Letter | Published:

The wMel Wolbachia strain blocks dengue and invades caged Aedes aegypti populations

Nature volume 476, pages 450453 (25 August 2011) | Download Citation

Abstract

Dengue fever is the most important mosquito-borne viral disease of humans with more than 50 million cases estimated annually in more than 100 countries1,2. Disturbingly, the geographic range of dengue is currently expanding and the severity of outbreaks is increasing2,3,4. Control options for dengue are very limited and currently focus on reducing population abundance of the major mosquito vector, Aedes aegypti5,6. These strategies are failing to reduce dengue incidence in tropical communities and there is an urgent need for effective alternatives. It has been proposed that endosymbiotic bacterial Wolbachia infections of insects might be used in novel strategies for dengue control7,8,9. For example, the wMelPop-CLA Wolbachia strain reduces the lifespan of adult A. aegypti mosquitoes in stably transinfected lines8. This life-shortening phenotype was predicted to reduce the potential for dengue transmission. The recent discovery that several Wolbachia infections, including wMelPop-CLA, can also directly influence the susceptibility of insects to infection with a range of insect and human pathogens9,10,11 has markedly changed the potential for Wolbachia infections to control human diseases. Here we describe the successful transinfection of A. aegypti with the avirulent wMel strain of Wolbachia, which induces the reproductive phenotype cytoplasmic incompatibility with minimal apparent fitness costs and high maternal transmission, providing optimal phenotypic effects for invasion. Under semi-field conditions, the wMel strain increased from an initial starting frequency of 0.65 to near fixation within a few generations, invading A. aegypti populations at an accelerated rate relative to trials with the wMelPop-CLA strain. We also show that wMel and wMelPop-CLA strains block transmission of dengue serotype 2 (DENV-2) in A. aegypti, forming the basis of a practical approach to dengue suppression12.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Persistent emergence of dengue. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11, 738–739 (2005)

  2. 2.

    & Global spread and persistence of dengue. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 62, 71–92 (2008)

  3. 3.

    et al. Dengue: a continuing global threat. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 8, S7–S16 (2010)

  4. 4.

    , , & The dengue threat to the United States. Biosecur. Bioterror. 8, 273–276 (2010)

  5. 5.

    , & What do community-based dengue control programmes achieve? A systematic review of published evaluations. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 101, 317–325 (2007)

  6. 6.

    , , & Prospects for a dengue virus vaccine. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 5, 518–528 (2007)

  7. 7.

    , & Modifying insect population age structure to control vector-borne disease. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 627, 126–140 (2008)

  8. 8.

    et al. Stable introduction of a life-shortening Wolbachia infection into the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Science 323, 141–144 (2009)

  9. 9.

    et al. A Wolbachia symbiont in Aedes aegypti limits infection with dengue, chikungunya, and Plasmodium. Cell 139, 1268–1278 (2009)

  10. 10.

    , , & Wolbachia and virus protection in insects. Science 322, 702 (2008)

  11. 11.

    , & The bacterial symbiont Wolbachia induces resistance to RNA viral infections in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Biol. 6, e2 (2008)

  12. 12.

    et al. Successful establishment of Wolbachia in Aedes populations to suppress dengue transmission. Nature doi:10.1038/nature10356 (this issue).

  13. 13.

    & in Influential Passengers: Inherited Microorganisms and Arthropod Reproduction (eds , & ) 42–80 (Oxford Univ. Press, 1997)

  14. 14.

    & Rapid spread of an inherited incompatibility factor in California Drosophila. Nature 353, 440–442 (1991)

  15. 15.

    Cytoplasmic incompatibility in populations with overlapping generations. Evolution 64, 232–241 (2010)

  16. 16.

    et al. Dynamics of the “popcorn” Wolbachia infection in outbred Aedes aegypti informs prospects for mosquito vector control. Genetics 187, 583–595 (2011)

  17. 17.

    , , & Evidence for a global Wolbachia replacement in Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 15, 1428–1433 (2005)

  18. 18.

    & A virulent Wolbachia infection decreases the viability of the dengue vector Aedes aegypti during periods of embryonic quiescence. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 4, e748 (2010)

  19. 19.

    , , , & Integrating biophysical models and evolutionary theory to predict climatic impacts on species’ ranges: the dengue mosquito Aedes aegypti in Australia. Funct. Ecol. 23, 528–538 (2009)

  20. 20.

    & Roof gutters: a key container for Aedes aegypti and Ochlerotatus notoscriptus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Australia. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 67, 244–246 (2002)

  21. 21.

    & The effect of larval and adult nutrition on successful autogenous egg production by a mosquito. J. Insect Physiol. 50, 677–685 (2004)

  22. 22.

    Differences in performance of Aedes aegypti larvae raised at different densities in tires and ovitraps under field conditions in Argentina. J. Vector Ecol. 31, 371–377 (2006)

  23. 23.

    et al. A secure semi-field system for the study of Aedes aegypti. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 5, e988 (2011)

  24. 24.

    , & Population dynamic models of the spread of Wolbachia. Am. Nat. 177, 323–333 (2011)

  25. 25.

    et al. Analysis of survival of young and old Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) from Puerto Rico and Thailand. J. Med. Entomol. 38, 537–547 (2001)

  26. 26.

    , , , & Effect of temperature on the vector efficiency of Aedes aegypti for dengue 2 virus. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 36, 143–152 (1987)

  27. 27.

    , , , & Dengue virus type 2: replication and tropisms in orally infected Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. BMC Microbiol. 7, 9 (2007)

  28. 28.

    et al. Variation in vector competence for dengue 2 virus among 24 collections of Aedes aegypti from Mexico and the United States. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 67, 85–92 (2002)

  29. 29.

    , , , & Variation in susceptibility to oral infection with dengue viruses among geographic strains of Aedes aegypti. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 28, 1045–1052 (1979)

  30. 30.

    , , , & The endosymbiotic bacterium Wolbachia induces resistance to dengue virus in Aedes aegypti. PLoS Pathog. 6, e1000833 (2010)

  31. 31.

    & The native Wolbachia endosymbionts of Drosophila melanogaster and Culex quinquefasciatus increase host resistance to West Nile virus infection. PLoS ONE 5, e11977 (2010)

  32. 32.

    , , , & Characterization of Wolbachia host cell range via the in vitro establishment of infections. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 656–660 (2002)

  33. 33.

    et al. Host adaptation of a Wolbachia strain after long-term serial passage in mosquito cell lines. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 6963–6969 (2008)

  34. 34.

    et al. Phylogenomics of the reproductive parasite Wolbachia pipientis wMel: a streamlined genome overrun by mobile genetic elements. PLoS Biol. 2, e69 (2004)

  35. 35.

    et al. Rapid estimation of Aedes aegypti population size using simulation modeling, with a novel approach to calibration and field validation. J. Med. Entomol. 45, 1173–1179 (2008)

  36. 36.

    , , , & Wolbachia-mediated resistance to dengue virus infection and death at the cellular level. PLoS ONE 5, e13398 (2010)

  37. 37.

    , , & Quantitative analysis of dengue-2 virus RNA during the extrinsic incubation period in individual Aedes aegypti. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 74, 132–141 (2006)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to N. Kenny for technical support and to members of the O’Neill laboratory for critical reading of the manuscript. We thank R. Silcock, M. Janes, S. Long, C. Paton and C. Omodei for their assistance in the semi-field cages and laboratory at James Cook University. We are very grateful for all of our volunteers who helped to blood-feed the mosquitoes in the cages and to P. Young for providing the anti-dengue antibodies. This research was supported by a grant from the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health through the Grand Challenges in Global Health Initiative of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, The National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia, the RAPIDD program of the NIH, the Climate and Health Cluster of the CSIRO Flagship collaboration Fund and fellowships from the Australian Research Council.

Author information

Author notes

    • L. A. Moreira
    •  & C. J. McMeniman

    Present addresses: Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou-Fiocruz, Belo Horizonte, MG 30190, Brasil (L.A.M.); Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Behavior, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, Campus Box 63, New York, New York10065, USA (C.J.M.).

    • T. Walker
    •  & P. H. Johnson

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia

    • T. Walker
    • , L. A. Moreira
    • , I. Iturbe-Ormaetxe
    • , F. D. Frentiu
    • , C. J. McMeniman
    • , Y. S. Leong
    • , Y. Dong
    •  & S. L. O’Neill
  2. Bio21 Institute, Department of Genetics, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia

    • J. Axford
    • , P. Kriesner
    •  & A. A. Hoffmann
  3. School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine and Rehabilitative Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland 4870, Australia

    • P. H. Johnson
    •  & S. A. Ritchie
  4. Biomathematics Graduate Program and Department of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA

    • A. L. Lloyd
  5. Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA

    • A. L. Lloyd
  6. School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia

    • S. L. O’Neill

Authors

  1. Search for T. Walker in:

  2. Search for P. H. Johnson in:

  3. Search for L. A. Moreira in:

  4. Search for I. Iturbe-Ormaetxe in:

  5. Search for F. D. Frentiu in:

  6. Search for C. J. McMeniman in:

  7. Search for Y. S. Leong in:

  8. Search for Y. Dong in:

  9. Search for J. Axford in:

  10. Search for P. Kriesner in:

  11. Search for A. L. Lloyd in:

  12. Search for S. A. Ritchie in:

  13. Search for S. L. O’Neill in:

  14. Search for A. A. Hoffmann in:

Contributions

T.W. performed transinfection and initial phenotypic characterization of the infection. P.H.J., Y.S.L., Y.D. and S.A.R. performed cage invasion experiments and fecundity assays on outbred mosquito lines. T.W., L.A.M. and F.D.F. carried out vector competence assays. I.I.-O. performed FISH. C.J.M. established cell lines for transinfection. J.A. and P.K. performed cytoplasmic incompatibility and lifespan assays on outbred mosquito lines. A.L.L. undertook modelling studies. T.W. and A.A.H. performed data analysis. T.W., P.H.J., S.L.O. and A.A.H. wrote the paper. S.L.O., A.A.H. and S.A.R. provided oversight of the design and direction of the work.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. L. O’Neill.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    The file contains Supplementary Figures 1- 8 with legends, Supplementary Tables 1- 2, Supplementary Text and Data and additional references.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10355

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.