Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Two ten-billion-solar-mass black holes at the centres of giant elliptical galaxies


Observational work conducted over the past few decades indicates that all massive galaxies have supermassive black holes at their centres. Although the luminosities and brightness fluctuations of quasars in the early Universe suggest that some were powered by black holes with masses greater than 10 billion solar masses1,2, the remnants of these objects have not been found in the nearby Universe. The giant elliptical galaxy Messier 87 hosts the hitherto most massive known black hole, which has a mass of 6.3 billion solar masses3,4. Here we report that NGC 3842, the brightest galaxy in a cluster at a distance from Earth of 98 megaparsecs, has a central black hole with a mass of 9.7 billion solar masses, and that a black hole of comparable or greater mass is present in NGC 4889, the brightest galaxy in the Coma cluster (at a distance of 103 megaparsecs). These two black holes are significantly more massive than predicted by linearly extrapolating the widely used correlations between black-hole mass and the stellar velocity dispersion or bulge luminosity of the host galaxy5,6,7,8,9. Although these correlations remain useful for predicting black-hole masses in less massive elliptical galaxies, our measurements suggest that different evolutionary processes influence the growth of the largest galaxies and their black holes.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Two-dimensional maps of the line-of-sight stellar velocity dispersions.
Figure 2: One-dimensional profiles of the line-of-sight velocity dispersions.
Figure 3: Correlations of dynamically measured black hole masses and bulk properties of host galaxies.


  1. 1

    Netzer, H. The largest black holes and the most luminous galaxies. Astrophys. J. 583, L5–L8 (2003)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Vestergaard, H., Fan, X., Tremonti, C. A., Osmer, P. S. & Richards, G. T. Mass functions of the active black holes in distant quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey data release 3. Astrophys. J. 674, L1–L4 (2008)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Sargent, W. L. W. et al. Dynamical evidence for a central mass concentration in the galaxy M87. Astrophys. J. 221, 731–744 (1978)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Gebhardt, K. et al. The black hole mass in M87 from Gemini/NIFS adaptive optics observations. Astrophys. J. 729, 119 (2011)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Dressler, A. in Active Galactic Nuclei (eds Osterbrock, D. E. & Miller, J. S. ) 217–232 (IAU Symposium 134, Springer, 1989)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Kormendy, J. & Richstone, D. Inward bound the search for supermassive black holes in galactic nuclei. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 33, 581–624 (1995)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Ferrarese, L. & Merritt, D. A fundamental relation between supermassive black holes and their host galaxies. Astrophys. J. 539, L9–L12 (2000)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Gebhardt, K. et al. A relationship between nuclear black hole mass and galaxy velocity dispersion. Astrophys. J. 539, L13–L16 (2000)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Gültekin, K. et al. The MBH−σ and MBH−L relations in galactic bulges, and determinations of their intrinsic scatter. Astrophys. J. 698, 198–221 (2009)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Laine, S. et al. Hubble Space Telescope imaging of brightest cluster galaxies. Astron. J. 125, 478–505 (2003)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Postman, M. & Lauer, T. R. Brightest cluster galaxies as standard candles. Astrophys. J. 440, 28–47 (1995)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Schwarzschild, M. A numerical model for a triaxial stellar system in dynamical equilibrium. Astrophys. J. 232, 236–247 (1979)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Loubser, S. I., Sansom, A. E., Sánchez-Blázquez, P., Soechting, I. K. & Bromage, G. E. Radial kinematics of brightest cluster galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 391, 1009–1028 (2008)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Lauer, T. R. et al. The masses of nuclear black holes in luminous elliptical galaxies and implications for the space density of the most massive black holes. Astrophys. J. 662, 808–834 (2007)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Dalla Bontà, E. et al. The high-mass end of the black hole mass function: mass estimates in brightest cluster galaxies. Astrophys. J. 690, 537–559 (2009)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    McConnell, N. J. et al. The black hole mass in brightest cluster galaxy NGC 6086. Astrophys. J. 728, 100 (2011)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Nowak, N. et al. The supermassive black hole of Fornax A. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 391, 1629–1649 (2008)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Di Matteo, T., Volker, S. & Hernquist, L. Energy input from quasars regulates the growth and activity of black holes and their host galaxies. Nature 433, 604–607 (2005)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Robertson, B. et al. The evolution of the MBH − σ relation. Astrophys. J. 641, 90–102 (2006)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Boylan-Kolchin, M., Ma, C.-P. & Quataert, E. Red mergers and the assembly of massive elliptical galaxies: the fundamental plane and its projections. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 369, 1081–1089 (2006)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Hopkins, P. F., Bundy, K., Hernquist, L. & Ellis, R. S. Observational evidence for the coevolution of galaxy mergers, quasars, and the blue/red galaxy transition. Astrophys. J. 659, 976–996 (2007)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Lauer, T. R., Tremaine, S., Richstone, D. & Faber, S. M. Selection bias in observing the cosmological evolution of the MBH−σ and MBH−L relationships. Astrophys. J. 670, 249–260 (2007)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Allington-Smith, J. et al. Integral field spectroscopy with the Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph. I. Design, construction, and testing. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 114, 892–912 (2002)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Hill, G. J. et al. Design, construction, and performance of VIRUS-P: the prototype of a highly replicated integral field spectrograph for the HET. Proc. Soc. Photo-opt. Instrum. Eng. 7014, 701470 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Larkin, J. et al. OSIRIS: a diffraction limited integral field spectrograph for Keck. Proc. Soc. Photo-opt. Instrum. Eng. 6269, 62691A (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references


N.J.M., C.-P.M, K.G. and J.R.G. are supported by the National Science Foundation. C.-P.M. is supported by NASA and by the Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science, University of California, Berkeley. S.A.W. is supported by NASA through a Hubble Fellowship. Data presented here were obtained using the Gemini Observatory, the W. M. Keck Observatory and the McDonald Observatory. The Gemini Observatory is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under a cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation on behalf of the Gemini partnership. The W. M. Keck Observatory is operated as a scientific partnership among the California Institute of Technology, the University of California and NASA. The McDonald Observatory is operated by the University of Texas at Austin. The instrument VIRUS-P was funded by G. and C. Mitchell. Stellar orbit models were run using the facilities at the Texas Advanced Computing Center at The University of Texas at Austin.

Author information




N.J.M. carried out the data analysis and modelling. N.J.M, C.-P.M. and S.A.W. wrote the manuscript. C.-P.M. compiled the data for Fig. 3 and oversaw communication among co-authors. S.A.W. analysed OSIRIS data on NGC 3842. K.G. provided GMOS data on NGC 3842 and NGC 4889. K.G. and D.O.R. developed the stellar orbit modelling code. J.D.M. provided VIRUS-P data on NGC 3842. T.R.L. provided photometric data on and image analysis of NGC 3842 and NGC 4889. J.R.G. led the OSIRIS observing campaign for NGC 3842. All authors contributed to the interpretive analysis of the observations and the writing of the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nicholas J. McConnell or Chung-Pei Ma.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Text and Data, Supplementary Figures 1-7 with legends and additional references. (PDF 435 kb)

Supplementary Data

This file contains data for the line-of-sight velocity distributions at various spatial locations in the central regions of galaxies NGC 3842 and NGC 4889. (TXT 81 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McConnell, N., Ma, CP., Gebhardt, K. et al. Two ten-billion-solar-mass black holes at the centres of giant elliptical galaxies. Nature 480, 215–218 (2011).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing