Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Network science

Luck or reason

The concept of preferential attachment is behind the hubs and power laws seen in many networks. New results fuel an old debate about its origin, and beg the question of whether it is based on randomness or optimization. See Letter p.537

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Randomness or optimization?

Notes

  1. *This article and the paper under discussion1 were published online on 12 September 2012.

References

  1. Papadopoulos, F., Kitsak, M., Serrano, M. A., Boguñá, M. & Krioukov, D. Nature 489, 537–540 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eggenberger, F. & Pólya, G. J. Appl. Math. Mech. (ZAMM) 3, 279–289 (1923).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Merton, R. K. Science 159, 56–63 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Barabási, A.-L. & Albert, R. Science 286, 509–512 (1999).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Krapivsky, P. L., Redner, S. & Leyvraz, F. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4629–4632 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jeong, H., Néda, Z. & Barabási, A.-L. Europhys. Lett. 61, 567–572 (2003).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Newman, M. E. J. Phys. Rev. E 64, 025102(R) (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dorogovtsev, S. N., Mendes, J. F. F. & Samukhin, A. N. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4633–4636 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar, R. et al. in Proc. 19th Symp. Princ. Database Syst. (eds Vianu, V. & Gottlob, G.) 1–10 (ACM, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pastor-Satorras, R., Smith, E. & Solé, R. V. J. Theor. Biol. 222, 199–210 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vazquez, A., Flammini, A., Maritan, A. & Vespignani, A. ComPlexUs 1, 38–44 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D'Souza, R. M., Borgs, C., Chayes, J. T., Berger, N. & Kleinberg, R. D. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 6112–6117 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fabrikant, A., Koutsoupias, E. & Papadimitriou, C. in Proc. 29th Int. Colloq. Automata, Languages and Programming (eds Widmayer, P. et al.) 110–122 (Springer, 2002).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Kornai, A. Mathematical Linguistics 71 (Springer, 2008).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert-László Barabási.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barabási, AL. Luck or reason. Nature 489, 507–508 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11486

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11486

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics