Letter | Published:

Non-adaptive origins of interactome complexity

Nature volume 474, pages 502505 (23 June 2011) | Download Citation

  • An Addendum to this article was published on 26 November 2014

Abstract

The boundaries between prokaryotes, unicellular eukaryotes and multicellular eukaryotes are accompanied by orders-of-magnitude reductions in effective population size, with concurrent amplifications of the effects of random genetic drift and mutation1. The resultant decline in the efficiency of selection seems to be sufficient to influence a wide range of attributes at the genomic level in a non-adaptive manner2. A key remaining question concerns the extent to which variation in the power of random genetic drift is capable of influencing phylogenetic diversity at the subcellular and cellular levels2,3,4. Should this be the case, population size would have to be considered as a potential determinant of the mechanistic pathways underlying long-term phenotypic evolution. Here we demonstrate a phylogenetically broad inverse relation between the power of drift and the structural integrity of protein subunits. This leads to the hypothesis that the accumulation of mildly deleterious mutations in populations of small size induces secondary selection for protein–protein interactions that stabilize key gene functions. By this means, the complex protein architectures and interactions essential to the genesis of phenotypic diversity may initially emerge by non-adaptive mechanisms.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & The origins of genome complexity. Science 302, 1401–1404 (2003)

  2. 2.

    The Origins of Genome Architecture (Sinauer, 2007)

  3. 3.

    On the possibility of constructive neutral evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 49, 169–181 (1999)

  4. 4.

    , , , & Cell biology. Irremediable complexity? Science 330, 920–921 (2001)

  5. 5.

    & Molecular Theory of Capillarity (Oxford Univ. Press, 1982)

  6. 6.

    The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104 (Suppl.). 8597–8604 (2007)

  7. 7.

    , , & 3D Complex: a structural classification of protein complexes. PLOS Comput. Biol. 2, e155 (2006)

  8. 8.

    , , & Structural and functional analysis of the 1:1 growth hormone:receptor complex reveals the molecular basis for receptor affinity. J. Mol. Biol. 277, 1111–1128 (1998)

  9. 9.

    , , & Assembly reflects evolution of protein complexes. Nature 453, 1262–1265 (2008)

  10. 10.

    , , & Bulk solvent and hydration-shell fluctuations, similar to α- and β-fluctuations in glasses, control protein motions and functions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 14408–14413 (2004)

  11. 11.

    et al. InParanoid 7: new algorithms and tools for eukaryotic orthology analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D196–D203 (2010)

  12. 12.

    et al. Joining forces in the quest for orthologs. Genome Biol. 10, 403 (2009)

  13. 13.

    & Comparative protein modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 779–815 (1993)

  14. 14.

    & Improving threading algorithms for remote homology modeling by combining fragment and template comparisons. Proteins 78, 2041–2048 (2010)

  15. 15.

    & ProSA-web: interactive web service for the recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W407–W410 (2007)

  16. 16.

    Accelerated evolution and Muller’s ratchet in endosymbiotic bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 2873–2878 (1996)

  17. 17.

    & The origin of protein interactions and allostery in colocalization. Nature 450, 983–990 (2007)

  18. 18.

    & OPLS All-atom model for amines: resolution of the amine hydration problem. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 4827–4836 (1999)

  19. 19.

    , , , & Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926–935 (1983)

  20. 20.

    & Golden rule for buttressing vulnerable soluble proteins. J. Proteome Res. 9, 2643–2648 (2010)

  21. 21.

    , & A graph-theory algorithm for rapid protein side-chain prediction. Protein Sci. 12, 2001–2014 (2003)

  22. 22.

    , & Dehydration propensity of order-disorder intermediate regions in soluble proteins. J. Proteome Res. 6, 3519–3526 (2007)

  23. 23.

    & What are the dielectric constants of proteins and how to validate electrostatic models? Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 44, 400–417 (2001)

  24. 24.

    , , & Continuum equations for dielectric response to macromolecular assemblies at the nanoscale. J. Phys. A 37, 9791–9803 (2004)

  25. 25.

    , & Dynamics of hydrogen-bond desolvation in folding proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 321, 659–675 (2002)

  26. 26.

    , & GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J. Mol. Model. 7, 302–317 (2001)

  27. 27.

    , & Particle mesh Ewald: an N log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089–10092 (1993)

  28. 28.

    Canonical dynamics: equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695–1697 (1985)

  29. 29.

    , , , & Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684–3690 (1984)

  30. 30.

    , , , & Predicting protein disorder for N-, C-, and internal regions. Genome Informat. 10, 30–40 (1999)

Download references

Acknowledgements

A.F. was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R01GM072614, and by the Institute of Biophysical Dynamics and the Department of Computer Science at The University of Chicago. M.L. was supported by National Institutes of Health grant R01GM036827 and National Science Foundation grant EF-0827411.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA

    • Ariel Fernández
  2. Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA

    • Ariel Fernández
  3. Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA

    • Michael Lynch

Authors

  1. Search for Ariel Fernández in:

  2. Search for Michael Lynch in:

Contributions

A.F. and M.L. conceived the project and wrote the paper. A.F. collected the orthologue groups across 36 species with sufficient structural representation, performed the structural analysis and determined the interaction propensities across orthologues.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ariel Fernández or Michael Lynch.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    The file contains Supplementary Information Parts 1 and 2, which include Supplementary Text and Data, Supplementary Tables 1-7, Supplementary Figures 1-7 with legends and additional references.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09992

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.