Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Experimental non-classicality of an indivisible quantum system

Abstract

In contrast to classical physics, quantum theory demands that not all properties can be simultaneously well defined; the Heisenberg uncertainty principle is a manifestation of this fact1. Alternatives have been explored—notably theories relying on joint probability distributions or non-contextual hidden-variable models, in which the properties of a system are defined independently of their own measurement and any other measurements that are made. Various deep theoretical results2,3,4,5 imply that such theories are in conflict with quantum mechanics. Simpler cases demonstrating this conflict have been found6,7,8,9,10 and tested experimentally11,12 with pairs of quantum bits (qubits). Recently, an inequality satisfied by non-contextual hidden-variable models and violated by quantum mechanics for all states of two qubits was introduced13 and tested experimentally14,15,16. A single three-state system (a qutrit) is the simplest system in which such a contradiction is possible; moreover, the contradiction cannot result from entanglement between subsystems, because such a three-state system is indivisible. Here we report an experiment with single photonic qutrits17,18 which provides evidence that no joint probability distribution describing the outcomes of all possible measurements—and, therefore, no non-contextual theory—can exist. Specifically, we observe a violation of the Bell-type inequality found by Klyachko, Can, Binicioğlu and Shumovsky19. Our results illustrate a deep incompatibility between quantum mechanics and classical physics that cannot in any way result from entanglement.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Experimental preparation and five successive measurement stages.
Figure 2: Representation of the measurements and a state providing maximal violation of the inequality (2) by directions in three-dimensional space19.
Figure 3: Experimental set-up.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heisenberg, W. The Physical Principles of Quantum Theory 13–52 (Univ. Chicago Press, 1930)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Specker, E. Die Logik nicht gleichzeitig entscheidbarer Aussagen. Dialectica 14, 239–246 (1960)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bell, J. S. On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447–452 (1966)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kochen, S. & Specker, E. P. The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. J. Math. Mech. 17, 59–87 (1967)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gleason, A. M. Measures on the closed subspaces of a Hilbert space. J. Math. Mech. 6, 885–893 (1957)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Mermin, N. D. Simple unified form for the major no-hidden-variables theorems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3373–3376 (1990)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Peres, A. Two simple proofs of the Kochen-Specker theorem. J. Phys. A 24, L175–L178 (1991)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Peres, A. Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods Ch. 7 (Kluwer, 1993)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Clifton, R. Getting contextual and nonlocal elements-of-reality the easy way. Am. J. Phys. 61, 443–447 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cabello, A., Estebaranz, J. M. & García-Alcaine, G. Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem: a proof with 18 vectors. Phys. Lett. A 212, 183–187 (1996)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang, Y.-F., Li, C.-F., Zhang, Y.-S., Pan, J.-W. & Guo, G.-C. Experimental test of the Kochen-Specker theorem with single photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 250401 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bartosik, H. et al. Experimental test of quantum contextuality in neutron interferometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 040403 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cabello, A. Experimentally testable state-independent quantum contextuality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 210401 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kirchmair, G. et al. State-independent experimental test of quantum contextuality. Nature 460, 494–497 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Amselem, E., Rådmark, M., Bourennane, M. & Cabello, A. State-independent quantum contextuality with single photons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 160405 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moussa, O., Ryan, C. A., Cory, D. G. & Laflamme, R. Testing contextuality on quantum ensembles with one clean qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 160501 (2010)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Lapkiewicz, R. et al. Most Basic Experimental Falsification of Non-Contextuality (Poster, 13th Workshop on Quantum Information Processing, 2010)

  18. Lapkiewicz, R. et al. Experimental Non-Classicality of an Indivisible System. Abstr. Q29.00008 (41st Annu. Meeting Div. Atom. Mol. Opt. Phys., American Physical Society, 2010)

  19. Klyachko, A. A., Can, M. A., Biniciog˘lu, S. & Shumovsky, A. S. Simple test for hidden variables in spin-1 systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 20403 (2008)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Gühne, O. et al. Compatibility and noncontextuality for sequential measurements. Phys. Rev. A 81, 22121 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the ERC (Advanced Grant QIT4QAD), the Austrian Science Fund (Grant F4007), the EC (Marie Curie Research Training Network EMALI), the Vienna Doctoral Program on Complex Quantum Systems and the John Templeton Foundation. We acknowledge A. A. Klyachko for discussion of the proposal made in ref. 19; M. Hentschel, M. Kacprowicz and G. J. Pryde for discussions of technical issues; A. Cabello, S. Osnaghi, H. M. Wiseman and M. Z˙ukowski, with whom we discussed the conceptual issues; and M. Nespoli for help during the early stages of the experiment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the design of the experiment. R.L., P.L. and C.S. performed the experiment and all authors wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Zeilinger.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

The file contains Supplementary Text and Data 1-5, Supplementary Figure 1 with a legend and Supplementary Table 1. (PDF 522 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lapkiewicz, R., Li, P., Schaeff, C. et al. Experimental non-classicality of an indivisible quantum system. Nature 474, 490–493 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10119

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10119

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing