Chemical ozone destruction occurs over both polar regions in local winter–spring. In the Antarctic, essentially complete removal of lower-stratospheric ozone currently results in an ozone hole every year, whereas in the Arctic, ozone loss is highly variable and has until now been much more limited. Here we demonstrate that chemical ozone destruction over the Arctic in early 2011 was—for the first time in the observational record—comparable to that in the Antarctic ozone hole. Unusually long-lasting cold conditions in the Arctic lower stratosphere led to persistent enhancement in ozone-destroying forms of chlorine and to unprecedented ozone loss, which exceeded 80 per cent over 18–20 kilometres altitude. Our results show that Arctic ozone holes are possible even with temperatures much milder than those in the Antarctic. We cannot at present predict when such severe Arctic ozone depletion may be matched or exceeded.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    , & Large losses of total ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal ClOx/NOx interaction. Nature 315, 207–210 (1985)

  2. 2.

    , , & On the depletion of Antarctic ozone. Nature 321, 755–758 (1986)

  3. 3.

    & Production of Cl2O2 from the self-reaction of the ClO radical. J. Phys. Chem. 91, 433–436 (1987)

  4. 4.

    , & Ozone destruction by chlorine radicals within the Antarctic vortex: the spatial and temporal evolution of ClO-O3 anticorrelation based on in situ ER-2 data. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 11465–11479 (1989)

  5. 5.

    Stratospheric ozone depletion: a review of concepts and history. Rev. Geophys. 37, 275–316 (1999)

  6. 6.

    & The dynamics of the stratospheric polar vortex and its relation to springtime ozone depletions. Science 251, 46–52 (1991)

  7. 7.

    . Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2010 (Report 52, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, 2011)

  8. 8.

    et al. High concentrations of chlorine monoxide at low altitudes in the Antarctic spring stratosphere: secular variation. Nature 328, 411–413 (1987)

  9. 9.

    et al. Stratospheric ClO and ozone from the Microwave Limb Sounder on the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite. Nature 362, 597–602 (1993)

  10. 10.

    , , & Variations and climatology of ClO in the polar lower stratosphere from UARS Microwave Limb Sounder measurements. J. Geophys. Res.. 108, 4454, (2003)

  11. 11.

    et al. A study of stratospheric chlorine partitioning based on new satellite measurements and modeling. J. Geophys. Res.. 113, D12307, (2008)

  12. 12.

    . Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2006 (Report 50, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project, 2007)

  13. 13.

    et al. Arctic winter 2005: implications for stratospheric ozone loss and climate change. Geophys. Res. Lett.. 33, L23808, (2006)

  14. 14.

    et al. EOS MLS observations of ozone loss in the 2004–2005 Arctic winter. Geophys. Res. Lett.. 33, L04802, (2006)

  15. 15.

    , , & A closer look at Arctic ozone loss and polar stratospheric clouds. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 8499–8510 (2010)

  16. 16.

    et al. Arctic ozone loss and climate change. Geophys. Res. Lett.. 31, L04116, (2004)

  17. 17.

    , , , & Chemical ozone loss in the Arctic and Antarctic stratosphere between 1992 and 2005. Geophys. Res. Lett.. 33, L20812, (2006)

  18. 18.

    & Polar stratospheric cloud climatology based on Stratospheric Aerosol Measurement II observations from 1978 to 1989. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 13083–13089 (1994)

  19. 19.

    et al. An analysis of Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement (POAM) II Arctic stratospheric cloud observations, 1993–1996. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 24341–24357 (1999)

  20. 20.

    , & CALIPSO polar stratospheric cloud observations: second-generation detection algorithm and composition discrimination. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 7577–7589 (2009)

  21. 21.

    et al. Interhemispheric differences in springtime production of HCl and ClONO2 in the polar vortices. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 13967–13978 (1995)

  22. 22.

    et al. Chemical depletion of ozone in the Arctic lower stratosphere during winter 1992–93. Nature 370, 429–434 (1994)

  23. 23.

    , , & Relative importance of dynamical and chemical contributions to Arctic wintertime ozone. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35 L17801 (2008)

  24. 24.

    et al. In situ measurements of stratospheric ozone depletion rates in the Arctic winter of 1991/1992: a Lagrangian approach. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 5843–5853 (1998)

  25. 25.

    et al. Lagrangian transport calculations using UARS data. Part II: ozone. J. Atmos. Sci. 52, 3069–3081 (1995)

  26. 26.

    et al. Variability of ozone loss during Arctic winter (1991–2000) estimated from UARS Microwave Limb Sounder measurements. J. Geophys. Res.. 108, 4149, (2003)

  27. 27.

    , & The Lagrangian chemistry and transport model ATLAS: simulation and validation of stratospheric chemistry and ozone loss in the winter 1999/2000. Geosci. Model Dev. 3, 585–601 (2010)

  28. 28.

    et al. Observational evidence for chemical ozone depletion over the Arctic in winter 1991–92. Nature 375, 131–134 (1995)

  29. 29.

    The vertical ozone distribution above the GDR-research base, Antarctica in 1985. Geophys. Res. Lett. 14, 84–86 (1987)

  30. 30.

    et al. Prolonged stratospheric ozone loss in the 1995–96 Arctic winter. Nature 389, 835–838 (1997)

  31. 31.

    , , , & MLS observations of Arctic ozone loss in 1996–97. Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 2697–2700 (1997)

  32. 32.

    , , , & Polar vortex conditions during the 1995–96 Arctic winter: meteorology and MLS ozone. Geophys. Res. Lett. 23, 3203–3206 (1996)

  33. 33.

    The role of dynamics in total ozone deviations from their long-term mean over the Northern Hemisphere. Ann. Geophys. 17, 231–241 (1999)

  34. 34.

    , , & Origin of extreme ozone minima at middle to high northern latitudes. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 20925–20940 (2001)

  35. 35.

    et al. Aura Microwave Limb Sounder observations of dynamics and transport during the record-breaking 2009 Arctic stratospheric major warming. Geophys. Res. Lett.. 36, L12815, (2009)

  36. 36.

    et al. What would have happened to the ozone layer if chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) had not been regulated? Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 2113–2128 (2009)

  37. 37.

    , & What controls the temperatures of the Arctic stratosphere during the spring? J. Geophys. Res. 106, 19999–20010 (2001)

  38. 38.

    & The three-dimensional structure of breaking Rossby waves in the polar wintertime stratosphere. J. Atmos. Sci. 57, 3663–3685 (2000)

  39. 39.

    , & Variability of the Northern Hemisphere polar stratospheric cloud potential: the role of North Pacific disturbances. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 135, 1020–1029 (2009)

  40. 40.

    , , , & Associations between stratospheric variability and tropospheric blocking. J. Geophys. Res.. 115, D06108, (2010)

  41. 41.

    et al. Multimodel climate and variability of the stratosphere. J. Geophys. Res.. 116, D05102, (2011)

  42. 42.

    et al. The potential to narrow uncertainty in projections of stratospheric ozone over the 21st century. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 9473–9486 (2010)

  43. 43.

    et al. MERRA — NASA’s modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications. J. Clim. 24 3624–3648 (2011)

  44. 44.

    et al. CALIPSO lidar description and performance assessment. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 26, 1214–1228 (2009)

  45. 45.

    et al. The Earth Observing System Microwave Limb Sounder (EOS MLS) on the Aura satellite. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens. 44, 1075–1092 (2006)

  46. 46.

    et al. The Ozone Monitoring Instrument. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens. 44, 1093–1101 (2006)

  47. 47.

    et al. Chemical ozone loss in the Arctic winter 1994/95 as determined by the Match technique. J. Atmos. Chem. 32, 35–59 (1999)

  48. 48.

    et al. Chemical depletion of Arctic ozone in winter 1999/2000. J. Geophys. Res.. 107, 8276, (2002)

  49. 49.

    , & On the use and significance of isentropic potential-vorticity maps. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 111, 877–946 (1985)

  50. 50.

    et al. Earth Probe Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) Data Products User’s Guide (NASA Technical Publication 1998-206895, 1998)

  51. 51.

    , , , & The anomalous Arctic lower stratospheric polar vortex of 1992–1993. Geophys. Res. Lett. 21, 2405–2408 (1994)

  52. 52.

    et al. Solar occultation satellite data and derived meteorological products: Sampling issues and comparisons with Aura MLS. J. Geophys. Res.. 112, D24S50, (2007)

  53. 53.

    & The area of the stratospheric polar vortex as a diagnostic for tracer transport on an isentropic surface. J. Atmos. Sci. 43, 1319–1339 (1986)

  54. 54.

    & Laboratory studies of the nitric acid trihydrate: implications for the south polar stratosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 15, 855–858 (1988)

  55. 55.

    et al. CALIOP algorithm theoretical basis document. Calibration and Level 1 data products (Technical Report, NASA Langley Research Center, 2006); available at 〈 〉.

  56. 56.

    et al. Version 3.3 Level 2 data quality and description document. (Technical Report JPL D-33509, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 2010); available at 〈〉.

  57. 57.

    et al. Assessment of the performance of ECC-ozonesondes under quasi-flight conditions in the environmental simulation chamber: insights from the Jülich Ozone Sonde Intercomparison Experiment (JOSIE). J. Geophys. Res.. 112, D19306, (2007)

  58. 58.

    et al. Intercomparison of stratospheric chemistry models under polar vortex conditions. J. Atmos. Chem. 45, 51–77 (2003)

  59. 59.

    et al. Validation of the Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument total column ozone product. J. Geophys. Res.. 113, D15S14, (2008)

Download references


We thank the MLS (especially A. Lambert, D. Miller, W. Read, M. Schwartz, P. Stek, J. Waters), OMI (especially P. K. Bhartia, G. Jaross, G. Labow), CALIPSO and Match science teams, as well as A. Douglass, J. Joiner and the Aura project, for their support. We also thank W. Daffer and R. Fuller for programming assistance at JPL; the many observers whose work went into obtaining the ozone-sonde measurements; the ozone scientists who participated in the discussion of the 2011 Arctic ozone loss and appropriate definition of an Arctic ozone hole (including, but not limited to, N. Harris, G. Bodeker, G. Braathen, M. Kurylo, R. Salawitch); and especially P. Newman and K. Minschwaner for discussions and comments. Meteorological analyses were provided by NASA’s Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO) and by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts. We thank S. Pawson of GMAO for advice on usage of the MERRA reanalysis. Ozone-sonde measurements at Alert, Eureka, Resolute Bay, Churchill and Goose Bay were funded by Environment Canada. Additional ozone sondes were flown at Eureka as part of the Canadian Arctic Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE) Validation Campaign and were funded by the Canadian Space Agency. Academy of Finland provided partial funding for performing and processing ozone-sonde measurements in Jokioinen and Sodankylä. Ozone soundings and work at AWI were partially funded by the EC DG Research through the RECONCILE project. Work at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, and at Science Systems and Applications Inc., was done under contract with NASA.

Author information


  1. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91109, USA

    • Gloria L. Manney
    • , Michelle L. Santee
    • , Nathaniel J. Livesey
    •  & Lucien Froidevaux
  2. New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA

    • Gloria L. Manney
  3. Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany

    • Markus Rex
    • , Ingo Wohltmann
    • , Ralph Lehmann
    • , Hartwig Gernandt
    •  & Peter von der Gathen
  4. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia 23681, USA

    • Michael C. Pitts
  5. Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, 3730 AE De Bilt, The Netherlands

    • Pepijn Veefkind
    •  & Pieternel F. Levelt
  6. Delft University of Technology, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands

    • Pepijn Veefkind
    •  & Pieternel F. Levelt
  7. Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Lanham, Maryland 20706, USA

    • Eric R. Nash
    •  & David P. Haffner
  8. Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, Virginia 23666, USA

    • Lamont R. Poole
  9. Science and Technology Corporation, Lanham, Maryland 20706, USA

    • Mark R. Schoeberl
  10. Environment Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3H 5T4

    • Jonathan Davies
    • , C. Thomas McElroy
    •  & David W. Tarasick
  11. Central Aerological Observatory, Dolgoprudny 141700, Russia

    • Valery Dorokhov
  12. NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado 80305, USA

    • Bryan Johnson
  13. Arctic Research Center, Finnish Meteorological Institute, 99600 Sodankylä, Finland

    • Rigel Kivi
    •  & Esko Kyrö
  14. Danish Climate Center, Danish Meteorological Institute, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

    • Niels Larsen
  15. Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands

    • Pieternel F. Levelt
  16. Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, St Petersburg 199397, Russia

    • Alexander Makshtas
    •  & Nikita S. Zinoviev
  17. National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba-city, 305-8506, Japan

    • Hideaki Nakajima
  18. National Institute for Aerospace Technology, 28850 Torrejón De Ardoz, Spain

    • Maria Concepción Parrondo
  19. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A7

    • Kaley A. Walker


  1. Search for Gloria L. Manney in:

  2. Search for Michelle L. Santee in:

  3. Search for Markus Rex in:

  4. Search for Nathaniel J. Livesey in:

  5. Search for Michael C. Pitts in:

  6. Search for Pepijn Veefkind in:

  7. Search for Eric R. Nash in:

  8. Search for Ingo Wohltmann in:

  9. Search for Ralph Lehmann in:

  10. Search for Lucien Froidevaux in:

  11. Search for Lamont R. Poole in:

  12. Search for Mark R. Schoeberl in:

  13. Search for David P. Haffner in:

  14. Search for Jonathan Davies in:

  15. Search for Valery Dorokhov in:

  16. Search for Hartwig Gernandt in:

  17. Search for Bryan Johnson in:

  18. Search for Rigel Kivi in:

  19. Search for Esko Kyrö in:

  20. Search for Niels Larsen in:

  21. Search for Pieternel F. Levelt in:

  22. Search for Alexander Makshtas in:

  23. Search for C. Thomas McElroy in:

  24. Search for Hideaki Nakajima in:

  25. Search for Maria Concepción Parrondo in:

  26. Search for David W. Tarasick in:

  27. Search for Peter von der Gathen in:

  28. Search for Kaley A. Walker in:

  29. Search for Nikita S. Zinoviev in:


G.L.M. and M.L.S. led analysis of MLS data; M.R. led analysis of ozone-sonde data; G.L.M. led the meteorological data analysis. M.R., G.L.M., N.J.L. and I.W. did chemical ozone loss calculations. R.L. and M.R. performed and analysed chemical box model calculations. M.C.P. and L.R.P. provided CALIPSO/CALIOP data analyses; E.R.N. and P.V. provided TOMS and OMI data analyses. L.F., M.L.S., G.L.M. and N.J.L. provided expertise on MLS data usage; D.P.H., P.V. and P.F.L. provided expertise on OMI data usage. J.D., V.D., H.G., B.J., R.K., E.K., N.L., A.M., C.T.M., H.N., M.C.P., D.W.T., P.v.d.G., K.A.W. and N.S.Z. were responsible for performing and processing ozone-sonde measurements. All authors contributed comments on the manuscript. G.L.M., M.L.S. and M.R. jointly compiled and synthesized the results. G.L.M. and M.L.S. wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Gloria L. Manney or Michelle L. Santee.

CALIOP data are publicly available at http://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/PRODOCS/calipso/table_calipso.html, MLS data at http://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/Aura/data-holdings/MLS, OMI data at http://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/Aura/data-holdings/OMI/omto3_v003.shtml, and GEOS-5 MERRA analyses through http://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/mdisc/data-holdings/merra/. The balloon-borne Antarctic ozone-sonde data recorded in 1985 and the following years are publicly available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.547983.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    The file contains a Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary Figures 1-7 with legends and additional references.

Zip files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Data 1A

    The data shows Arctic Ozone Data

Excel files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Data 1B

    The data shows Arctic Ozone Station Information

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.