Letter | Published:

Verbal and non-verbal intelligence changes in the teenage brain

Nature volume 479, pages 113116 (03 November 2011) | Download Citation

  • An Addendum to this article was published on 16 May 2012

Abstract

Intelligence quotient (IQ) is a standardized measure of human intellectual capacity that takes into account a wide range of cognitive skills1. IQ is generally considered to be stable across the lifespan, with scores at one time point used to predict educational achievement and employment prospects in later years1. Neuroimaging allows us to test whether unexpected longitudinal fluctuations in measured IQ are related to brain development. Here we show that verbal and non-verbal IQ can rise or fall in the teenage years, with these changes in performance validated by their close correlation with changes in local brain structure. A combination of structural and functional imaging showed that verbal IQ changed with grey matter in a region that was activated by speech, whereas non-verbal IQ changed with grey matter in a region that was activated by finger movements. By using longitudinal assessments of the same individuals, we obviated the many sources of variation in brain structure that confound cross-sectional studies. This allowed us to dissociate neural markers for the two types of IQ and to show that general verbal and non-verbal abilities are closely linked to the sensorimotor skills involved in learning. More generally, our results emphasize the possibility that an individual’s intellectual capacity relative to their peers can decrease or increase in the teenage years. This would be encouraging to those whose intellectual potential may improve, and would be a warning that early achievers may not maintain their potential.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Childhood IQs as predictors of adult educational and occupational status. Science 197, 482–483 (1977)

  2. 2.

    , , , & The stability of differences in mental ability from childhood to old age: follow-up of the 1932 Scottish Mental Survey. Intelligence 28, 49–55 (2000)

  3. 3.

    , , & Bright spots: correlations of gray matter volume with IQ in a normal pediatric population. Neuroimage 20, 202–215 (2003)

  4. 4.

    et al. Voxel-based morphometry and stereology provide convergent evidence of the importance of medial prefrontal cortex for fluid intelligence in healthy adults. Neuroimage 25, 1175–1186 (2005)

  5. 5.

    , & Psychological test usage: implications in professional psychology. Prof. Psychol. Res. Pr. 31, 141–154 (2000)

  6. 6.

    & Assessing Adolescent and Adult Intelligence 209–216 (Wiley, 2006)

  7. 7.

    , , , & Structural brain variation and general intelligence. Neuroimage 23, 425–433 (2004)

  8. 8.

    , , & Human intelligence and brain networks. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 12, 489–501 (2010)

  9. 9.

    et al. Intellectual ability and cortical development in children and adolescents. Nature 440, 676–679 (2006)

  10. 10.

    , & Comparing cortical activations for silent and overt speech using event-related fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 15, 39–53 (2002)

  11. 11.

    , , & Somatotopic motor representation in the human anterior cerebellum: a high-resolution functional MRI study. Brain 119, 1023–1029 (1996)

  12. 12.

    , & An fMRI study of intra-individual functional topography in the human cerebellum. Behav. Neurol. 23, 65–79 (2010)

  13. 13.

    Close interrelation of motor development and cognitive development and of the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex. Child Dev. 71, 44–56 (2000)

  14. 14.

    et al. Beyond age and gender: relationships between cortical and subcortical brain volume and cognitive-motor abilities in school-age children. Neuroimage 54, 3093–3100 (2011)

  15. 15.

    , , , & The canonical relationship between sensory-motor functioning and cognitive processing in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 24, 273–286 (2009)

  16. 16.

    , , , & Development of cognitive and motor function following cerebellar tumour injury sustained in early childhood. Cortex 46, 919–932 (2010)

  17. 17.

    , & Acquisition of intellectual and perceptual-motor skills. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 52, 453–470 (2001)

  18. 18.

    et al. Relation between cognitive and motor performance in 5- to 6-year-old children: results from a large-scale cross-sectional study. Child Dev. 76, 1092–1103 (2005)

  19. 19.

    & The parieto-frontal integration theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: converging neuroimaging evidence. Behav. Brain Sci. 30, 135–154 (2007)

  20. 20.

    et al. To modulate or not to modulate: differing results in uniquely shaped Williams syndrome brains. Neuroimage 32, 1001–1007 (2006)

  21. 21.

    et al. Anatomical traces of vocabulary acquisition in the adolescent brain. J. Neurosci. 27, 1184–1189 (2007)

  22. 22.

    , , , & Contrasting effects of vocabulary knowledge on temporal and parietal brain structure across lifespan. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22, 943–954 (2010)

  23. 23.

    , & Functional subdivisions in the left angular gyrus where the semantic system meets and diverges from the default network. J. Neurosci. 30, 16809–16817 (2010)

  24. 24.

    & Dissociating functional brain networks by decoding the between-subject variability. Neuroimage 45, 349–359 (2009)

  25. 25.

    ‘O¯. et al. Where, when and why brain activation differs for bilinguals and monolinguals during picture naming and reading aloud. Cereb. Cortex advance online publication, 〈〉 (24 June 2011)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Wellcome Trust. We thank J. Glensman, A. Brennan, A. Peters, L. Stewart, K. Pitcher and R. Rutherford for their help with data collection; and W. Penny for his advice on statistical analyses.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK

    • Sue Ramsden
    • , Fiona M. Richardson
    • , Goulven Josse
    • , Caroline Ellis
    • , Clare Shakeshaft
    • , Mohamed L. Seghier
    •  & Cathy J. Price
  2. Developmental Neurocognition Laboratory, Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, UK

    • Michael S. C. Thomas

Authors

  1. Search for Sue Ramsden in:

  2. Search for Fiona M. Richardson in:

  3. Search for Goulven Josse in:

  4. Search for Michael S. C. Thomas in:

  5. Search for Caroline Ellis in:

  6. Search for Clare Shakeshaft in:

  7. Search for Mohamed L. Seghier in:

  8. Search for Cathy J. Price in:

Contributions

C.J.P. designed and supervised the study. C.J.P. and C.S. recruited the participants. C.S., S.R. and G.J. collected the data. F.M.R., S.R., C.E., M.L.S. and C.J.P. analysed the data. S.R., M.S.C.T. and C.J.P. wrote the manuscript and all authors edited the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cathy J. Price.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Text, additional references, Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Figure 1 with a legend.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10514

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.