Subunit arrangement and phenylethanolamine binding in GluN1/GluN2B NMDA receptors

Abstract

Since it was discovered that the anti-hypertensive agent ifenprodil has neuroprotective activity through its effects on NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptors1, a determined effort has been made to understand the mechanism of action and to develop improved therapeutic compounds on the basis of this knowledge2,3,4. Neurotransmission mediated by NMDA receptors is essential for basic brain development and function5. These receptors form heteromeric ion channels and become activated after concurrent binding of glycine and glutamate to the GluN1 and GluN2 subunits, respectively. A functional hallmark of NMDA receptors is that their ion-channel activity is allosterically regulated by binding of small compounds to the amino-terminal domain (ATD) in a subtype-specific manner. Ifenprodil and related phenylethanolamine compounds, which specifically inhibit GluN1 and GluN2B NMDA receptors6,7, have been intensely studied for their potential use in the treatment of various neurological disorders and diseases, including depression, Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease2,4. Despite considerable enthusiasm, mechanisms underlying the recognition of phenylethanolamines and ATD-mediated allosteric inhibition remain limited owing to a lack of structural information. Here we report that the GluN1 and GluN2B ATDs form a heterodimer and that phenylethanolamine binds at the interface between GluN1 and GluN2B, rather than within the GluN2B cleft. The crystal structure of the heterodimer formed between the GluN1b ATD from Xenopus laevis and the GluN2B ATD from Rattus norvegicus shows a highly distinct pattern of subunit arrangement that is different from the arrangements observed in homodimeric non-NMDA receptors and reveals the molecular determinants for phenylethanolamine binding. Restriction of domain movement in the bi-lobed structure of the GluN2B ATD, by engineering of an inter-subunit disulphide bond, markedly decreases sensitivity to ifenprodil, indicating that conformational freedom in the GluN2B ATD is essential for ifenprodil-mediated allosteric inhibition of NMDA receptors. These findings pave the way for improving the design of subtype-specific compounds with therapeutic value for neurological disorders and diseases.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Binding of phenylethanolamine requires both GluN1b and GluN2B ATDs, and stabilizes heterodimers.
Figure 2: Structure of the GluN1b–GluN2B ATD heterodimer in complex with ifenprodil at 2.6 Å resolution.
Figure 3: Phenylethanolamine binding site.
Figure 4: Engineering of disulphide bonds at the subunit interface alters sensitivity to ifenprodil.

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Protein Data Bank

Data deposits

Structural coordinates are deposited in the Protein Data Bank with accession codes 3QEK for GluN1b ATD, 3QEL for GluN1b–GluN2B ATD in complex with ifenprodil and 3QEM for GluN1b–GluN2B ATD in complex with Ro 25-6981.

References

  1. 1

    Gotti, B. et al. Ifenprodil and SL 82.0715 as cerebral anti-ischemic agents. I. Evidence for efficacy in models of focal cerebral ischemia. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 247, 1211–1221 (1988)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Koller, M. & Urwyler, S. Novel N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists: a review of compounds patented since 2006. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 20, 1683–1702 (2010)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Hansen, K. B., Furukawa, H. & Traynelis, S. F. Control of assembly and function of glutamate receptors by the amino-terminal domain. Mol. Pharmacol. 78, 535–549 (2010)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Mony, L., Kew, J. N., Gunthorpe, M. J. & Paoletti, P. Allosteric modulators of NR2B-containing NMDA receptors: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Br. J. Pharmacol. 157, 1301–1317 (2009)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Traynelis, S. F. et al. Glutamate receptor ion channels: structure, regulation, and function. Pharmacol. Rev. 62, 405–496 (2010)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Gallagher, M. J., Huang, H., Pritchett, D. B. & Lynch, D. R. Interactions between ifenprodil and the NR2B subunit of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 9603–9611 (1996)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Williams, K. Ifenprodil discriminates subtypes of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor: selectivity and mechanisms at recombinant heteromeric receptors. Mol. Pharmacol. 44, 851–859 (1993)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Ewald, R. C. & Cline, H. T. Cloning and phylogenetic analysis of NMDA receptor subunits NR1, NR2A and NR2B in Xenopus laevis tadpoles. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2, 4 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Schmidt, C. & Hollmann, M. Molecular and functional characterization of Xenopus laevis N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 42, 116–127 (2009)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Karakas, E., Simorowski, N. & Furukawa, H. Structure of the zinc-bound amino-terminal domain of the NMDA receptor NR2B subunit. EMBO J. 28, 3910–3920 (2009)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Kumar, J., Schuck, P., Jin, R. & Mayer, M. L. The N-terminal domain of GluR6-subtype glutamate receptor ion channels. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 631–638 (2009)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Jin, R. et al. Crystal structure and association behaviour of the GluR2 amino-terminal domain. EMBO J. 28, 1812–1823 (2009)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Clayton, A. et al. Crystal structure of the GluR2 amino-terminal domain provides insights into the architecture and assembly of ionotropic glutamate receptors. J. Mol. Biol. 392, 1125–1132 (2009)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Sobolevsky, A. I., Rosconi, M. P. & Gouaux, E. X-ray structure, symmetry and mechanism of an AMPA-subtype glutamate receptor. Nature 462, 745–756 (2009)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Gielen, M., Siegler Retchless, B., Mony, L., Johnson, J. W. & Paoletti, P. Mechanism of differential control of NMDA receptor activity by NR2 subunits. Nature 459, 703–707 (2009)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Rachline, J., Perin-Dureau, F., Le Goff, A., Neyton, J. & Paoletti, P. The micromolar zinc-binding domain on the NMDA receptor subunit NR2B. J. Neurosci. 25, 308–317 (2005)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Malherbe, P. et al. Identification of critical residues in the amino terminal domain of the human NR2B subunit involved in the RO 25-6981 binding pocket. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 307, 897–905 (2003)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Masuko, T. et al. A regulatory domain (R1–R2) in the amino terminus of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor: effects of spermine, protons, and ifenprodil, and structural similarity to bacterial leucine/isoleucine/valine binding protein. Mol. Pharmacol. 55, 957–969 (1999)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Perin-Dureau, F., Rachline, J., Neyton, J. & Paoletti, P. Mapping the binding site of the neuroprotectant ifenprodil on NMDA receptors. J. Neurosci. 22, 5955–5965 (2002)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Lee, C. H. & Gouaux, E. Amino terminal domains of the NMDA receptor are organized as local heterodimers. PLoS ONE 6, e19181 (2011)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D 58, 1948–1954 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Fitzgerald, D. J. et al. Protein complex expression by using multigene baculoviral vectors. Nature Methods 3, 1021–1032 (2006)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326 (1997)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    de La Fortelle, E. & Bricogne, G. Maximum-likelihood heavy-atom parameter refinement for multiple isomorphous replacement and multiwavelength anomalous diffraction methods. Methods Enzymol. 276, 472–494 (1997)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Cohen, S. X. et al. Towards complete validated models in the next generation of ARP/wARP. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2222–2229 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Cryst. 40, 658–674 (2007)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126–2132 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Schuck, P. Size-distribution analysis of macromolecules by sedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation and Lamm equation modeling. Biophys. J. 78, 1606–1619 (2000)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Furukawa, H., Singh, S. K., Mancusso, R. & Gouaux, E. Subunit arrangement and function in NMDA receptors. Nature 438, 185–192 (2005)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff at X25 and X29 at the National Synchrotron Light Source for beamline support. M. Mayer is thanked for comments on this work. We also thank D. Raleigh for the use of analytical ultracentrifugation. GluN1 clones from Xenopus laevis were gifts from M. Hollmann and H. Cline. This work was supported by NIH MH085926, the Alzheimer’s Association and a donation from the Fox family (to H.F.). H.F. was also funded by a scientist development grant from the American Heart Association. E.K. is supported by a NARSAD Lieber Young Investigator Award.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The project was initiated by E.K. and H.F. All of the experiments were designed by E.K. and H.F. Crystallographic studies, isothermal calorimetry and analytical ultracentrifugation were carried out by E.K. Electrophysiology and crosslinking experiments were conducted by H.F. Technical support was given by N.S. The manuscript was written by H.F. and E.K.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiro Furukawa.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-12 with legends, Supplementary Tables 1-2 and additional references. (PDF 1376 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karakas, E., Simorowski, N. & Furukawa, H. Subunit arrangement and phenylethanolamine binding in GluN1/GluN2B NMDA receptors. Nature 475, 249–253 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10180

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter for a daily update on COVID-19 science.
Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing