Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Two populations of X-ray pulsars produced by two types of supernova

Subjects

Abstract

Two types of supernova are thought to produce the overwhelming majority of neutron stars in the Universe1. The first type, iron-core-collapse supernovae, occurs when a high-mass star develops a degenerate iron core that exceeds the Chandrasekhar limit2. The second type, electron-capture supernovae, is associated with the collapse of a lower-mass oxygen–neon–magnesium core as it loses pressure support owing to the sudden capture of electrons by neon and/or magnesium nuclei3,4. It has hitherto been impossible to identify the two distinct families of neutron stars produced in these formation channels. Here we report that a large, well-known class of neutron-star-hosting X-ray pulsars is actually composed of two distinct subpopulations with different characteristic spin periods, orbital periods and orbital eccentricities. This class, the Be/X-ray binaries, contains neutron stars that accrete material from a more massive companion star5. The two subpopulations are most probably associated with the two distinct types of neutron-star-forming supernova, with electron-capture supernovae preferentially producing systems with short spin periods, short orbital periods and low eccentricities. Intriguingly, the split between the two subpopulations is clearest in the distribution of the logarithm of spin period, a result that had not been predicted and which still remains to be explained.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The Corbet diagram for high-mass X-ray binaries.
Figure 2: The log( P spin ) distribution of confirmed and probable BeXs.
Figure 3: The dependence of eccentricity on P spin among BeXs.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heger, A., Fryer, C. L., Woosley, S. E., Langer, N. & Hartmann, D. H. How massive single stars end their life. Astrophys. J. 591, 288–300 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Woosley, S. & Janka, T. The physics of core-collapse supernovae. Nature Phys. 1, 147–154 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nomoto, K. Evolution of 8–10 solar mass stars toward electron capture supernovae. I - Formation of electron-degenerate O + NE + MG cores. Astrophys. J. 277, 791–805 (1984)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nomoto, K. Evolution of 8–10 solar mass stars toward electron capture supernovae. II - Collapse of an O + NE + MG core. Astrophys. J. 322, 206–214 (1987)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Reig, P. Be/X-ray binaries. Astrophys. Space Sci. 332, 1–29 (2011)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, U., Osaki, Y. & Saio, H. Viscous excretion discs around Be stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 250, 432–437 (1991)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Harris, J. & Zaritsky, D. The star formation history of the Small Magellanic Cloud. Astron. J. 127, 1531–1544 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Haberl, F. & Pietsch, W. X-ray observations of Be/X-ray binaries in the SMC. Astron. Astrophys. 414, 667–676 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Coe, M. J., Edge, W. R. T., Galache, J. L. & McBride, V. A. Optical properties of Small Magellanic Cloud X-ray binaries. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 356, 502–514 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Waters, L. B. F. M. & van Kerkwijk, M. H. The relation between orbital and spin periods in massive X-ray binaries. Astron. Astrophys. 223, 196–206 (1989)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, X. & van den Heuvel, E. P. J. On the relation between spin and orbital periods in Be/X-ray binaries. Astron. Astrophys. 314, L13–L16 (1996)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, Q. Z., Li, X. D. & Wei, D. M. in High Energy Processes and Phenomena in Astrophysics (eds Li, X. D., Trimble, V. & Wang, Z. R. ) 215–217 (Proc. IAU Symp. 214, Univ. Chicago Press, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Corbet, R. H. D. Be/neutron star binaries: a relationship between orbital period and neutron star spin period. Astron. Astrophys. 141, 91–93 (1984)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. de Jager, C., Nieuwenhuijzen, H. & van der Hucht, K. A. Mass loss rates in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 72, 259–289 (1988)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tout, C. A. & Hall, D. S. Wind driven mass transfer in interacting binary systems. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 253, 9–18 (1991)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Podsiadlowski, P. et al. The double pulsar J0737–3039: testing the neutron star equation of state. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 361, 1243–1249 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Podsiadlowski, P. et al. The effects of binary evolution on the dynamics of core collapse and neutron star kicks. Astrophys. J. 612, 1044–1051 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Poelarends, A. J. T., Herwig, F., Langer, N. & Heger, A. The supernova channel of super-AGB stars. Astrophys. J. 675, 614–625 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. van den Heuvel, E. P. J. in ESA SP-552: Proc. 5th INTEGRAL Workshop “The INTEGRAL Universe” (eds Schoenfelder, V., Lichti, G., & Winkler, C. ) 185–194 (ESA Spec. Publ. 552, European Space Agency, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schwab, J., Podsiadlowski, P. & Rappaport, S. Further evidence for the bimodal distribution of neutron-star masses. Astrophys. J. 719, 722–727 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Coe, M. J. An estimate of the supernova kick velocities for high-mass X-ray binaries in the Small Magellanic Cloud. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 358, 1379–1382 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Antoniou, V., Zezas, A., Hatzidimitriou, D. & Kalogera, V. Star formation history and X-ray binary populations: the case of the Small Magellanic Cloud. Astrophys. J. 716, L140–L145 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Coe, M. J., McBride, V. A. & Corbet, R. H. D. Exploring accretion theory with X-ray binaries in the Small Magellanic Cloud. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 401, 252–256 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Linden, T., Sepinsky, J. F., Kalogera, V. & Belczynski, K. Probing electron-capture supernovae: X-Ray binaries in starbursts. Astrophys. J. 699, 1573–1577 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ashman, K. M., Bird, C. M. & Zepf, S. E. Detecting bimodality in astronomical datasets. Astron. J. 108, 2348–2361 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research support for this project was provided by the UK Science and Technology Facilities Council. We would like to thank T. Maccarone and T. Linden for discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.K. carried out the statistical analysis for this project and wrote most of the text. M.J.C. compiled the high-mass X-ray binary data set that forms the basis for our analysis, and collaborated with C.K. on all aspects of the project from its inception. P.P. contributed to the theoretical interpretation of the results and to the final text. All authors discussed the results and their presentation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Knigge.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Text 1-4, Supplementary Figure 1 with a legend and additional references. (PDF 289 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knigge, C., Coe, M. & Podsiadlowski, P. Two populations of X-ray pulsars produced by two types of supernova. Nature 479, 372–375 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10529

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10529

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing