Abstract
Mushroom bodies are a well-known site for associative learning in insects. Yet the precise mechanisms that underlie plasticity there and ensure their specificity remain elusive. In locusts, the synapses between the intrinsic mushroom body neurons and their postsynaptic targets obey a Hebbian spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) rule. Although this property homeostatically regulates the timing of mushroom body output, its potential role in associative learning is unknown. Here we show in vivo that pre–post pairing causing STDP can, when followed by the local delivery of a reinforcement-mediating neuromodulator, specify the synapses that will undergo an associative change. At these synapses, and there only, the change is a transformation of the STDP rule itself. These results illustrate the multiple actions of STDP, including a role in associative learning, despite potential temporal dissociation between the pairings that specify synaptic modification and the delivery of reinforcement-mediating neuromodulator signals.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Norepinephrine potentiates and serotonin depresses visual cortical responses by transforming eligibility traces
Nature Communications Open Access 09 June 2022
-
Learning with reinforcement prediction errors in a model of the Drosophila mushroom body
Nature Communications Open Access 07 May 2021
-
Plasticity and modulation of olfactory circuits in insects
Cell and Tissue Research Open Access 04 December 2020
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout




References
McGuire, S. E., Le, P. T. & Davis, R. L. The role of Drosophila mushroom body signaling in olfactory memory. Science 293, 1330–1333 (2001)
Tully, J. B. C. T. in Drosophila: A Practical Approach (ed. Roberts, D. B. ) 265–317 (Oxford Univ. Press, 1998)
de Belle, J. S. & Heisenberg, M. Associative odor learning in Drosophila abolished by chemical ablation of mushroom bodies. Science 263, 692–695 (1994)
Tully, T. & Quinn, W. G. Classical conditioning and retention in normal and mutant Drosophila melanogaster . J. Comp. Physiol. A 157, 263–277 (1985)
Heisenberg, M., Borst, A., Wagner, S. & Byers, D. Drosophila mushroom body mutants are deficient in olfactory learning. J. Neurogenet. 2, 1–30 (1985)
Quinn, W. G., Harris, W. A. & Benzer, S. Conditioned behavior in Drosophila melanogaster . Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 71, 708–712 (1974)
Keene, A. C. & Waddell, S. Drosophila olfactory memory: single genes to complex neural circuits. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 8, 341–354 (2007)
Akalal, D. B. et al. Roles for Drosophila mushroom body neurons in olfactory learning and memory. Learn. Mem. 13, 659–668 (2006)
Davis, R. L. Olfactory memory formation in Drosophila: from molecular to systems neuroscience. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 28, 275–302 (2005)
Gerber, B., Tanimoto, H. & Heisenberg, M. An engram found? Evaluating the evidence from fruit flies. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14, 737–744 (2004)
Heisenberg, M. Mushroom body memoir: from maps to models. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 4, 266–275 (2003)
Perez-Orive, J. et al. Oscillations and sparsening of odor representations in the mushroom body. Science 297, 359–365 (2002)
Turner, G. C., Bazhenov, M. & Laurent, G. Olfactory representations by Drosophila mushroom body neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 99, 734–746 (2008)
Ito, I., Ong, R. C.-Y., Raman, B. & Stopfer, M. Sparse odor representation and olfactory learning. Nature Neurosci. 11, 1177–1184 (2008)
Kanerva, P. Sparse Distributed Memory (MIT Press, 1988)
Papadopoulou, M., Cassenaer, S., Nowotny, T. & Laurent, G. Normalization for sparse encoding of odors by a wide-field interneuron. Science 332, 721–725 (2011)
Cassenaer, S. & Laurent, G. Hebbian STDP in mushroom bodies facilitates the synchronous flow of olfactory information in locusts. Nature 448, 709–713 (2007)
Markram, H., Lübke, J., Frotscher, M. & Sakmann, B. Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APs and EPSPs. Science 275, 213–215 (1997)
Bi, G. Q. & Poo, M. M. Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type. J. Neurosci. 18, 10464–10472 (1998)
Abbott, L. F. & Nelson, S. B. Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast. Nature Neurosci. 3, 1178–1183 (2000)
Meeks, J. P. & Holy, T. E. Pavlov’s moth: olfactory learning and spike-timing-dependent plasticity. Nature Neurosci. 11, 1126–1127 (2008)
Pawlak, V. et al. Timing is not everything: neuromodulation opens the STDP gate. Front. Syn. Neurosci. 2, 146 (2010)
Izhikevich, E. M. Solving the distal reward problem through linkage of STDP and dopamine signaling. Cereb. Cortex 17, 2443–2452 (2007)
Gütig, R., Aharonov, R., Rotter, S. & Sompolinsky, H. Learning input correlations through nonlinear temporally asymmetric Hebbian plasticity. J. Neurosci. 23, 3697–3714 (2003)
Huerta, R., Nowotny, T., García-Sanchez, M., Abarbanel, H. D. I. & Rabinovich, M. I. Learning classification in the olfactory system of insects. Neural Comput. 16, 1601–1640 (2004)
Masquelier, T. & Thorpe, S. J. Unsupervised learning of visual features through spike timing dependent plasticity. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3, e31 (2007)
Waddell, S. & Quinn, W. G. Learning how a fruit fly forgets. Science 293, 1271–1272 (2001)
Isabel, G., Pascual, A. & Preat, T. Exclusive consolidated memory phases in Drosophila . Science 304, 1024–1027 (2004)
Gervasi, N., Tchénio, P. & Preat, T. PKA dynamics in a Drosophila learning center: coincidence detection by rutabaga adenylyl cyclase and spatial regulation by dunce phosphodiesterase. Neuron 65, 516–529 (2010)
Wang, Y., Mamiya, A., Chiang, A. S. & Zhong, Y. Imaging of an early memory trace in the Drosophila mushroom body. J. Neurosci. 28, 4368–4376 (2008)
Claridge-Chang, A. et al. Writing memories with light-addressable reinforcement circuitry. Cell 139, 405–415 (2009)
Kim, Y. C., Lee, H. G. & Han, K. A. D1 dopamine receptor dDA1 is required in the mushroom body neurons for aversive and appetitive learning in Drosophila . J. Neurosci. 27, 7640–7647 (2007)
Riemensperger, T., Voller, T., Stock, P., Buchner, E. & Fiala, A. Punishment prediction by dopaminergic neurons in Drosophila . Curr. Biol. 15, 1953–1960 (2005)
Schwaerzel, M. et al. Dopamine and octopamine differentiate between aversive and appetitive olfactory memories in Drosophila . J. Neurosci. 23, 10495–10502 (2003)
Mizunami, M. & Matsumoto, Y. Roles of aminergic neurons in formation and recall of associative memory in crickets. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 4, 172 (2010)
Braunig, P. Suboesophageal DUM neurons innervate the principal neuropiles of the locust brain. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 332, 221–240 (1991)
Wendt, B. & Homberg, U. Immunocytochemistry of dopamine in the brain of the locust Schistocerca gregaria . J. Comp. Neurol. 321, 387–403 (1992)
Laurent, G. & Naraghi, M. Odorant-induced oscillations in the mushroom bodies of the locust. J. Neurosci. 14, 2993–3004 (1994)
Hammer, M. An identified neuron mediates the unconditioned stimulus in associative olfactory learning in honeybees. Nature 366, 59–63 (1993)
Gütig, R. & Sompolinsky, H. The tempotron: a neuron that learns spike timing-based decisions. Nature Neurosci. 9, 420–428 (2006)
Huerta, R. & Nowotny, T. Fast and robust learning by reinforcement signals: explorations in the insect brain. Neural Comput. 21, 2123–2151 (2009)
Seol, G. H. et al. Neuromodulators control the polarity of spike-timing- dependent synaptic plasticity. Neuron 55, 919–929 (2007)
Shen, W., Flajolet, M., Greengard, P. & Surmeier, D. J. Dichotomous dopaminergic control of striatal synaptic plasticity. Science 321, 848–851 (2008)
Izhikevich, E. M. Simple model of spiking neurons. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 14, 1569–1572 (2003)
Mazor, O. & Laurent, G. Transient dynamics versus fixed points in odor representations by locust antennal lobe projection neurons. Neuron 48, 661–673 (2005)
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Lawrence Hanson Chair at Caltech, the National Institutes on Deafness and other Communication Disorders, Caltech's Broad Fellows Program, the Office of Naval Research (grants N00014-07-1-0741 and N00014-10-1-0735) and the Max Planck Society. We are grateful to L.-P. Mok for help with locust dissections and to E. Schuman, A. Siapas, E. Lubenov, M. Papadopoulou and members of the Laurent lab for comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.C. and G.L. designed the experiments and simulations, discussed the results and wrote the paper. S.C. carried out the experiments and simulations.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
This file contains Supplementary Notes and Supplementary Figures 1- 8 with legends. (PDF 2500 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cassenaer, S., Laurent, G. Conditional modulation of spike-timing-dependent plasticity for olfactory learning. Nature 482, 47–52 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10776
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10776
This article is cited by
-
Norepinephrine potentiates and serotonin depresses visual cortical responses by transforming eligibility traces
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Neurotensin orchestrates valence assignment in the amygdala
Nature (2022)
-
Learning with reinforcement prediction errors in a model of the Drosophila mushroom body
Nature Communications (2021)
-
Plasticity and modulation of olfactory circuits in insects
Cell and Tissue Research (2021)
-
Multiple network properties overcome random connectivity to enable stereotypic sensory responses
Nature Communications (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.