Dynamical similarity of geomagnetic field reversals

Article metrics


No consensus has been reached so far on the properties of the geomagnetic field during reversals or on the main features that might reveal its dynamics. A main characteristic of the reversing field is a large decrease in the axial dipole and the dominant role of non-dipole components1,2,3. Other features strongly depend on whether they are derived from sedimentary or volcanic records. Only thermal remanent magnetization of lava flows can capture faithful records of a rapidly varying non-dipole field, but, because of episodic volcanic activity, sequences of overlying flows yield incomplete records. Here we show that the ten most detailed volcanic records of reversals can be matched in a very satisfactory way, under the assumption of a common duration, revealing common dynamical characteristics. We infer that the reversal process has remained unchanged, with the same time constants and durations, at least since 180 million years ago. We propose that the reversing field is characterized by three successive phases: a precursory event, a 180° polarity switch and a rebound. The first and third phases reflect the emergence of the non-dipole field with large-amplitude secular variation. They are rarely both recorded at the same site owing to the rapidly changing field geometry and last for less than 2,500 years. The actual transit between the two polarities does not last longer than 1,000 years and might therefore result from mechanisms other than those governing normal secular variation. Such changes are too brief to be accurately recorded by most sediments.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Paths of VGPs.
Figure 2: Dynamical characteristics of the reversal records.
Figure 3: Secular variation in presence of low axial dipole.
Figure 4: Reversal timing and eruption rates.


  1. 1

    Dagley, P. &. Lawley, E. Paleomagnetic evidence for the transitional behavior of the geomagnetic field. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 36, 577–598 (1974)

  2. 2

    Jacobs, J. A. Reversals of the Earth’s Magnetic Field 2nd edn (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1994)

  3. 3

    Amit, H., Leonhardt, R. & Wicht, J. Polarity reversals from paleomagnetic observations and numerical dynamos simulations. Space Sci. Rev. 155, 293–335 (2010)

  4. 4

    Brown, M. C., Holme, R. & Bargery, A. Exploring the influence of the non-dipole field on magnetic records for field reversals and excursions. Geophys. J. Int. 168, 541–550 (2007)

  5. 5

    Valet, J. P. & Plenier, G. Simulations of a time-varying non-dipole field during geomagnetic reversals and excursions. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 169, 178–193 (2008)

  6. 6

    Hagstrum, J. T. & Champion, D. E. Late Quaternary geomagnetic secular variation from historical and 14C-dated lava flows on Hawaii. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 24393–24403 (1995)

  7. 7

    Korte, M., Constable, C., Donadini, F. & Holme, R. Reconstructing the Holocene geomagnetic field. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 312, 497–505 (2011)

  8. 8

    Jarboe, N. A., Coe, R. S. & Glen, J. M. G. Evidence from lava flows for complex polarity transitions: the new composite Steens Mountain reversal record. Geophys. J. Int. 186, 580–602 (2011)

  9. 9

    Hulot, G. & Le Mouël, J.-L. A statistical approach to the Earth’s main magnetic field. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 82, 167–183 (1994)

  10. 10

    Lhuillier, F., Fournier, A., Hulot, G. & Aubert, J. The geomagnetic secular-variation timescale in observations and numerical dynamo models. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L09306 (2011)

  11. 11

    Singer, B. S. et al. Structural and temporal requirements for geomagnetic reversal deduced from lava flows. Nature 434, 633–636 (2005)

  12. 12

    Kent, D. V. & Schneider, D. A. Correlation of paleointensity variation records in the Brunhes/Matuyama polarity transition interval. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 129, 135–144 (1995)

  13. 13

    Hartl, P. & Tauxe, L. A precursor to the Matuyama-Brunhes transition-field instability as recorded in pelagic sediments. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 138, 121–135 (1996)

  14. 14

    Narteau, C., Le Mouël, J.-L. & Valet, J.-P. The oscillatory nature of the geomagnetic field during reversals. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 262, 66–76 (2007)

  15. 15

    Pétrélis, F., Fauve, S., Dormy, E. & Valet, J. P. Simple mechanism for reversals of Earth’s magnetic field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 144503 (2009)

  16. 16

    Clement, B. M. Dependence of the duration of geomagnetic polarity reversals on site latitude. Nature 428, 637–640 (2004)

  17. 17

    Langereis, C. G., van Hoof, A. A. M. & Rochette, P. Longitudinal confinement of geomagnetic reversal paths as a possible sedimentary artefact. Nature 358, 226–230 (1992)

  18. 18

    Channell, J. E. T., Curtis, J. H. & Flower, B. P. The Matuyama-Brunhes boundary interval (500–900 ka) in North Atlantic drift sediments. Geophys. J. Int. 158, 489–505 (2004)

  19. 19

    Prévot, M., Mankinen, E. A., Coe, R. S. & Grommé, C. S. The Steens Mountain (Oregon) geomagnetic polarity transition. 2. Field intensity variations and discussion of reversal models. J. Geophys. Res. 90, 10,417–10,448 (1985)

  20. 20

    Herrero-Bervera, E. & Valet, J.-P. Absolute paleointensity and reversal records from the Waianae sequence (Oahu, Hawaii, USA). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 234, 279–296 (2005)

  21. 21

    Richards, M., Duncan, R. & Courtillot, V. Flood basalts and hot-spot tracks: plume heads and tails. Science 246, 103–107 (1989)

  22. 22

    Olson, P. L., Glatzmaier, G. A. & Coe, R. S. Complex polarity reversals in a geodynamo model. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 304, 168–179 (2011)

  23. 23

    Herrero-Bervera, E. & Valet, J.-P. Paleosecular variation during sequential geomagnetic reversals from Hawaii. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 171, 139–148 (1999)

  24. 24

    Herrero-Bervera, E., Walker, G. P. L., Harrison, C. G. A., Guerrero Garcia, J. & Kristjansson, L. Detailed paleomagnetic study of two volcanic polarity transitions recorded in eastern Iceland. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 115, 119–135 (1999)

  25. 25

    Coe, R. S., Singer, B., Pringle, M. S. & Zhao, X. Matuyama-Brunhes reversal and Kamikatsura event on Maui: paleomagnetic directions, 40Ar/39Ar ages and implications. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 222, 667–684 (2004)

  26. 26

    Mochizuki, N., Oda, H., Ishizuka, O., Yamazaki, T. & Tsunakawa, H. Paleointensity variation across the Matuyama-Brunhes polarity transition: Observations from lavas at Punaruu Valley, Tahiti. J. Geophys. Res. 116, B06103 (2011)

  27. 27

    Moulin, M., Courtillot, V., Fluteau, F. & Valet, J. P. The “van Zijl” Jurassic geomagnetic reversal revisited. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 13, Q03010 (2012)

  28. 28

    Chauvin, A., Roperch, P. & Duncan, R. A. Records of geomagnetic reversals from volcanic islands of French Polynesia. 2. Paleomagnetic study of a flow sequence (1.2–0.6 Ma) from the Island of Tahiti and discussion of reversal models. J. Geophys. Res. 95, 2727–2752 (1990)

  29. 29

    Riisager, J., Riisager, P. & Ken Pedersen, A. The C27n-C26r geomagnetic polarity reversal recorded in the west Greenland flood basalt province: how complex is the transitional field? J. Geophys. Res. 108, 2155 (2003)

  30. 30

    Aubert, J., Labrosse, S. & Poitou, C. Modelling the palaeo-evolution of the geodynamo. Geophys. J. Int. 179, 1414–1428 (2009)

  31. 31

    Heunemann, C., Krasa, D., Soffel, H., Gurevitch, E. & Bachtadse, V. Directions and intensities of the Earth’s magnetic field during a reversal: results from the Permo-Triassic Siberian trap basalts, Russia. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 218, 197–213 (2004)

  32. 32

    Leonhardt, R., Matzka, J., Hufenbecher, F. & Soffel, H. C. A reversal of the Earth’s magnetic field recorded in mid-Miocene lava flows of Gran Canaria: paleodirections. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 2024 (2002)

  33. 33

    Hoffman, K. A. & Singer, B. S. Magnetic source separation in Earth’s outer core. Science 321, 1800 (2008)

  34. 34

    Bloxham, J. & Jackson, A. Time-dependent mapping of the magnetic field at the core-mantle boundary. J. Geophys. Res. 97, 19537–19563 (1992)

  35. 35

    Roberts, P. H. & Scott, S. On the analysis of the secular variation. 1. A hydromagnetic constraint: theory. J. Geomag. Geoelectr. 17, 137–151 (1965)

  36. 36

    Jackson, A. & Finlay, C. C. in Geomagnetism (ed. Kono, M.) 147–193 (Treatise on Geophysics 5, Elsevier, 2007)

  37. 37

    Christensen, U. & Aubert, J. Scaling properties of convection-driven dynamos in rotating spherical shells and application to planetary magnetic fields. Geophys. J. Int. 166, 97–114 (2006)

  38. 38

    Nimmo, F. in Core Dynamics (ed. Olson, P. ) 31–65 (Treatise on Geophysics 8, Elsevier, 2007)

Download references


We are grateful to J. Dyon for significantly improving the quality of the figures and to J. Channell for providing us with his reversal data. This is IPGP contribution number 3313 and HIGP contribution number 1987.

Author information

J.-P.V. initiated the study, performed reversal data treatment and wrote the manuscript. A.F. contributed to all stages of the study by developing the link with theoretical modelling, performing the calculations derived from the CALS10k.1b model, writing and editing. V.C. edited the manuscript and influenced its content via discussions. E.H.-B. acquired a large part of the data and critically read the paper.

Correspondence to Jean-Pierre Valet.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figures

This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-3. (PDF 286 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valet, J., Fournier, A., Courtillot, V. et al. Dynamical similarity of geomagnetic field reversals. Nature 490, 89–93 (2012) doi:10.1038/nature11491

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.