Empirical data indicate that sexual preferences are critical for maintaining species boundaries1,2,3,4, yet theoretical work has suggested that, on their own, they can have only a minimal role in maintaining biodiversity5,6,7,8,9. This is because long-term coexistence within overlapping ranges is thought to be unlikely in the absence of ecological differentiation9. Here we challenge this widely held view by generalizing a standard model of sexual selection to include two ubiquitous features of populations with sexual selection: spatial variation in local carrying capacity, and mate-search costs in females. We show that, when these two features are combined, sexual preferences can single-handedly maintain coexistence, even when spatial variation in local carrying capacity is so slight that it might go unnoticed empirically. This theoretical study demonstrates that sexual selection alone can promote the long-term coexistence of ecologically equivalent species with overlapping ranges, and it thus provides a novel explanation for the maintenance of species diversity.
Your institute does not have access to this article
Open Access articles citing this article.
Evolutionary Biology Open Access 19 September 2017
Scientific Reports Open Access 10 August 2017
Current Landscape Ecology Reports Open Access 31 October 2016
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Eberhard, W. G. Sexual Selection and Animal Genitalia (Harvard Univ. Press, 1985)
Seehausen, O. & van Alphen, J. J. M. Can sympatric speciation by disruptive sexual selection explain rapid evolution of cichlid diversity in Lake Victoria? Ecol. Lett. 2, 262–271 (1999)
Gray, D. A. & Cade, W. H. Sexual selection and speciation in field crickets. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 14449–14454 (2000)
Wilson, A. B., Noack-Kunnmann, K. & Meyer, A. Incipient speciation in sympatric Nicaraguan crater lake cichlid fishes: sexual selection versus ecological diversification. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 2133–2141 (2000)
Turner, G. F. & Burrows, M. T. A model of sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 260, 287–292 (1995)
Panhuis, T. M., Butlin, R., Zuk, M. & Tregenza, T. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 364–371 (2001)
van Doorn, G. S., Dieckmann, U. & Weissing, F. J. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection: a critical reevaluation. Am. Nat. 163, 709–725 (2004)
Johansson, J. & Ripa, J. Will sympatric speciation fail due to stochastic competitive exclusion? Am. Nat. 168, 572–578 (2006)
Weissing, F. J., Edelaar, P. & van Doorn, G. S. Adaptive speciation theory: a conceptual review. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 461–480 (2011)
Schluter, D. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation (Oxford Univ. Press, 2000)
Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Clarendon Press, 1930)
Lande, R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 78, 3721–3725 (1981)
Lande, R. Rapid origin of sexual isolation and character divergence in a cline. Evolution 36, 213–223 (1982)
Kirkpatrick, M. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36, 1–12 (1982)
Seger, J. Unifying genetic models for the evolution of female choice. Evolution 39, 1185–1193 (1985)
Payne, R. J. H. & Krakauer, D. C. Sexual selection, space, and speciation. Evolution 51, 1–9 (1997)
Mallet, J. Hybridization, ecological races and the nature of species: empirical evidence for the ease of speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 363, 2971–2986 (2008)
Mallet, J., Meyer, A., Nosil, P. & Feder, J. L. Space, sympatry and speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 22, 2332–2341 (2009)
Barton, N. H. & Hewitt, G. M. Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16, 113–148 (1985)
Barton, N. H. & Hewitt, G. M. Adaptation, speciation and hybrid zones. Nature 341, 497–503 (1989)
Dieckmann, U. in Adaptive Speciation (eds Dieckmann, U., Metz, J. A. J., Doebeli, M. & Tautz, D. ) 306–307 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004)
Seehausen, O., van Alphen, J. J. M. & Witte, F. Cichlid fish diversity threatened by eutrophication that curbs sexual selection. Science 277, 1808–1811 (1997)
Hollocher, H., Ting, C., Pollack, F. & Wu, C. Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: variation in mating preference and correlation between sexes. Evolution 51, 1175–1181 (1997)
Feulner, P. G. D., Kirschbaum, F. & Tiedemann, R. Adaptive radiation in the Congo River: an ecological speciation scenario for African weakly electric fish (Teleostei; Mormyridae; Campylomormyrus). J. Physiol. (Paris) 102, 340–346 (2008)
Ryan, M. J. & Wilczynski, W. Coevolution of sender and receiver: effect on local mate preference in cricket frogs. Science 240, 1786–1788 (1988)
Tregenza, T., Pritchard, V. L. & Butlin, R. K. The origins of premating reproductive isolation: testing hypotheses in the grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus . Evolution 54, 1687–1698 (2000)
We thank J. S. Brown, R. G. FitzJohn, D. E. Irwin, J. Ohlberger, J. L. Payne, A. Pomiankowski and G. S. van Doorn for discussions. Funding was provided by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada) grant to L.K.M. (CGS-D) and S.P.O. (Discovery Grant). L.K.M. received additional support from the European Science Foundation Research Networking Programme ‘Frontiers of Speciation Research’. R.M. and U.D. gratefully acknowledge support by the Vienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF). U.D. received additional financial support from the European Commission, the European Science Foundation, the Austrian Science Fund and the Austrian Ministry of Science and Research.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Program code is available at http://www.zoology.ubc.ca/prog/coexist.
About this article
Cite this article
M’Gonigle, L., Mazzucco, R., Otto, S. et al. Sexual selection enables long-term coexistence despite ecological equivalence. Nature 484, 506–509 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10971
Journal of Mathematical Biology (2018)
Evolutionary Biology (2018)
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology (2018)
Scientific Reports (2017)