Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Corticostriatal plasticity is necessary for learning intentional neuroprosthetic skills


The ability to learn new skills and perfect them with practice applies not only to physical skills but also to abstract skills1, like motor planning or neuroprosthetic actions. Although plasticity in corticostriatal circuits has been implicated in learning physical skills2,3,4, it remains unclear if similar circuits or processes are required for abstract skill learning. Here we use a novel behavioural task in rodents to investigate the role of corticostriatal plasticity in abstract skill learning. Rodents learned to control the pitch of an auditory cursor to reach one of two targets by modulating activity in primary motor cortex irrespective of physical movement. Degradation of the relation between action and outcome, as well as sensory-specific devaluation and omission tests, demonstrate that these learned neuroprosthetic actions are intentional and goal-directed, rather than habitual. Striatal neurons change their activity with learning, with more neurons modulating their activity in relation to target-reaching as learning progresses. Concomitantly, strong relations between the activity of neurons in motor cortex and the striatum emerge. Specific deletion of striatal NMDA receptors impairs the development of this corticostriatal plasticity, and disrupts the ability to learn neuroprosthetic skills. These results suggest that corticostriatal plasticity is necessary for abstract skill learning, and that neuroprosthetic movements capitalize on the neural circuitry involved in natural motor learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Volitional modulation of M1 neural activity in awake behaving rodents.
Figure 2: Learning intentional neuroprosthetic actions independently of movement.
Figure 3: Learning abstract skills is accompanied by corticostriatal plasticity.
Figure 4: Selective deletion of NMDARs in the striatum impairs brain–machine interface learning.

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. VanLehn, K. Cognitive skill acquisition. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 47, 513–539 (1996)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yin, H. H. et al. Dynamic reorganization of striatal circuits during the acquisition and consolidation of a skill. Nature Neurosci. 12, 333–341 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barnes, T. D., Kubota, Y., Hu, D., Jin, D. Z. & Graybiel, A. M. Activity of striatal neurons reflects dynamic encoding and recoding of procedural memories. Nature 437, 1158–1161 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kimchi, E. Y. & Laubach, M. Dynamic encoding of action selection by the medial striatum. J. Neurosci. 29, 3148–3159 (2009)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brashers-Krug, T., Shadmehr, R. & Bizzi, E. Consolidation in human motor memory. Nature 382, 252–255 (1996)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fetz, E. E. Volitional control of neural activity: implications for brain–computer interfaces. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 579, 571–579 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hikosaka, O. et al. Parallel neural networks for learning sequential procedures. Trends Neurosci. 22, 464–471 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brasted, P. J. & Wise, S. P. Comparison of learning-related neuronal activity in the dorsal premotor cortex and striatum. Eur. J. Neurosci. 19, 721–740 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rioult-Pedotti, M. S., Friedman, D. & Donghue, J. P. Learning-induced LTP in neocortex. Science 290, 533–536 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Georgopoulos, A. P., Taira, M. & Lukashin, A. Cognitive neurophysiology of the motor cortex. Science 260, 47–52 (1993)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gandolfo, F., Li, C., Benda, B. J., Schioppa, C. P. & Bizzi, E. Cortical correlates of learning in monkeys adapting to a new dynamical environment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 2259–2263 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fincham, J. M. & Anderson, J. R. Distinct roles of the anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in the acquisition and performance of a cognitive skill. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 12941–12946 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Badre, D., Kayser, A. S. & D’Esposito, M. Frontal cortex and the discovery of abstract action rules. Neuron 66, 315–326 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Taylor, D. M., Tillery, S. I. & Schwartz, A. B. Direct cortical control of 3D neuroprosthetic devices. Science 296, 1829–1832 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Carmena, J. M. et al. Learning to control a brain-machine interface for reaching and grasping by primates. PLoS Biol. 1, 193–208 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ganguly, K. & Carmena, J. M. Emergence of a stable cortical map for neuroprosthetic control. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000153 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ganguly, K., Dimitrov, D. F., Wallis, J. D. & Carmena, J. M. Reversible large-scale modification of cortical networks during neuroprosthetic control. Nature Neurosci. 14, 662–667 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Beauchamp, M. H., Dagher, A., Aston, J. A. & Doyon, J. Dynamic functional changes associated with cognitive skill learning of an adapted version of the Tower of London task. Neuroimage 20, 1649–1660 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Poldrack, R. A., Prabhakaran, V., Seger, C. A. & Gabrieli, J. D. Striatal activation during acquisition of a cognitive skill. Neuropsychology 13, 564–574 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pasupathy, A. & Miller, E. K. Different time courses of learning-related activity in the prefrontal cortex and striatum. Nature 433, 873–876 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Karni, A. et al. The acquisition of skilled motor performance: fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 861–868 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Venkatraman, S., Jin, X., Costa, R. M. & Carmena, J. M. Investigating neural correlates of behavior in freely behaving rodents using inertial sensors. J. Neurophysiol. 104, 569–575 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Balleine, B. W. & Dickinson, A. Goal-directed instrumental action: contingency and incentive learning and their cortical substrates. Neuropharmacology 37, 407–419 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yin, H. H., Knowlton, B. J. & Balleine, B. W. Inactivation of dorsolateral striatum enhances sensitivity to changes in the action-outcome contingency in instrumental conditioning. Behav. Brain Res. 166, 189–196 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hilario, M. R., Clouse, E., Yin, H. H. & Costa, R. M. Endocannabinoid signaling is critical for habit formation. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 1, 1–12 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Costa, R. M., Cohen, D. & Nicolelis, M. A. Differential corticostriatal plasticity during fast and slow motor skill learning in mice. Curr. Biol. 14, 1124–1134 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jin, X. & Costa, R. M. Start/stop signals emerge in nigrostriatal circuits during sequence learning. Nature 466, 457–462 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Miyachi, S., Hikosaka, O. & Lu, X. Differential activation of monkey striatal neurons in the early and late stages of procedural learning. Exp. Brain Res. 146, 122–126 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Calabresi, P., Pisani, A., Mercuri, N. B. & Bernardi, G. Long-term potentiation in the striatum is unmasked by removing the voltage-dependent magnesium block of NMDA receptor channels. Eur. J. Neurosci. 4, 929–935 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dang, M. T. et al. Disrupted motor learning and long-term synaptic plasticity in mice lacking NMDAR1 in the striatum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 15254–15259 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank S. Venkatraman for the three-axis accelerometer, Y. Li for the RGS9L-Cre mice, K. Nakazawa for the NMDAR1-loxP mice, G. Luo for genotyping, M. Davis for advice on staining and G. Martins for performing immunohistochemistry. This work was supported by National Science Foundation CAREER Award 0954243, the Multiscale Systems Research Center and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency contract N66001-10-C-2008 to J.M.C., and the Division of Intramural Clinical and Basic Research of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Marie Curie International Reintegration Grant 239527 and European Research Council STG 243393 to R.M.C.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



A.C.K., X.J., J.D.L., R.M.C. and J.M.C. designed experiments. A.C.K., X.J. and J.D.L. conducted experiments. A.C.K., X.J., R.M.C. and J.M.C. analysed data and wrote the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rui M. Costa or Jose M. Carmena.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Methods, Supplementary References and Supplementary Figures 1-13. (PDF 1335 kb)

Supplementary Movie 1

This file shows an example of locomotor activity for a control mouse with electrode implantation and used in the BMI experiments. (MOV 5295 kb)

Supplementary Movie 2

This file shows an example of locomotor activity for a RGS9L-Cre/Nr1f/fmouse with electrode implantation and used in the BMI experiments. (MOV 5462 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koralek, A., Jin, X., Long II, J. et al. Corticostriatal plasticity is necessary for learning intentional neuroprosthetic skills. Nature 483, 331–335 (2012).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing