Extended leaf phenology and the autumn niche in deciduous forest invasions

Abstract

The phenology of growth in temperate deciduous forests, including the timing of leaf emergence and senescence, has strong control over ecosystem properties such as productivity1,2 and nutrient cycling3,4, and has an important role in the carbon economy of understory plants5,6,7. Extended leaf phenology, whereby understory species assimilate carbon in early spring before canopy closure or in late autumn after canopy fall, has been identified as a key feature of many forest species invasions5,8,9,10, but it remains unclear whether there are systematic differences in the growth phenology of native and invasive forest species11 or whether invaders are more responsive to warming trends that have lengthened the duration of spring or autumn growth12. Here, in a 3-year monitoring study of 43 native and 30 non-native shrub and liana species common to deciduous forests in the eastern United States, I show that extended autumn leaf phenology is a common attribute of eastern US forest invasions, where non-native species are extending the autumn growing season by an average of 4 weeks compared with natives. In contrast, there was no consistent evidence that non-natives as a group show earlier spring growth phenology, and non-natives were not better able to track interannual variation in spring temperatures. Seasonal leaf production and photosynthetic data suggest that most non-native species capture a significant proportion of their annual carbon assimilate after canopy leaf fall, a behaviour that was virtually absent in natives and consistent across five phylogenetic groups. Pronounced differences in how native and non-native understory species use pre- and post-canopy environments suggest eastern US invaders are driving a seasonal redistribution of forest productivity that may rival climate change in its impact on forest processes.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Seasonal patterns of leaf emergence and leaf fall for native and non-native species over three growing seasons.
Figure 2: Relative leaf Chl content for native and non-native species.
Figure 3: Proportion of total annual C assimilated in spring and autumn for native and non-native species.

References

  1. 1

    Richardson, A. D. et al. Influence of spring and autumn phenological transitions on forest ecosystem productivity. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 3227–3246 (2010)

  2. 2

    Polgar, C. A. & Primack, R. B. Leaf-out phenology of temperate woody plants: from trees to ecosystems. New Phytol. 191, 926–941 (2011)

  3. 3

    Muller, R. N. & Bormann, F. H. Role of Erythronium americanum Ker. in energy flow and nutrient dynamics of a northern hardwood forest ecosystem. Science 193, 1126–1128 (1976)

  4. 4

    Ehrenfeld, J. G. Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6, 503–523 (2003)

  5. 5

    Harrington, R. A., Brown, B. J. & Reich, P. B. Ecophysiology of exotic and native shrubs in southern Wisconsin. I. Relationship of leaf characteristics, resource availability, and phenology to seasonal patterns of carbon gain. Oecologia 80, 356–367 (1989)

  6. 6

    Augsperger, C. K., Chesseman, J. M. & Salk, C. F. Light gains and physiological capacity of understorey woody plants during phenological avoidance of canopy shade. Funct. Ecol. 19, 537–546 (2005)

  7. 7

    Rothstein, D. E. & Zak, D. R. Photosynthetic adaptation and acclimation to exploit seasonal periods of direct irradiance in three temperate, deciduous-forest herbs. Funct. Ecol. 15, 722–731 (2001)

  8. 8

    Schierenbeck, K. A. & Marshall, J. D. Seasonal and diurnal patterns of photosynthetic gas exchange for Lonicera sempervirens and L. japonica (Caprifoliaceae). Am. J. Bot. 80, 1292–1299 (1993)

  9. 9

    Xu, C.-Y., Griffin, K. L. & Schuster, W. S. F. Leaf phenology and seasonal variation of photosynthesis of invasive Berberis thunbergii (Japanese barberry) and two co-occurring native understory shrubs in a northeastern United States deciduous forest. Oecologia 154, 11–21 (2007)

  10. 10

    Myers, C. V. & Anderson, R. C. Seasonal variation in photosynthetic rates influences success of an invasive plant, garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata). Am. Midl. Nat. 150, 231–245 (2003)

  11. 11

    Wolkovitch, E. M. & Cleland, E. E. The phenology of plant invasions: a community ecology perspective. Front. Ecol. Environ 9, 287–294 (2011)

  12. 12

    Willis, C. G., Ruhfel, B. R., Primack, R. B., Miller-Rushing, A. J. & Losos, J. B. Favorable climate change response explains non-native species’ success in Thoreau’s Woods. PLoS ONE 5, e8878 (2010)

  13. 13

    Gill, D. S., Amthor, J. S. & Bormann, F. H. Leaf phenology, photosynthesis, and the persistence of saplings and shrubs in a mature northern hardwood forest. Tree Physiol. 18, 281–289 (1998)

  14. 14

    Augsperger, C. K. & Bartlett, E. A. Differences in leaf phenology between juvenile and adult trees in a temperate deciduous forest. Tree Physiol. 23, 517–525 (2003)

  15. 15

    Webster, C. R., Jenkins, M. A. & Jose, S. Woody invaders and the challenges they pose to forest ecosystems in the Eastern United States. J. For. 104, 366–374 (2006)

  16. 16

    Fridley, J. D. Of Asian forests and European fields: Eastern U.S. plant invasions in a global floristic context. PLoS ONE 3, e3630 (2008)

  17. 17

    May, J. D. & Killingbeck, K. T. Effects of preventing nutrient resorption on plant fitness and foliar nutrient dynamics. Ecology 73, 1868–1878 (1992)

  18. 18

    Saxe, H., Cannell, G. R., Johnsen, Ø., Ryan, M. G. & Vourlitis, G. Tree and forest functioning in response to global warming. New Phytol. 149, 369–400 (2001)

  19. 19

    Mitchell, T. D. & Jones, P. D. An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 693–712 (2005)

  20. 20

    Aber, J. D., Nadelhoffer, K. J., Steudler, P. & Melillo, J. M. Nitrogen saturation in northern forest ecosystems. Bioscience 39, 378–387 (1989)

  21. 21

    Mack, R. N. Plant naturalizations and invasions in the Eastern United States: 1634–1860. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 90, 77–90 (2003)

  22. 22

    Frelich, L. E. et al. Earthworm invasion into previously earthworm-free temperate and boreal forests. Biol. Invasions 8, 1235–1245 (2006)

  23. 23

    Nuzzo, V. A., Maerz, J. C. & Blossey, B. Earthworm invasion as the driving force behind plant invasion and community change in Northeastern North American forests. Conserv. Biol. 23, 966–974 (2009)

  24. 24

    Ehlers, J. & Gibbard, P. L. The extent and chronology of Cenozoic global glaciation. Quat. Int. 164, 6–20 (2007)

  25. 25

    Lechowicz, M. J. Why do temperate deciduous trees leaf out at different times? Adaptation and ecology of forest communities. Am. Nat. 124, 821–842 (1984)

  26. 26

    Mack, R. N. Phylogenetic constraint, absent life forms, and preadapted alien plants: a prescription for biological invasions. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164, S185–S196 (2003)

  27. 27

    Goulden, M. L., Munger, J. W., Fan, S.-M., Daube, B. C. & Wofsy, S. C. Exchange of carbon dioxide by a deciduous forest: response to interannual climate variability. Science 271, 1576–1578 (1996)

  28. 28

    Piao, S. et al. Net carbon dioxide losses of northern ecosystems in response to autumn warming. Nature 451, 49–52 (2008)

  29. 29

    Liao, C. et al. Altered ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycles by plant invasion: a meta-analysis. New Phytol. 177, 706–714 (2008)

  30. 30

    Chapin, F. S. Nitrogen and phosphorus nutrition and nutrient cycling by evergreen and deciduous understory shrubs in an Alaskan black spruce forest. Can. J. For. Res. 13, 773–781 (1983)

  31. 31

    Canham, C. D. et al. Light regimes beneath closed canopies and tree-fall gaps in temperate and tropical forests. Can. J. For. Res. 20, 620–631 (1990)

  32. 32

    Morgan, D. C. & Smith, H. A. systematic relationship between phytochrome-controlled development and species habitat, for plants grown in simulated natural radiation. Planta 145, 253–258 (1979)

  33. 33

    Hothorn, T. & Hornik, K. exactRankTests: exact distributions for rank and permutation tests. R package version 0.8-19. (2010)

  34. 34

    Hochberg, Y. A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 75, 800–802 (1988)

  35. 35

    Richardson, A. D., Duigan, S. P. & Berlyn, G. P. An evaluation of noninvasive methods to estimate foliar chlorophyll content. New Phytol. 153, 185–194 (2002)

  36. 36

    Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D. & the R Development Core Team nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-102. (2011)

  37. 37

    Hothorn, T., Bretz, F. & Westfall, P. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical J. 50, 346–363 (2008)

  38. 38

    Lambers, H., Chapin, F. S. & Pons, T. L. Plant Physiological Ecology (Springer, 1998)

  39. 39

    Koenker, R. quantreg: Quantile Regression. R package version 4.44. (2009)

  40. 40

    Wood, S. N. Fast stable direct fitting and smoothness selection for generalized additive models. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 70, 495–518 (2008)

  41. 41

    Hutchison, B. A. & Matt, D. R. The distribution of solar radiation within a deciduous forest. Ecol. Monogr. 47, 185–207 (1977)

Download references

Acknowledgements

I acknowledge technical assistance and advice from A. Craddock, S. Anderson, E. Fridley, S. Kelley, A. Surace, L. Giencke and D. Frank, and project support from Syracuse University.

Author information

J.D.F. designed the study, supervised data collection, performed the analyses and wrote the paper.

Correspondence to Jason D. Fridley.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-3. Figure 1 includes spring heat accumulation over 2008-2010, Figure 2 a comparison of seasonal photosynthetic rate between native and non-native species, and Figure 3 the seasonal light distribution used in carbon gain models. (PDF 428 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

This file contains data and metadata. (XLS 111 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fridley, J. Extended leaf phenology and the autumn niche in deciduous forest invasions. Nature 485, 359–362 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11056

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.