Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communications Arising
  • Published:

Cardinale reply

Subjects

Abstract

Replying to H. M. Baulch, E. H. Stanley & E. S. Bernhardt Nature 477, doi:10.1038/nature10418 (2011)

Over the last 20 years, 59 experiments have quantified how the richness of plants and algae influence concentrations of inorganic nitrogen in soil or water1. Of these, 86% have shown that the concentration of nitrogen decreases as biodiversity increases—by an average of 48%. The primary contribution of my study2 was to identify a biological mechanism that is likely to explain these biodiversity effects. Using stream mesocosms, I showed that the impacts of algal diversity on nitrogen dynamics are controlled by niche partitioning—a long presumed, but rarely demonstrated mechanism. Baulch, Stanley and Bernhardt3 have questioned whether my findings have any implications for managing water quality in ‘real’ streams, as I suggested. They argue that nitrogen assimilation by algae cannot influence long-term nitrogen retention due to high turnover of algal biomass and rapid recycling of nitrogen, and they suggest that the only permanent loss of nitrogen from a stream is via denitrification.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cardinale, B. J. et al. The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. Am. J. Bot. 98, 572–592 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cardinale, B. J. Biodiversity improves water quality through niche partitioning. Nature 472, 86–89 (2011)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baulch, H. M., Stanley, E. H. & Bernhardt, E. S. Can algal uptake stop NO3 pollution? Nature 477 10.1038/nature10418 (2011)

  4. Hall, R. O. et al. Nitrate removal in stream ecosystems measured by 15N addition experiments: total uptake. Limnol. Oceanogr. 54, 653–665 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mulholland, P. J. et al. Nitrate removal in stream ecosystems measured by 15N addition experiments: denitrification. Limnol. Oceanogr. 54, 666–680 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mulholland, P. J. et al. Stream denitrification across biomes and its response to anthropogenic nitrate loading. Nature 452, 202–205 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dodds, W. K. et al. Quantification of the nitrogen cycle in a prairie stream. Ecosystems 3, 574–589 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sanzone, D. M. et al. Carbon and nitrogen transfer from a desert stream to riparian predators. Oecologia 134, 238–250 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakano, S. & Murakami, M. Reciprocal subsidies: dynamic interdependence between terrestrial and aquatic food webs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 166–170 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bernot, M. J. & Dodds, W. K. Nitrogen retention, removal, and saturation in lotic ecosystems. Ecosystems 8, 442–453 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Triska, F. J., Kennedy, V. C., Avanzino, R. J., Zellweger, G. W. & Bencala, K. E. Retention and transport of nutrients in a third-order stream in northwestern California: hyporheic processes. Ecology 70, 1893–1905 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hall, R. O., Baker, M. A., Arp, C. D. & Koch, B. J. Hydrologic control of nitrogen removal, storage, and export in a mountain stream. Limnol. Oceanogr. 54, 2128–2142 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ashkenas, L. R., Johnson, S. L., Gregory, S. V., Tank, J. L. & Wollheim, W. M. A stable isotope tracer study of nitrogen uptake and transformation in an old-growth forest stream. Ecology 85, 1725–1739 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradley J. Cardinale.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cardinale, B. Cardinale reply. Nature 477, E3–E4 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10419

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10419

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology