Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The structural biochemistry of Zucchini implicates it as a nuclease in piRNA biogenesis

Nature volume 491, pages 279–283 (2012)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

PIWI-family proteins and their associated small RNAs (piRNAs) act in an evolutionarily conserved innate immune mechanism to provide essential protection for germ-cell genomes against the activity of mobile genetic elements1. piRNA populations comprise a molecular definition of transposons, which permits them to distinguish transposons from host genes and selectively silence them. piRNAs can be generated in two distinct ways, forming either primary or secondary piRNAs. Primary piRNAs come from discrete genomic loci, termed piRNA clusters, and seem to be derived from long, single-stranded precursors2. The biogenesis of primary piRNAs involves at least two nucleolytic steps. An unknown enzyme cleaves piRNA cluster transcripts to generate monophosphorylated piRNA 5′ ends. piRNA 3′ ends are probably formed by exonucleolytic trimming, after a piRNA precursor is loaded into its PIWI partner1,3. Secondary piRNAs arise during the adaptive ‘ping-pong’ cycle, with their 5′ termini being formed by the activity of PIWIs themselves2,4. A number of proteins have been implicated genetically in primary piRNA biogenesis. One of these, Drosophila melanogaster Zucchini, is a member of the phospholipase-D family of phosphodiesterases, which includes both phospholipases and nucleases5,6,7. Here we produced a dimeric, soluble fragment of the mouse Zucchini homologue (mZuc; also known as PLD6) and show that it possesses single-strand-specific nuclease activity. A crystal structure of mZuc at 1.75 Å resolution indicates greater architectural similarity to phospholipase-D family nucleases than to phospholipases. Together, our data suggest that the Zucchini proteins act in primary piRNA biogenesis as nucleases, perhaps generating the 5′ ends of primary piRNAs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: mZuc acts as a nuclease but not a phospholipase in vitro.
Figure 2: mZuc acts as a single-strand-specific endoribonuclease in vitro.
Figure 3: Crystal structure of mZuc.
Figure 4: Electrostatic surfaces of PLD-family proteins indicate distinct binding surfaces for specific substrates.

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Protein Data Bank

Data deposits

Coordinates were deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession codes 4GGJ (native) and 4GGK (tungstate derivative).

References

  1. Senti, K. A. & Brennecke, J. The piRNA pathway: a fly’s perspective on the guardian of the genome. Trends Genet. 26, 499–509 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Brennecke, J. et al. Discrete small RNA-generating loci as master regulators of transposon activity in Drosophila. Cell 128, 1089–1103 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kawaoka, S., Izumi, N., Katsuma, S. & Tomari, Y. 3′ end formation of PIWI-interacting RNAs in vitro. Mol. Cell 43, 1015–1022 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gunawardane, L. S. et al. A slicer-mediated mechanism for repeat-associated siRNA 5′ end formation in Drosophila. Science 315, 1587–1590 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Haase, A. D. et al. Probing the initiation and effector phases of the somatic piRNA pathway in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 24, 2499–2504 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Pane, A., Wehr, K. & Schupbach, T. zucchini and squash encode two putative nucleases required for rasiRNA production in the Drosophila germline. Dev. Cell 12, 851–862 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Schupbach, T. & Wieschaus, E. Female sterile mutations on the second chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Mutations blocking oogenesis or altering egg morphology. Genetics 129, 1119–1136 (1991)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Malone, C. D. et al. Specialized piRNA pathways act in germline and somatic tissues of the Drosophila ovary. Cell 137, 522–535 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Olivieri, D., Sykora, M. M., Sachidanandam, R., Mechtler, K. & Brennecke, J. An in vivo RNAi assay identifies major genetic and cellular requirements for primary piRNA biogenesis in Drosophila. EMBO J. 29, 3301–3317 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Selvy, P. E., Lavieri, R. R., Lindsley, C. W. & Brown, H. A. Phospholipase D: enzymology, functionality, and chemical modulation. Chem. Rev. 111, 6064–6119 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi, S. Y. et al. A common lipid links Mfn-mediated mitochondrial fusion and SNARE-regulated exocytosis. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 1255–1262 (2006)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang, H. et al. piRNA-associated germline nuage formation and spermatogenesis require MitoPLD profusogenic mitochondrial-surface lipid signaling. Dev. Cell 20, 376–387 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Watanabe, T. et al. MITOPLD is a mitochondrial protein essential for nuage formation and piRNA biogenesis in the mouse germline. Dev. Cell 20, 364–375 (2011)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Gonzalvez, F. & Gottlieb, E. Cardiolipin: setting the beat of apoptosis. Apoptosis 12, 877–885 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gottlin, E. B., Rudolph, A. E., Zhao, Y., Matthews, H. R. & Dixon, J. E. Catalytic mechanism of the phospholipase D superfamily proceeds via a covalent phosphohistidine intermediate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 9202–9207 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lackey, D., Walker, G. C., Keng, T. & Linn, S. Characterization of an endonuclease associated with the drug resistance plasmid pKM101. J. Bacteriol. 131, 583–588 (1977)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Pohlman, R. F., Liu, F., Wang, L., More, M. I. & Winans, S. C. Genetic and biochemical analysis of an endonuclease encoded by the IncN plasmid pKM101. Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 4867–4872 (1993)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Stuckey, J. A. & Dixon, J. E. Crystal structure of a phospholipase D family member. Nature Struct. Biol. 6, 278–284 (1999)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J. Mol. Biol. 372, 774–797 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Berg, J. M. & Shi, Y. The galvanization of biology: a growing appreciation for the roles of zinc. Science 271, 1081–1085 (1996)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lai, W. S., Carballo, E., Thorn, J. M., Kennington, E. A. & Blackshear, P. J. Interactions of CCCH zinc finger proteins with mRNA. Binding of tristetraprolin-related zinc finger proteins to Au-rich elements and destabilization of mRNA. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 17827–17837 (2000)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kelly, S. M. et al. Recognition of polyadenosine RNA by zinc finger proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 12306–12311 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hurt, J. A. et al. A conserved CCCH-type zinc finger protein regulates mRNA nuclear adenylation and export. J. Cell Biol. 185, 265–277 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gao, G., Guo, X. & Goff, S. P. Inhibition of retroviral RNA production by ZAP, a CCCH-type zinc finger protein. Science 297, 1703–1706 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Van Der Spoel, D. et al. GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1701–1718 (2005)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Aravin, A. et al. A novel class of small RNAs bind to MILI protein in mouse testes. Nature 442, 203–207 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Girard, A., Sachidanandam, R., Hannon, G. J. & Carmell, M. A. A germline-specific class of small RNAs binds mammalian Piwi proteins. Nature 442, 199–202 (2006)

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Frank, F., Sonenberg, N. & Nagar, B. Structural basis for 5′-nucleotide base-specific recognition of guide RNA by human AGO2. Nature 465, 818–822 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mi, S. et al. Sorting of small RNAs into Arabidopsis argonaute complexes is directed by the 5′ terminal nucleotide. Cell 133, 116–127 (2008)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Esnouf, R. M. Further additions to MolScript version 1.4, including reading and contouring of electron-density maps. Acta Crystallogr. D 55, 938–940 (1999)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bieniossek, C., Richmond, T. J. & Berger, I. MultiBac: multigene baculovirus-based eukaryotic protein complex production. Curr. Protoc. Protein Sci. Chapter 5, Unit 5.20 (2008)

  32. Pozharski, E. V., McWilliams, L. & MacDonald, R. C. Relationship between turbidity of lipid vesicle suspensions and particle size. Anal. Biochem. 291, 158–162 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vagin, V. V. et al. A distinct small RNA pathway silences selfish genetic elements in the germline. Science 313, 320–324 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kabsch, W. Automatic processing of rotation diffraction data from crystals of initially unknown symmetry and cell constants. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 795–800 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Collaborative Computation Project, 4. The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 50, 760–763 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Perrakis, A., Harkiolaki, M., Wilson, K. S. & Lamzin, V. S. ARP/wARP and molecular replacement. Acta Crystallogr. D 57, 1445–1450 (2001)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126–2132 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Murshudov, G. N., Vagin, A. A. & Dodson, E. J. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. D 53, 240–255 (1997)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 12–21 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. DeLano, W. L. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. (Schrödinger, LLC, 2002)

  42. Holm, L. & Rosenstrom, P. Dali server: conservation mapping in 3D. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, W545–W549 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Lindorff-Larsen, K. et al. Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field. Proteins 78, 1950–1958 (2010)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Essmann, U. et al. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J. Chem. Phys. 103, 8577–8593 (1995)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank W. Filipowicz, R. MacDonald and members of the G.J.H. and L.J. laboratories for discussions; G. Bencze, K. Rivera and D. Pappin of the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory proteomics facility, which is funded in part by an National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant (CA045508), for support with mass spectrometry; and H. Robinson for help at the National Synchrotron Light Source, which is supported by the Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences. J.J.I. was supported by the Harvey L. Karp award and by a Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Awards National Institutes of Health (NIH) fellowship F32GM97888. This work was supported by NIH grant R01GM062534. G.J.H. and L.J. are Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigators.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jonathan J. Ipsaro and Astrid D. Haase: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. W. M. Keck Structural Biology Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, 11724, New York, USA

    Jonathan J. Ipsaro & Leemor Joshua-Tor

  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, 11724, New York, USA

    Jonathan J. Ipsaro, Astrid D. Haase, Simon R. Knott, Leemor Joshua-Tor & Gregory J. Hannon

Authors
  1. Jonathan J. Ipsaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Astrid D. Haase
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Simon R. Knott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Leemor Joshua-Tor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gregory J. Hannon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.J., G.J.H., A.D.H. and J.J.I. planned studies and wrote the paper. A.D.H. and J.J.I. performed the experiments, and S.R.K. analysed datasets.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Leemor Joshua-Tor or Gregory J. Hannon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-10, Supplementary Table 1 and additional references. (PDF 9119 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ipsaro, J., Haase, A., Knott, S. et al. The structural biochemistry of Zucchini implicates it as a nuclease in piRNA biogenesis. Nature 491, 279–283 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11502

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11502

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing