Letter

Experimental non-classicality of an indivisible quantum system

  • Nature volume 474, pages 490493 (23 June 2011)
  • doi:10.1038/nature10119
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published:

Abstract

In contrast to classical physics, quantum theory demands that not all properties can be simultaneously well defined; the Heisenberg uncertainty principle is a manifestation of this fact1. Alternatives have been explored—notably theories relying on joint probability distributions or non-contextual hidden-variable models, in which the properties of a system are defined independently of their own measurement and any other measurements that are made. Various deep theoretical results2,3,4,5 imply that such theories are in conflict with quantum mechanics. Simpler cases demonstrating this conflict have been found6,7,8,9,10 and tested experimentally11,12 with pairs of quantum bits (qubits). Recently, an inequality satisfied by non-contextual hidden-variable models and violated by quantum mechanics for all states of two qubits was introduced13 and tested experimentally14,15,16. A single three-state system (a qutrit) is the simplest system in which such a contradiction is possible; moreover, the contradiction cannot result from entanglement between subsystems, because such a three-state system is indivisible. Here we report an experiment with single photonic qutrits17,18 which provides evidence that no joint probability distribution describing the outcomes of all possible measurements—and, therefore, no non-contextual theory—can exist. Specifically, we observe a violation of the Bell-type inequality found by Klyachko, Can, Binicioğlu and Shumovsky19. Our results illustrate a deep incompatibility between quantum mechanics and classical physics that cannot in any way result from entanglement.

  • Subscribe to Nature for full access:

    $199

    Subscribe

Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.

References

  1. 1.

    The Physical Principles of Quantum Theory 13–52 (Univ. Chicago Press, 1930)

  2. 2.

    Die Logik nicht gleichzeitig entscheidbarer Aussagen. Dialectica 14, 239–246 (1960)

  3. 3.

    On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447–452 (1966)

  4. 4.

    & The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. J. Math. Mech. 17, 59–87 (1967)

  5. 5.

    Measures on the closed subspaces of a Hilbert space. J. Math. Mech. 6, 885–893 (1957)

  6. 6.

    Simple unified form for the major no-hidden-variables theorems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3373–3376 (1990)

  7. 7.

    Two simple proofs of the Kochen-Specker theorem. J. Phys. A 24, L175–L178 (1991)

  8. 8.

    Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods Ch. 7 (Kluwer, 1993)

  9. 9.

    Getting contextual and nonlocal elements-of-reality the easy way. Am. J. Phys. 61, 443–447 (1993)

  10. 10.

    , & Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem: a proof with 18 vectors. Phys. Lett. A 212, 183–187 (1996)

  11. 11.

    , , , & Experimental test of the Kochen-Specker theorem with single photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 250401 (2003)

  12. 12.

    et al. Experimental test of quantum contextuality in neutron interferometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 040403 (2009)

  13. 13.

    Experimentally testable state-independent quantum contextuality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 210401 (2008)

  14. 14.

    et al. State-independent experimental test of quantum contextuality. Nature 460, 494–497 (2009)

  15. 15.

    , , & State-independent quantum contextuality with single photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 160405 (2009)

  16. 16.

    , , & Testing contextuality on quantum ensembles with one clean qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 160501 (2010)

  17. 17.

    et al. Most Basic Experimental Falsification of Non-Contextuality (Poster, 13th Workshop on Quantum Information Processing, 2010)

  18. 18.

    et al. Experimental Non-Classicality of an Indivisible System. Abstr. Q29.00008 (41st Annu. Meeting Div. Atom. Mol. Opt. Phys., American Physical Society, 2010)

  19. 19.

    , , & Simple test for hidden variables in spin-1 systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 20403 (2008)

  20. 20.

    et al. Compatibility and noncontextuality for sequential measurements. Phys. Rev. A 81, 22121 (2010)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the ERC (Advanced Grant QIT4QAD), the Austrian Science Fund (Grant F4007), the EC (Marie Curie Research Training Network EMALI), the Vienna Doctoral Program on Complex Quantum Systems and the John Templeton Foundation. We acknowledge A. A. Klyachko for discussion of the proposal made in ref. 19; M. Hentschel, M. Kacprowicz and G. J. Pryde for discussions of technical issues; A. Cabello, S. Osnaghi, H. M. Wiseman and M. Z˙ukowski, with whom we discussed the conceptual issues; and M. Nespoli for help during the early stages of the experiment.

Author information

Author notes

    • Nathan K. Langford
    •  & Marcin Wieśniak

    Present addresses: Clarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, UK (N.K.L.); Institute of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics, University of Gdansk, PL-80-952 Gdansk, Poland (M.W.).

Affiliations

  1. Vienna Center for Quantum Science and Technology, Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, Vienna A-1090, Austria

    • Radek Lapkiewicz
    • , Peizhe Li
    • , Christoph Schaeff
    • , Nathan K. Langford
    • , Sven Ramelow
    • , Marcin Wieśniak
    •  & Anton Zeilinger
  2. Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Boltzmanngasse 3, Vienna A-1090, Austria

    • Radek Lapkiewicz
    • , Christoph Schaeff
    • , Nathan K. Langford
    • , Sven Ramelow
    •  & Anton Zeilinger

Authors

  1. Search for Radek Lapkiewicz in:

  2. Search for Peizhe Li in:

  3. Search for Christoph Schaeff in:

  4. Search for Nathan K. Langford in:

  5. Search for Sven Ramelow in:

  6. Search for Marcin Wieśniak in:

  7. Search for Anton Zeilinger in:

Contributions

All authors contributed to the design of the experiment. R.L., P.L. and C.S. performed the experiment and all authors wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Zeilinger.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    The file contains Supplementary Text and Data 1-5, Supplementary Figure 1 with a legend and Supplementary Table 1.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.