Warming experiments are increasingly relied on to estimate plant responses to global climate change1,2. For experiments to provide meaningful predictions of future responses, they should reflect the empirical record of responses to temperature variability and recent warming, including advances in the timing of flowering and leafing3,4,5. We compared phenology (the timing of recurring life history events) in observational studies and warming experiments spanning four continents and 1,634 plant species using a common measure of temperature sensitivity (change in days per degree Celsius). We show that warming experiments underpredict advances in the timing of flowering and leafing by 8.5-fold and 4.0-fold, respectively, compared with long-term observations. For species that were common to both study types, the experimental results did not match the observational data in sign or magnitude. The observational data also showed that species that flower earliest in the spring have the highest temperature sensitivities, but this trend was not reflected in the experimental data. These significant mismatches seem to be unrelated to the study length or to the degree of manipulated warming in experiments. The discrepancy between experiments and observations, however, could arise from complex interactions among multiple drivers in the observational data, or it could arise from remediable artefacts in the experiments that result in lower irradiance and drier soils, thus dampening the phenological responses to manipulated warming. Our results introduce uncertainty into ecosystem models that are informed solely by experiments and suggest that responses to climate change that are predicted using such models should be re-evaluated.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Arft, A. M. et al. Responses of tundra plants to experimental warming: meta-analysis of the international tundra experiment. Ecol. Monogr. 69, 491–511 (1999)
Morin, X., Roy, J., Sonie, L. & Chuine, I. Changes in leaf phenology of three European oak species in response to experimental climate change. New Phytol. 186, 900–910 (2010)
Menzel, A. et al. European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 1969–1976 (2006)
Schwartz, M. D., Ahas, R. & Aasa, A. Onset of spring starting earlier across the Northern Hemisphere. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 343–351 (2006)
Parmesan, C. Influences of species, latitudes and methodologies on estimates of phenological response to global warming. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 1860–1872 (2007)
Cleland, E. E., Chuine, I., Menzel, A., Mooney, H. A. & Schwartz, M. D. Shifting plant phenology in response to global change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 357–365 (2007)
Chapin, F. S. & Shaver, G. R. Physiological and growth responses of arctic plants to a field experiment simulating climatic change. Ecology 77, 822–840 (1996)
Amano, T., Smithers, R. J., Sparks, T. H. & Sutherland, W. J. A 250-year index of first flowering dates and its response to temperature changes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 277, 2451–2457 (2010)
Harte, J. & Shaw, R. Shifting dominance within a montane vegetation community: results of a climate-warming experiment. Science 267, 876–880 (1995)
Dunne, J. A., Harte, J. & Taylor, K. J. Subalpine meadow flowering phenology responses to climate change: integrating experimental and gradient methods. Ecol. Monogr. 73, 69–86 (2003)
Sherry, R. A. et al. Divergence of reproductive phenology under climate warming. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 198–202 (2007)
Chuine, I., Morin, X. & Bugmann, H. Warming, photoperiods, and tree phenology. Science 329, 277–278 (2010)
Dunne, J. A., Saleska, S. R., Fischer, M. L. & Harte, J. Integrating experimental and gradient methods in ecological climate change research. Ecology 85, 904–916 (2004)
Rohde, A., Bastien, C. & Boerjan, W. Temperature signals contribute to the timing of photoperiodic growth cessation and bud set in poplar. Tree Physiol. 31, 472–482 (2011)
Trenberth, K. E. & Josey, S. A. Observations: Surface and Atmospheric Climate Change 235–336 (IPCC, 2007)
Marion, G. M. et al. Open-top designs for manipulating field temperature in high-latitude ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 3, 20–32 (1997)
Kimball, B. A. Theory and performance of an infrared heater for ecosystem warming. Glob. Change Biol. 11, 2041–2056 (2005)
Kimball, B. A. et al. Infrared heater arrays for warming ecosystem field plots. Glob. Change Biol. 142, 309–320 (2008)
Kennedy, A. D. Simulated climate-change: are passive greenhouses a valid microcosm for testing the biological effects of environmental perturbations? Glob. Change Biol. 1, 29–42 (1995)
Molau, U. Responses to natural climatic variation and experimental warming in two tundra plant species with contrasting life forms: Cassiope tetragona and Ranunculus nivalis . Glob. Change Biol. 3, 97–107 (1997)
Kennedy, A. D. Temperature effects of passive greenhouse apparatus in high-latitude climate-change experiments. Funct. Ecol. 9, 340–350 (1995)
Rathcke, B. & Lacey, E. P. Phenological patterns of terrestrial plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16, 179–214 (1985)
Aikawa, S., Kobayashi, M. J., Satake, A., Shimizu, K. K. & Kudoh, H. Robust control of the seasonal expression of the Arabidopsis FLC gene in a fluctuating environment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 11632–11637 (2010)
Chapin, F. S., Matson, P. A. & Mooney, H. A. Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology (Springer, 2002)
Körner, C. & Basler, D. Phenology under global warming. Science 327, 1461–1462 (2010)
Root, T. L. et al. Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421, 57–60 (2003)
Williams, J. W. & Jackson, S. T. Novel climates, no-analog communities, and ecological surprises. Front. Ecol. Environ. 59, 475–482 (2007)
Rosenzweig, C. et al. Attributing physical and biological impacts to anthropogenic climate change. Nature 453, 353–357 (2008)
This work was conducted as part of the Forecasting Phenology Working Group supported by the National Center for Ecological Analysis & Synthesis (EF-0553768), with additional support from National Science Foundation grants DBI-0905806, IOS-0639794, DEB-0922080 and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada CREATE Training Program. Special thanks to the many data managers, including G. Aldridge, P. Huth, D. Inouye, G. Johansson, A. Miller-Rushing, J. O’Keefe, R. Primack, S. Smiley, T. Sparks and J. Thompson. We thank M. Ayres, L. Kueppers, D. Moore and M. O’Connor for comments on earlier drafts.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
This file contains Supplementary Text including Supplementary Data, Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Results. Also included are Supplementary Tables 1-6, Supplementary Figures 1-9 and additional references. (PDF 712 kb)
This file contains the raw sensitivities that are shown in Figure S2c, which are from the PEP725 database and which are discussed in the Supplementary Data, Methods and Results. (ZIP 3239 kb)
About this article
Cite this article
Wolkovich, E., Cook, B., Allen, J. et al. Warming experiments underpredict plant phenological responses to climate change. Nature 485, 494–497 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11014
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology (2020)
Spring wildflower phenology and pollinator activity respond similarly to climatic variation in an eastern hardwood forest
Effect of warming and degradation on phenophases of Kobresia pygmaea and Potentilla multifida on the Tibetan Plateau
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment (2020)
Diversity and Distributions (2020)
Experimental warming alleviates the adverse effects from tropospheric ozone on two urban tree species
Environmental Pollution (2020)