In female (XX) mammals, one of the two X chromosomes is inactivated to ensure an equal dose of X-linked genes with males (XY)1. X-chromosome inactivation in eutherian mammals is mediated by the non-coding RNA Xist2. Xist is not found in metatherians3 (marsupials), and how X-chromosome inactivation is initiated in these mammals has been the subject of speculation for decades4. Using the marsupial Monodelphis domestica, here we identify Rsx (RNA-on-the-silent X), an RNA that has properties consistent with a role in X-chromosome inactivation. Rsx is a large, repeat-rich RNA that is expressed only in females and is transcribed from, and coats, the inactive X chromosome. In female germ cells, in which both X chromosomes are active, Rsx is silenced, linking Rsx expression to X-chromosome inactivation and reactivation. Integration of an Rsx transgene on an autosome in mouse embryonic stem cells leads to gene silencing in cis. Our findings permit comparative studies of X-chromosome inactivation in mammals and pose questions about the mechanisms by which X-chromosome inactivation is achieved in eutherians.


X-chromosome dosage-compensation mechanisms vary between metazoans5. In metatherians, X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is imprinted, affecting the paternal X chromosome6, but the factors that drive XCI in these mammals are unknown4. The metatherian and eutherian female inactive X chromosomes share common epigenetic features7,8,9, suggesting that XCI in these mammals proceeds by a similar mechanism. Notably, the metatherian inactive X chromosome is enriched for histone H3 Lys 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3)7,8,9,10. In eutherians, this H3K27me3 enrichment is Xist-dependent11. We therefore proposed that an unidentified X-linked RNA initiates XCI in metatherians7. Xist RNA is expressed in female but not male somatic tissues, coats the inactive X chromosome, and is expressed from the inactive X chromosome12,13,14,15. We posited that a regulator of XCI in metatherians would also exhibit these unusual properties.

We analysed XCI in the female brain of the short-tailed opossum M. domestica. Using RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), we studied the expression of the X-linked gene Hprt1 with a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC), VM18-839J22, containing Hprt1 plus 49 kilobases (kb) of upstream and 82 kb of downstream sequence, and in which no other known genes mapped (Fig. 1a). RNA FISH signals usually appear as pinpoint dots. However, the RNA signal detected resembled a cloud (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1) that was reminiscent of the Xist RNA cloud seen in female mouse (Fig. 1a) and human cells15. We observed the same RNA cloud using a modified form of the BAC carrying an Hprt1 deletion (Fig. 1a). The RNA therefore originated from another, uncharacterized gene located within the genomic region defined by VM18-839J22. RNA FISH using other BACs narrowed down this region to 82 kb downstream of Hprt1 (Fig. 1a). We identified the RNA using reverse transcription PCR (RT–PCR) on female brain complementary DNA with primers located along this critical region (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Table 1), revealing a transcription unit spanning 47 kb (Fig. 1b).

Figure 1: Discovery of a candidate X-inactivating RNA in the opossum.
Figure 1

a, RNA FISH mapping of the new gene using BACs; green BACs give RNA FISH cloud signals, red BACs do not. The VM18-839J22 BAC gives a cloud signal (green; second panel, bottom) identical to Xist RNA (first panel, bottom) as seen in mouse brain cells (further RNA cloud images in Supplementary Fig. 1). The cloud is still observed with VM18-839J22del (third panel, bottom), deleted for Hprt1 (Supplementary Table 1 for recombineering sequences) and VM18-303M7 (fourth panel, bottom). The 82-kb critical interval is defined by VM18-839J22del and VM18-3O1. The Lnx3 gene that gave rise to Xist3 maps to a locus distinct from Rsx. DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; Mb, megabases. b, Top, RT–PCR using primers denoted ‘L’ (originating in the left half of the critical region in the figure) and ‘R’ (originating in the right half of the critical region in the figure) identifies a female-specific 47-kb transcript (green boxed area in RT–PCR figure) within the 82-kb critical interval (see Supplementary Table 1 for primers). Transcript limits are shown above the X chromosome. Middle, RNA FISH images showing RNA clouds in female but not male brain cells. Bottom, RT–PCR using primer pair M3 (black rectangle in first RT–PCR image) shows female-specific expression in all tissues. Gapdh is an autosomal control. c, Combined VM18-839J22 RNA FISH and H3K27me3 immunostaining shows the inactive X chromosome (marked by dotted line in first panel) coated with the new RNA. d, Combined VM18-839J22 RNA and DNA FISH for the new RNA. No RNA signal is observed from the active X chromosome (Xa) locus, but an RNA signal colocalizes with the DNA locus on the inactive X chromosome (Xi). Scale bars, 5 μm.

We then investigated whether the RNA exhibited other Xist-like features. First, we looked for evidence of sexually dimorphic expression. No RNA clouds were detected in male opossum brain by VM18-839J22 RNA FISH (Fig. 1b), demonstrating that in this tissue expression of the RNA was female-specific. Consistent with this, RT–PCR on male brain cDNA revealed no expression of the 47-kb transcript previously identified in females (Fig. 1b). RT–PCR on a broad array of tissues, representing derivatives of endoderm, mesoderm and ectoderm, from both males and females revealed expression of the RNA in all female but no male tissues examined (Fig. 1b).

Next, we established whether the RNA coats the inactive X chromosome. We combined VM18-839J22 RNA FISH on female brain cells with immunostaining for the inactive X chromosome marker H3K27me3. We observed colocalization of RNA clouds and H3K27me3 signals (Fig. 1c), demonstrating inactive X chromosome coating.

To determine whether the RNA was expressed from the inactive X chromosome, we performed dual RNA–DNA FISH using the VM18-839J22 BAC. No RNA signal was seen colocalizing with the DNA signal on the active X chromosome (Fig. 1d). By contrast, an RNA signal was observed colocalizing with the DNA signal on the inactive X chromosome (Fig. 1d). This RNA signal was brighter than others in the surrounding cloud, a feature characteristic of a site of nascent RNA synthesis. Thus, the RNA is expressed only from the inactive X chromosome. This must be the paternal X chromosome, as this is always chosen for inactivation6. In summary, like Xist, the RNA that we identified is female-specific, coats the inactive X and is transcribed only from the inactive X chromosome. We call the RNA Rsx (RNA-on-the-silent X).

To characterize Rsx further, we performed RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) on female opossum brain (Fig. 2a). This confirmed that the Rsx gene generates a precursor RNA of 47 kb (University of California Santa Cruz (UCSC) monDom5 coordinates: chrX 35,605,415–35,651,609) transcribed antisense relative to Hprt1. Split RNA reads indicated that Rsx encodes a spliced RNA consisting of four exons: this was confirmed by RT–PCR (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Table 1). The RNA-seq data predicted that the mature Rsx RNA is large, approximating 27 kb, with 25 kb of sequence deriving from a single exon. Northern blots confirmed that Rsx RNA was large, exceeding the 17 kb mouse Xist RNA in size, and validated the strandedness, female-specificity and broadness of Rsx expression (Fig. 2b). The level of Rsx expression varied between female tissues, an observation also noted for Xist (Supplementary Fig. 2). 3′ rapid amplification of complementary DNA ends (RACE) demonstrated that Rsx transcripts are polyadenylated.

Figure 2: Characterization of Rsx RNA.
Figure 2

a, RNA-seq shows female-specific expression of Rsx, whereas reads mapping to the Phf6 and Hprt1 genes are found in both sexes. Boxed area shows magnification of Rsx locus. Pale red reads are ambiguous, that is, they hit several repeats within the Rsx RNA. Inferred exons and their verification by RT–PCR are shown at the bottom. Dark grey bars along the chromosome coordinate axis represent DNA sequence gaps (Methods). b, Northern blot analysis of Rsx. (See Supplementary Fig. 2 for controls, and Supplementary Table 1 for primers for probes.) Top left, female-specific expression of an RNA greater than 23 kb. Middle, size verification of Rsx RNA by comparison with the 17-kb Xist RNA. Verification of the strandedness of Rsx transcription (sequences in Supplementary Table 1) is shown in the right two panels. Bottom, multi-tissue blot showing female-specific Rsx expression in all tissues. c, Comparison of repeat organization with that of Xist by sequence-similarity plots, window size = 28 nucleotides (grey area represents the unsequenced 2.8 kb). The 5′ 12-kb stretch of repeats includes two highly conserved 34- and 35-base motifs (Supplementary Fig. 3 for predicted 34-base stem–loops). RNA FISH using a repeat probe (green) co-localizes with the VM18-839J22 BAC (red; antisense probe sequence, Supplementary Table 1). A sense probe generates no signals (data not shown), confirming the transcriptional orientation of Rsx. Scale bar, 5 μm. d, Adjusted female:male ratios inferred from brain RNA-seq data identifying Rsx as a candidate XCI RNA (Methods). The second highest ranking RNA, ENSMODG00000003195, was found by RT–PCR to not be female-specific in other tissues, so can be excluded as an XCI candidate.

Sequence comparisons showed that Rsx and Xist are not homologous. Nevertheless, Rsx exhibited features reminiscent of Xist. Notably, it was highly enriched in tandem repeats biased towards the 5′ end of the RNA (Fig. 2c) and exhibiting high GC content. The Rsx repeats included two highly conserved and similar motifs with the potential to form stem–loop structures (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 3). RNA FISH using an oligonucleotide probe recognizing one of these repeats gave a cloud signal indistinguishable from that seen using the VM18-839J22 BAC, confirming that the repeats are included in the RNA that coats the inactive X chromosome (Fig. 2c). The longest open reading frame (ORF) found for Rsx constituted less than 5% of the total RNA length, and was located in the repeat region, suggesting that Rsx functions as a non-coding RNA. We conclude that the Rsx and Xist RNAs display similar features.

RNA-seq has been used previously to identify new transcripts16. We speculated that analysis of RNA-seq data alone would identify Rsx as a candidate XCI RNA. An RNA with a role in XCI would be X-linked and expressed only in females, and should therefore be evident in a comparison of female and male transcriptomes. To identify X-linked genes with sexually dimorphic expression levels, we compared the numbers of reads mapping to each region of the X in the female with that in the male brain and expressed this as a female:male ratio (Supplementary Table 2 and Methods). When all transcribed regions on the X chromosome were examined, Rsx was an outlier, with a female:male ratio exceeding the second-ranked RNA by threefold (Fig. 2d). We repeated this RNA-seq approach on liver, in which the level of Rsx expression is low (Fig. 2b). In this analysis, Rsx appeared second (Supplementary Table 2). Thus, RNA-seq can be used as a preliminary discovery tool to identify RNAs involved in dosage compensation.

To investigate a link between Rsx RNA and XCI, we examined Rsx expression in the female germ line. In mice, Xist is expressed in somatic tissues but is silenced during oocyte development. This is accompanied by a loss of H3K27me3 from the inactive X chromosome and by X-chromosome reactivation17,18,19. Similar to other somatic cells, supporting cells in the ovary displayed Rsx clouds (Fig. 3a) and XCI, as shown by X chromosome H3K27me3 enrichment (Fig. 3b) and monoallelic expression of the X chromosome gene Msn (Fig. 3c). However, in germ cells, identified by HORMAD1 immunostaining20, Rsx clouds were absent (Fig. 3a). Consistent with a relationship between Rsx expression and XCI, most meiotic cells had two active X chromosomes, with no X chromosome H3K27me3 accumulation (Fig. 3b), and biallelic Msn expression (Fig. 3c). Rsx expression is therefore linked to X-chromosome inactivation and reactivation.

Figure 3: Links between Rsx RNA expression and X-chromosome inactivation and reactivation.
Figure 3

a, Rsx clouds (arrowheads) are present in supporting cells (s) but not in meiotic cells (m, labelled with HORMAD1). b, Rsx clouds (in lower panel; arrowheads) colocalize with the XCI marker H3K27me3, which is not observed in meiotic cells. c, RNA FISH for the X-chromosome gene Msn shows that although supporting cells undergo XCI (that is, display a single RNA spot, arrows), meiotic cells have two active X chromosomes. Msn RNA signals are very bright in meiotic cells owing to an increase in global transcription during this point in germ-cell development. Scale bars, 5 μm.

We next carried out experiments to address whether Rsx induces gene silencing. Xist transgenes function as ectopic X-inactivation centres in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells, with Xist RNA coating the transgenic chromosome and inducing gene silencing in cis21,22. We generated an XX ES cell line, 303.2, carrying a single-copy chromosome 18-integrated transgene expressing full-length Rsx RNA (Fig. 4a).

Figure 4: Autosomal gene silencing in mouse ES cells by an Rsx transgene.
Figure 4

a, In Rsx transgenic female ES cell clone 303.2, the full-length Rsx transgene is expressed, as shown by RT–PCR spanning all exon–exon boundaries and by M3 (see Fig. 1) RT–PCR. b, Rsx RNA appears as a cloud in 303.2 cells, indicating autosomal coating. RNA FISH for three chromosome 18 genes, Ndfip1, Prrc1 and Synpo, shows that this coating induces gene silencing in differentiated cells (left column), whereas in other differentiated cells silencing does not occur (middle column). Wild-type (WT) ES cells show biallelic expression for each chromosome 18 gene (right column). TG, transgenic. Scale bars, 5 μm. c, Quantification of gene silencing (n > 100 cells per gene) in differentiated 303.2 cells versus controls (see Supplementary Table 1 for PCR primers for chromosome 18 RNA FISH probes). RNA FISH for the chromosome 9 gene Atr serves as a positive control.

We performed RNA FISH for Rsx and three chromosome 18 genes, Ndfip1, Prrc1 and Synpo, mapping near the transgene integration site, in differentiated 303.2 ES cells. We observed coating of the transgenic chromosome by Rsx RNA (Fig. 4b). Although Ndfip1, Prrc1 and Synpo were biallelically expressed in control ES cells (Fig. 4b, c), all three genes were silenced in more than half of the 303.2 ES cells (Fig. 4b, c). Silencing also occurred in undifferentiated 303.2 cells, albeit in a lower proportion than seen after differentiation (Fig. 4c). We conclude that Rsx expression can induce gene silencing in cis.

Finally, we looked for evidence of Rsx conservation among metatherians. Metatherians are divided into the South American and Australasian groups, which diverged 75–80 Myr ago. We identified expressed sequence tags (ESTs) with homology to opossum Rsx in two Australasian marsupials, the brushtail possum and tammar wallaby (Supplementary Table 3). In support of a role in XCI, RT–PCR demonstrated that in both organisms these ESTs were expressed only in females (Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Table 1). Rsx therefore originated before the major American–Australasian metatherian evolutionary split, indicating a common mechanism of XCI in all metatherians.

Here we identify Rsx, an RNA with properties suggestive of a role in metatherian XCI. Our findings indicate that RNA-mediated dosage-compensation mechanisms are widespread in the mammals. In eutherians, Xist is one of many non-coding RNAs expressed at the onset of XCI and colocated in the X-inactivation centre23. Our work identifies a candidate X-inactivation centre on the metatherian X chromosome and provides a point of focus for the identification of further RNAs that regulate XCI and ensure that it is imprinted. These studies will deepen our understanding not only of XCI, but also of the evolution and mechanisms controlling genomic imprinting in mammals.

Our results raise questions about the epigenetics of eutherian XCI. Xist RNA has been proposed to spread along the X chromosome by long interspersed elements (LINEs), which are abundant on the X chromosome24. Genomic analyses have concluded that the opossum X chromosome is not enriched in LINEs25, however Rsx RNA can nevertheless coat the inactive X chromosome. Thus, other factors, such as nuclear matrix and scaffold proteins26, may be more important primary determining factors for Rsx and potentially Xist spreading than LINEs. In addition, a study has found that in mice, imprinted inactivation of some X-linked genes proceeds in the absence of Xist27 (but see also ref. 28). It is therefore essential to determine whether an Rsx orthologue is present in eutherians and, if so, whether it is expressed and contributes to imprinted XCI in these mammals (Supplementary Discussion).

Previous work has shown that epigenetic features of XCI are conserved between metatherians and eutherians7,8,9. Although Rsx and Xist are not homologous, arising independently during evolution, they exhibit similarities in secondary sequence features. Thus, many aspects of the XCI pathway seem to have evolved convergently in metatherians and eutherians. With this in mind, it will be interesting to establish whether Rsx and Xist can replace one another in the XCI process. These experiments, as well as those that directly test the role of Rsx in metatherian XCI, would benefit from a genetically manipulable in vitro method for studying XCI in metatherians, akin to the ES cell system used in eutherians. The application of somatic cell reprogramming techniques29 to marsupials should now make this achievable.

Methods Summary

RNA FISH, DNA FISH and immunostaining were performed as described elsewhere30. RNA-seq was performed on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencer. Repeats were predicted using CisFinder.

Online Methods


Material for this study was acquired from opossums maintained at the Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research in San Antonio (germ-cell studies) and from opossums maintained at the MRC NIMR (all other studies) according to UK Home Office regulations. Tammar wallabies of Kangaroo Island, South Australia origin were maintained in a breeding colony in open grassy enclosures. Husbandry, handling and experiments were in accordance with the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia/Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization/Australian Research Council (2004) guidelines, and all sampling techniques and collection of tissues were approved by the University of Melbourne Animal Experimentation Ethics Committees. Material from the brushtail possums was obtained from adult male and female possums housed at the Landcare Research Captive Animal Facility, Lincoln, New Zealand, following the Landcare Research code of ethical conduct and in accordance with part 6 of the New Zealand Animal Welfare Act 1999.

RNA FISH, DNA FISH and immunostaining

Combined RNA FISH, DNA FISH and immunostaining was carried out exactly as previously described30. All RNA FISH was carried out on primary cells collected immediately post-mortem. Germ cells were collected at both 14 days post-partum (d.p.p.) and 17 d.p.p.


VM18-839J22 BAC was electroporated into modified DH10B strain SW102 cells followed by selection using chloramphenicol. Competent BAC-containing SW102 cells were grown to competency and then electroporated with a recombineering construct that had been generated from a kanamycin-resistance template using primers listed in Supplementary Table 1. Kanamycin-resistant colonies were subsequently picked and the Hprt1 deletion was verified using primers flanking the deletion site.


RNA was sequenced using a strand-specific protocol31 with the exception that total RNA was used instead of the polyA+ fraction. In brief, 3.5 μg of total RNA was reverse-transcribed using Superscript II (Invitrogen) in the presence of 10 pmol of T18VN primer, 250 ng random hexamers (Promega), 120 ng actinomycin D (Sigma), 40 U RNAzin (Promega) and 0.5 mM dNTP in a total volume of 20 µl 1× reverse transcription buffer (Invitrogen). Reaction mixture was purified using QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and second-strand synthesis was performed using SuperScript double-stranded cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen) as recommended by the manufacturer with the exception that 200 μM dTTP was replaced with 400 μM dUTP. Double-stranded cDNA was fragmented using Bioruptor (Diagenode) (15 min, low power, 30 s on, 30 s off) in a 50 μl volume. Sequencing libraries were prepared from fragmented cDNA using NEBNext DNA sample preparation kit (New England Biolabs) and Illumina PE adapters (PE-102-1003). Before the final PCR amplification samples were treated with uracil-N-glycosylase (Applied Biosystems). Sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 sequencer in the NIDDK Genomics core in 2× 50-base-pair (bp) paired-end mode. After initial processing with Illumina pipeline, quality-filtered sequencing reads were aligned to monDom5 version of the opossum genome assembly using BWA32. We generated in total 96 Mb reads for the female brain sample and 56 Mb reads for the male brain sample. Data were further processed using Samtools33 and visualized with IGV34.

Sequencing of Rsx RNA

RNA-seq gives an overall predicted size of the mature Rsx RNA as 26,800 bp. Note that the predicted transcription start site differs when using RNA-seq or 5′ RACE (coordinates in Supplementary Table 1). Split reads spanning the two sequence gaps on the right, indicating that these gaps contain only intronic sequence (Fig. 2a). We sequenced 8 kb of the gaps located within this intron, and no RNA-seq reads mapped to this sequence, suggesting that further exons have not been missed. A third gap resides in the middle of the third exon of Rsx. PCR shows that this gap is 5 kb, rather than 8 kb according to the monDom5 version of genome assembly. We sequenced 2.2 kb of this gap, and encountered a short and highly repetitive unit that precludes sequencing of the remaining 2.8 kb.

Female and male transcriptome analysis

RNA-seq data was converted into a total of 12,582 transcription units (top 500 listed in Supplementary Table 2). Closely mapping and overlapping reads were amalgamated into ‘blocks’, in which adjacent reads were amalgamated if there was no more than a ‘coalescence distance’ between them, measured between their nearest inside edges. Initially this was done with a 250-nucleotide coalescence distance, and the male and female samples were analysed separately. A count was kept of the number of reads amalgamated into each block. To compare identical loci, the sex-specific blocks were then amalgamated with each other using a longer coalescence distance of 2 kb. These second level amalgamated blocks were then analysed for the ratio of female:male reads in each block. To prevent divide-by-zero errors, and suppress probable false positives in which only small numbers of reads are involved, we added an arbitrary amount of noise (in this case 10 reads) to both female and male read counts for each block, before calculating the ratio. Blocks are then ranked by this noise-adjusted ratio. Note that the ratio of 150 for Rsx cited in the text is the average of three different regions of the RNA; individual ratios were 218, 205 and 28 (see also Supplementary Table 2).

Repeat predictions

For repeat prediction, the 5′ region of the Rsx transcript was searched for over-represented motifs using CisFinder35. Motifs were then mapped back to the primary transcript using pairwise BLAST.

RNA extraction, RT–PCR, cloning, northern blotting, RACE and quantitative PCR

RNA was extracted using Trizol (GIBCO BRL) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For RT–PCR, 2 μg of total RNA was treated with DNase (Promega) for 1 h at 37 °C, before random hexameric reverse transcription using Superscript II (Gibco BRL) for 1.5 h at 42 °C. PCR primers (Supplementary Table 1) were designed using Primer3 and all PCRs were carried out using the parameters: 1 cycle: 94 °C 3 min; 35 cycles: 96 °C 10 s, 56 °C 30 s, 72 °C 30 s; 1 cycle: 72 °C 10 min. PCR products spanning exon–exon boundaries (Supplementary Table 1) were cloned into TOPO TA cloning vector (Clontech) for subsequent sequencing.

For northern blot analysis, 10 μg of total RNA, extracted as described earlier, was electrophoresed, together with RNA size markers, on a 0.8% agarose gel containing 1.9 M formaldehyde. RNA was transferred to Hybond-N membranes (Amersham) using 20× saline-sodium citrate (SSC), and the membrane was hybridized overnight at 60 °C for α32P-labelled oligonucleotide probes and 42 °C for γ32P-labelled oligonucleotide probes. For α32P-labelled probe experiments, filters were then washed at 60 °C for 20 min in 2× SSC, 0.1% SDS then for 30 min in 0.5× SSC, 0.1% SDS and finally for 10 min in 0.2× SSC, 0.1% SDS. For γ32P-labelled probe experiments, filters were washed at 42 °C for 10 min in 6× saline sodium phosphate EDTA (SSPE) buffer, 0.1% SDS, then for 5 min in 2× SSC, 0.1% SDS. Note, the reason that Rsx is expressed at varying levels in different tissues is not clear, but may reflect differing requirements for this RNA in X-gene silencing in different cell types. The same phenomenon of variable expression is also observed for Xist (Supplementary Fig. 2) so is not peculiar to this RNA.

5′ RACE was performed using the 5′ RACE system (Invitrogen) and 3′ RACE with the SMARTer RACE cDNA amplification kit (Clontech), in both cases using 1 μg of total RNA from the female opossum brain.

Quantitative PCR for copy number was carried out as previously described36.

ES cell derivation and differentiation

ES cell lines were established from a mouse transgenic for VM18-303M7 BAC, according to published protocols37. In brief, blastocysts were flushed from the uterus at 3.5 d.p.c. and cultured in 2-inhibitor/leukemia inhibitory factor (2i/LIF) medium for 10 days without feeders, during which time inner cell mass outgrowth occurred. This was dissociated in tryspin and passaged to generate ES cells. ES cells were differentiated using retinoic acid for three days exactly as described38.


Image acquisition was performed with an Olympus IX70 inverted microscope with a 100 W mercury arc lamp and a 1003/1.35 UPLAN APO oil immersion objective. Each fluorochrome image was captured separately as a 12-bit source image with a computer-assisted (SoftWoRx) liquid cooled charge-coupled device (Photometrics CH350L; Kodak KAF1400 sensor, 1317 3 1035 pixels).


Primary accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

Data deposits

RNA-seq data is available from the Gene Expression Omnibus under accession number GSE36861; Rsx accession number JQ937282.


  1. 1.

    Gene action in the X-chromosome of the mouse (Mus musculus L.). Nature 190, 372–373 (1961)

  2. 2.

    et al. Requirement for Xist in X chromosome inactivation. Nature 379, 131–137 (1996)

  3. 3.

    et al. The Xist RNA gene evolved in eutherians by pseudogenization of a protein-coding gene. Science 312, 1653–1655 (2006)

  4. 4.

    , , & Unravelling the evolutionary origins of X chromosome inactivation in mammals: insights from marsupials and monotremes. Chromosome Res. 17, 671–675 (2009)

  5. 5.

    & Dosage compensation: the beginning and end of generalization. Nature Rev. Genet. 8, 47–57 (2007)

  6. 6.

    Late DNA replication in the paternally derived X chromosome of female kangaroos. Nature 230, 231–232 (1971)

  7. 7.

    et al. Key features of the X inactivation process are conserved between marsupials and eutherians. Curr. Biol. 19, 1478–1484 (2009)

  8. 8.

    et al. Epigenetic modifications on X chromosomes in marsupial and monotreme mammals and implications for evolution of dosage compensation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 17657–17662 (2010)

  9. 9.

    et al. Evolution from XIST-independent to XIST-controlled X-chromosome inactivation: epigenetic modifications in distantly related mammals. PLoS ONE 6, e19040 (2011)

  10. 10.

    et al. Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in X inactivation. Science 300, 131–135 (2003)

  11. 11.

    et al. A chromosomal memory triggered by Xist regulates histone methylation in X inactivation. PLoS Biol. 7, 991–1003 (2004)

  12. 12.

    et al. Conservation of position and exclusive expression of mouse Xist from the inactive X chromosome. Nature 351, 329–331 (1991)

  13. 13.

    et al. Characterization of a murine gene expressed from the inactive X chromosome. Nature 351, 325–329 (1991)

  14. 14.

    et al. A gene from the region of the human X inactivation centre is expressed exclusively from the inactive X chromosome. Nature 349, 38–44 (1991)

  15. 15.

    et al. The human XIST gene: Analysis of a 17kb inactive X-specific RNA that contains conserved repeats and is highly localised within the nucleus. Cell 71, 527–542 (1992)

  16. 16.

    , & RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nature Rev. Genet. 10, 57–63 (2009)

  17. 17.

    , & Early loss of Xist RNA expression and inactive X chromosome associated chromatin modification in developing primordial germ cells. PLoS ONE 2, e860 (2007)

  18. 18.

    & X chromosome reactivation initiates in nascent primordial germ cells in mice. PLoS Genet. 3, e116 (2007)

  19. 19.

    et al. X chromosome activity in mouse XX primordial germ cells. PLoS Genet. 4, e30 (2008)

  20. 20.

    et al. Mouse HORMAD1 and HORMAD2, two conserved meiotic chromosomal proteins, are depleted from synapsed chromosome axes with the help of TRIP13 AAA-ATPase. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000702 (2009)

  21. 21.

    , , & A 450kb transgene displays properties of the mammalian X-inactivation center. Cell 86, 83–94 (1996)

  22. 22.

    , , & Xist has properties of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 386, 272–275 (1997)

  23. 23.

    , & Regulation of X-chromosome inactivation by the X-inactivation centre. Nature Rev. Genet. 12, 429–442 (2011)

  24. 24.

    Do LINEs have a role in X-chromosome inactivation? J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2006, 59746 (2006)

  25. 25.

    et al. Genome of the marsupial Monodelphis domestica reveals innovation in non-coding sequences. Nature 447, 167–177 (2007)

  26. 26.

    et al. The matrix protein hnRNP U is required for chromosomal localization of Xist RNA. Dev. Cell 19, 469–476 (2010)

  27. 27.

    , , , & Evidence of Xist RNA-independent initiation of mouse imprinted X-chromosome inactivation. Nature 460, 647–651 (2009)

  28. 28.

    , , , & Two-step imprinted X inactivation: repeat versus genic silencing in the mouse. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 3187–3125 (2010)

  29. 29.

    & Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663–676 (2006)

  30. 30.

    , , , & Pachytene asynapsis drives meiotic sex chromosome inactivation and leads to substantial postmeiotic repression in spermatids. Dev. Cell 10, 521–529 (2006)

  31. 31.

    et al. Transcriptome analysis by strand-specific sequencing of complementary DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, e123 (2009)

  32. 32.

    & Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009)

  33. 33.

    et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009)

  34. 34.

    et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nature Biotechnol. 29, 24–26 (2011)

  35. 35.

    & Exhaustive search for over-represented DNA sequence motifs with CisFinder. DNA Res. 16, 261–273 (2009)

  36. 36.

    et al. Evidence that meiotic sex chromosome inactivation is essential for male fertility. Curr. Biol. 20, 2117–2123 (2010)

  37. 37.

    et al. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 453, 519–523 (2008)

  38. 38.

    , & X chromosome inactivation in embryonic stem cells: analysis of histone modifications and transcriptional activity using immunofluorescence and FISH. Methods Enzymol. 376, 405–419 (2005)

Download references


We thank D. Bell and R. Lovell-Badge for advice on the characterisation of Rsx, J. Cloutier and G. Polikiewicz for help with germ-cell preparations and quantitative PCR, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) Genomics core (National Institutes of Health, NIH) for RNA sequencing, A. Toth for the HORMAD1 antibody, the Biological and Procedural Services units at the National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR) for animal husbandry and Rsx transgenesis, and J. Cocquet, L. Reynard, H. Byers and members of the Turner and P. Burgoyne laboratories for reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Medical Research Council (MRC) (U117588498, U117597141, U117581331, U117597137), the NIH (HD60858), the Robert J. Kleberg Jr and Helen C. Kleberg Foundation, the New Zealand Foundation for Research, Science and Technology, Possum Biocontrol (C10X0501), the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (1010453) and the NIDDK (NIH) Intramural Research Program.

Author information


  1. MRC National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK

    • Jennifer Grant
    • , Shantha K. Mahadevaiah
    • , Mahesh N. Sangrithi
    • , Hélène Royo
    • , Willie Taylor
    • , Greg Elgar
    • , Mike J. Gilchrist
    •  & James M. A. Turner
  2. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA

    • Pavel Khil
    •  & R. Daniel Camerini-Otero
  3. Landcare Research - Manaaki Whenua, Pest Control Technology Group, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand

    • Janine Duckworth
  4. University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78249, USA

    • John R. McCarrey
  5. Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas 78227, USA

    • John L. VandeBerg
  6. Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 3010

    • Marilyn B. Renfree


  1. Search for Jennifer Grant in:

  2. Search for Shantha K. Mahadevaiah in:

  3. Search for Pavel Khil in:

  4. Search for Mahesh N. Sangrithi in:

  5. Search for Hélène Royo in:

  6. Search for Janine Duckworth in:

  7. Search for John R. McCarrey in:

  8. Search for John L. VandeBerg in:

  9. Search for Marilyn B. Renfree in:

  10. Search for Willie Taylor in:

  11. Search for Greg Elgar in:

  12. Search for R. Daniel Camerini-Otero in:

  13. Search for Mike J. Gilchrist in:

  14. Search for James M. A. Turner in:


J.G. and J.M.A.T. conceived and designed the experiments, performed RNA FISH and RT–PCR and wrote the manuscript. P.K., R.D.C.-O. and M.J.G. generated and analysed RNA-seq data. J.G., G.E. and W.T. performed repeat analysis. J.M.A.T. and S.K.M. performed northern blots. M.N.S. generated the transgenic ES cell line, and H.R. determined the ES cell transgene copy number. J.D., J.R.M., J.L.V. and M.B.R. provided animals and tissues.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James M. A. Turner.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-4, a Supplementary Discussion and additional references.

Excel files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Table

    This file contains the probe and primer sequences used in this study.

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Table 2

    This file contains the female:male ratios for X-encoded transcripts derived from RNA-seq data.

  3. 3.

    Supplementary Table 3

    This file contains the Australasian marsupial Rsx EST identifiers.

About this article

Publication history







By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.