Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Continuing Colorado plateau uplift by delamination-style convective lithospheric downwelling

Nature volume 472, pages 461–465 (2011)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The Colorado plateau is a large, tectonically intact, physiographic province in the southwestern North American Cordillera that stands at ∼1,800–2,000 m elevation and has long been thought to be in isostatic equilibrium1. The origin of these high elevations is unclear because unlike the surrounding provinces, which have undergone significant Cretaceous–Palaeogene compressional deformation followed by Neogene extensional deformation, the Colorado plateau is largely internally undeformed. Here we combine new seismic tomography2 and receiver function images to resolve a vertical high-seismic-velocity anomaly beneath the west-central plateau that extends more than 200 km in depth. The upper surface of this anomaly is seismically defined by a dipping interface extending from the lower crust to depths of 70–90 km. The base of the continental crust above the anomaly has a similar shape, with an elevated Moho. We interpret these seismic structures as a continuing regional, delamination-style foundering of lower crust and continental lithosphere. This implies that Pliocene (2.6–5.3 Myr ago) uplift of the plateau and the magmatism on its margins are intimately tied to continuing deep lithospheric processes. Petrologic and geochemical observations indicate that late Cretaceous–Palaeogene (∼90–40 Myr ago) low-angle subduction hydrated and probably weakened much of the Proterozoic tectospheric mantle3,4,5 beneath the Colorado plateau. We suggest that mid-Cenozoic (∼35–25 Myr ago) to Recent magmatic infiltration subsequently imparted negative compositional buoyancy to the base and sides of the Colorado plateau upper mantle, triggering downwelling. The patterns of magmatic activity suggest that previous such events have progressively removed the Colorado plateau lithosphere inward from its margins6, and have driven uplift. Using Grand Canyon incision rates7,8 and Pliocene basaltic volcanism patterns, we suggest that this particular event has been active over the past ∼6 Myr.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Elevation map of the Colorado plateau.
Figure 2: Seismic velocity measurements at 80 km depth, and LAB depth, as measured with different seismic probes.
Figure 3: Receiver function and seismic velocity cross-sections through the downwelling region.
Figure 4: The inferred progression of events associated with lithospheric foundering and the geometry of the drip today.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thompson, G. A. & Zoback, M. L. Regional geophysics of the Colorado Plateau. Tectonophysics 61, 149–181 (1979)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Schmandt, B. & Humphreys, E. D. Complex subduction and small-scale convection revealed by body-wave tomography of the western United States upper mantle. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 297, 435–445 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Humphreys, E. et al. How Laramide-age hydration of North American lithosphere by the Farallon slab controlled subsequent activity in the western United States. Int. Geol. Rev. 45, 575–595 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee, C.-T. A., Yin, Q., Rudnick, R. L. & Jacobsen, S. B. Preservation of ancient and fertile lithospheric mantle beneath the southwestern United States. Nature 411, 69–73 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, Z.-X. A., Lee, C.-T., Peslier, A. H., Lenardic, A. & Mackwell, S. J. Water contents in mantle xenoliths from the Colorado Plateau and vicinity: implications for the mantle rheology and hydration-induced thinning of continental lithosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 113 B09210 10.1029/2007JB005540 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Roy, M., Jordan, T. H. & Pederson, J. Colorado Plateau magmatism and uplift by warming of heterogeneous lithosphere. Nature 459, 978–982 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Crow, R. S. et al. Shrinking of the Colorado Plateau via lithospheric mantle erosion: evidence from Nd and Sr isotopes and geochronology of Neogene basalts. Geology 39, 27–30 (2011)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Karlstrom, K. E., Crow, R., Crossey, L. J., Coblentz, D. & Van Wijk, J. W. Model for tectonically driven incision of the younger than 6 Ma Grand Canyon. Geology 36, 835–838 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith, D. Insights into the evolution of the uppermost continental mantle from xenolith localities on and near the Colorado Plateau and regional comparisons. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 16769–16781 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Livaccari, R. F. & Perry, F. V. Isotopic evidence for preservation of Cordilleran lithospheric mantle during the Sevier-Laramie orogeny, western United States. Geology 21, 719–722 (1993)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Humphreys, E. D. Post-Laramide removal of the Farallon slab, western United States. Geology 23, 987–990 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Huntington, K. W., Wernicke, B. P. & Eiler, J. M. Influence of climate change and uplift on Colorado Plateau paleotemperatures from carbonate clumped isotope thermometry. Tectonics 29 TC3005 10.1029/2009TC002449 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Spencer, J. Uplift of the Colorado Plateau due to lithosphere attenuation during Laramide low-angle subduction. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 13595–13609 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Moucha, R. et al. Deep mantle forces and the uplift of the Colorado Plateau. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36 L19310 10.1029/2009GL039778 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. van Wijk, J. W. et al. Small-scale convection at the edge of the Colorado Plateau: implications for topography, magmatism, and evolution of Proterozoic lithosphere. Geology 38, 611–614 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Benz, H. M. & McCarthy, J. Evidence for an upper mantle low velocity zone beneath the southern Basin and Range – Colorado Plateau transition zone. Geophys. Res. Lett. 21, 509–512 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Henstock, T. J., Levander, A. & DeepProbe Working Group Probing the Archean and Proterozoic lithosphere of western North America. GSA Today 8, 1–5 16–17 (1998)

  18. Buehler, J. & Shearer, P. Pn tomography of the western United States using USArray. J. Geophys. Res.115 B09315 (2010)

  19. Schmandt, B. & Humphreys, E. Complex subduction and small-scale convection revealed by body-wave tomography of the western United States upper mantle. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 297, 435–445 (2010)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bassin, C., Laske, G. & Masters, G. The current limits of resolution for surface wave tomography in North America. Eos 81, F897 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bird, P. Continental delamination and the Colorado Plateau. J. Geophys. Res. 84, 7561–7571 (1979)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Morency, C. & Doin, M.-P. Numerical simulations of the mantle lithosphere delamination. J. Geophys. Res. 109 B03410 10.1029/2003JB002414 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Conrad, C. P. & Molnar, P. Convective instability of a boundary layer with temperature-and strain-rat-dependent viscosity in terms of 'available buoyancy'. Geophys. J. Int. 139, 51–68 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bird, P. Laramide crustal thickening event in the Rocky Mountain foreland and Great Plains. Tectonics 3, 741–758 (1984)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kay, S. M., Coira, B. & Viramonte, J. Young mafic back arc volcanic rocks as indicators of continental lithospheric delamination beneath the Argentine Puna Plateau, Central Andes. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 24323–24339 (1994)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ducea, M. N. & Saleeby, J. B. Buoyancy sources for a large, unrooted mountain range, the Sierra Nevada, California; evidence from xenolith thermobarometry. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 8229–8244 (1996)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bird, P. Formation of the Rocky Mountains, Western United States: a continuum computer model. Science 239, 1507 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Menzies, M., Xu, Y., Zhang, H. & Fan, W. Integration of geology, geophysics and geochemistry: a key to understanding the North China Craton. Lithos 96, 1–21 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Foley, S. F. et al. The composition of near-solidus melts of peridotite in the presence of CO2 and H2O between 40 and 60 kbar. Lithos 112, 274–283 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ehrenberg, S. N. Petrogenesis of garnet lherzolite and megacrystalline nodules from the Thumb, Navajo volcanic field. J. Petrol. 23, 507–547 (1982)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lipman, P. W. in The Cordilleran Orogen: Conterminous U. S. (eds Burchfiel, B. C., Lipman, P. W. & Zoback, M. L. ) 481–514 (Geological Society of America, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nelson, S. T., Davidson, J. P. & Sullivan, K. R. New age determinations of central Colorado Plateau Laccoliths, Utah — recognizing disturbed K-Ar systematics and re-evaluating tectonomagmatic relationships. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 104, 1547–1560 (1992)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Schmandt, B. & Humphreys, E. Seismic heterogeneity and small-scale convection in the southern California upper mantle. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 11 Q05004 10.1029/2010GC003042 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu, K., Levander, A., Niu, F. & Miller, M. S. Imaging crustal and upper mantle structure beneath the Colorado Plateau using finite-frequency Rayleigh wave tomography. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. (submitted)

  35. Forsyth, D. W. & Li, A. in Seismic Earth: Array Analysis of Broadband Seismograms Vol. 157 (eds Levander, A. & Nolet, G. ) 81–97 (American Geophysical Union, 2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Langston, C. A. Corvallis, Oregon, crustal and upper mantle receiver structure from teleseismic P and S waves. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 67, 713–724 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yuan, X., Kind, R., Li, X. & Wang, R. The S receiver functions: synthetics and data example. Geophys. J. Int. 165, 555–564 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Dueker, K. G. & Sheehan, A. F. Mantle discontinuity structure form midpoint stacks of converted P to S waves across the Yellowstone hotspot track. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 8313–8327 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The USArray data are from the IRIS DMS. A.L., K.L., M.S.M., E.D.H. and B.S. were supported by NSF EarthScope grants EAR-0844741, EAR-0844760 and EAR-0911006. Part of this research was initiated at the CIDER 2008 workshop (A.L., M.S.M.), and part was initiated at the GFZ-Potsdam (A.L.). A.L. acknowledges an Alexander von Humboldt Foundation Research Prize.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Earth Science Department, Rice University, Houston, 77005-1892, Texas, USA

    A. Levander, K. Liu & C.-T. A. Lee

  2. Department of Geological Sciences, University of Oregon, Eugene, 97403, Oregon, USA

    B. Schmandt & E. D. Humphreys

  3. Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 90089-0740, California, USA

    M. S. Miller

  4. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, 87131, New Mexico, USA

    K. E. Karlstrom & R. S. Crow

Authors
  1. A. Levander
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Schmandt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. S. Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K. Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. K. E. Karlstrom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R. S. Crow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. C.-T. A. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. E. D. Humphreys
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.L. wrote the receiver function analysis codes and processed the PdS receiver functions. B.S. and E.D.H. wrote the tomography codes and processed the body wave data. M.S.M. and A.L. analysed the SdP receiver functions. K.L. analysed the Rayleigh wave data. K.E.K. and R.S.C. provided uplift and geochemical information. C.-T.A.L. provided geochemical information. All the authors participated in the interpretation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Levander.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Text and Data, additional references, and Supplementary Figures 1-5 with legends. (PDF 10074 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levander, A., Schmandt, B., Miller, M. et al. Continuing Colorado plateau uplift by delamination-style convective lithospheric downwelling. Nature 472, 461–465 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10001

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10001

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing