Letter | Published:

The limits of the nuclear landscape

Nature volume 486, pages 509512 (28 June 2012) | Download Citation

Abstract

In 2011, 100 new nuclides were discovered1. They joined the approximately 3,000 stable and radioactive nuclides that either occur naturally on Earth or are synthesized in the laboratory2,3. Every atomic nucleus, characterized by a specific number of protons and neutrons, occupies a spot on the chart of nuclides, which is bounded by ‘drip lines’ indicating the values of neutron and proton number at which nuclear binding ends. The placement of the neutron drip line for the heavier elements is based on theoretical predictions using extreme extrapolations, and so is uncertain. However, it is not known how uncertain it is or how many protons and neutrons can be bound in a nucleus. Here we estimate these limits of the nuclear ‘landscape’ and provide statistical and systematic uncertainties for our predictions. We use nuclear density functional theory, several Skyrme interactions and high-performance computing, and find that the number of bound nuclides with between 2 and 120 protons is around 7,000. We find that extrapolations for drip-line positions and selected nuclear properties, including neutron separation energies relevant to astrophysical processes, are very consistent between the models used.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & From isotopes to the stars. Nature 473, 25–26 (2011)

  2. 2.

    National Nuclear Data Center. Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File. .

  3. 3.

    Reaching the limits of nuclear stability. Rep. Prog. Phys. 67, 1187–1232 (2004)

  4. 4.

    et al. Synthesis of the isotopes of elements 118 and 116 in the 249Cf and 245Cm+48Ca fusion reactions. Phys. Rev. C 74, 044602 (2006)

  5. 5.

    et al. Theoretical description of superheavy nuclei. Nucl. Phys. A 701, 165–171 (2002)

  6. 6.

    Rare. Isotope Science Assessment Committee. Scientific Opportunities with a Rare-Isotope Facility in the United States (Natl Acad. Press, 2007)

  7. 7.

    & Nuclear superfluidity: pairing in finite systems (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005)

  8. 8.

    , & Self-consistent calculations of ground state properties for unstable nuclei. Nucl. Phys. A 249, 1–28 (1975)

  9. 9.

    & Nuclear reactions and stellar processes. Rep. Prog. Phys. 64, 1657–1701 (2001)

  10. 10.

    et al. Shell structure of exotic nuclei. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 59, 432–445 (2007)

  11. 11.

    & Open problems in nuclear structure near drip lines. J. Phys. G 37, 064017 (2010)

  12. 12.

    , & Self-consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 121–180 (2003)

  13. 13.

    et al. Variations on a theme by Skyrme: a systematic study of adjustments of model parameters. Phys. Rev. C 79, 034310 (2009)

  14. 14.

    & Information content of a new observable: The case of the nuclear neutron skin. Phys. Rev. C 81, 051303(R) (2010)

  15. 15.

    et al. Nuclear energy density optimization. Phys. Rev. C 82, 024313 (2010)

  16. 16.

    et al. Systematic study of deformed nuclei at the drip lines and beyond. Phys. Rev. C 68, 054312 (2003)

  17. 17.

    , & Further explorations of Skyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov mass formulas. XII. Stiffness and stability of neutron-star matter. Phys. Rev. C 82, 035804 (2010)

  18. 18.

    et al. Nuclear ground-state masses and deformations. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 59, 185–381 (1995)

  19. 19.

    , , & First Gogny-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov nuclear mass model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 242501 (2009)

  20. 20.

    et al. Structure of even-even nuclei using a mapped collective Hamiltonian and the D1S Gogny interaction. Phys. Rev. C 81, 014303 (2010)

  21. 21.

    et al. A Skyrme parametrization from subnuclear to neutron star densities Part II. Nuclei far from stabilities. Nucl. Phys. A 635, 231–256 (1998); erratum. 643, 441 (1998)

  22. 22.

    et al. Nuclear energy density optimization: large deformations. Phys. Rev. C 85, 024304 (2012)

  23. 23.

    , & Large-scale mass table calculations. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 18, 816–822 (2009)

  24. 24.

    et al. Towards a better parametrisation of Skyrme-like effective forces: a critical study of the SkM force. Nucl. Phys. A 386, 79–100 (1982)

  25. 25.

    , & Hartree-Fock-Bogolyubov description of nuclei near the neutron-drip line. Nucl. Phys. A 422, 103–139 (1984)

  26. 26.

    et al. Discovery of 40 Mg and 42Al suggests neutron drip-line slant towards heavier isotopes. Nature 449, 1022–1024 (2007)

  27. 27.

    et al. Three-body forces and the limit of oxygen isotopes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 032501 (2010)

  28. 28.

    , & Nuclear ground-state properties from mean-field calculations. Eur. Phys. J. A 15, 21–26 (2002)

  29. 29.

    et al. Axially deformed solution of the Skyrme–Hartree–Fock–Bogolyubov equations using the transformed harmonic oscillator basis. The program HFBTHO (v1.66p). Comput. Phys. Commun. 167, 43–63 (2005)

  30. 30.

    et al. Axial and reflection asymmetry of the nuclear ground state. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 94, 758–780 (2008)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Office of Nuclear Physics, US Department of Energy, and by the Academy of Finland.

Author information

Author notes

    • Mario Stoitsov

    Deceased

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA

    • Jochen Erler
    • , Noah Birge
    • , Markus Kortelainen
    • , Witold Nazarewicz
    • , Erik Olsen
    • , Alexander M. Perhac
    •  & Mario Stoitsov
  2. Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA

    • Jochen Erler
    • , Markus Kortelainen
    • , Witold Nazarewicz
    • , Erik Olsen
    •  & Mario Stoitsov
  3. Department of Physics, PO Box 35 (YFL), University of Jyväskylä, FI-40014 Jyväskylä, Finland

    • Markus Kortelainen
  4. Institute of Theoretical Physics, Warsaw University, PL-00681 Warsaw, Poland

    • Witold Nazarewicz

Authors

  1. Search for Jochen Erler in:

  2. Search for Noah Birge in:

  3. Search for Markus Kortelainen in:

  4. Search for Witold Nazarewicz in:

  5. Search for Erik Olsen in:

  6. Search for Alexander M. Perhac in:

  7. Search for Mario Stoitsov in:

Contributions

Theoretical calculations were performed by J.E., M.K. and M.S. The data were analysed by N.B., J.E., W.N., E.O. and A.M.P. The manuscript was prepared by J.E. and W.N. All authors contributed to this work, discussed the results and conclusions, and commented on the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Witold Nazarewicz.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Text and Data, Supplementary Figures 1-5, Supplementary Table 1 and additional references.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11188

Further reading Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.