Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Induction of human neuronal cells by defined transcription factors


Somatic cell nuclear transfer, cell fusion, or expression of lineage-specific factors have been shown to induce cell-fate changes in diverse somatic cell types1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. We recently observed that forced expression of a combination of three transcription factors, Brn2 (also known as Pou3f2), Ascl1 and Myt1l, can efficiently convert mouse fibroblasts into functional induced neuronal (iN) cells13. Here we show that the same three factors can generate functional neurons from human pluripotent stem cells as early as 6 days after transgene activation. When combined with the basic helix–loop–helix transcription factor NeuroD1, these factors could also convert fetal and postnatal human fibroblasts into iN cells showing typical neuronal morphologies and expressing multiple neuronal markers, even after downregulation of the exogenous transcription factors. Importantly, the vast majority of human iN cells were able to generate action potentials and many matured to receive synaptic contacts when co-cultured with primary mouse cortical neurons. Our data demonstrate that non-neural human somatic cells, as well as pluripotent stem cells, can be converted directly into neurons by lineage-determining transcription factors. These methods may facilitate robust generation of patient-specific human neurons for in vitro disease modelling or future applications in regenerative medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Rapid generation of functional neurons from human ES cells.
Figure 2: NeuroD1 increases reprogramming efficiency in primary human fetal fibroblasts.
Figure 3: Membrane properties of fibroblast iN cells.
Figure 4: Synaptic responses of HFF-iN cells.

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Blau, H. M. et al. Plasticity of the differentiated state. Science 230, 758–766 (1985)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gurdon, J. B. From nuclear transfer to nuclear reprogramming: the reversal of cell differentiation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 22, 1–22 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Heins, N. et al. Glial cells generate neurons: the role of the transcription factor Pax6. Nature Neurosci. 5, 308–315 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ieda, M. et al. Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into functional cardiomyocytes by defined factors. Cell 142, 375–386 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shen, C.-N., Slack, J. M. W. & Tosh, D. Molecular basis of transdifferentiation of pancreas to liver. Nature Cell Biol. 2, 879–887 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tada, M., Takahama, Y., Abe, K., Nakatsuji, N. & Tada, T. Nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells by in vitro hybridization with ES cells. Curr. Biol. 11, 1553–1558 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Takahashi, K. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131, 861–872 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilmut, I., Schnieke, A. E., McWhir, J., Kind, A. J. & Campbell, K. H. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 385, 810–813 (1997)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Xie, H., Ye, M., Feng, R. & Graf, T. Stepwise reprogramming of B cells into macrophages. Cell 117, 663–676 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou, Q., Brown, J., Kanarek, A., Rajagopal, J. & Melton, D. A. In vivo reprogramming of adult pancreatic exocrine cells to β-cells. Nature 455, 627–632 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Graf, T. & Enver, T. Forcing cells to change lineages. Nature 462, 587–594 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou, Q. & Melton, D. A. Extreme makeover: converting one cell into another. Cell Stem Cell 3, 382–388 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vierbuchen, T. et al. Direct conversion of fibroblasts to functional neurons by defined factors. Nature 463, 1035–1041 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hansen, D. V., Lui, J. H., Parker, P. R. & Kriegstein, A. R. Neurogenic radial glia in the outer subventricular zone of human neocortex. Nature 464, 554–561 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kriegstein, A., Noctor, S. & Martinez-Cerdeno, V. Patterns of neural stem and progenitor cell division may underlie evolutionary cortical expansion. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 7, 883–890 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, X. et al. Pax6 is a human neuroectoderm cell fate determinant. Cell Stem Cell 7, 90–100 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bottenstein, J. E. & Sato, G. H. Growth of a rat neuroblastoma cell line in serum-free supplemented medium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 76, 514–517 (1979)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Guo, G. et al. Resolution of cell fate decisions revealed by single-cell gene expression analysis from zygote to blastocyst. Dev. Cell 18, 675–685 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson, M. A., Weick, J. P., Pearce, R. A. & Zhang, S. C. Functional neural development from human embryonic stem cells: accelerated synaptic activity via astrocyte coculture. J. Neurosci. 27, 3069–3077 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu, H. et al. Integrative genomic and functional analyses reveal neuronal subtype differentiation bias in human embryonic stem cell lines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 13821–13826 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Koch, P., Opitz, T., Steinbeck, J. A., Ladewig, J. & Brustle, O. A rosette-type, self-renewing human ES cell-derived neural stem cell with potential for in vitro instruction and synaptic integration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 3225–3230 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Marchetto, M. C. et al. A model for neural development and treatment of Rett syndrome using human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell 143, 527–539 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hu, B. Y. et al. Neural differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells follows developmental principles but with variable potency. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 4335–4340 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Xu, Y. et al. Revealing a core signaling regulatory mechanism for pluripotent stem cell survival and self-renewal by small molecules. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8129–8134 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Maximov, A., Pang, Z. P., Tervo, D. G. & Sudhof, T. C. Monitoring synaptic transmission in primary neuronal cultures using local extracellular stimulation. J. Neurosci. Methods 161, 75–87 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wong, C. C. et al. Non-invasive imaging of human embryos before embryonic genome activation predicts development to the blastocyst stage. Nature Biotechnol. 28, 1115–1121 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Somers, A. et al. Generation of transgene-free lung disease-specific human induced pluripotent stem cells using a single excisable lentiviral stem cell cassette. Stem Cells 28, 1728–1740 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank Y. Kokubu for technical assistance in molecular cloning and Y. Zhang for assistance in iPS cell induced neuron culture. We also thank Y. Sun for providing the microRNAs expression lentiviral vectors and S. Majumder for the REST-VP16 construct. This work was enabled by start-up funds from the Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine at Stanford (M.W.), the Ellison Medical Foundation (M.W.), the Stinehard-Reed Foundation (M.W.), the Donald E. and Delia B. Baxter Foundation (M.W.), the NIH grants 1R01MH092931 (M.W. and T.C.S.) and RC4 NS073015 (M.W.), and a Robertson Investigator Award from the New York Stem Cell Foundation. Z.P.P. is supported by 2008 and 2010 NARSAD Young Investigator Awards. T.V. is supported by the Ruth and Robert Halperin Stanford Graduate Fellowship. A.C. is supported by the AXA research fund and D.R.F. is supported by BioX Undergraduate Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Z.P.P., N.Y., T.V., A.O., T.C.S. and M.W. designed the experiments and analysed the data. D.R.F. and T.Q.Y. helped with lentiviral production. A.C., V.S. and S.M. helped to provide experimental material and helped with the analyses. Z.P.P., N.Y., T.V., T.C.S. and M.W. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marius Wernig.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-15 with legends and Supplementary Tables 1-2. (PDF 2992 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pang, Z., Yang, N., Vierbuchen, T. et al. Induction of human neuronal cells by defined transcription factors. Nature 476, 220–223 (2011).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing