Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Sharply increased mass loss from glaciers and ice caps in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago


Mountain glaciers and ice caps are contributing significantly to present rates of sea level rise and will continue to do so over the next century and beyond1,2,3,4,5. The Canadian Arctic Archipelago, located off the northwestern shore of Greenland, contains one-third of the global volume of land ice outside the ice sheets6, but its contribution to sea-level change remains largely unknown. Here we show that the Canadian Arctic Archipelago has recently lost 61 ± 7 gigatonnes per year (Gt yr−1) of ice, contributing 0.17 ± 0.02 mm yr−1 to sea-level rise. Our estimates are of regional mass changes for the ice caps and glaciers of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago referring to the years 2004 to 2009 and are based on three independent approaches: surface mass-budget modelling plus an estimate of ice discharge (SMB+D), repeat satellite laser altimetry (ICESat) and repeat satellite gravimetry (GRACE). All three approaches show consistent and large mass-loss estimates. Between the periods 2004–2006 and 2007–2009, the rate of mass loss sharply increased from 31 ± 8 Gt yr−1 to 92 ± 12 Gt yr−1 in direct response to warmer summer temperatures, to which rates of ice loss are highly sensitive (64 ± 14 Gt yr−1 per 1 K increase). The duration of the study is too short to establish a long-term trend, but for 2007–2009, the increase in the rate of mass loss makes the Canadian Arctic Archipelago the single largest contributor to eustatic sea-level rise outside Greenland and Antarctica.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Glaciers and ice caps of the Canadian Arctic Archipelago.
Figure 2: Cumulative change in glacier mass between autumn 2003 and autumn 2009.
Figure 3: Modelled surface mass budget of the northern CAA between autumn 2003 and autumn 2009.


  1. Meier, M. F. et al. Glaciers dominate eustatic sea-level rise in the 21st century. Science 317, 1064–1067 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hock, R., de Woul, M., Radic´, V. & Dyurgerov, M. Mountain glaciers and ice caps around Antarctica make a large sea level rise contribution. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L07501 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaser, G., Cogley, J. G., Dyurgerov, M. B., Meier, M. F. & Ohmura, A. Mass balance of glaciers and ice caps: consensus estimates for 1961–2004. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L19501 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bahr, D. B., Dyurgerov, M. & Meier, M. F. Sea-level rise from glaciers and ice caps: a lower bound. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L03501 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Radic´, V. & Hock, R. Regionally differentiated contribution of mountain glaciers and ice caps to future sea-level rise. Nature Geosci. 4, 91–94 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Radic´, V. & Hock, R. Regional and global volumes of glaciers derived from statistical upscaling of glacier inventory data. J. Geophys. Res. 115 10.1029/2009JF001373 (2010)

  7. Koerner, R. M. Mass balance of glaciers in the Queen Elizabeth Islands, Nunavut, Canada. Ann. Glaciol. 42, 417–423 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cogley, J. G., Adams, W. P., Ecclestone, M. A., Jung-Rothenhäusler, F. & Ommanney, C. S. L. Mass balance of White Glacier, Axel Heiberg Island, NWT, Canada, 1960–91. J. Glaciol. 42, 548–563 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Abdalati, W. et al. Elevation changes of ice caps in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. J. Geophys. Res. 109, F04007 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cogley, J. G. et al. Glossary of Glacier Mass Balance and Related Terms. IHP-VII Technical Documents in Hydrology No. 86 (IACS Contribution No. 2, UNESCO-IHP, in the press).

  11. Zwally, H. J. et al. ICESat’s laser measurements of polar ice, atmosphere, ocean, and land. J. Geodyn. 34, 405–445 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lotz, J. R. & Sagar, R. B. Northern Ellesmere Island: an Arctic desert. Geogr. Ann. 44, 366–377 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bradley, R. S. & England, J. Recent climatic fluctuations of the Canadian High Arctic and their significance for glaciology. Arct. Alp. Res. 10, 715–731 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hooke, R. L., Johnson, G. W., Brugger, K. A., Hanson, B. & Holdsworth, G. Changes in mass balance, velocity, and surface profile along a flow line on Barnes Ice Cap, 1970–1984. Can. J. Earth Sci. 24, 1550–1561 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gardner, A. S. & Sharp, M. Influence of the Arctic Circumpolar Vortex on the mass balance of Canadian High Arctic glaciers. J. Clim. 20, 4586–4598 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor Alt, B. Developing synoptic analogs for extreme mass balance conditions on Queen Elizabeth Island ice caps. J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol. 26, 1605–1623 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hock, R. Temperature index melt modelling in mountain areas. J. Hydrol. 282, 104–115 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Braithwaite, R. J. Positive degree-day factors for ablation on the Greenland Ice Sheet studied by energy-balance modeling. J. Glaciol. 41, 153–160 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gardner, A. S. et al. Near-surface temperature lapse rates over Arctic glaciers and their implications for temperature downscaling. J. Clim. 22, 4281–4298 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zwally, H. J. et al. GLAS/ICESat L1B Global Elevation Data V031, 20 February 2003 to 11 October 2009 (National Snow and Ice Data Center, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Moholdt, G., Nuth, C., Hagen, J. O. & Kohler, J. Recent elevation changes of Svalbard glaciers derived from ICESat laser altimetry. Remote Sens. Environ. 114, 2756–2767 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Arendt, A. et al. Updated estimates of glacier volume changes in the western Chugach Mountains, Alaska, and a comparison of regional extrapolation methods. J. Geophys. Res. 111, F000436 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sole, A., Payne, T., Bamber, J., Nienow, P. & Krabill, W. Testing hypotheses of the cause of peripheral thinning of the Greenland Ice Sheet: is land-terminating ice thinning at anomalously high rates? Cryosphere 2, 205–218 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Oerlemans, J. et al. Estimating the contribution of Arctic glaciers to sea-level change in the next 100 years. Ann. Glaciol. 42, 230–236 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. De Woul, M. & Hock, R. Static mass-balance sensitivity of Arctic glaciers and ice caps using a degree-day approach. Ann. Glaciol. 42, 217–224 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rignot, E., Rivera, A. & Casassa, G. Contribution of the Patagonia icefields of South America to sea level rise. Science 302, 434–437 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen, J. L., Wilson, C. R., Tapley, B. D., Blankenship, D. D. & Ivins, E. R. Patagonia icefield melting observed by gravity recovery and climate experiment (GRACE). Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, L22501 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Luthcke, S. B., Arendt, A. A., Rowlands, D. D., McCarthy, J. J. & Larsen, C. F. Recent glacier mass changes in the Gulf of Alaska region from GRACE mascon solutions. J. Glaciol. 54, 767–777 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wouters, B., Chambers, D. & Schrama, E. J. O. GRACE observes small-scale mass loss in Greenland. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L20501 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. van den Broeke, M. et al. Partitioning recent Greenland mass loss. Science 326, 984–986 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank A. Arendt for reviewing the manuscript and S. Luthcke and A. Arendt for providing the updated glacier mass anomalies for Alaska. We thank H. Blatter, W. Colgan, E. Dowdeswell, M. Huss, S. Marshall and D. Mueller for contributing observational data sets. We thank R. Riva and P. Stocchi for providing glacial isostatic adjustment models. This work was supported by funding to A.S.G. from NSERC Canada and the Alberta Ingenuity Fund, funding to G.M. by the European Union 7th Framework Program (grant number 226375) through the ice2sea programme (contribution number 017), and funding to M.J.S. from NSERC and CFCAS (through the Polar Climate Stability Network). The SMB modelling was conducted using the infrastructure and resources of AICT of the University of Alberta.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



A.S.G. developed the study and wrote the paper. A.S.G, G.M. and B.W. all contributed equally to the analysis, using SMB+D, ICESat and GRACE, respectively. G.J.W. provided ice and basin outlines, model topography and created Fig. 1. The remaining authors provided in situ measurements. All authors discussed and commented on the manuscript at all stages.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex S. Gardner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Methods, additional references, Supplementary Tables 1-7 and Supplementary Figures 1-8 with legends. (PDF 4640 kb)

Supplementary Data 1

This zipped file contains the Supplementary Data. (ZIP 23171 kb)

Supplementary Data 2

This file contains the guide to the Supplementary Data. (TXT 3 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gardner, A., Moholdt, G., Wouters, B. et al. Sharply increased mass loss from glaciers and ice caps in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Nature 473, 357–360 (2011).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing