Abstract

A main limitation of therapies that selectively target kinase signalling pathways is the emergence of secondary drug resistance. Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody that binds the extracellular domain of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), is effective in a subset of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancers1. After an initial response, secondary resistance invariably ensues, thereby limiting the clinical benefit of this drug2. The molecular bases of secondary resistance to cetuximab in colorectal cancer are poorly understood3,4,5,6,7,8. Here we show that molecular alterations (in most instances point mutations) of KRAS are causally associated with the onset of acquired resistance to anti-EGFR treatment in colorectal cancers. Expression of mutant KRAS under the control of its endogenous gene promoter was sufficient to confer cetuximab resistance, but resistant cells remained sensitive to combinatorial inhibition of EGFR and mitogen-activated protein-kinase kinase (MEK). Analysis of metastases from patients who developed resistance to cetuximab or panitumumab showed the emergence of KRAS amplification in one sample and acquisition of secondary KRAS mutations in 60% (6 out of 10) of the cases. KRAS mutant alleles were detectable in the blood of cetuximab-treated patients as early as 10 months before radiographic documentation of disease progression. In summary, the results identify KRAS mutations as frequent drivers of acquired resistance to cetuximab in colorectal cancers, indicate that the emergence of KRAS mutant clones can be detected non-invasively months before radiographic progression and suggest early initiation of a MEK inhibitor as a rational strategy for delaying or reversing drug resistance.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & EGFR antagonists in cancer treatment. N. Engl. J. Med. 358, 1160–1174 (2008)

  2. 2.

    et al. K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 359, 1757–1765 (2008)

  3. 3.

    et al. Mechanisms of acquired resistance to cetuximab: role of HER (ErbB) family members. Oncogene 27, 3944–3956 (2008)

  4. 4.

    et al. Establishment and characterization of a model of acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor targeting agents in human cancer cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 15, 1585–1592 (2009)

  5. 5.

    , , , & Nuclear EGFR contributes to acquired resistance to cetuximab. Oncogene 28, 3801–3813 (2009)

  6. 6.

    et al. Regulation of heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor by miR-212 and acquired cetuximab-resistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS ONE 5, e12702 (2010)

  7. 7.

    et al. Activation of ERBB2 signaling causes resistance to the EGFR-directed therapeutic antibody cetuximab. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 99ra86 (2011)

  8. 8.

    et al. Identification of a mutation in the extracellular domain of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor conferring cetuximab resistance in colorectal cancer. Nature Med. 18, 221–223 (2012)

  9. 9.

    et al. Gene copy number for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and clinical response to antiEGFR treatment in colorectal cancer: a cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 6, 279–286 (2005)

  10. 10.

    et al. Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis. Lancet Oncol. 11, 753–762 (2010)

  11. 11.

    et al. Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics. Nature Med. 14, 985–990 (2008)

  12. 12.

    et al. Replacement of normal with mutant alleles in the genome of normal human cells unveils mutation-specific drug responses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 20864–20869 (2008)

  13. 13.

    & Molecular mechanisms of resistance to cetuximab and panitumumab in colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 28, 1254–1261 (2010)

  14. 14.

    et al. Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 1408–1417 (2009)

  15. 15.

    et al. Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 1626–1634 (2008)

  16. 16.

    Challenges of detecting EGFR T790M in gefitinib/erlotinib-resistant tumours. Lung Cancer 60, (suppl. 2)S3–S9 (2008)

  17. 17.

    et al. Allelic dilution obscures detection of a biologically significant resistance mutation in EGFR-amplified lung cancer. J. Clin. Invest. 116, 2695–2706 (2006)

  18. 18.

    et al. Rebiopsy of lung cancer patients with acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors and enhanced detection of the T790M mutation using a locked nucleic acid-based assay. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 1169–1180 (2011)

  19. 19.

    et al. Increased detection sensitivity for KRAS mutations enhances the prediction of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody resistance in metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 4901–4914 (2011)

  20. 20.

    , , & A colon cancer cell line (LIM1215) derived from a patient with inherited nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 74, 759–765 (1985)

  21. 21.

    et al. Activating K-Ras mutations outwith ‘hotspot’ codons in sporadic colorectal tumours - implications for personalised cancer medicine. Br. J. Cancer 102, 693–703 (2010)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are particularly indebted to S. Lamba for generating the KRAS(G12R) knock-in in Lim1215 cells. We thank C. Cancelliere and S. Destefanis for technical assistance. We thank S. Arena, M. Russo and D. Zecchin for critically reading the manuscript. We also thank A. Heguy, A. Viale, N. Socci and M. Pirun for assistance with analysis of next generation sequencing data. This work was supported by European Union Seventh Framework Programme, grant 259015 COLTHERES (A.B. and S.S.); Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) 2010 Special Program Molecular Clinical Oncology 5 × 1000, project 9970 (A.B. and S.S.); Regione Piemonte (A.B. and F.D.N.); Fondazione Piemontese per la Ricerca sul Cancro (FPRC) Intramural Grant, 5xmille 2008, ONLUS (A.B. and F.D.N.); AIRC MFAG 11349 (F.D.N.); Oncologia Ca’ Granda ONLUS (OCGO) (S.S.); Mr William H. Goodwin and Mrs Alice Goodwin and the Commonwealth Foundation for Cancer Research; the Experimental Therapeutics Center of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (D.S.); the Society of MSKCC (M.W.); the National Institutes of Health (D.S.); the Beene Foundation (D.S.) and Regione Lombardia and Ministerio Salute grant ‘Gene Mutation Monitoring in mCRC’ (S.S.).

Author information

Author notes

    • Sandra Misale
    • , Rona Yaeger
    • , Sebastijan Hobor
    • , Elisa Scala
    •  & Manickam Janakiraman

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment (IRCC), 10060 Candiolo (Torino), Italy

    • Sandra Misale
    • , Sebastijan Hobor
    • , Elisa Scala
    • , Michela Buscarino
    • , Giulia Siravegna
    • , Carlo Zanon
    • , Federica Di Nicolantonio
    •  & Alberto Bardelli
  2. Department of Oncological Sciences, University of Torino Medical School, 10060 Candiolo (Torino), Italy

    • Sandra Misale
    • , Elisa Scala
    • , Michela Buscarino
    • , Enzo Medico
    •  & Alberto Bardelli
  3. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA

    • Rona Yaeger
    • , Andrea Cercek
    •  & David Solit
  4. Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA

    • Manickam Janakiraman
    •  & David Solit
  5. Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA

    • David Liska
    • , Chin-Tung Chen
    •  & Martin Weiser
  6. Division of Pathology, Ospedale Niguarda Ca’ Granda, 20162 Milano, Italy

    • Emanuele Valtorta
    • , Silvio Veronese
    •  & Marcello Gambacorta
  7. Falck Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Niguarda Ca’ Granda, 20162 Milano, Italy

    • Roberta Schiavo
    • , Katia Bencardino
    • , Andrea Sartore-Bianchi
    •  & Salvatore Siena
  8. Dipartimento di Scienza e Tecnologia del Farmaco, University of Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy

    • Margherita Gallicchio
    •  & Valentina Boscaro
  9. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10065, USA

    • Efsevia Vakiani
  10. Laboratory of Functional Genomics, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment (IRCC), 10060 Candiolo (Torino), Italy

    • Enzo Medico
  11. FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology (IFOM), 20139 Milano, Italy

    • Federica Di Nicolantonio
    •  & Alberto Bardelli

Authors

  1. Search for Sandra Misale in:

  2. Search for Rona Yaeger in:

  3. Search for Sebastijan Hobor in:

  4. Search for Elisa Scala in:

  5. Search for Manickam Janakiraman in:

  6. Search for David Liska in:

  7. Search for Emanuele Valtorta in:

  8. Search for Roberta Schiavo in:

  9. Search for Michela Buscarino in:

  10. Search for Giulia Siravegna in:

  11. Search for Katia Bencardino in:

  12. Search for Andrea Cercek in:

  13. Search for Chin-Tung Chen in:

  14. Search for Silvio Veronese in:

  15. Search for Carlo Zanon in:

  16. Search for Andrea Sartore-Bianchi in:

  17. Search for Marcello Gambacorta in:

  18. Search for Margherita Gallicchio in:

  19. Search for Efsevia Vakiani in:

  20. Search for Valentina Boscaro in:

  21. Search for Enzo Medico in:

  22. Search for Martin Weiser in:

  23. Search for Salvatore Siena in:

  24. Search for Federica Di Nicolantonio in:

  25. Search for David Solit in:

  26. Search for Alberto Bardelli in:

Contributions

A.B., D.S., S.S. and F.D.N. planned the project and supervised all research. A.B., D.S. and F.D.N. wrote the manuscript. S.M., R.Y., S.H., E.S., M.W. and F.D.N. designed the experiments. A.B. conceived the molecular analysis of plasma samples. S.M., R.Y., S.H., E.S., M.J., D.L., E.V., R.S., M.B., G.S., C.-T.C., S.V., M.G. and V.B. performed the experiments. C.Z., A.S.-B., M.G. and E.M. analysed data. K.B., A.C. and E.V. provided samples for analysis. S.S., D.S. and A.B. devised dual biopsy clinical protocols for EGFR mAb resistant mCRC.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to David Solit or Alberto Bardelli.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-7 and Supplementary Tables 1-4.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11156

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.