavier Dumusque
    • , Francesco Pepe
    • , Christophe Lovis
    • , Damien Ségransan
    • , Johannes Sahlmann
    • , François Bouchy
    • , Michel Mayor
    • , Didier Queloz
    •  & Stéphane Udry
  2. Centro de Astrofìsica da Universidade do Porto, Rua das Estrelas, P-4150-762 Porto, Portugal

    • Xavier Dumusque
    •  & Nuno Santos
  3. Physikalisches Institut Universitat Bern, Sidlerstrasse 5, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland

    • Willy Benz
  4. Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, UMR7095 CNRS, Université Pierre & Marie Curie, 98bis Boulevard Arago, F-75014 Paris, France

    • François Bouchy
  5. Departamento de Fìsica e Astronomia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre s/n, P-4169-007 Porto, Portugal

    • Nuno Santos


  1. Search for Xavier Dumusque in:

  2. Search for Francesco Pepe in:

  3. Search for Christophe Lovis in:

  4. Search for Damien Ségransan in:

  5. Search for Johannes Sahlmann in:

  6. Search for Willy Benz in:

  7. Search for François Bouchy in:

  8. Search for Michel Mayor in:

  9. Search for Didier Queloz in:

  10. Search for Nuno Santos in:

  11. Search for Stéphane Udry in:


F.P., C.L., W.B., F.B., M.M., D.Q., N.S. and S.U. obtained data under the ESO programme ‘Searching for Earth-analogs around nearby stars with HARPS’. The HARPS spectrograph was designed and built by F.P., C.L., W.B., F.B., M.M., D.Q. and S.U. C.L. and D.S. performed the reduction of the data. Data analysis was carried out by X.D., J.S., F.P., D.S. and C.L. All the work was supervised by S.U. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xavier Dumusque or Francesco Pepe.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Text and Data 1-9, Supplementary Figures 1-13, Supplementary Tables 1-2 and additional references.

Text files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Data

    This text file contains all data used in our analysis, in tab-separated format.

About this article

Publication history





Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing