Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Eisenegger et al. reply


Replying to J. van Honk, E. R. Montoya, P. A. Bos, M. van Vugt & D. Terburg Nature 485 10.1038/nature11136 (2012)

van Honk and colleagues have taken our findings on the role of testosterone in ultimatum game bargaining1 a step forward by showing that the hormone has important prosocial effects beyond the ultimatum game by increasing cooperation in the public goods game (PGG)2. In contrast to the ultimatum game, participants in the PGG decide simultaneously about their cooperation levels and are not confronted with a rejection threat from other participants, suggesting a much more universal effect of testosterone on prosociality than revealed by our study1. As the PGG captures a large class of evolutionarily and contemporaneously important situations, their findings are of great interest, and considerably extend our knowledge about the causal effect of testosterone on social behaviour. In addition, their results raise intriguing questions regarding the motivational and biological mechanisms through which testosterone increased cooperation levels, suggesting that the study will trigger further important experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


  1. Eisenegger, C., Naef, M., Snozzi, R., Heinrichs, M. & Fehr, E. Prejudice and truth about the effect of testosterone on human bargaining behaviour. Nature 463, 356–359 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. van Honk, J., Montoya, E. R., Bos, P. A., van Vugt, M. & Terburg, D. New evidence on testosterone and cooperation. Nature 485, (2012)

  3. Mazur, A. & Booth, A. Testosterone and dominance in men. Behav. Brain Sci. 21, 353–397 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Eisenegger, C., Haushofer, J. & Fehr, E. The role of testosterone in social interaction. Trends Cogn. Sci. 15, 263–271 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hardy, C. L. & Van Vugt, M. Nice guys finish first: the competitive altruism hypothesis. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 32, 1402–1413 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Willer, R. Groups reward individual sacrifice: the status solution to the collective action problem. Am. Sociol. Rev. 74, 23–43 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zheng, Z. & Cohn, M. J. Developmental basis of sexually dimorphic digit ratios. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16289–16294 (2011)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. van Honk, J. et al. Testosterone administration impairs cognitive empathy in women depending on second-to-fourth digit ratio. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 3448–3452 (2011)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Eisenegger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eisenegger, C., Naef, M., Snozzi, R. et al. Eisenegger et al. reply. Nature 485, E5–E6 (2012).

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing